Current Applications of Gingival Retraction

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1095 - 1104, 01.04.2012

Meral Kurt Bilge Turhan Bal Neşet Volkan Asar

Öz

Marginal fit is one of the most important factors that influences long term success of tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses. For this reason, it is essential to make the precise impression of the margin by retracting the gingival tissues around the prepared tooth or implant abutment. Gingival retraction is a procedure that separates gingiva temporarily from tooth in lateral and vertical directions. In literature, there are many materials and methods related to the retraction of gingival tissues. Clinician should make the appropriate selection according to the status of case. The aim of this review is to provide knowledge in details about the current gingival retraction materials and methods used in making impressions of the tooth and implant supported crown and bridge prostheses

Anahtar Kelimeler

Retraction, margin, natural tooth, implant

Güncel Gingival Retraksiyon Uygulamaları

Öz

Diş ve implant destekli kron ve köprü protezlerinde kenar uyumu restorasyonun uzun süreli başarısını etkileyen en önemli faktörlerden birisidir. Bu nedenle prepare edilmiş diş veya abutmentin implant desteği çevresindeki gingival dokuların retrakte edilerek kenar bitim çizgisinin net ölçüsünün alınması gerekir. Gingival retraksiyon, dişetinin dişten lateral ve vertikal yönlerde geçici olarak uzaklaştırılması işlemidir. Literatürde gingival dokuların retraksiyonu ile ilgili birçok materyal ve yöntem mevcuttur. Diş hekimi en uygun seçimi vakanın durumuna göre yapmalıdır. Bu derlemenin amacı, günümüzde diş ve implant destekli kron ve köprü protezlerinin ölçülerinde kullanılan güncel gingival retraksiyon materyal ve yöntemleri hakkında detaylı bilgi verilmesidir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Retraksiyon, marjin, doğal diş, implant

Kaynakça

• Kamath R., Sarandha DL., Baid GC. Advances in gingival retraction. Int. J. Clin. Dent. Sci. 2: 64-67, 2011.
• Shillingburg HT. Fundamental of Fixed Prostho- dontics. 3 ed. Quintessence Publishing Co, Lon- don, 1997, 257-277.
• Ekren O., Kurtoğlu C. Dişeti Retraksiyon Yöntem- leri. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 18: 78-84, 2008.
• Yavuzyılmaz H. Metal Destekli Estetik (Veneer- Kaplama) Kronlar. Gazi Üni. İletişim Fakültesi Basımevi, Ankara,1989
• Donovan TE., Gandar BK., Nemetz H. Review and survey of medicaments used with gingival retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 53: 525-531, 1985.
• Csillag M., Nyiri G., Vag J., Fazekas A. Dose- related effects of epinephrine on human gingival blood flow and crevicular fluid production used as a soaking solution for chemo-mechanical tissue retraction. J. Prosthet. Dent. 97: 6-11, 2007.
• Nemetz H. Tissue management in fixed prostho- dontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 31: 628-636, 1974.
• Harrison JD. Effect of retraction materials on the gingival sulcus epithelium. J. Prosthet. Dent. 11: 514-521, 1961.
• Benson W., Bomberg TJ., Hatch RA., Hoffman W. Tissue displacement methods in fixed prostho- dontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 55: 175-181, 1986.
• Weir DJ., Williams BH. Clinical effectiveness of mechanical-chemical tissue displacement met- hods. J. Prosthet. Dent. 51: 326-329, 1984.
• Wilson CA., Tay WM. Alum solution as an ad- junct to gingival retraction. Br. Dent. J. 142: 155- 158, 1977.
• Gupta G., Kumar S., Rao H., Garg P., Kumar R. Astringents in dentistry: a review. Asian J. Pharm. and Hea. Sci. 2: 428-432, 2012.
• Mohan M., Gupta A., Shenoy V., Parolia A. Pharmacological agents in dentistry: a review. Brit. J. Pharm. Res. 1: 66-87, 2011.
• Fischer D. Tissue management for making imp- ressions. Baum L editor- Restorative technigues for individual teeth. NewYork 1981. Mason Pub. USA, chap15,pp. 247-65
• Akca EA., Yildirim E., Dalkiz M., Yavuzyilmaz H., Beydemir B. Effects of different retraction me- dicaments on gingival tissue. Quintessence Int. 37: 53-59, 2006.
• Woody RD., Miller A., Staffanou RS. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displa- cement. J. Prosthet. Dent. 70: 191-192, 1993.
• Nowakowska D., Saczko J., Kulbacka J., Choro- manska A., Raszewski Z. Cytotoxic potential of vasoconstrictor experimental gingival retraction agents: in vitro study on primary human gingival fibroblasts. Folia Biol. 58: 37-43, 2012.
• Runyan DA., Reddy TG., Shimoda ML. Fluid absorbency of retraction cords after soaking in aluminum chloride solution. J. Prosthet. Dent. 60: 676-678, 1988.
• Jokstad A. Clinical trial of gingival retraction cords. J. Prosthet. Dent. 81: 258-261, 1999.
• Donovan TE., Chee WW. Current concepts in gingival displacement. Dent. Clin. North Am. 48: 433-444, 2004.
• Abadzhiev M. Comparative research of the sub- gingival impression quality by fixed prosthesis using one and double cord retraction techni- que. J. IMAB-Annual Proceeding (Scientific Pa- pers). 15: 52-54, 2009.
• Bhansali S., Bhansali N., Singh K., Agarwal B. An Impression Technique for Preserving Inter- dental Papillae. J. Indian Prosthodont. Soc. 10: 226–229, 2010.
• Ingraham R., Sochat P., Hansing FJ. Rotary gin- gival curettage - A technique for tooth prepara- tion and management of the gingival sulcus for impression taking. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1: 8-33, 1981.
• Tupac RG., Neacy K. A comparison of cord gingival displacement with the gingitage technique. J. Prosthet. Dent. 46: 509-515, 1981.
• Brady WF. Periodontal and restorative conside- rations in rotary gingival curettage. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 105: 231-236, 1982.
• Podshadley AG., Lundeen HC. Electrosurgical procedures in crown and bridge restorations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 77: 1321-1326, 1968.
• Patel MG. Electrosurgical management of hyperplastic tissue. J. Prosthet. Dent. 56: 145- 147, 1986.
• Kalkwarf KL., Krejici RF., Edison AR., Reinnardt RA. Lateral heat production secondary to elect- rosurgical incisions. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 55: 344-348, 1983.
• Walter C. Dental treatment of patients with car- diac pacemaker implants. Quintessence Int. 8: 57-58, 1975.
• Wostmann B., Rehmann P., Trost D., Balkenhol M. Effect of different retraction and impression techniques on marginal fit of crowns. J. Dent. 36: 508-512, 2008.
• Bennani V., Schwass D., Chandler N. Gingival retraction techniques for implants versus teeth: Current status. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 139: 1354- 1363, 2008.
• Prasad KD., Hegde C., Agrawal G., Shetty M. Gingival displacement in prosthodontics: A cri- tical review of existing methods. J. Interdiscip. Dentistry. 1: 80-86, 2011.
• Gherlone EF., Maiorana C., Grassi RF., Ciancag- lini R., Cattoni F. The use of 980-nm diode and 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser for gingival retraction in fixed prostheses. J. Oral Laser Appl. 4: 183-190, 2004.
• Parker S. The use of lasers in fixed prosthodon- tics. Dent. Clin. North Am. 48: 971-998, 2004.
• Martin E. Lasers in dental implantology. Dent. Clin. North Am. 48: 999-1015, 2004.
• Beier U., Kronewitter R., Dumfahrt H. Quality of the impressions after use of the magic foam cord gingival retraction system- a clinical study of 269 abutment teeth. Int. J. Prosthodont. 22: 143-147, 2009.
• Bennani V., Aarts J., He L. A comparison of the pressure generated by cordless gingival displa- cement techniques. J. Prosthet. Dent. 107: 388- 392, 2012.
• Al Hamad KQ., Azar WZ., Alwaeli HA., Said KN. A clinical study on the effects of cordless and conventional retraction techniques on the gingi- val and periodontal health. J. Clin. Periodontol. 35: 1053-1058, 2008.
• Phatale S., Marawar P., Byakod G., Lagdive SB., Kalburge JV. Effect of retraction materials on gin- gival health: a histophathological study. J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 14: 35-39, 2010.
• Ferrari M., Cagidiaco MC., Ercoli C. Tissue ma- nagement with a new gingival retraction materi- al: a preliminary clinical report. J. Prosthet. Dent. 75: 242-247, 1996.
• Livaditis GJ. The matrix impression system for fi- xed prosthodontics. J. Prosthet. Dent. 79: 208- 216, 1998.
• Livatidis GJ. Comparison of the new matrix system with traditional fixed prosthodontic imp- ression procedures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 79: 200- 207, 1998.
• Misch CE. Cement retained implant prothesis: İmplant protective occlusion. Dental implant prost- hetics. St. Louis; Mosby, 2005.
• Subramani K., Jung RE., Molenberg A., Hammer- le CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 24: 616-626, 2009.
• Fazekas A., Csempesz F., Csabai Z., Vag J. Ef- fects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the micro- circulation of the human gingival margin. Oper. Dent. 27: 343-348, 2002.
• KopacI., Cvetko E., Pavlica Z., Marion L. Gingi- val tissue inflammatory response following treat- ment with chemical retraction agents in Beagle dogs. Pflügers Arch. 442: 145-146, 2001.
• Chang Y., Bennani V., Tawse-Smith A. Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study. Braz. Oral Res. 25: 492-499, 2011.