Usage Of The Three Dimensional Imaging Systems In Intraoral Implant Planning

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 564 - 573, 01.07.2010

Merve Bankoğlu Seçil Karakoca Nemli

Öz

Success of the implant treatments does not depend on only improvements of the implant materials properties. The important facts for success of the implant treatment are planning of the implants according to the available bone features and prosthetic rehabilitation that we plan to do and appropriate surgery to this plan. For this support, using three dimensional imaging systems such as CT, CBCT and MRI in implant planning, provides the accurate insertion of the implants to patient and to do a succeeded prosthese biomechanically, esthetically, phonetically and functionally . Besides, by using the three dimensional datas, streolitographic templates, stereolitographic models and prosthetic frameworks can be produced. The purpose of the this literature review is to give contemporary informations about the usage of the three dimensional imaging systems in intraoral implant planning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

implant planning, three dimensional imaging systems

İntraoral İmplant Planlamasında Üç Boyutlu Görüntüleme Tekniklerinin Kullanımı

Öz

İmplant tedavilerinin başarısı sadece implant materyallerinin özelliklerinin gelişmesine bağlanamaz. Mevcut kemiğin durumuna ve yapılacak olan protetik rehabilitasyona göre implantların planlanması ve bu plana uygun cerrahi işlem başarının önemli faktörleridir. Bu amaçla BT, CBBT ve MRG gibi üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemlerinin implant planlamasında kullanımı, implantların en doğru şekilde hastaya yerleştirilmesini ve biyomekanik, estetik, fonetik ve fonksiyonel açıdan başarılı bir protez yapılmasını sağlar. Ayrıca üç boyutlu veriler yardımıyla stereolitografik cerrahi plaklar, stereolitografik modeller ve protetik iskeletler üretilebilmektedir.Bu literatür derlemesinin amacı, üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemlerinin intraoral implant planlamasında kullanımı hakkında güncel bilgiler vermektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

implant planlaması, üç boyutlu görüntüleme sistemleri

Kaynakça

• Xiaojun C, Yanping L, Yiqun W, Chengtao W. Compu- ter-aided oral implantology: methods and applications. J Med Eng Technol. 31(6): 459-467; 2007.
• BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Steenberghe D. Ima- ging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res. 4(3): 156-172; 2002.
• Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and Iimitations associ- ated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 79: 74- 78; 1998.
• Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behaviour of implants. Adv Dent Res. 13:88-92; 1999.
• Miller RJ, Bier J. Surgical navigation in oral implantology. Implant Dent. 15(1): 41-47; 2006.
• Tal H, Moses O. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 20:40-42; 1991.
• Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc. 70(1): 32a-g; 2004.
• Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A. Cone-Beam CT for preoperative implant planning in posterior man- dible: visibility of anatomic landmarks. Clin Impl Dent Re- lat Res.11(3): 246-255; 2008.
• Tyndall DA, Brooks SL, Arbor A. Selection criteria for den- tal implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 89(5): 630- 637; 2000.
• Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Third edition. Mosby Elsevier. Los Angeles, California; 2007.
• Çakur B, Sümbüllü MA, Harorlı A. Operasyon önce- si implant yerlerinin belirlenmesinde radyolojik kriterler ve radyolojik teknik seçimi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 17(2); 23-30; 2007.
• Reiskin AB. Implant Planning, status, controversies, and new developments. Dent Clin N Am. 42(1): 47-56; 1998.
• Babbush CA. Implants; principles and practice. WB Sa- unders Company. 1991.
• Jabero M, Sarment DP. Advanced surgical guidance te- chnology: a review. Implant Dent. 15: 135-142; 2006.
• Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer- aided imp- lant surgery- a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21: 305-313; 2006.
• Azari A, Nikzad S. Computer- assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes- a review. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg.4: 95-104; 2008.
• Ganz SD. Computer-aided design/ computer aided ma- nufacturing applications using ct and cone beam CT scan- ning technology. Dent Clin N Am. 52: 777-808; 2008.
• Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale R. Use of a surgical navigation system for CT- guided template production. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 22: 72-78; 2007.
• Chiu W, Luk W, Cheung L. Three- dimensional accuracy of implant placement in a computer- assisted navigati- on system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21: 465-470; 2006.
• Siebegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA, Lazar F, Krug B, Klesper B, Zöller JE. Use of an image- guided na- vigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 29(5): 276-281; 2001.
• Spector L. Computer-aided dental implant planning. Dent Clin N Am. 52: 761-775; 2008.
• Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of imp- lant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 18: 571-577; 2003.
• Kramer FJ, Baethge C, Swennen G, Rosahi S. Navigated vs conventional implant insertion for maxillary single too- th replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 16: 60-68; 2005.
• Widmann G, Stoffner R, Bale R. Errors and error ma- nagement in image-guide craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 107: 701-715; 2009.
• Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer- aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24: 234-242; 2009.
• White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and interpretation. Edition 6. Mosby Elsevier. Los Angeles, California; 2009.
• Gray CF, Redpath TW, Smith FW, Staff RT. Advanced imaging: Magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA. 18:103-111; 2005.
• Kau CH, Bozic M, English J, Lee R, Bussa H, Ellis RK. Co- ne-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial re- gion- an update. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2009.
• Weinberg LA. Ct scan as a radiologic data base for op- timum implant orientation. J Prosthet Dent. 69: 381-5; 1993.
• Çelik İ, Toraman M, Mıhçıoğlu T, Ceritoğlu D. Dental imp- lant planlamasında kullanılan radyografik yöntemlerin değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci. 13:21- 28; 2007.
• Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetense P, Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT ima- ging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Invest. 10: 1-7; 2006.
• İplikçioğlu H, Akça K, Çehreli MC. The use of computeri- zed tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol. 28: 29, 2002.
• Besimo C, Lambrecht JT, Nidecker A. Dental implant tre- atment planning with reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 24: 264, 1995.
• Scortecci GM, Misch CE, Benner KU. Implants and Resto- rative Dentistry. Martin Dunitz. London, UK; 2003.
• Penaroccha M, Boronat A, Carrillo C, Albalat S. Com- puter- guided implant placement in a patient with severe atrophy. J Oral Implantol. 34(4): 203-7; 2008.
• Rodriguez- Recio O, Rodriguez- Recio C, Gallego L, Junquera L. Computed tomography and computer- aided design for locating available palatal bone for grafting: two case reports. Int J Maxillofac Implants. 25: 197-200; 2010.
• Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukoviç P. Clinical applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 72:75, 2006.
• De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone- beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the lite- rature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 38: 609-625; 2009.
• Magrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, Lopez- Quiles J. Study of avaliable bone for interforaminal implant treatment using cone-beam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 13(5); 307-312; 2008.
• Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited co- ne-beam computerized tomography. Int J Maxillofac Imp- lants. 19: 228-231; 2004.
• Van Assche N, Van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, Hirsch E, Shutyser F, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre- surgical planning of three- di- mensional cone- beam images: a pilot study. J Clin Perio- dontol. 34: 816-821; 2007.
• Lauterbur PC. Image formation by induced local intera- ctions: example employing nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature. 242: 190; 1973.
• Aguiar MF, Marques AP, Carvalho ACP, Cavalcanti MGP. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compa- red with computed tomography for implant planning. Clin Oral Impl Res. 19: 362-365; 2008.
• Shellock FG. MR imaging of metallic implants and materi- als: Acompilation of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 151(4): 811- 4; 1998.
• Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging ca- used by dental material. MAGMA. 18: 103-111; 2005.
• Hassfeld S, Fiebach J, Widmann S, Heiland S, Mühling J. Magnetic resonance tomography for dental implantation. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. May; 5(3): 186-92; 2001.
• Imamura H, Sato H, Matsuura T, Ishikawa M, Zeze R. A comparative study of computed tomography and mag- netic resonance imaging for the detection of mandibu- lar canals and cross- sectional areas in diagnosis prior to dental implant treatment. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 6(2): 75-81; 2004.
• Serrano MR, Estela SA, Diago MP, Diago MP. Softwa- re applied to oral implantology: update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 13(10): 661-665; 2008.
• Al-Harbi SA, Sun AYT. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolitographic template as a surgical guide: pre- liminary results. Implant Dent. 18: 46-56; 2009.
• Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stere- olithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement.Part 1.The concept. J Prosthodont. 15: 51-58; 2006.
• Fortin T, Isidori M, Blanchet E, Perriat M, Bouchet H, Cou- dert JL. An image-guided system drilled surgical template and trephine guide pin to make treatment of completely edentulous patients easier: a clinical report on immediate loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 6:111-119; 2006.
• Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement af- ter virtual planning of imp lant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillo- fac Surg. 35: 207-211; 2007.
• Fortin T, Bosson JL, Coudert JL, Isidori M. Reliability of pre-operative planning of an implant guided system for oral implant placement based on 3- dimensional images: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 18: 886- 893; 2003.
• D’Urso, Atkinson RL, Lanigan MW, Earwaker WJ, Bruce IJ, Holmes A, Barker TM, Effeney DJ, Thompson RG. Ste- reolithographic (SL) biomodelling in craniofacial surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 51: 522-530; 1998.