BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Intraoral Implant Supported Maxillofacial Prostheses

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4, 468 - 475, 01.01.2010

Merve Bankoğlu Seçil Karakoca

Öz

Maxillofacial defects can occur a result of trauma, infection, malign neoplasm and congenital anomalies. Prosthetic treatments are often used to restorate these defects. Conventional methods for the retention of maxillofacial prostheses are far from providing efficient retention. Osseointegrated implants, used for efficient retention, provide maximum rehabilitation of the patients. The purpose of this literature review is to give information about treatment planning of intraoral implant supported maxillofacial prostheses, implant insertion and retention systems

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maxillofacial prostheses Maxillofacial implants

Kaynakça

  • Taylor TD. Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthesis. Chi- cago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 2000, 145-182.
  • Ulusoy M, Aydın K. Diş Hekimliğinde Hareketli Bölümlü Protezler. 2.Baskı. Ankara: Ankara Üni. Diş Hek. Fak. Yayınları yayın no: 25; 965-999, 2005.
  • Gaiato MC, Pesqueira AA, Ramos da Silva C, Gennari Filho H, Micheline dos Santos D. Patient satisfaction with maxillofacial prosthesis. Literatu- re review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 62: 175- 180, 2009.
  • Ismail JY, Zaki HS. Osseointegration in maxillofa- cial prosthetics. Dent Clin North Am. 34(2): 327- 341, 1990.
  • Schoen PJ, Reintsema H, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Roodenburg JL. The use of implant retained mandibular prostheses in the oral rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients. A review and rationale for treatment planning. Oral Oncol. 40: 862-871, 2004.
  • Beumer T, Curtis AT, Firtell DN. Maxillofacial re- habilitation prosthodontic and surgical considera- tion. St. Louis; The C.V Mosby Co, 1979.
  • Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetic. St. Louis: Mosby Inc, 2005.
  • Worthington P, Branemark PI. Advanced osseo- integration surgery: applications in the maxillofa- cial region. Illınois; Quintessence Publishing Co; 1992.
  • Çelik İ, Toraman M, Mıhçıoğlu T, Ceritoğlu D. Dental implant planlamasında radyografik yön- temlerin değerlendirilmesi. T Klin J Dental Sci ; 13: 21-28, 2003.
  • Karakoca S, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Bal BT. Survi- val rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years. J Prosthet Dent. 100: 458-464, 2008.
  • Roumanas ED, Nishmura RD, Davis BK ,Beumer J 3rd. Clinical evaluation of implants retaining edentulous maxillary obturator prostheses. J Pros- thet Dent. 77: 184-90, 1997.
  • Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical app- lications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 72:75, 2006.
  • Song YD, Jun SH, Kwon JJ. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computeri- zed tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:59-64, 2009.
  • Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Invest. 10:1-7, 2006.
  • Weisher T, Mohr C. Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilition of cancer patients:treatment concept and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 14(4): 521-528, 1999.
  • Ueda M, Kaneda T, Takahashi H. Effect of hiper- baric oxygen therapy on osseointegration of tita- nium implants in irradiated bone: A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 8: 41-4, 1993.
  • Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, Jha N. Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: a pros- pective study. Int J Prosthodont. Mar-Apr; 15(2): 139-44, 2002.
  • Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator de- sign for partially edentulous patients. Part I: clas- sification. J Prosthet Dent. 40: 554-557, 1978.
  • Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator de- sign for partially edentulous patient. Part II: design principles. J Prosthet Dent. 40: 656-662, 1978.
  • Hooper SM, Westcott T, Evans PL, Bocca AP, Jag- ger DC. Implant-supported facial prostheses pro- vided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions. J Prost- hodont. 14: 32-38, 2005.
  • Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing for mis- sing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment, review. Cochrane Data- base Syst Rev. Jan 25; (1): CD003607, 2006.
  • Yerit KC, Posch M, Hainich S, Turhani D, Klug C, Wanschitz F, Wagner A, Watzinger F, Ewers R. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxilla: results of a 12 year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15: 693-699, 2004.
  • Goto M, Jin-Nouchi S, Ihara K, Katsuki T. Lon- gitudinal follow-up osseointegrated implants in patients with resected jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 17. 225-230, 2002.
  • Ahlgren F, Stİrksen K, Tornes K. A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months follow up after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp- lants. 21: 421-425, 2006.
  • Zwahlen RA, Grätz KW, Oechslin CK, Studer SP. Survival rate of zygomatic implants atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional lo- ading; a retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21: 413-420, 2006.
  • Kreissl ME, Heydecke G, Metzger MC, Schoen R. Zygoma implant- supported prosthetic rehabi- litation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 97 : 121-8, 2007.
  • Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6-48 months follow up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15: 18-22, 2004.
  • Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Branemark I, McAlpine JA. A protocol for maxil- lary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont. 20: 521-531, 2007.
  • Griffitts T, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 100: 81-84, 2005.
  • Dilek OC, Tezulas E, Dincel M. A mini dental imp- lant-supported obturator application in a patient with partial maxillectomy due to tumor: case re- port. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radi- ol Endod. 103: 6-10, 2007.
  • Ahn MR, An KM, Choi JH, Sohn DS. Immedia- te loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible. Implant Dent. 13: 367– 372, 2004.
  • Bohle GC, Mitcherling WW, Mitcherling JJ, Joh- nson RM, Bohle GC 3rd. Immediate obturator stabilization using mini dental implants. J Prost- hodont. 17: 482–486, 2008.
  • Schoen P, Raghoebar G, Vissink A, Roodenburg JL. Mandibulotomy and implant insertion. Head Neck. 25: 748–753, 2003.
  • Schrag C, Chang YM, Tsai CY, Wei FC. Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmen- tal resection. J Surg Oncol. 94: 538–545, 2006.
  • Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Romeo E, Zaniboni M, Brusati R. Long-term results of mandibular recons- truction with autogenous bone grafts and oral implants after tumor resection. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19: 1074-1080, 2008.
  • Davodi A, Nishimura R, Beumer J 3rd. An imp- lant supported fixed-removable prosthesis with a milled tissue bar and Hader clip rerention as a restorative option for the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent. 78: 212-217, 1997.
  • el-Sheikh AM, Hobkirk JA. Force transmission in bar-retained implantstabilized mandibular over- dentures: an in-vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Res- tor Dent. 10(4):173-8, 2002.
  • Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Manage- ment of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 11:108-25, 2000.
  • Schroeder A, Sutter F, Buser D, Krekeler G. Oral Implantology. 2 nd ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1994.
  • Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vis- sink A. Treatment concept for mandibular over- dentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13: 539-545, 1998.
  • Al-Salehi SK, Calder ID, Lamb DJ . Magnetic retention for obturators. J Prosthodont. 16: 214- 218, 2007.
  • Weisher T, Mohr C. Implant-supported mandibu- lar telescopic prostheses in oral cancer patients: an up to 9 year retrospective study. Int J Prostho- dont. 14(4): 329-334,2001.
  • Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA. Influence of attachment systems on loading transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture. Int J Prosthodont. 13: 214- 220, 2004.
  • van Kampen F, Cune M, van Der Bilt A, Bom- san F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in man- dibular implant overdenture treatment: an vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14: 720-726, 2003.

İntraoral İmplant Destekli Çene-Yüz Protezleri

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4, 468 - 475, 01.01.2010

Merve Bankoğlu Seçil Karakoca

Öz

Maksillofasiyal defektler, travma, enfeksiyon, malign neoplazmlar, konjenital ve gelişimsel anomaliler sonucu oluşmaktadır. Bu defektlerin restorasyonunda sıklıkla protetik tedaviler kullanılmaktadır. Çene yüz protezlerinin tutuculuğunda kullanılan klasik yöntemler; etkili bir retansiyon sağlamaktan uzaktır. Etkili retansiyon için kullanılan osseointegre implantlar hastanın maksimum rehabilitasyonunda önemli katkılar sağlamaktadırlar. Bu literatür derlemesinin amacı; intraoral implant destekli maksillofasiyal protezlerde tedavi planlaması, implant yerleşimi ve retansiyon sistemleri ilgili bilgi vermektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maksillofasiyal protezler Maksillofasiyal implantlar

Kaynakça

  • Taylor TD. Clinical Maxillofacial Prosthesis. Chi- cago: Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, 2000, 145-182.
  • Ulusoy M, Aydın K. Diş Hekimliğinde Hareketli Bölümlü Protezler. 2.Baskı. Ankara: Ankara Üni. Diş Hek. Fak. Yayınları yayın no: 25; 965-999, 2005.
  • Gaiato MC, Pesqueira AA, Ramos da Silva C, Gennari Filho H, Micheline dos Santos D. Patient satisfaction with maxillofacial prosthesis. Literatu- re review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 62: 175- 180, 2009.
  • Ismail JY, Zaki HS. Osseointegration in maxillofa- cial prosthetics. Dent Clin North Am. 34(2): 327- 341, 1990.
  • Schoen PJ, Reintsema H, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Roodenburg JL. The use of implant retained mandibular prostheses in the oral rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients. A review and rationale for treatment planning. Oral Oncol. 40: 862-871, 2004.
  • Beumer T, Curtis AT, Firtell DN. Maxillofacial re- habilitation prosthodontic and surgical considera- tion. St. Louis; The C.V Mosby Co, 1979.
  • Misch CE. Dental implant prosthetic. St. Louis: Mosby Inc, 2005.
  • Worthington P, Branemark PI. Advanced osseo- integration surgery: applications in the maxillofa- cial region. Illınois; Quintessence Publishing Co; 1992.
  • Çelik İ, Toraman M, Mıhçıoğlu T, Ceritoğlu D. Dental implant planlamasında radyografik yön- temlerin değerlendirilmesi. T Klin J Dental Sci ; 13: 21-28, 2003.
  • Karakoca S, Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Bal BT. Survi- val rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years. J Prosthet Dent. 100: 458-464, 2008.
  • Roumanas ED, Nishmura RD, Davis BK ,Beumer J 3rd. Clinical evaluation of implants retaining edentulous maxillary obturator prostheses. J Pros- thet Dent. 77: 184-90, 1997.
  • Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical app- lications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 72:75, 2006.
  • Song YD, Jun SH, Kwon JJ. Correlation between bone quality evaluated by cone-beam computeri- zed tomography and implant primary stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 24:59-64, 2009.
  • Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Invest. 10:1-7, 2006.
  • Weisher T, Mohr C. Ten-year experience in oral implant rehabilition of cancer patients:treatment concept and proposed criteria for success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 14(4): 521-528, 1999.
  • Ueda M, Kaneda T, Takahashi H. Effect of hiper- baric oxygen therapy on osseointegration of tita- nium implants in irradiated bone: A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 8: 41-4, 1993.
  • Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, Jha N. Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: a pros- pective study. Int J Prosthodont. Mar-Apr; 15(2): 139-44, 2002.
  • Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator de- sign for partially edentulous patients. Part I: clas- sification. J Prosthet Dent. 40: 554-557, 1978.
  • Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator de- sign for partially edentulous patient. Part II: design principles. J Prosthet Dent. 40: 656-662, 1978.
  • Hooper SM, Westcott T, Evans PL, Bocca AP, Jag- ger DC. Implant-supported facial prostheses pro- vided by a maxillofacial unit in a U.K. regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions. J Prost- hodont. 14: 32-38, 2005.
  • Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing for mis- sing teeth: bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment, review. Cochrane Data- base Syst Rev. Jan 25; (1): CD003607, 2006.
  • Yerit KC, Posch M, Hainich S, Turhani D, Klug C, Wanschitz F, Wagner A, Watzinger F, Ewers R. Long-term implant survival in the grafted maxilla: results of a 12 year retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15: 693-699, 2004.
  • Goto M, Jin-Nouchi S, Ihara K, Katsuki T. Lon- gitudinal follow-up osseointegrated implants in patients with resected jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 17. 225-230, 2002.
  • Ahlgren F, Stİrksen K, Tornes K. A study of 25 zygomatic dental implants with 11 to 49 months follow up after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp- lants. 21: 421-425, 2006.
  • Zwahlen RA, Grätz KW, Oechslin CK, Studer SP. Survival rate of zygomatic implants atrophic or partially resected maxillae prior to functional lo- ading; a retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 21: 413-420, 2006.
  • Kreissl ME, Heydecke G, Metzger MC, Schoen R. Zygoma implant- supported prosthetic rehabi- litation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 97 : 121-8, 2007.
  • Malevez C, Abarca M, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomatic implants: a 6-48 months follow up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 15: 18-22, 2004.
  • Boyes-Varley JG, Howes DG, Davidge-Pitts KD, Branemark I, McAlpine JA. A protocol for maxil- lary reconstruction following oncology resection using zygomatic implants. Int J Prosthodont. 20: 521-531, 2007.
  • Griffitts T, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: an adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg. Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 100: 81-84, 2005.
  • Dilek OC, Tezulas E, Dincel M. A mini dental imp- lant-supported obturator application in a patient with partial maxillectomy due to tumor: case re- port. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radi- ol Endod. 103: 6-10, 2007.
  • Ahn MR, An KM, Choi JH, Sohn DS. Immedia- te loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible. Implant Dent. 13: 367– 372, 2004.
  • Bohle GC, Mitcherling WW, Mitcherling JJ, Joh- nson RM, Bohle GC 3rd. Immediate obturator stabilization using mini dental implants. J Prost- hodont. 17: 482–486, 2008.
  • Schoen P, Raghoebar G, Vissink A, Roodenburg JL. Mandibulotomy and implant insertion. Head Neck. 25: 748–753, 2003.
  • Schrag C, Chang YM, Tsai CY, Wei FC. Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmen- tal resection. J Surg Oncol. 94: 538–545, 2006.
  • Chiapasco M, Colletti G, Romeo E, Zaniboni M, Brusati R. Long-term results of mandibular recons- truction with autogenous bone grafts and oral implants after tumor resection. Clin Oral Implants Res. 19: 1074-1080, 2008.
  • Davodi A, Nishimura R, Beumer J 3rd. An imp- lant supported fixed-removable prosthesis with a milled tissue bar and Hader clip rerention as a restorative option for the edentulous maxilla. J Prosthet Dent. 78: 212-217, 1997.
  • el-Sheikh AM, Hobkirk JA. Force transmission in bar-retained implantstabilized mandibular over- dentures: an in-vitro study. Eur J Prosthodont Res- tor Dent. 10(4):173-8, 2002.
  • Mericske-Stern RD, Taylor TD, Belser U. Manage- ment of the edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 11:108-25, 2000.
  • Schroeder A, Sutter F, Buser D, Krekeler G. Oral Implantology. 2 nd ed. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1994.
  • Batenburg RH, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Vis- sink A. Treatment concept for mandibular over- dentures supported by endosseous implants: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 13: 539-545, 1998.
  • Al-Salehi SK, Calder ID, Lamb DJ . Magnetic retention for obturators. J Prosthodont. 16: 214- 218, 2007.
  • Weisher T, Mohr C. Implant-supported mandibu- lar telescopic prostheses in oral cancer patients: an up to 9 year retrospective study. Int J Prostho- dont. 14(4): 329-334,2001.
  • Fanuscu MI, Caputo AA. Influence of attachment systems on loading transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture. Int J Prosthodont. 13: 214- 220, 2004.
  • van Kampen F, Cune M, van Der Bilt A, Bom- san F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in man- dibular implant overdenture treatment: an vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 14: 720-726, 2003.
Toplam 44 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Merve Bankoğlu Bu kişi benim

Seçil Karakoca Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Bankoğlu M, Karakoca S. İntraoral İmplant Destekli Çene-Yüz Protezleri. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi. 2010;3(4):468-75.