Effect of the Pandemic on the Frequency of Rubber-dam Use by Dentists: A Questionnaire Study

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 328 - 336, 20.05.2024

Zübeyde Gökçe Ürün , Gizem Kaplan , Ali Cemal Tınaz

https://doi.org/10.54617/adoklinikbilimler.1388856

Öz

Aim: This study aimed to compare the frequency of rubber-dam usage by dentists in different specialties before and after the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic.
Materials and Method: A questionnaire was delivered electronically to dentists in different specialties during May 2021. This questionnaire included questions about the demographics and professional backgrounds of the dentists and their opinions about and the frequencies of use of the rubber-dam. Additionally, whether their rubber-dam usage approaches were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic was also questioned.
Results: Seven hundred and fifty people responded to the questionnaire. Among the participants, 36.4% said that the frequency of using rubber-dams increased after the pandemic. Regardless of the specialty, the frequency of using rubber-dams decreased as the years of professional experience increased (P < 0.05). When specialties were considered, endodontists used rubber-dams during endodontic and restorative procedures significantly more often than the others (P < 0.05). When the workplaces were compared, it was seen that rubber-dams were used significantly more often in university clinics (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Despite the quality guideline recommendations, the use of rubber dams is still not at the desired level in Turkey; however, there has been an increase in the number of dentists using them since the pandemic.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pandemic, questionnaire, Rubber-dam

Etik Beyan

This study was approved by Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry Clinical Research Ethics Committee (GÜDHKAEK. 2021.05/1).

Destekleyen Kurum

This study is not supported by any institution.

Pandeminin Diş Hekimlerinin Lastik Örtü Kullanım Sıklığına Etkisi: Anket Çalışması

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma, farklı uzmanlık dallarındaki diş hekimlerinin koronavirüs hastalığı (COVID-19) salgını öncesi ve sonrasında lastik örtü kullanım sıklığını karşılaştırmayı amaçladı.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Mayıs 2021'de farklı uzmanlık dallarındaki diş hekimlerine elektronik ortamda bir anket gönderildi. Bu ankette diş hekimlerinin demografik bilgileri, mesleki geçmişleri, lastik örtü hakkındaki görüşleri ve kullanım sıklıkları hakkında sorular yer almaktaydı. Ayrıca, lastik ölçü kullanım yaklaşımlarının COVID-19 salgınından etkilenip etkilenmediği de sorgulandı.
Bulgular: İletilen ankete 750 kişi yanıt verdi. Katılımcıların %36.4'ü pandemi sonrasında lastik baraj kullanım sıklığının arttığını söyledi. Uzmanlık alanı ne olursa olsun mesleki deneyim yılı arttıkça lastik örtü kullanma sıklığının arttığı belirlendi (P<0.05). Uzmanlık alanları göz önüne alındığında, endodontistlerin endodontik ve restoratif işlemler sırasında diğerlerine göre önemli ölçüde daha fazla lastik örtü kullandığı görüldü (P < 0.05). İşyerleri karşılaştırıldığında üniversite kliniklerinde lastik örtülerin anlamlı olarak daha sık kullanıldığı görüldü (P<0.05). Sonuç: Kalite rehberi önerilerine rağmen Türkiye'de lastik örtü kullanımı hala istenilen düzeyde değildir; ancak pandemi başladıktan sonra bunları kullanan diş hekimlerinin sayısında artış olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anket, Lastik örtü, Pandemi

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Klinik Araştırmalar Etik Kurulu tarafından onaylanmıştır (GÜDHKAEK. 2021.05/1).

Destekleyen Kurum

Çalışma hiçbir kurum tarafından desteklenmemektedir.

Kaynakça

• Peng X, Xu X, Li Y, Cheng L, Zhou X, Ren B. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci 2020;12:9.
• Şenel FÇ. COVID-19 Salgınının Diş Hekimliği Uygulamalarına Etkisi. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2021;10:1 - 12.
• Rothe C, Schunk M, Sothmann P, Bretzel G, Froeschl G, Wallrauch C, et al. Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany. N Engl Med 2020;382:970-1.
• Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and Future Challenges for Dental and Oral Medicine. J Dent Res 2020;99:481-7.
• Ren YF, Rasubala L, Malmstrom H, Eliav E. Dental Care and Oral Health under the Clouds of COVID-19. JDR Clin Trans Res 2020;5:202-10.
• Zemouri C, de Soet H, Crielaard W, Laheij A. A scoping review on bio-aerosols in healthcare and the dental environment. PLoS One 2017;12:e0178007.
• Gamio L. The Workers Who Face the Greatest Coronavirus Risk. 2020.
• Luzzi V, Ierardo G, Bossù M, Polimeni A. Paediatric Oral Health during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Paediatr Dent 2021;31:20-6.
• Kohn WG, Collins AS, Cleveland JL, Harte JA, Eklund KJ, Malvitz DM. Guidelines for infection control in dental health-care settings--2003. MMWR Recomm Rep 2003;52:1-61.
• Al-Amad SH, Awad MA, Edher FM, Shahramian K, Omran TA. The effect of rubber dam on atmospheric bacterial aerosols during restorative dentistry. J Infect Public Health 2017;10:195-200.
• Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: a review. Int Endod J 2009;42:963-72.
• Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;119:141-4.
• Samaranayake LP, Reid J, Evans D. The efficacy of rubber dam isolation in reducing atmospheric bacterial contamination. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56:442-4.
• Martinho FC, Griffin IL. A Cross-sectional Survey on the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on the Clinical Practice of Endodontists across the United States. J Endod 2021;47:28-38.
• Madarati AA. Why dentists don’t use rubber dam during endodontics and how to promote its usage? BMC Oral Health 2016;16:24.
• Savani GM, Sabbah W, Sedgley CM, Whitten B. Current trends in endodontic treatment by general dental practitioners: report of a United States national survey. J Endod 2014;40:618-24.
• Pertek Hatipoğlu F HÖ, Arıcıoğlu B . Türk Dişhekimlerinin Endodontik Tedavi Prosedürlerindeki Yaklaşımlarının İncelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2020;11:54-64.
• Ferreira ACG, Frozoni M, Prado M, Gomes B, Signoretti F, De-Jesus-Soares A. Current trends in technological armamentarium and treatment among Brazilian endodontists. Braz J Oral Sci 2017;16:1-10.
• Filipović J JS, Miletić I, Pavelić B, Malčić A, Anić I. Patients attitude to rubber dam use. Acta Stomatol Croat 2004;38:319-22.
• M. G. Rubber Dam’in Hastalar Tarafından Kabul Edilebilirliği Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme Çalışması. Hacettepe Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006;30:8-12.
• Kapitan M, Hodacova L, Jagelska J, Kaplan J, Ivancakova R, Sustova Z. The attitude of Czech dental patients to the use of rubber dam. Health Expect 2015;18:1282-90.
• Beer R, Baumann, M.A. ve Kim, S. Color atlas of dental medicine: Endodontology: New York: Thieme Stuttgart; 2000.
• G S, Jena A, Maity AB, Panda PK. Prevalence of Rubber Dam Usage during Endodontic Procedure: A Questionnaire Survey. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:Zc01-3.
• Simonsen R. The rubber dam–dentistry’s ugly duckling. Quintessence Int. 1984;15:101.
• Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients' attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002;35:812-9.
• Maslamani M, Mitra AK. Factors associated with patients' satisfaction of rubber dam use during root canal treatment. Indian J Dent Res 2018;29:144-9.
• Hill EE, Rubel BS. Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use? J Dent Educ 2008;72:1177-81.
• Hassandarvish P, Tiong V, Mohamed NA, Arumugam H, Ananthanarayanan A, Qasuri M, et al. In vitro virucidal activity of povidone iodine gargle and mouthwash against SARS-CoV-2: implications for dental practice. Br Dent J 2020:1-4.
• Bidra AS, Pelletier JS, Westover JB, Frank S, Brown SM, Tessema B. Comparison of In Vitro Inactivation of SARS CoV-2 with Hydrogen Peroxide and Povidone-Iodine Oral Antiseptic Rinses. J Prosthodont 2020;29:599-603.
• Carrotte P. Endodontics: Part 6 Rubber dam and access cavities. Br Dent J 2004;197:527-34; quiz 77.