Teknolojik Gelişimin Entegrasyonu : Evrimsel Bir Model

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 , 1 - 20 , 29.12.2025

Aras Yolusever

https://doi.org/10.30803/adusobed.1558420

https://izlik.org/JA75LM64YN

Öz

Günümüzün hızlı tempolu teknoloji dünyasında, yatırım stratejilerini anlamak yeniliği teşvik etmek ve rekabet avantajı elde etmek açısından son derece önemlidir. Bu makale, rekabetçi ortamlardaki stratejileri analiz eden evrimsel oyun teorisini kullanarak, organizasyonların teknolojik gelişmeleri süreçlere nasıl entegre ettiklerini incelemektedir. Çalışmanın temel kavramları olan evrimsel kararlı strateji (ESS) ve çoğaltıcı dinamik, yeni yatırım stratejilerinin benimsenmesinin ve teknolojiye ayak uydurmanın önemine vurgu yapmaktadır. Makale, bu konudaki literatürün bir özetini sunmakta ve temel modeli ortaya koymaya, ayrıca iki temel stratejinin varlığını ele almaya odaklanmaktadır. Çalışma ayrıca, evrimsel bir durağan stratejinin varlığını belirlemeye de çalışmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları teknolojik gelişime duyulan güvenin, konformizmin ve sosyal ve hukuki düzenin kapsamlı bir entegrasyonun birincil itici gücü olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evrimsel Oyun Teorisi , Replikatör Dinamikleri , Teknolojik Gelişim , İnovasyon , Evrimsel Durağan Denge

Integration of Technological Development: An Evolutionary Model

https://izlik.org/JA75LM64YN

Öz

In today's fast-paced tech world, understanding investment strategies is crucial for driving innovation and gaining a competitive edge. This article explores how organizations integrate technological advancements using evolutionary game theory, which analyzes strategies in competitive environments. Key concepts include the evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) and replicator dynamics, emphasizing the importance of adopting new investment strategies and staying updated on technology. The article provides a summary of the existing literature on this topic and focuses on establishing the fundamental model and acknowledging the presence of two core strategies. The study also attempts to identify the existence of an evolutionary stationary strategy. The results of the study reveal that trust in technological development, conformity, and the social and legal order are the primary driving forces behind comprehensive integration.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evolutionary Game Theory , Replicator Dynamics , Technological Development , Innovation , Evolutionary Stability

Kaynakça

• Aghion, P., Bloom, N., & Reenen, J. N. (2014). Incomplete Contracts and the Internal Organizations of Firms. The Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 30(1), i37-i63.
• Alger, I., & Weibull, J.W. (2016). Evolution and Kantian morality. Games and Economic Behaviour, 98, 56–67
• Almeida, M., & Terra, B. (2018). Technological strategies and sustainable management for small businesses in the Brazilian innovation context. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 20-35. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.
• Aruwa, S. A. (2004), Financing options for small and medium scale enterprises in Nigeria, Nigerian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(2), 50- 99.
• Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. In J. V.
• Henderson & J.-F. Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739). Elsevier
• Baden-Fuller, C., & Haefliger, S. (2013). Business Models and Technological Innovation. Long Range Planning, 46(6), 419-426.
• Bauch, T., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2012). Evolutionary game theory and social learning can determine how vaccine scare unfold. Evolutionary Game Theory and Vaccine Scares, 8(4), Article e1002452.
• Bayarcelik, E. B., Tasel, F., & Apak, S. (2016). Innovation Factors in Service Industry and Knowledge Based Economy. Journal of Management Marketing and Logistics, 3(2), 145-155.
• Bayer, P., Brown, J.S., Dubbeldam, J., & Broom, M. (2021) A markov chain model of cancer treatment. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/2021.06.16.448669
• Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.
• Bonito, A., & Pais, C. (2018). The Macroeconomic Determinants of the Adoption of IFRS for SMEs. Span. Account. Rev., 21, 116–127.
• Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (2001). The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory notes. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 817–833.
• Camerer, C. F., & and Fehr, E. (2002). Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: A guide for social scientists. IEER Working Paper No. 97.
• Chen, J. (2006). Development of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(2), 140-147.
• Daude, C., & Fernandez, E. (2010). On the Role of Productivity and Factor Accumulation in Economic Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, IDB Working Paper 41.
• De Vrande, V., & De Jong, J.P.J. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29, 423-437.
• Drejeris, R., & Oželienė, D. (2019). New approach to the technological aspect of corporate sustainable development. Business: Theory and Practice, 20, 363-371.
• Drew, S. (2003). Strategic Uses of E-Commerce by SMEs in the East of England. European Management Journal, 21(1), 79-88.
• Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1155–1179.
• Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 1, pp. 609–639). Elsevier.
• Han, A., Pereira, L., Santos, F., & Lenaerts, T. (2020). To regulate or not: A social dynamics analysis of an idealised AI race. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 69, 881–921.
• Haseeb, M., Hussain, H.I., Kot, S., Androniceanu, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achieving a Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance. Sustainability,11(14),3811.
• Herliana, S. (2015). Regional Innovation Cluster for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME): A Triple Helix Concept. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 169, 151–160.
• Huff, S., & Munro, M. (1985). Information Technology Assessment and Adoption: A Field Study. MIS Quarterly, 9(4),327-340.
• Keen, P. (1991). Every Manager's Guide to Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
• Khuan, H., Andriani , E., & Rukmana, A. Y. (2023). The Role of Technology in Fostering Innovation and Growth in Start-up Businesses. West Science Journal Economic and Entrepreneurship, 1(08), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsjee.v1i03.151
• Liu, X. (2008), SME Development in China: A Policy Perspective on SME Industrial Clustering. in Lim, H. (ed.), SME in Asia and Globalization, ERIA Research Project Report 2007-5, pp.37-68. Available at: http://www.eria.org/SME%20Development%20in%20China_A%20Policy%20Perspective%20on%20SME%20Industrial%20Clustering.pdf
• Muñiz, H., Accinelli, E., & Hernández, E. (2023) An evolutionary game theoretical approach to the teaching-learning techniques in the post-pandemic era. Open Access Library Journal, 10, 1–22.
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1985). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
• Peters, B., Roberts, M. J., Vuong, V., & Fryges, H. (2017). Estimating dynamic R&D demand: An analysis of costs and long-run benefits. RAND Journal of Economics, 48(2), 409–437.
• Pipitone, V. (2009). The Role of Total Factor Productivity in the Mediterranean Countries. IJEMS, 2 (1), 27-51.
• Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
• Prasanna, R., Jayasundra, J., Gamage, S., Ekanayake, E., Rajapakshe, P., & Abeyrathne, G. (2019). Sustainability of SMEs in the Competition: A Systemic Review on Technological Challenges and SME Performance. Journal of Open Innovation, 5(4), 100-118.
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). London: Free Press.
• Romer, P.M. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economics, 94, 1002–1037.
• Shahadat, M. M. H., Nekmahmud, Md., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023), Digital Technology Adoption in SMEs: What Technological, Environmental and Organizational Factors Influence in Emerging Countries?. Global Business Review, 1-27.
• Smith, J.M., & Price, G. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.
• Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological Innovation and the Theory of the Firm: The Role of Enterprise-Level Knowledge, Complementarities, and (Dynamic) Capabilities. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol.1, pp. 679-730). Elsevier.
• Vega-Redondo, F. (2007). Complex social networks. Cambridge University Press.
• Windrum, P., & Berranger, P. (2002). The adoption of e-business technology by SMEs. http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:1124/rm2002-023.pdf.
• Young, H. P. (1998). Invidual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. USA: Princeton University Press.