Performance of Some Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Genotypes for Agronomical and Within-Boll Yield Characters

Yıl 2024, , 1 - 8, 30.06.2024

Gülşah Müjdeci , Volkan Mehmet Çınar , Aydın Ünay

https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.1251080

Öz

Evaluating the cultivars' performance is an important step in the cotton breeding process. Therefore, we tested the yield, fiber quality and within-boll yield components of genotypes, and associations among observed characters were estimated. Ten cotton genotypes inc., Bomba, Özbek 100, Ramses, May 455, Bir 949, Fiona, Şahin 2000, Sahra, Sasha and Eva, were planted in a Randomized Complete Block Design with four replications in 2022. The highest seed cotton yield was recorded in Sasha and Bomba genotypes. Ramses performed the higher ginning out-turn (47.70%) and favorable fiber fineness (4.62 mic.). Bir 949 (32.65 mm), Ramses (31.49 mm) and Sasha (31.31 mm) for fiber length; Sasha (35.18 g tex-1) and Sahra (34.08 g tex-1) for fiber strength exhibited desirable performances. The highest relative leaf water content (%) as a drought indicator was recorded in Ramses (67.79), Fiona (67.45), Şahin 2000 (65.25) and Bomba (65.11). The number of fibers per seed ranged from 10.82 thousand (Özbek 100) to 13.00 thousand (Bir 949). It was concluded that it seemed difficult to associate the seed cotton yield, fiber quality and relative leaf water content. Therefore, the genotypes in which all three traits are optimized should be emphasized.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cotton, fiber quality, relative leaf water content, within-boll yield components, yield

Bazı Pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Genotiplerinin Tarımsal ve Koza İçi Verim Özellikleri Yönünden Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Islah programlarının en önemli aşamalarından birisi genotiplerin performanslarını belirlemektir. Bu amaçla, genotiplerin verim, lif kalite özellikleri ve koza içi verim bileşenleri belirlenmiş ve incelenen özellikler arası ilişkiler değerlendirilmiştir. Bomba, Özbek 100, Ramses, May 455, Bir 949, Fiona, Şahin 2000, Sahra, Sasha ve Eva gibi 10 farklı pamuk genotipi 2022 yılında Tesadüf Blokları Deneme Deseninde 4 tekerrürlü olarak ekilmiştir. Sasha ve Bomba çeşitlerinin en yüksek kütlü pamuk verimine sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Ramses çeşidi yüksek çırçır randımanı (%47.7) ve ince lifleri (4.62 mic.) ile dikkati çekmiştir. Lif uzunluğu yönünden Bir 949 (32.65 mm), Ramses (31.49 mm) ve Sasha (31.31 mm); lif dayanıklılığı yönünden Sasha (35.18 g tex-1) ve Sahra (34.08 g tex-1) yüksek performans sergilemiştir. Kuraklığa toleransın bir belirteci olan yaprak oransal su içeriği yönünden Ramses (67.79), Fiona (67.45), Şahin 2000 (65.25) ve Bomba (65.11) en iyi çeşitler olarak bulunmuştur. Tohumdaki lif sayısı değerleri 10821 (Özbek 100) ile 13002 (Bir 949) arasında değişmiştir. Çalışmada verim, lif özellikleri ve kuraklığa tolerans özelliklerinin aynı çeşitte bulunmasının güç olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu nedenle tüm özellikler yönünden optimum değerlerin bir çeşitte toplanmasının yararlı olacağı önerilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lif kalitesi, koza-içi verim bileşenleri, oransal yaprak su içeriği, pamuk, verim

Kaynakça

• Anonymous (2023) Uster® HVI 1000: The Fiber Classification and Analysis System. https://www.uster.com/products/cotton-classing/uster-hvi/ Date of access: 06.02.2023
• Aydın F, Sarptaş H (2018) The Impact of the Climate Change to Crop Cultivation: The Case Study with Model Crops for Turkey. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 24(3): 512-521. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2017.37880
• Babu AG, Patil BC, Koti RV (2019) Identification of Drought Tolerant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Genotypes by Biophysical and Physiological Traits. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 8(1): 1855-1860.
• Balci S, Cinar VM, Unay A (2022) A Preliminary Study on the Determination of Carpel Characteristics, Yield Losses and Free Fatty Acid Content of Seed under Pre-Harvest Precipitation in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) . ANADOLU Journal of Aegean Agricultural Research Institute 32(2): 161-166. https://10.18615/anadolu.1224464
• Balci S, Cinar VM, Unay A (2023) The Investigation of Effects of Pre-Harvest Rainfall on Lint Color Grade and Seed Germination Rate in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Agriculture and Nature 26(1): 118-125. https://10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.1061028
• Barrs HD, Weatherley PE (1962) A Re-Examination of the Relative Turgidity Techniques for Estimating Water Deficits in Leaves. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15(3): 413-428. https://doi.org/10.1071/BI9620413
• Basal H, Unay A, Canavar O, Yavas I (2009) Combining Ability for Fiber Quality Parameters and Within-boll Yield Components in Intraspecific Cotton Populations. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7(2): 364-374. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2009072-428
• Bayder A, Kanber R (2012) Effects on Climate Changes on Cotton Production. Soil Water Journal 1(1): 47-54.
• Brown N, Smith CW, Hague S, Auld D, Hequet E, Joy K, Jones D (2015) Within‐Boll Yield Characteristics and Their Correlation with Fiber Quality Parameters following Mutagenesis of Upland Cotton, TAM 94L‐25. Crop Science 55(4): 1513-1523. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2014.06.0442
• Brown PW (2008) Cotton Heat Stress. Arizona (Tucson, AZ): College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Publisher). Series/Report no: University of Arizona Cooperative Extension Publication AZ1448.
• Cengiz F, Goktepe F (2006) An Investigation of the Variation in Turkish Cotton Fibre Properties in Years 2002 and 2003. Textile and Apparel 16(1): 271-275.
• Cinar VM, Unay A (2021) Response to Early Treatment of Chlormequat Chloride in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Agriculture Journal of Agricultural Sciences 18(1): 127-131. https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.874300
• Damtew S, Gurmessa D, Balcha M, Egziabher AG, Gudeta B, Workie A, Arega M (2022) Performance of Cotton Genotypes (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for Yield and Yield Component Traits under Irrigated Climatic Conditions of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science 16(10): 270-275. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2021.2148
• Darawsheh MK, Beslemes D, Kouneli V, Tigka E, Bilalis D, Roussis I, Karydogianni S, Mavroeidis A, Triantafyllidis V, Kosma C, Zotos A (2022) Environmental and Regional Effects on Fiber Quality of Cotton Cultivated in Greece. Agronomy 12(4): 943. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040943
• Delhom CD, Kelly B, Martin V (2018) Physical Properties of Cotton Fiber and Their Measurement. In: Fang D (ed), Cotton Fiber: Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Springer, Cham, 41-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_3
• Dhamayanathi KPM, Manickam S, Rathinavel K (2010) Genetic Variability Studies in Gossypium barbadense L. Genotypes for Seed Cotton Yield and Its Yield Components. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1(4): 961-965.
• Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11(1): 1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
• Dutta P, Bandopadhyay P, Bera AK (2016) Identification of Leaf Based Physiological Markers for Drought Susceptibility during Early Seedling Development of Mungbean. American Journal of Plant Sciences 7(14):1921-1936. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.714176
• Feng G, Luoa H, Zhanga Y, Goua L, Yaoa Y, Linb Y, Zhanga W (2016) Relationship Between Plant Canopy Characteristics and Photosynthetic Productivity in Diverse Cultivars of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). The Crop Journal 4(6): 499-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.05.012
• Gormus O (2012) Effect of Cultivar Blends on Yield and Fiber Quality of Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Planting in the Çukurova Region, Turkey. Çukurova Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 27(2): 21- 28.
• He Z, Shankle M, Zhang H, Way TR, Tewolde H, Uchimiya M (2013) Mineral Composition of Cottonseed is Affected by Fertilization Management Practices. Agronomy Journal 105(2): 341-350. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0351
• ICAC, 2022. Cotton Production by Country Worldwide 2021/2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263055/cotton-production-worldwide-by-top-countries/
• Imran M, Shakeel A, Azhar FM, Farooq J, Saleem MF, Saeed A, Nazeer W, Riaz M, Naeem M, Javaid A (2012). Combining Ability Analysis for Within-Boll Yield Components in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Genetics and Molecular Research 11(3): 2790-2800. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2012.August.24.4
• Karapinar BO, Erdem N (2003) Comparison of Quality Characteristics of Yarns Spun from Aegean Cotton Fibres and Their Mixtures with Southeast Anatolian Cotton Fibres. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 11(4): 26-29.
• Khan NU, Marwat KB, Hassan G, Kumbhar MB, Farhatullah ZA, Soomro NK, Parveen A, Aiman U (2009) Study of Fiber Quality Traits in Upland Cotton Using Additive-Dominance Model. Pakistan Journal of Botany 41(3): 1271-1283.
• Liu Y (2018) Chemical Composition and Characterization of Cotton Fibers. In: Fang D (ed). Cotton Fiber: Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Springer, Cham. 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00871-0_4 Mendiburu F, Mendiburu MF (2019) Package ‘agricolae’. R Package, Version,1.3. 2019. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/agricolae/agricolae.pdf
• Nawaz B, Sattar S, Malik TA (2019) Genetic Analysis of Yield Components and Fiber Quality Parameters in Upland Cotton. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 9: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.25081/imrj.2019.v9.5284
• Nikhil PG, Nidagundi JM, Anusha HA (2018). Genetic Variability and Heritability Studies for Seed Cotton Yield, Yield Attributing and Fibre Quality Traits in Upland Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(5): 1639-1642.
• Olivoto T, Lúcio ADC (2020) Metan: An R package for multi‐environment trial analysis. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(6): 783-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13384
• Parida AK, Dagaonkar VS, Phalak MS, Umalkar, GV, Aurangabadkar LP (2007) Alterations in photosynthetic pigments, protein and osmotic components in cotton genotypes subjected to short-term drought stress followed by recovery. Plant Biotechnology Reports 1(1): 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-006-0004-1.
• R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org
• R Studio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA; 2020. Available from: http://www.rstudio.com/32
• Sasser P, Shane JL (1996) Crop quality -A decade of improvement. In: Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., National Cotton Council of America. Memphis, Tenn. 1996;9-12.
• Saleem MA, Amjid MW, Ahmad MQ, Noor E, Qayyum A, Awan MI, Asif M, Nauman M (2018) Marker Assisted Selection for Relative Water Content, Excised Leaf Water Loss and Cell Membrane Stability in Cotton. Advancements in Life Sciences 5(2): 56-60.
• Shah MA, Rasheed SM (2019) Evaluation of Different Cotton Varieties for Yield Performance Collected from Public Sector. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Research 5(4): 227-233
• Tatar O (2016) Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Turkey. Lucrări Ştiinţifice seria Agronomie 59(2): 135-140.
• Worley S, Ramey HH, Harrell DC, Culp TW (1976) Ontogenetic Model of Cotton Yield1. Crop Science 16(1): 30-34.
• Yu K, Yu S, Fan S, Song M, Zhai H, Li X (2012) Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci for Cottonseed Oil, Protein and Gossypol Content in a Gossypium hirsutum × Gossypium barbadense Backcross Inbred Line Population. Euphytica 187(2): 191-200.