Determination of Yield and Fiber Quality Parameters of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Progeny Rows at F3:6 Generation Under Full and Deficit Irrigation Conditions

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 65 - 71, 30.06.2018

Bahar Ulu Huseyin Başal

https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.376140

Cited By: 1

Öz

This study was conducted to determine the
yield, yield components and fiber quality parameters in a single plant progeny
rows at F_3:6 generation under the full and deficit irrigation conditions. The
experiment was conducted at Adnan Menderes University, Agriculture Faculty in
full and deficit conditions.In the full irrigation e×periment, 76 single
plants, and in the experiment of deficit irrigation 68 single plants were
planted. In addition, planting system was the augmented randomized complete
block experimental design by performing 4 replications by 70 cm of row spacing
and 12 m of row length. Under  deficit
irrigation (% 50) genotypic variation was found to be significant for all
investigated parameters and, under full irrigation (% 100) condition
significant variation was detected for seed cotton yield, fiber length and
fiber strength. Based on seed cotton yield and fiber quality parameters of
single progeny rows, it was concluded that Carmen × Tamcot-22, Carmen ×
Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × DPL-90, BA-308 × Carmen single progeny rows are
promising in the full irrigation conditions, and Nazilli-503 × Tamcot-22,
Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × Şahin 2000, Carmen × Tamcot-22, BA-308 ×
Nazilli-503 was detected as promising hybrids in the deficit irrigation
conditions.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler

water stress, tolerant lines

F3:6 Generasyonunda Pamuk (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Döl Sıralarının Tam ve Kısıtlı Sulama Koşullarında Verim ve Lif Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu
çalışma F_3:6 generasyonunda tek bitki döl sıralarının tam ve kısıtlı sulama
koşullarında verim, verim bileşenleri ve lif kalite özelliklerinin
karşılaştırılması amacıyla Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi
uygulama alanında tam (%100) ve kısıtlı (%50) sulama koşullarında
yürütülmüştür. Tam sulama denemesinde 76 tek bitki, kısıtlı sulama da 68 tek
bitki, Carizma, Gloria, Carmen, Claudia ve Elsa kontrol çeşitleri ile birlikte
Tesadüf Bloklarında Augmented deneme desenine göre, 4 tekerrürlü olarak sıra
arası 70 cm, sıra üzeri 20 cm, sıra uzunluğu
12 m olacak şekilde ekilmiştir. Kısıtlı sulama (% 50) koşullarında incelenen
tüm özellikler bakımından, tam (% 100) sulama koşullarında ise kütlü pamuk
verimi, lif uzunluğu ve lif kopma
dayanıklılığı yönünden
genotipik farklılığın önemli olduğu
saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda tek bitki döl sıraları; verim ve lif kalite
özellikleri bakımından birlikte değerlendirildiğinde;
tam sulama koşullarında, Carmen × Tamcot-22, Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503
× DPL-90, BA-308 × Carmen, kısıtlı sulama koşullarında ise Nazilli-503 ×
Tamcot-22, Carmen × Nazilli-503, Nazilli-503 × Şahin-2000, Carmen × Tamcot-22,
BA-308 × Nazilli-503, tek bitki döl sıraları ümit verici döl sıraları olarak
saptanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

su stresi, tolerant hatlar

Kaynakça

• Asadi R, Kohi N, Tavassoli A (2011) Effect of Irrigation Regime and Method of Strip Irrigation System on Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton Under Drought Stress Conditions of Orzouiyeh Region of Kerman Province in Iran. Scientific Research and Essays 6: 5812-5819.
• Balkchom KS, Reeves DW, Shaw JN, Burmester CH, Curtis LM (2006) Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality From Irrigated Tillage Systems in The Tennessee Valley. Agronomy Journal 98: 596-602.
• Basal H, Dagdelen N, Unay A, Yılmaz E (2009) Effects of Deficit Drip Irrigation Ratios on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Yield and Fiber Quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 195: 19-29.
• Bradow JM, Davidonis, GH (2000) Quantitation of Fiber Quality and The Cotton Production-Processing Interface: A Physiologist’s Perspective. Journal of Cotton Science 4: 34-64.
• Cave J. (2013) Cotton Lint Yield, Fiber Quality, and Water-Use Efficiency As İnfluenced by Cultivar and Irrigation Level. Master of Sciences, Texas Tech University, USA.
• Hussein F, Janat M, Yakoub A (2011) Assessment of Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Drip Irrigated Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) as Affected by Deficit Irrigation. Turkish Journal of Agrıculture and Forestry 35: 611-621.
• Karademir Ç, Karademir E, Gençer O (2011) Yield and Fiber Quality of F1 and F2 Generations of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Under Drought Stress Conditions. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 17: 795-805.
• Krieg DR (1997) Genetic and Environmental Factors Affecting Productivity of Cotton. In: Dugger P, Richter DA (eds.), Proceeding Beltwide Cotton Conf., January 7–10 1997. New Orleans, LA, 1347.
• Marani A, Amirav A (1971) Effects of Soil Moisture Stress on Two Varieties of Upland Cotton in Israel. Experimental Agriculture 7: 213-224. McWilliams D (2004) Drought Strategies for Cotton. Cooperative Extension Service Circular 582 College of Agriculture and Home Economics http://www.cahe.nmsu.edu/pubs/circulars (Erişim Tarihi: 15/10/2011).
• Mert M (2005) Irrigation of Cotton Cultivars Improves Seed Cotton Yield, Yield Components and Fibre Properties in The Hatay Region, Turkey. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica B 55: 44-50.
• Özkara M, Sahin A (1993) Ege Bölgesinde Farklı Sulama Programlarının Nazilli-84 ve Nazilli-87 Pamuk Çesidinin Verim ve Bazı Kalite Özelliklerine Etkileri. Menemen Araştırma Enst. Md. Yayınları, Genel Yayın No:193, s. 58, Menemen.
• Papastylianou P, Argyrokastritis I (2014) Effect of Limited Drip İrrigation Regime on Yield, Yield Components, and Fiber Quality of Cotton Under Mediterranean Conditions. Agricultural Water Management 142:127-134.
• Petersen RG, Calvin LD (1965) Sampling. In: Black, CA (ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling. Madison, American Society of Agronomy, 54-71.
• Pettigrew WT (2004) Moisture Deficit Effect on Cotton Lint Yield, Yield Components and Boll Distribution. Agronomy Journal 96: 377-383.
• Price K (2009). Investigation of Methods to Evaluate Drought Toerance in Cotton. The Degree of Doctor of Philosopy. Texas Tech University, Texas Lubbock, USA.
• Quisenberry JE, Roark B, Fryrear DW, Kohel RJ (1980) Effectiveness of Selection in Uplan Dcotton in Stres Environments. Crop Science 20: 450 - 453.
• Rai E (2011) Mechanism of Drought Tolerance in Cotton-Response of Cotton Cultivars to Irrigation in The Texas High Plains. Master of Science, Texas Tech University. Texas Lubbock, USA.
• Shakoor MS, Malik TA, Azhar FM, Saleem MF (2010) Genetics of Agronomic and Fiber Traits in Upland Cotton Under Drought Stress. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 12: 495–500.
• Stiller WN, Reid PE, Constable GA(2004) Maturity and Leaf Shape as Traits Influencing Cotton Cultivar Adaptation to Dry Land Conditions. Agronomy Journal 96: 656–664.
• Türkeş M (2008) Gözlenen İklim Değişiklikleri ve Kuraklık: Nedenleri ve Geleceği. Toplum ve Hekim, 23: 97-107.