KENTSEL YEŞİL ALANLARIN KARAKTERİSTİK ÖZELLİKLERİ İLE İNSANLARIN FİZİKSEL AKTİVİTE SIKLIKLARI VE SÜRESİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ NEDİR?

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 73 - 80, 30.06.2019

Abdullah Akpınar

https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.522680

Öz

Bu
çalışmanın amacı kentsel yeşil alanların karakteristik özellikleri ile
insanların fiziksel aktivite sıklıkları ve süreleri arasındaki ilişkiyi
belirlemektir. Bu çalışmanın verileri,
Aydın kent merkezinde bulunan yedi farklı kentsel yeşil alanda, 1 Nisan-15
Mayıs 2016 tarihlerinde kentsel yeşil alanları fiziksel aktivite için aktif
olarak kullanan 394 kullanıcıyla yüz yüze bireysel görüşmeler yapılarak
toplanmıştır. Katılımcıların
sosyo-ekonomik durumları istatistiki olarak kontrol edilerek çoklu regresyon
analiz yöntemi ile kentsel yeşil alanların karakteristik özellikleri ile
insanların fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Çoklu
regresyon analizi sonucunda insanların fiziksel aktivite sıklıkları kentsel
yeşil alanlardaki ağaçların çokluğu arasında pozitif anlamlı ilişki
bulunmuştur. Diğer taraftan, insanların fiziksel aktivite süreleri ile farklı
türde bitki ve hayvan, piknik alanı ve egzersiz aletleri özelliklerine sahip
yeşil alanların pozitif anlamlı ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte,
mangal ve ateş yakma özelliğine sahip kentsel yeşil alanların insanların
fiziksel aktivite süreleriyle anlamlı negatif ilişkide olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu
sonuçlar ışığında kentsel yeşil alanlarda insanların fiziksel aktiviteleri
ağaçların çokluğu, egzersiz aletleri, farklı türde bitki ve hayvan ve piknik
alanları ile artırılabilir. Ancak, gerçek anlamda sebep-sonuç ilişkisini belirleyebilmek için
ileride yapılacak çalışmalarda girişim (intervention) veya kesitsel (longitudinal) çalışmaların
yapılması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kentsel yeşil alanlar, fiziksel aktivite, yeşil alan karakteristik özellikleri, Aydın

WHAT ARE THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN GREEN SPACES AND PEOPLE’S FREQUENCY AND DURATION OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY?

Öz

The aim of this study was to
determine the relationship between the characteristics of urban green spaces (UGSs)
and people’s frequency and duration of physical activity (PA) level. The data
of this study were collected in face-to-face interviews with 394 users who
actively use UGSs for PA on April 1 to May 15, 2016 in seven different UGSs in
Aydın city center. While the socio-economic status of participants was
statistically controlled, the relationships between the characteristics of UGSs
and people`s PA levels were examined. In the regression analyses, a positive
relationship between people’s frequency of PA and many trees in UGSs. In
addition, positive significant relationships between
people’s duration of PA and varied flora and fauna, picnic areas, and exercise equipment in UGSs were found. On the other hand, a negative relationship between
people’s duration of PA and fire and BBQs places. The
findings suggest that levels of PA could be promoted with many trees, exercise equipment, flora and fauna, picnic
areas, in UGSs. However, in future studies causal
relationship needs to be conducted with longitudinal or intervention studies
for more accurate results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Urban green spaces, physical activity, characteristics of green spaces, Aydın

Kaynakça

• Akpınar A (2014) Kullanıcıların kentsel yeşil yolları kullanım sebepleri, algıları ve tercihlerinin Aydın-Koşuyolu örneğinde incelenmesi (Assessing the users` perceptions, preferences, and reasons for use of urban greenway in Aydın-Koşuyolu province). Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University, 64(2): 41-55. doi:10.17099/jffiu.31281
• Akpınar A (2016a) How is quality of urban green spaces associated with physical activity and health? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16: 76–83.
• Akpınar A (2016b) Factors influencing the use of urban greenways: A case study of Aydın, Turkey. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 16: 123–131.
• Akpınar A, Cankurt M (2017) How are characteristics of urban green space related to levels of physical activity: Examining the links. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(8): 1091–1101.
• Amorim T C, Azevedo M R, Hallal P C (2010) Physical activity levels according to physical and social environmental factors in a sample of adults livingin South Brazil. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 7(Suppl 2): S204-S212.
• Anonim (2014). Park ve Bahçeler Müdürlüğü. Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi: http://www.aydin.bel.tr/belediyemiz/111-park-ve-baher-ml, Erişim: Tarihi: 18.11.2014
• Bancroft C, Joshi S, Rundle A, Hutson M, Chong C, Weiss C C (2015) Association of proximity and density of parks and objectively measured physical activity in the United States: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 138: 22-30.
• Barton J, Pretty J (2010) What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 44: 3947–3955.
• Bedimo-Rung A L, Mowen A, Cohen D (2005) The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2S2): 159–168.
• Bize R, Johnson J A, Plotnikoff R C (2007) Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med, 45: 401-15.
• Byomkesh T, Nakagoshi N, Dewan A M (2012) Urbanization and green space dynamics in Greater Dhaka, Bangladesh. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 8: 45–58.
• Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, Agrimi A, Portoghesi L, Semenzato P, Sanesi G (2015) Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas . Landscape and Urban Planning , 134: 221–228.
• Cohen D A, Ashwood J S, Scott M M, Overton A, Evenson K R, Staten L K, Porter D, McKenzie T L, Catellier D (2006) Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics, 118: e1381–e1389.
• Corti B, Donovan R J, Holman C D (1996) Factors influencing the use of physical activity facilities: results from qualitative research. Health Promotion J Aust, 6: 16–21.
• Crossette B (2010). State of world population 2010. Information and External Relations Division of UNFPA, the United Nations Population Fund.
• de Jong K, Albin M, Skarback E, Grahn P, Bjork J (2012) Perceived green qualities were associated with neighborhood satisfaction, physical activity, and general health: Results from a cross-sectional study in suburban and rural Scania, southern Sweden. Health & Place, 18: 1374–1380.
• de Vries S, van Dillen, S M, Groenewegen, P P, Spreeuwenberg, P (2013) Streetscape greenery and health: Stress, social cohesion and physical activity as mediators. Social Science & Medicine, 94: 26-33.
• Floyd M F, Spengler J O, Maddock J E, Gobster P H, Suau L J (2008) Park-based physical activity in diverse communities of two U.S. cities: an observational study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(4): 299–305.
• Fox K R (1999) The influence of physical activity on mental wellbeing. Public Health Nutr, 2(Suppl. 3a): 411-8.
• Gül A, Özgüner H, Akten M, Küçük V. (2004) Gölcük gölü ve çevresi peyzaj planlama ve tasarım projesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta.
• Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A (2009) Dose–response relationship between physical activity and mental health: The Scottish Health Survey. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43: 1111–1114.
• Hansmann R, Hug S-M, Seeland K (2007) Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6: 213-225.
• Hillsdon M, Panter J, Foster C, Jones A (2006) The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health, 120(12): 1127-32.
• İmar ve Şehircilik Dairesi Başkanlığı (2013) Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi Nazım İmar Planı. Aydın Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
• Jones A, Hillsdon M, Coombes E (2009) Greenspace access, use, and physical activity: Understanding the effects of area deprivation. Preventive Medicine, 49: 500–505.
• Kabisch N, Qureshi S, Haase D. (2015) Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces — A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50: 25–34.
• Kaczynski A T, Potwarka L R, Saelens B E (2008) Association of park size, distance and features with physical activity in neighborhood parks. American Journal of Public Health, 98: 1451–1456.
• Kaczynski A T, Potwarka L R, Smale B J, Havitz M E (2009) Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: Variations by gender and age. Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(2): 174-191.
• Karaküçük S, Gürbüz B (2007). Rekreasyon ve kent(li)leşme (Recreation and urbanization). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
• Kong F, Nakagoshi N (2006) Spatial-temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3): 147–164.
• Koohsari M J, Mavoa S, Villanueva K, Sugiyama T, Badland H, Kaczynski A, Owen N, Giles-Corti B (2015) Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda. Health & Place, 33: 75–82.
• Lachowycz K, Jones A P (2011) Greenspace and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence. obesity reviews, 12: e183–e189.
• Maas J, Verheij R, Spreeuwenberg P, Groenewegen P (2008) Physical activity as a possible mechanism behind the relationship between green space and health: A multilevel analysis. BMC Public Health, 8: 206-218.
• Mackay G J, Neill J T (2010) The effect of “green exercise” on state anxiety and the role of exercise duration, intensity, and greenness: A quasi-experimental study. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11: 238-245.
• Maller C, Townsend M, St Leger L, Henderson-Wilson C, Pryor A, Prosser L, Moore M (2009). Healthy parks, healthy people: The health benefits of contact with nature in a park context. The George Wright Forum, 26(2): 51-83.
• McCormack G R, Giles-Corti B, Bulsara M (2008) The relationship between destination proximity, destination mix and physical activity behaviors. Preventive Medicine, 46: 33–40.
• Niemelä J, Breuste J, Guntenspergen G, McIntyre N, Elmqvist T, James P (2011) Urban Ecology: Patterns, Processes, and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Nieuwenhuijsen M J, Kruize H, Gidlow C, Andrusaityte S, Antó J, Basagaña X, Cirach M, Dadvand P, Danileviciute A, Donaire-Gonzalez D, Garcia J, Jerrett M, Jones M, Julvez J, van Kempen E, van Kamp I, Maas J, Seto E, Smith G, Triguero M, Wendel-Vos W, Wright J, Zufferey J, van den Hazel P J, Lawrence R, Grazuleviciene R (2014) Positive health effects of the natural outdoor environment in typical populations in different regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE): a study programme protocol. BMJ Open, 4.
• Nocon M, Hiemann T, Muller-Riemenschneider F, Thalau F (2008) Association of physical activity with all cause and cardiovascular mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil, 15: 239-46.
• Oğuz D (2000) User surveys of Ankara's urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52: 165-171.
• Özgüner H (2011) Cultural Differences in Attitudes towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces. Landscape Research, 36(5): 599-620.
• Reed J A, Arant C A, Wells P, Stevens K, Hagen S, Harring H (2008) A descriptive examination of the most frequently used activity settings in 25 community parks using direct observation. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 5(Supp 1): S183-S195.
• Rethorst C D, Wipfli B M, Landers D M (2009) The antidepressive effects of exercise: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Sports Medicine, 39: 491-511.
• Sağlık Bakanlığı (2014) Türkiye beslenme ve sağlık araştırması 2010: Beslenme durumu ve alışkanlıklarının değerlendirilmesi sonuç raporu Ankara: Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Araştırmaları Genel Müdürlüğü, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Beslenme ve Diyetetik Bölümü, Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi.
• Sallis J F, Floyd M F, Rodríguez D A, Saelens B E (2012) The role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and CVD. Circulation, 125(5): 729–737.
• Schipperijn J, Bentsen P, Troelsen J, Toftager M, Stigsdotter U (2013) Associations between physical activity and characteristics of urban green space. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12: 109–116.
• Shaw K, Gennat H, O’Rourke P, Del Mar C (2006) Exercise foroverweight or obesity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 4: CD003817.
• Smith S (2013) Determining sample size: How to ensure you get the correct sample size. Erişim: Nisan 10, 2014, http://www.qualtrics.com/blog/determining-sample-size/
• Sugiyama T, Giles-Corti B, Summers J, duToit L, Leslie E, Owen N (2013). Initiating and maintaining recreational walking: A longitudinal study on the influence of neighborhood green space. Preventive Medicine, 57: 178–182.
• Tamosiunas A, Grazuleviciene R, Luksiene D, Dedele A, Reklaitiene R, Baceviciene M, Vencloviene J, Bernotiene G, Radisauskas R, Malinauskiene V, Milinaviciene E, Bobak M, Peasey A, Nieuwenhuijsen M (2014) Accessibility and use of urban green spaces, and cardiovascular health: findings from a Kaunas cohort study. Environmental Health, 13(20).
• Taylor L M, Leslie E, Plotnikoff R, Owen N, Spence J (2008) Associations of perceived community environmental attributes with walking in a population-based sample of adults with Type 2 diabetes. Ann. Behav. Med, 35: 170–178.
• The World Bank (2011) Climate change, disaster risk, and the urban poor: Cities building resilience for a changing world. Washington, USA: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
• Tsatsoulis A, Fountoulakis S (2006) The protective role of exercise on stress system dysregulation and comorbidities. Stress, Obesity, and Metabolic Syndrome, 1083: 196–213.
• Ulrich R S (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman, & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human Behavior and Vol. 6: Behavior and Natural Environment (pp. 85-125). New York: Plenum.
• Ulrich R S, Simons R F, Losito B D, Fiorito E, Miles M A, Zelson M (1991) Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11: 201-230.
• US Department of Health and Human Services (1996). Physical activity and health: A report of the surge on general. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
• Warburton D E, Nicol C W, Bredin S S (2006) Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ, 174(6): 801-9.
• Ward Thompson C, Roe J, Aspinall P, Mitchell R, Clow A, Miller D (2012) More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: Evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105: 221–229.
• World Bank (2018) Turkey. The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/country/Turkey
• World Cities Culture Forum (2015) World cities culture peport. London: Mayor of London.
• World Cities Culture Report (2013) World cities culture peport. London: Mayor of London. http://www.worldcitiescultureforum.com/sites/default/files/publications/WCCR2013_low.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 17.06.2018