Inclusive Education for Hearing Impairment: Teacher Perspectives, Strategies and the Role of Educational Technologies

Öz

This study extensively explores the methodologies, technological aids (for example, smart board and projection devices) and pedagogical strategies (for example, creative drama) employed in the education of students with hearing impairments. Employing a qualitative methodology, the research assesses the effectiveness of the teaching strategies and technologies used by teachers to interact with hearing-impaired students. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, focusing on educational techniques that bolster the academic and social development of students with hearing disabilities. These findings illuminate the challenges teachers encounter in sourcing suitable materials and resources, effectively utilizing specialized communication techniques such as sign language and lip reading, and the pedagogical benefits derived from these efforts. The results of the study indicate that tailored strategies and technological tools aimed at the education of hearing-impaired students enable them to be more successful and confident within their educational frameworks. The efficacy of methods such as peer teaching, auditory and visual supports, which are used to facilitate the social and academic integration of hearing-impaired students, is underscored. Additionally, the teachers stated that throughout this process, they achieved various personal gains such as improved communication skills, increased capacity for empathy, and enhanced diversity in their instructional approaches. Furthermore, they reported improvements in their professional competencies, including adapting instructional materials, simplifying pedagogical methods, and developing strategies tailored to the needs of students with special educational needs. The research thoroughly examines how inclusive educational practices support the complete participation and social integration of students with hearing impairments, emphasizing the importance of continuous professional support and training for teachers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hearing impairment
• Educational technologies
• Special education teacher
• Inclusive education

Kapsayıcı Eğitimde İşitme Yetersizliği: Öğretmen Görüşleri, Stratejiler ve Eğitim Teknolojilerinin Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışma işitme yetersizliği olan öğrencilere yönelik eğitim süreçlerinde kullanılan yöntemler, teknolojik destekler (akıllı tahta ve projeksiyon vb.) ve pedagojik yaklaşımları (yaratıcı drama vb.) kapsamlı bir şekilde incelemektedir. Araştırma nitel bir metodoloji kullanarak, öğretmenlerin işitme engelli öğrencilerle etkileşimde kullanılan öğretim stratejileri ve teknolojilerin etkinliğini değerlendirmiştir. Çalışma derinlemesine ve odak grup görüşmeler yoluyla, işitme yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin akademik ve sosyal gelişimlerini destekleyen eğitim teknikleri üzerine veri toplamıştır. Bu veriler öğretmenlerin işitme yetersizliği olan öğrencilere uygun materyal ve kaynak bulma, özel iletişim yöntemleri olan işaret dili ve dudak okuma tekniklerini etkin kullanma zorluklarını ve bu süreçten elde edilen pedagojik kazanımları ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, işitme engelli öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik özelleştirilmiş stratejilerin ve teknolojik araçların, bu öğrencilerin eğitim süreçlerinde daha başarılı ve öz güvenli olmalarını sağladığını göstermektedir. Özellikle işitme engelli öğrencilerin sosyal ve akademik bütünleşmesini desteklemek için kullanılan akran öğretimi, işitsel ve görsel destekler gibi yöntemlerin etkinliği vurgulanmıştır. Ayrıca öğretmenler bu süreçte; iletişim becerilerinde gelişme, empati kurma yeteneklerinde artış ve öğretim yaklaşımlarında çeşitlilik sağlama gibi kişisel kazanımlar elde ettiklerini ve bunun yanında materyal uyarlama, pedagojik yöntemleri sadeleştirme ve özel gereksinimli öğrencilere uygun stratejiler geliştirme gibi mesleki yeterliliklerini artırdıklarını ifade etmiştir. Araştırma kapsayıcı eğitim uygulamalarının, işitme yetersizliği olan öğrencilerin eğitimde tam katılımlarını ve sosyal bütünleşmesini nasıl desteklediğini derinlemesine irdelerken, öğretmenlere yönelik sürekli profesyonel destek ve eğitimin önemini de vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşitme yetersizliği
• Eğitim teknolojileri
• Özel eğitim öğretmeni
• Kapsayıcı eğitim

Kaynakça

1. Accardo, A., Xin, J., & Shuff, M. (2020). Special education teacher preparation and family collaboration. School Community Journal, 30, 53–72.
2. Ain, Q. (2021). Inclusive education for students with hearing impairment in Pakistan: Communication & socialization challenges at higher education. UMT Education Review. https://doi.org/10.32350/uer.41.05
3. Ayan Ceyhan, M. (2016). Kapsayıcı eğitim: Okul pratikleri, öğretmen ihtiyaçları. ERG.
4. Aziz, F., Saeed, M. H., Raza, H., & Ilyas, M. (2020). Factors effecting motivation and satisfaction of teachers of hearing impaired. Pakistan Journal of Rehabilitation, 4(1), 29–36. https://ojs.zu.edu.pk/pjr/article/view/822
5. Bahng, J., & Han, W. (2023). Suggestions for successful inclusive education of hearing-impaired students through qualitative analysis. Audiology and Speech Research. https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.230106
6. Baş, T., & Akturan, U. (2008). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
7. Bell, D., & Foiret, J. (2020). A rapid review of the effect of assistive technology on the educational performance of students with impaired hearing. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15, 838–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1775317
8. Bell, F., Nicolai, L. (2017). School Psychological Practice with Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Students. In: Thielking, M., Terjesen, M. (eds) Handbook of Australian School Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45166-4_31

9. Belzile, J., & Öberg, G. (2012). Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Qualitative Research, 12, 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111433089
10. Brackett, D. (1997). Intervention for children with hearing impairment in general education settings. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 28(4), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2804.355
11. Bruce, S., DiNatale, P., & Ford, J. (2008). Meeting the needs of deaf and hard of hearing students with additional disabilities through professional teacher development. American Annals of the Deaf, 153, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.0.0058
12. Bulut, M., & Sarıçam, H. (2016). Okul öncesi öğretmen ve öğretmen adaylarında çokkültürlü kişiliğin çokkültürlü eğitim tutumları üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 295–322.
13. Cawthon, S. (2009). Professional development for teachers of students who are deaf or hard of hearing: Facing the assessment challenge. American Annals of the Deaf, 154, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/AAD.0.0073
14. Çokluk, Ö., Yılmaz, K., & Oğuz, E. (2011). A qualitative interview method: Focus group interview. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 4(1), 95–107. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/akukeg/issue/29342/313994
15. Darrow, A. (2007). Teaching students with hearing losses. General Music Today, 20, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/10483713070200020107
16. Deslandes, R., Royer, É., Potvin, P., & Leclerc, D. (1999). Patterns of home and school partnership for general and special education students at the secondary level. Exceptional Children, 65, 496–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299906500405
17. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
18. Faleh, A. B. U., Hatamleh, M., & Harafsheh, İ. (2023). The effect of using visual aids on learning some swimming skills among hearing-impaired individuals. International Journal of Disabilities Sports and Health Sciences, 6(3), 475–481.
19. Florian, L., Young, K., & Rouse, M. (2010). Preparing teachers for inclusive and diverse educational environments: Studying curricular reform in an initial teacher education course. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14, 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603111003778536
20. Fomina, M. (2021). Research of the readiness of university teachers to implement inclusive educational practice with students with disabled hearing opportunities. Vestnik of Minin University. https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2021-9-2-3
21. Gemeda, A. (2017). Major educational problems of the hearing impaired students and strategies for tackling them: The case of two schools in Ethiopia. The Global Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 6.
22. Genc, Z., Masalimova, A., Khairullina, E., Matvienko, V., Larionova, A., Tyazhelnikov, A., & Shaidullina, A. (2020). Analysis of documents published on mobile technology of hearing impaired in Web of Science database. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i23.18829
23. Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2003.10.001
24. Grash, N., Skuratovskaya, M., & Mamedova, E. (2021). Speech education of students with hearing impairment as a means of communication. E3S Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312091
25. Gudyanga, E., Wadesango, N., Hove, E., & Gudyanga, A. (2014). Challenges faced by students with hearing impairment in Bulawayo urban regular schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 445–445. https://doi.org/10.5901/MJSS.2014.V5N9P445
26. Guijarro, R. B. (2008). Conceptual framework of inclusive education [Conference presentation]. International Conference on Education, Inclusive Education: The Way of The Future, 25–28 November 2008, International Conference Centre, Geneva.
27. Gülcan, C. (2021). Nitel bir veri toplama aracı: Odak (focus) grup tekniğinin uygulanışı ve geçerliliği üzerine bir çalışma. Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(2), 94–109. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/meusbd/issue/63193/866942
28. Halcomb, E., Gholizadeh, L., DiGiacomo, M., Phillips, J., & Davidson, P. (2007). Literature review: Considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(6), 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2702.2006.01760.X
29. Hashim, H., Tasir, Z., & Mohamad, S. K. (2013). E-learning environment for hearing impaired students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 12(4), 67–70.
30. Hatamleh, M., Harafsheh, I., & Eid, F. (2023). Using visual aid tools on learning swimming skills among hearing-impaired individuals. International Journal of Disabilities Sports & Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1326091.
31. Jianghua, L. (2007). Construction of the comprehensive education model based on the language cognition for the deaf. Chinese Journal of Special Education.
32. Josilowski, C. (2019). Teachers' perceptions of the home-school collaboration: Enhancing learning for children with autism. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3408
33. Krasavina, Y. V., Serebryakova, Y. V., Ponomarenko, E. P., & Zhuykova, O. V. (2019). Research-based teaching of hearing-impaired students. Proceedings IFTE-2019, 1, 1387–1394. https://doi.org/10.3897/ap.1.e1316
34. Karuppannan, G., Sultan, F., Taising, R., & Yahya, L. (2021). Teaching strategies to teach hearing-impaired students at special education school in Sarawak, Malaysia. Innovare Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijoe.2021v9i5.42394
35. Keith, K., & Ross, E. (1998). Attitudes of a group of primary school teachers towards the educational inclusion of hearing-impaired learners in regular classrooms. The South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 45, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJCD.V45I1.717
36. Kisanga, D., Wambura, D., & Mwalongo, F. (2018). Exploring assistive technology tools and e-learning user interface in Tanzania's vocational education institutions. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14, 50–71.
37. Kulhade, P., & Kumar, A. (2022). Challenges faced by students with hearing impairment in an inclusive setup (special reference to Jaipur, Rajasthan). Towards Excellence. https://doi.org/10.37867/te1402167
38. Kumari, M. (2022). Inclusive education scope and challenges in 2022. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.810.6
39. Lancheros-Cuesta, D., Roncancio, L., & Varela, J. (2021). Augmentative alternative communication system in educational inclusion. In 2021 16th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI52073.2021.9476663
40. Latunde, Y., & Louque, A. (2012). Investing in collaboration: Preservice special educators and their readiness for home school collaboration. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 8, 73–82.
41. Li, L., & Miloň, P. (2022). Inclusive education of students with hearing impairment. EduPort. https://doi.org/10.21062/edp.2022.002
42. Liu, C., & Hong, Y. (2007). Providing hearing-impaired students with learning care after classes through smart phones and the GPRS network. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38, 727–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00656.x
43. Lo, L. (2009). Collaborating with Chinese families of children with hearing impairments. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 30, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740108324041
44. Luckner, J. (2006). Evidence-based practices with students who are deaf. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 28, 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401060280010801
45. Luckner, J., Rude, H., & Sileo, T. (1989). Collaborative consultation: A method for improving educational services for mainstreamed students who are hearing impaired. American Annals of the Deaf, 134, 301–304. https://doi.org/10.1353/AAD.2012.0535
46. Mandasini, A. (2022). Improving the validity of scientific research results through research methodology management. Kontigensi: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen. https://doi.org/10.56457/jimk.v10i2.389
47. Maunganidze, L., Kasayira, J., Ruhode, N., Shonhiwa, L., & Sodi, T. (2007). Teacher attitudes towards the inclusion of children with mild hearing impairments into the regular school settings. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 17, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2007.10820160
48. McLinden, M., & McCracken, W. (2016). Review of the visiting teachers service for children with hearing and visual impairment in supporting inclusive educational practice in Ireland: Examining stakeholder feedback through an ecological systems theory. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31, 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1194570
49. Mertens, D. M. (1990). Guidelines for Science Programs for Hearing Impaired Adolescents.
50. Mihić, S., Sanja, N. V., & Šokić, M. (2018). Stavovi odgajatelja i učitelja prema inkluziji djece s oštećenjem sluha. Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja, 54(1), 69–82.
51. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
52. Mingsiritham, K., & Chanyawudhiwan, G. (2020). Experiment of the prototype of online learning resources on massive open online course (MOOC) to develop life skills in using technology media for hearing impaired students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.12059
53. Morgan, D., & Spanish, M. (1984). Focus groups: A new tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 7, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987314
54. Mpofu, J., & Chimhenga, S. (2013). Challenges faced by hearing impaired pupils in learning: A case study of King George VI Memorial School. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0216974
55. Musyoka, M., & Clark, M. (2017). Teachers' perceptions of individualized education program (IEP) goals and related services. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29, 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10882-015-9462-0
56. Na, X. (2007). Inclusive education as a new approach to the early rehabilitation of hearing-impaired children. Chinese Scientific Journal of Hearing and Speech Rehabilitation.
57. Netherton, D., & Deal, W. (2006). Assistive technology in the classroom. Technology Teacher, 66, 10.
58. Palinkas, L., Horwitz, S., Green, C., Wisdom, J., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
59. Parmar, M., & Arun, A. (2023). Survey on knowledge and attitudes toward hearing loss and assistive listening technology among educational professionals. Journal of Indian Speech Language & Hearing Association, 37, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisha.jisha_4_23
60. Polvanov, J. (2023). Effective methods of teaching hearing impaired children. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Research. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/volume03issue05-22
61. Prakash, S. (2012). Inclusion of children hearing impairment in schools: A survey on teachers' attitudes. Disability, CBR and Inclusive Development, 23, 90–111. https://doi.org/10.5463/DCID.V23I3.117
62. Rieser, R. (2008). Implementing inclusive education: A Commonwealth guide to implementing Article 24 of the UN Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. Commonwealth Secretariat.
63. Rong, Y., & Qian, W. (2023). A Review Study of Inclusive Education. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/16/20231143.
64. Royer, D. (2017). My IEP: A student-directed individualized education program model. Exceptionality, 25, 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1216850
65. Sabiq, A. H., & Sukirno, M. A. (2020). Visual media utilization in mastering English vocabulary of hearing-impaired students. Insania: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 25(2), 162–173. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v25i2.3911
66. Sánchez, P. A., de Haro-Rodríguez, R., & Martínez, R. M. (2019). Barriers to student learning and participation in an inclusive school as perceived by future education professionals. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(1), 18–24.
67. Sasikala, J., Saraswathi, M., & Ravichandran, T. (2023). Attitude towards self-learning package among hearing impaired schoolteachers. Paripex Indian Journal of Research. https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex/0502961
68. Shamsideen, S. (2016). Impact of audio-visual materials in the dissemination of knowledge for facilitators in some selected literacy centres in Oshodi/Isolo Local Government Area. African Educational Research Journal, 4, 19–24.
69. Shields, M., & Lennox, M. (2017). Strategies to address educational needs of students who are deaf or hard of hearing. TEACH Journal of Christian Education. https://doi.org/10.55254/1835-1492.1357
70. Silvestri, J. A., & Hartman, M. C. (2022). Inclusion and deaf and hard of hearing students: Finding asylum in the LRE. Education Sciences, 12(11), 773.
71. Simkiss, D. (2013). Education of children with hearing impairment. Paediatrics and Child Health, 23, 434–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAED.2013.04.011
72. Sook, C., & Park, W. (2012). Inclusion strategy for hearing impaired students with community of knowledge. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2012.10.11.579
73. Srikantaswamy, D. (2021). Techniques for Teaching Students with Hearing Impairment. International Journal of Educational Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijesrdec20213
74. Stepanović, S., & Živković, J. (2020). Working with pupils with hearing impairments in an inclusive education: Characteristics and competences. Human: Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(1).
75. Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063
76. Suzianti, A., & Atthousi, H. (2019). Implementation of design thinking approach in designing learning support tools in the classroom for hearing impaired person: Case study: Elementary school students in SLB-B Santi Rama. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on E-business and Mobile Commerce. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332324.3332338
77. Şahsuvaroğlu, T., & Ekşi, H. (2013). Odak grup görüşmeleri ve sosyal temsiller kuramı. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 28(28), 127–139. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maruaebd/issue/367/2097
78. Tang, K., & Davis, A. (1995). Critical factors in the determination of focus group size. Family Practice, 12(4), 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/FAMPRA/12.4.474
79. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
80. Uçar, S., & Karadağ, E. (2021). Ay'ın evreleri ve oluşumu konusunda işitme engelli öğrencilerin kavram değişimlerinin incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Education, 40(2).
81. Umoh, P. (2020). Teachers Characteristics and Academic Performance of Students With Hearing Impairment in Special Education Centre Ibom Layout, Cross River State. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3568528.
82. UNICEF & UNESCO. (2007). A human rights-based approach to Education for All: A framework for the realization of children's right to education and rights within education. United Nations Children's Fund ve UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001548/154861e.pdf
83. Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6, 100. https://doi.org/10.5430/JNEP.V6N5P100
84. Walden, V. (2015). Conducting Focus Groups. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529716610.n4.
85. Zorn, T., Roper, J., Broadfoot, K., & Weaver, K. (2006). Focus groups as sites of influential interaction: Building communicative self-efficacy and effecting attitudinal change in discussing controversial topics. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600573965