Contextual Analysis of Proofs Without Words Skills of Pre-service Secondary Mathematics Teachers: Sum of Integers from 1 to n Case

Öz

Recently, studies have been carried out on alternative proof methods due to the change in the perspective of teaching proof and the difficulties of learners in proof. In this context, proof without words, which are presented as an alternative to proof teaching, defined by diagrams or visual representations and require the student to explain how proof is, are discussed in this study. The aim of this study is to examine pre-service mathematics teachers' explanations of proof without words about the sum of consecutive numbers from 1 to n. The data were collected by the proof of the sum of consecutive integers. 27 pre-service teachers from a university in the Middle Anatolia region participated in this study, which was conducted using a basic qualitative research design. At the end of the study, it was seen that most of the pre-service teachers were unable to explain the proof without words of the sum of integers from 1 to n. One of the reason for this may be related to the spatial thinking skills of pre-service teachers. However, there are pre-service teachers who can interpret the visual given in the proof correctly, use the necessary mathematical knowledge, but cannot generalize using the given visual. The reasons why the pre-service teachers could not express the general situation are considered as the lack of algebraic thinking.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Proof
• Proof teaching
• Proof without words
• Visual proof

Ortaöğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Sözsüz İspat Becerilerinin Bağlamsal İncelenmesi: 1’den n’ye Kadar Olan Tamsayıların Toplamı Durumu

Öz

İspata yönelik algının son dönemlerde değişmesi ve öğrenenlerin ispatta zorlanmalarından dolayı alternatif ispat yolları ile ilgili araştırmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, ispat öğretimine alternatif bir yol olarak sunulan, ispatın doğruluğunu göstermekle beraber öğrencinin ispatı açıklamasını gerektiren diyagram veya resimler olarak tanımlanan sözsüz ispatlardan biri bu çalışmada ele alınmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının 1'den n'ye kadar olan ardışık tamsayıların toplamının sözsüz ispatına yönelik açıklamalarını incelemektir. Veriler, ardışık tamsayılar toplamının sözsüz ispatı ile toplanmıştır. Temel nitel araştırma deseninde gerçekleştirilen bu araştırmaya İç Anadolu Bölgesi'ndeki bir üniversiteden 27 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonucunda matematik öğretmen adaylarının çoğunun, ardışık tamsayıların toplamı ile ilgili verilen sözsüz ispatı açıklayamadıkları görülmüştür. Bu durumun nedenlerinden birisi öğretmen adaylarının uzamsal düşünme yetenekleridir. Bununla birlikte öğretmen adaylarından sözsüz ispattaki görseli doğru biçimde yorumlayabilen, gerekli olan matematiksel bilgiyi kullanabilen ancak verilen görseli genelleyemeyenler de bulunmaktadır. Öğretmen adaylarının genel durumu ifade edememelerinin nedenleri cebirsel düşünme eksikliği olarak değerlendirilebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İspat
• İspat öğretimi
• Sözsüz ispatlar
• Görsel ispatlar

Kaynakça

1. Almeida, D. (1996). Variation in proof standards: Implication for mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 27, 659–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739960270504
2. Alsina, C., & Nelsen R. (2010). An invitation to proofs without words. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 3(1), 118-127. http://www.labjor.unicamp.br/comciencia/files/matematica/ar_roger/ar_roger.pdf
3. Arslan, C. (2007). The development of elementary school students on their reasoning and proof ideas. (Publication No. 210145) [Doctoral dissertation, Uludag University]. Available from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
4. Altun, M. (2014). Liselerde matematik öğretimi. (5. ed). Aktüel Yayıncılık.
5. Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils' practice of school mathematics (D. En Pimm, Ed.). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
6. Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof. In L. I. Tatsien (Ed.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, (pp. 907–920). Beijing. https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0305021.pdf
7. Bardelle, C. (2010). Visual proofs: An experiment. In V. Durand-Guerrier et al (Eds.), CERME6, (251-260). Lyon. France. http://ife.ens-lyon.fr/publications/edition-electronique/cerme6/wg2-08- bardelle.pdf
8. Bell, C. J. (2011). Proof without words: A visual application of reasoning. Mathematics Teachers, 104(9), 690–695. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.104.9.0690 Birinci, K. S. (2010). Investigation of mathematics teacher candidates’ proof processes in terms of process-object relationship (Publication No.279855) [Master’s thesis, Marmara University]. Available from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.

9. Britz, T., Mammoliti, A. & Sørensen, H. K. (2014). Proof by picture: A selection of nice picture proofs. Parabola, 50(3), 1-8.
10. Brown, J. R. (1997). Proofs and pictures. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 161-180. https://faculty.unlv.edu/jwood/unlv/Articles/Brown.pdf
11. Cain, A.J. (2019). Visual thinking and simplicity of proof. Philosophical Transactions A. 377, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0032
12. Davis, P.J. (1993). Visual theorems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273369
13. Dove, I. (2002). Can pictures prove? Logique & Analyze, 45(179), 309-340.
14. Demircioglu, H., & Polat, K. (2015). Secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ opinions about proof without words. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 41, 233-254. https://doi.org/10.9761/JASSS3171
15. Demircioglu, H., & Polat, K. (2016). Secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ opinions about the difficulties with “proof without words”. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 4(7), 82-99.
16. Dogan, M. F. (2019). The nature of middle school ın-service teachers’ engagements in proving-related activities. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(1), 100-130. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.442893
17. Dogan, M.F. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ criteria for evaluating mathematical arguments that include generic examples. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 267-279. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.721136
18. Dogan, M. F., & Williams-Pierce, C. (2021). The role of generic examples in teachers’ proving activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics,106, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10002-3
19. Doyle, T., Kutler, L., Miller, R., Schueller, A. (2014). Proof without words and beyond. Mathematical Association of America. https://doi:10.4169/convergence20140801
20. Duval R. (1999). Representation, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.). Proceedings of the twenty-first annual meeting of the north American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 1, 3-26. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED466379.pdf
21. Flores, A. (2000). Geometric representations in the transition from arithmetic to algebra. In F. Hitt (Ed.). Representation and mathematics Visualization (pp. 9-29).
22. Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics: An epistemological study. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285945.001.0001
23. Gierdien, F. (2007). From “Proofs without words” to “Proofs that explain” in secondary mathematics. Pythagoras, 65, 53 – 62. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v0i65.92
24. Güler, G., & Ekmekci, S. (2016). Examination of the proof evaluation skills of the prospective mathematics teachers: The example of sum of successive odd numbers. Journal of Bayburt Education Faculty, 11(1), 60-81.
25. Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6-13.
26. Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, Explanation and Exploration: An Overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012737223465
27. Heinze, A., & Reiss, K. (2004). The teaching of proof at lower secondary level—a video study. ZDM International Journal on Mathematics Education, 36(3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652777
28. Jamnik, M., Bundy, A., & Green, I. (1997). Automation of diagrammatic reasoning. 15th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, 1, 528–533. San Mateo, CA. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mj201/publications/pub873.drii-ijcai1997.pdf
29. Kristiyajati, A. & Wijaya, A. (2018). Teachers' perception on the use of "Proof without Words (PWWs)" visualization of arithmetic sequences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012144
30. Kulpa, Z. (2009). Main problems with diagrammatic reasoning. Part 1: The generalization problem. Foundations of Science, 14(1–2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9148-5
31. Lam, T. T. (2007) Contextual approach in teaching mathematics: An example using the sum of series of positive integers, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(2), 273-282, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390600913376
32. Larson, L.C. (1985). A discrete look at 1+2+ ...+n. The College Mathematics Journal, 16, 369-382. https://doi.org/10.2307/2686996
33. Marrades, R., & Gutierrez A. (2000). Proofs produced by secondary school students learning geometry in a dynamic computer environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics 44, 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012785106627
34. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bernarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65-86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1732-3_5
35. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber (Çev. Ed. Selahattin Turan). Nobel Yayıncılık.
36. Miller, R. L. (2012). On proofs without words. http://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/SeniorProjectArchive/2012/Miller.pdf
37. Nelsen. R. (1993). Proofs without words: Exercises in visual thinking. Mathematical Association of America.
38. Nelsen. R (2000). Proofs without words II: More exercises in visual thinking. Mathematical Association of America.
39. Ugurel, I., Morali, H. S., Karahan, Ö., & Boz, B. (2016). Mathematically gifted high school students’ approaches to developing visual proofs (VP) and preliminary ideas about VP. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(3), 174-197. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.61686
40. Polat, K. (2018). Proofs without words as an alternative proof method: Investigating of high school students’ proof skills. (Publication No.503666) [Doctoral dissertation, Ataturk University]. Available from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
41. Polat, K. & Akgün, L. (2020). Examining the processes of high school students to do proof without words. Education Reform Journal, 5(1), 8-26. https://doi.org/10.22596/erj2020.05.01.8.26
42. Presmeg, N., C. (1986). Visualization in high school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 6(3), 42-46.
43. Rinvold, R. A., & Lorange, A. (2011). Multimodal derivation and proof in algebra. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland & E. Swoboda (Eds.). Proceedings of CERME 7, 233-242, Poland. http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG1/WG1_Rinvold.pdf
44. Rodd, M. M. (2000). On mathematical warrants: Proof does not always warrant, and a warrant may be other than a proof. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(3), 221–244. https://doi.org 10.1207/S15327833MTL0203_4
45. Thornton, S. (2001). A picture is worth a thousand words. http://math.unipa.it/grim/AThornton251.PDF