ARA ALÜMİNYUM LEVHALAR İÇEREN FARKLI DİZİLİME SAHİP DOKUMA HİBRİT METALİK KUMAŞLARDA MEKANİK ÖZELLİKLERİN KARŞILAŞTIRMASI

Yıl 2024, , 1 - 17, 30.04.2024

Ali İhsan Kaya , Kaan Emre Engin , Şerif Çitil

https://doi.org/10.54365/adyumbd.1384174

Öz

Bu çalışmada, 0.2 mm kalınlığında Alüminyum (Al) 1005 H14 malzeme ve polietilen misina (PL) kullanılarak geleneksel dokuma yöntemi ile hibrit metalik kumaşlar üretilmiştir. Hibrit metalik kumaşların üretimi sırasında çözgü olarak misina, atkı olarak ise aynı kalınlıkta Al 1005 H14 teli kullanılmıştır. Üretilen kumaşlar 30 mm genişlik ve 300 mm uzunluk boyutlarına sahip katmanlar halinde kesilmiştir. Her katman FM® 73M yapısal yapıştırıcı kullanılarak yapıştırılmıştır. Al 5005 H34 ara levha parçası ile katmanların farklı dizilimlerde olduğu hibrit kompozitlerin laminatların imalatı yapılmıştır. Elde edilen laminatlar, ısı kontrollü bir hidrolik preste ek basınç uygulanarak kürlenmiş, sonrasında numuneler ASTM D3039 standardına göre bir testere ile çekme testi için kesilmiştir. Al 5005 H34 ara malzemesinin ağırlık üzerindeki etkisi belirlenmiştir. Her bir laminat grubundan üçer numunenin çekme testi gerçekleştirilmiş ve sonuçlar analiz edilmiştir. Al 1005 H14 ve PL içeren kumaşların başarılı olabileceği görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hibrit metalik kumaş, FM® 73M Yapısal Yapıştırıcı, Alüminyum, Polietilen misina, Dokuma

Destekleyen Kurum

Adıyaman Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Proje Numarası

MÜFMAP/2021-0001

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma Adıyaman Üniversitesi bilimsel araştırma projeleri koordinatörlüğü birimi tarafından MÜFMAP/2021-0001 proje numarasıyla desteklenmiştir. Yazarlar ayrıca Türk Hava Yolları yöneticilerine yapısal film yapıştırıcısını bağışladıkları için teşekkürlerini sunarlar.

COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF WOVEN HYBRID METALLIC FABRICS WITH DIFFERENT ARRANGEMENT OF INTERMEDIATE ALUMINUM SHEETS

Öz

In this study, hybrid metallic fabrics were produced by traditional weaving method using 0.2 mm thick Aluminum (Al) 1005 H14 material and polyethylene fishing line (PL). During the production of hybrid metallic fabrics, fishing line was used as warp and Al 1005 H14 wire of the same thickness was used as weft. The fabrics were cut into layers with dimensions of 30 mm width and 300 mm length. Each layer was bonded using FM® 73M structural adhesive. Laminates of hybrid composites with different arrangement of layers were fabricated with Al 5005 H34 spacer sheet. The resulting laminates were cured by applying additional pressure in a temperature-controlled hydraulic press, after which the specimens were cut for tensile testing with a saw according to ASTM D3039 standard. The effect of the Al 5005 H34 intermediate material on weight was determined. Three specimens from each laminate group were tensile tested and the results analyzed. It was found that fabrics containing Al 1005 H14 and PL can be successful.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hybrid metallic fabric, FM® 73M Structural Adhesive, Aluminum, Polyethylene fishing line, Weaving

Proje Numarası

MÜFMAP/2021-0001

Kaynakça

• Çitil Ş. Eğrisel yüzeyli yapıştırma bağlantılarında malzemenin yapıştırıcı üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi 2018;9(1):225-234.
• Da Silva LFM, Marques EAS. Joint strength optimization of adhesively bonded patches. J. Adhesion 2008; 84:915–934.
• Apalak MK, Engin A. Geometrically non-linear analysis of adhesively bonded double containment cantilever joint. Journal of Adhesion Science Technology 1997;11(9):1153-1195.
• Kweon JH, Jung JW, Kim TH, Choi JH, Kim DH. Failure of carbon composite-to-aluminum joints with combined mechanical fastening and adhesive bonding. Composite Structures 2006;75(1-4):192-198.
• Kairouz K C, Matthews F L. Strength and failure modes of bonded single lap joints between cross-ply adherends. Composites 1993; 24(6): 475-484.
• Da Silva LFM, Carbas RJC, Critchlowb GW, Figueiredo MAV, Brown K. (2009). Effect of material, geometry, surface treatment and environment on the shear strength of single lap joints, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 2009;29:621–632.
• Çitil Ş, Ayaz Y, Temiz Ş. Stress analysis of adhesively bonded double strap joints with or without intermediate part subjected to tensile loading. The Journal of Adhesion, 2017;93(5):343-356.
• Çitil Ş. Comparison of stepped, curved, and S-Type lap joints under tensile loading. In Materials Design and Applications, Springer, Cham; 2017.
• Boutar Y, Naïmi S, Mezlini S, Ali MBS. Effect of surface treatment on the shear strength of aluminium adhesive single-lap joints for automotive applications. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2016; 67:38-43.
• Naat N, Boutar Y, Naïmi S, Mezlini S, Da Silva LFM. Effect of surface texture on the mechanical performance of bonded joints: a review. The Journal of Adhesion 2021:1-93.
• Layec J, Ansart F, Duluard S, Turq V, Aufray M, Labeau MP. Development of new surface treatments for the adhesive bonding of aluminum surfaces. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2021:103006.
• Reneckis V, Vilutis A, Jankauskas V. Investigation of technological factors influencing the strength of bonded Al–alloy. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021;1140(1):012042.
• Ribeiro TEA, Campilho RDSG, Da Silva LF, Goglio L. Damage analysis of composite–aluminium adhesively-bonded single-lap joints. Composite Structures 2016;136:25-33.
• Thomas R, Fischer F, Gude M. Adhesives for increasing the bonding strength of in situ manufactured metal-composite joints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 2021;235(13):3256-3269.
• Banea MD, Rosioara M, Carbas RJC, Da Silva, LFM. Multi-material adhesive joints for automotive industry. Composites Part B: Engineering 2018;151:71-77.
• Dos Santos DG, Carbas RJC, Marques EAS, Da Silva LFM. Reinforcement of CFRP joints with fibre metal laminates and additional adhesive layers. Composites Part B: Engineering 2019;165:386-396.
• Hu Y, Yuan B, Cheng F, Hu X. NaOH etching and resin pre-coating treatments for stronger adhesive bonding between CFRP and aluminium alloy. Composites Part B: Engineering 2019;178:107478.
• Gültekin K, Akpinar S, Özel A, Öner GA. Effects of unbalance on the adhesively bonded composites-aluminium joints. The Journal of Adhesion 2017;93(9):674-687.
• Gültekin K, Yazici ME. Mechanical properties of aluminum bonded joints reinforced with functionalized boron nitride and boron carbide nanoparticles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications 2022;236(1):37-49.
• Pramanik A, Basak AK, Dong Y, Sarker PK, Uddin MS, Littlefair G, Chattopadhyaya S. Joining of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and aluminium alloys–A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2017;101:1-29.
• Marannano G, Zuccarello B. Numerical experimental analysis of hybrid double lap aluminum-CFRP joints. Composites Part B: Engineering 2015;71:28-39.
• Çitil Ş. Experimental and numerical investigation of adhesively bonded curved lap joints under three-point bending. Mechanics 2018;24(6):824-832.
• Zamani P, Jaamialahmadi A, Da Silva LF. The influence of GNP and nano-silica additives on fatigue life and crack initiation phase of Al-GFRP bonded lap joints subjected to four-point bending. Composites Part B: Engineering 2021;207:108589.
• Sun G, Liu X, Zheng G, Gong Z, Li Q. On fracture characteristics of adhesive joints with dissimilar materials–An experimental study using digital image correlation (DIC) technique. Composite Structures 2018;201:1056-1075.
• Reddy NS, Jinaga UK, Charuku BR, Penumakala PK, Prasad AS. Failure analysis of AA8011-pultruded GFRP adhesively bonded similar and dissimilar joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 2019; 90: 97-105.
• Cakir MV, Kinay D. MWCNT, nano‐silica, and nano‐clay additives effects on adhesion performance of dissimilar materials bonded joints. Polymer Composites 2021; 42(11): 5880-5892.
• Carbas RJC, Marques EAS, da Silva LFM. The influence of epoxy adhesive toughness on the strength of hybrid laminate adhesive joints. Applied Adhesion Science 2021; 9(1): 1-14.
• Morgado MA, Carbas RJC, Marques EAS, da Silva LFM. Reinforcement of CFRP single lap joints using metal laminates. Composite Structures 2019; 230: 111492.
• Solvay. Properties of FM73M. https://www.solvay.com/en/product/fm-73. (Access date: 01.09.2023).
• Cavezza F, Boehm M, Terryn H, Hauffman T. A review on adhesively bonded aluminium joints in the automotive industry. Metals 2020; 10(6): 730.
• Kuczmaszewski J. Fundamentals of metal-metal adhesive joint design. Lublin University of Technology, Poland. 2006.
• Davis M, Bond D. Principles and practices of adhesive bonded structural joints and repairs. International journal of adhesion and adhesives 1999;19(2-3): 91-105.
• Pethrick RA. Design and ageing of adhesives for structural adhesive bonding–a review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: design and applications, 2015; 229(5): 349-379.
• Da Silva LFM, Lopes MCQ. Joint strength optimization by the mixed-adhesive technique, International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 2009; 29: 509–514.
• Adams RD, Harris JA. Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints, The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 1974; 9(3): 185-196.
• Engin KE, Kaya AI, Citil S. Investigation of mechanical properties of woven hybrid metallic fabric. In 2nd International Conference on Industrial Applications of Adhesives 2022: Selected Contributions of IAA 2022, 2022; 2:115-133.
• Seong MS, Kim TH, Nguyen KH, Kweon JH, Choi J. H. A parametric study on the failure of bonded single-lap joints of carbon composite and aluminum. Composite structures 2008; 86(1-3): 135-145.