" TEACHING" A PROFESSION BETWEEN SANCTITY AND CAPTIVITY: ISSUES, APPROACHES AND EXPECTATIONS

Öz

Education is accepted as one of the basic means of socio-economics improvement. It contains mutual effect of different dynamics and also difficulty from various sources due to its feature. They can be classified as the operation of the system, the factors related to students, and variables connected with institution and teachers. The purpose of this paper is to examine teachers' approach to problems of educational process and their professional and institutional commitment in this context. The teachers emphasized how the system is operated as a main source associated with troubles. Moreover, it was found that both the importance of institutional qualification and the factors related to student were stressed. In this process, in spite of the relative strength of their professional commitment; it was found that the decrease based on status and income, in terms of working enthusiasm

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Education, Teacher, Problems in Education System.

KUTSALLIKLA TUTSAKLIK ARASINDA BİR MESLEK ÖĞRETMENLİK:SORUNLAR, YAKLAŞIMLAR VE BEKLENTİLER

Öz

Eğitim, günümüzde sosyo-ekonomik gelişmenin temel araçlarından birisi olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu özelliği nedeniyle de farklı dinamiklerin etkileşimini ve değişik kaynaklardan beslenen sorunları da içermektedir. Bunlar, sistemin işleyişi, öğrenciyle ilişkili unsurlar, kurumsal ve öğretmenlerle bağlantılı değişkenler olarak sınıflandırılabilir. Yapılan araştırmada, öğretmenlerin eğitim sürecine yönelik sorunlara yaklaşımı ve bu bağlamda mesleki ve kurumsal bağlılıkları araştırılmıştır. Öğretmenler sorunlara ilişkin öncelikli kaynak olarak sistemin işleyişine vurgu yapmışlardır. Diğer yandan öğrenci bağlantılı faktörler ile kuruma ilişkin karakteristiğin önemi dile getirilmiştir. Bu süreçte öğretmenlerin mesleki tutumları incelendiğinde, mesleki bağlılıkların göreli güçlülüğüne rağmen çalışma şevki noktasında özellikle “gelir ve statü” kaynaklı sorunun yaşandığı tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim, eğitim sistemi, öğretmen, eğitimde sorunlar.

Kaynakça

1. ACHINSTEIN, B. and , S. Z. ATHANASES, (2005). “ Focusing New Teachers On Diversity And Equity: Toward A Knowledge Base For Mentors”, Teaching And Teacher Education. Volume: 21, Issue: 7, October, P. 843- 862
2. EARTMAN, G., and I. LEMASTERS, Linda, K. (2009). “Teacher Attitudes About Classroom ConditionS”, Journal Of Educational Administration. Volume: 47, Issue: 3.
3. EYAL, O. (2008). “When Parents Choose To Start Up A School”, Journal Of Educational Administration. Volume: 46, Issue: 1.
4. FALCH, T. and B. STROM. (2005).“Teacher Turnover And Non-Pecuniary Factors”, Economics Of Education Review. Volume: 24, Issue: 6, December , P. 611-631
5. GIGANTE, N., FIRESTONE, W. A. (2008). “Administrative Support and Teacher Leadership in Schools Implementing Reform”, Journal Of Educational Administration. Volume: 46, Issue: 3.
6. KOLLIAS, V., N. MAMALOUGOS, X. VAMVAKOUSSI, M. LAKKALA and S. VOSNIADOU. (2005), Teachers’ Attitudes To And Beliefs About Web-Based Collaborative Learning Environments İn The Context Of An İnternational İmplementation”, Computer & Education, Volume:45,Issue:3,November,P.295-315
7. LAKKALA, M. J.LALLIMO and K.HAKKARAINEN. (Teachers’ Pedagogical Designs For Technology-Supported Collective İnquiry: A National Case Study”, Computers & Education Volume: 45, Issue: 3, November, 2005, P. 337-356
8. LI, C. , HUNG, (2009).“Marketing Tactics And Parents’ Loyalty: The Mediating Role Of School Image”, Journal Of Educational Administration ,Volume : 47.

9. RIVKIN, S. G., HANUSHEK, E. A., & KAIN, J. F. (2001). “Teachers, Schools And Academic Achievement”, Revised Version Of NBER Working Paper 6691.
10. ROBERTS, L. W. (2009). “Measuring School Facility Conditions: An Illustration Of The Importance Of Purpose”, Journal Of Educational Administration, Volume: 47.
11. SANDS, D., Iand L. D. GOODWIN (2005). “Shared Responsibility For Teacher Preparation: An Exploratory Study Of The Match Between Skills Of Clinical Teachers And Those Required Of Their Teacher Candidates”, Teaching And Teacher Education, Volume: 21, Issue: 7, October, P. 817-828
12. SEZGİN, F.. (2009). “Relationships Between Teacher Organizational Commitment, Psychological Hardiness And Some Demographic Variables In Turkish Primary Schools”, Journal Of Educational Administration, Volume: 47.
13. TANNER, C, Kenneth. (2009). “Effects Of School Design On Student Outcomes”, Journal Of Educational Administration, Volume: 47, Issue: 3.
14. TORUM, O. (2003). “Kurumsal Eğitimde Eğitişim ve Oyunlar, THY’de Örnek Uygulama” , UTED Dergisi, Sayı: 139, Haziran, s:38–41.
15. WHEATLEY, K. F. (2005). “The Case For Reconceptualizing Teacher Efficacy Research”, Teaching And Teacher Education ,Volume: 21, Issue: 7 , P. 747-766
16. YILMAZ, K., M. TAŞDAN. (2009). “Organizational Citizenship and Organizational Justice in Turkish Primary Schools”, Journal Of Educational Administration, Volume: 47.