THE INTERPLAY AMONG GREEN INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR, PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY, GREEN SHARED VISION, AND GREEN MARKET ORIENTATION OF EXPORTING FIRMS

Öz

This integrative study unveils and highlights the mechanism in which green innovative working behaviors of export department employees mediate the relationship between green shared vision and green market orientation, which is regulated by the extent of psychological safety. As a multilevel study, the sample captures 107 firms at organizational level and 215 employees at individual level questionnaires. The structural equation modelling by PLS is employed to test the developed hypotheses. The results reveal the importance of the green shared vision for green innovative working behavior and green market orientation, and the boosting effect of psychological safety on the relationship between green innovative working behavior and green market orientation. This study offers an in-depth understanding regarding the vital role of human capital in value creation through disclosing the role of export department employees in these interrelationships with a sustainable lens, which makes a contribution to microfoundational approach in the context of exporting.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Green Shared Vision
• Green Innovative Work Behavior
• Green Market Orientation
• Psychological Safety

Yeşil Yenilikçi Çalışma Davranışı, Psikolojik Güvenlik, Yeşil Paylaşımlı Vizyon ve İhracatçı Firmaların Yeşil Pazar Yönelimi Arasındaki Etkileşim: Mikro Temel Yaklaşım

Öz

Mikro temel yaklaşımdan yararlanan bu bütünleştirici çalışma, ihracat departmanı çalışanlarının yeşil yenilikçi çalışma davranışlarının, psikolojik güvenliğin derecesi tarafından düzenlenen yeşil paylaşımlı vizyon ve yeşil pazar yönelimi arasındaki ilişkiye nasıl aracılık ettiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Çok seviyeli bir çalışma olarak, örneklem, organizasyon düzeyinde 107 firmayı ve bireysel düzeyde 215 çalışanı kapsamaktadır. Geliştirilen hipotezleri test etmek için PLS tarafından yapılan yapısal denklem modellemesi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, yeşil paylaşımlı vizyonun yeşil yenilikçi çalışma davranışı ve yeşil pazar yönelimi için önemini ve psikolojik güvenliğin yeşil yenilikçi çalışma davranışı ile yeşil pazar yönelimi arasındaki ilişki üzerinde artırıcı etkisini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, ihracat departmanı çalışanlarının bu karşılıklı ilişkilerdeki hayati rolünü sürdürülebilir bir bakış açısıyla ortaya koyarak, değer yaratmada insan sermayesinin önemli rolünü derinlemesine anlaşılmasını sağlayarak ihracat bağlamında mikro temelli yaklaşıma katkıda bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yeşil Paylaşılan Vizyon
• Yeşil Yenilikçi Çalışma Davranışı
• Yeşil Pazar Yönelimi
• Mikro Temel
• Psikolojik Güvenlik

Kaynakça

1. Ahmad, S. (2015). Green human resource management: policies and practices. Cogent Business & Management, 2(1),1-13. http://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1030817
2. Ahmad, I., Donia, M. B., & Shahzad, K. (2019). Impact of corporate social responsibility attributions on employees’ creative performance: The mediating role of psychological safety. Ethics & Behavior, 29(6), 490-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1501566
3. Afsar, B., Masood, M., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). The role of job crafting and knowledge sharing on the effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Personnel Review, 48(5), 1186-1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2018-0133
4. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256995
5. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 41 1-423.
6. Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.179
7. Banerjee, S. B., Iyer, E. S., & Kashyap, R. K. (2003). Corporate environmentalism: Antecedents and influence of industry type. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 106-122.
8. Barney, J. A. Y., & Felin, T. (2013). What are microfoundations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 138-155. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43822016

9. Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., & Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.006
10. Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
11. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234-246.
12. Chen, J. H., & Wu, S. I. (2015). A comparison of green business relationship models between industry types. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(7-8), 778-792. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.884309
13. Chen, Y. S., & Chang, C. H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 489-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0
14. Chen, Y. S., Chang, C. H., Yeh, S. L., & Cheng, H. I. (2015). Green shared vision and green creativity: The mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy. Quality & Quantity, 49(3), 1169-1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0041-8
15. Cheng, C. C., & Krumwiede, D. (2012). The role of service innovation in the market orientation—new service performance linkage. Technovation, 32(7-8), 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.03.006
16. Chowhan, J. (2016). Unpacking the black box: understanding the relationship between strategy, HRM practices, innovation and organizational performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12097
17. Dediu, V., Leka, S., & Jain, A. (2018). Job demands, job resources and innovative work behaviour: a European Union study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27(3), 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1444604
18. DiLiello, T. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Maximizing organizational leadership capacity for the future: Toward a model of self‐leadership, innovation and creativity. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(4), 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663114
19. Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21792
20. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/ 0001 -8392/99/4402-0350
21. Eldor, L. (2020). How collective engagement creates competitive advantage for organizations: A business‐level model of shared vision, competitive intensity, and service performance. Journal of Management Studies, 57(2), 177-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12438
22. Felin, T., & Foss, N. J. (2005). Strategic organization: A field in search of micro-foundations. Strategic Organization, 3(4), 441-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055796
23. Foss, N. J., & Pedersen, T. (2019). Microfoundations in international management research: The case of knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1594-1621. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00270-4
24. Geng, R., Mansouri, S. A., & Aktas, E. (2017). The relationship between green supply chain management and performance: A meta-analysis of empirical evidences in Asian emerging economies. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.008
25. Hair, Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
26. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414-433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
27. Harman, G. H. (1967). Psychological aspects of the theory of syntax. The Journal of Philosophy, 64(2), 75-87. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2023773
28. He, P., Sun, R., Zhao, H., Zheng, L., & Shen, C. (2020). Linking work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships to knowledge hiding: a psychological safety lens. Asian Business & Management, 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00137-9
29. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
30. Hu, M.-L. M. (2009). Knowledge sharing and innovative service behavior relationship: Guanxi as mediator. Soc. Behav. Pers. 37, 977–992. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2009.37.7.977
31. Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007.
32. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
33. Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010
34. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
35. Katsikea, E. S., Theodosiou, M., Morgan, R. E., & Papavassiliou, N. (2005). Export market expansion strategies of direct-selling small and medium-sized firms: implications for export sales management activities. Journal of International Marketing, 13(2), 57-92. https://doi.org/ 1069-031X
36. Liu, Y., Fuller, B., Hester, K., Bennett, R. J., & Dickerson, M. S. (2017). Linking authentic leadership to subordinate behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(2), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2016-0327
37. Longoni, A., Luzzini, D., & Guerci, M. (2018). Deploying environmental management across functions: the relationship between green human resource management and green supply chain management. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 1081-1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3228-1
38. Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., ... & Hugé, J. (2015). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048
39. Moynihan, L. M., & Peterson, R. S. (2001). 7. A contingent configuration approach to understanding the role of personality in organizational groups. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 327-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23008-1
40. Navarro-García, A., Arenas-Gaitán, J., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., & Rey-Moreno, M. (2016). Global model of export performance: Moderator role of export department. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1880-1886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.073
41. Nunnally, J. C. (1982). Reliability of measurement. Encyclopedia of Educational Research, 4, 1589-1601.
42. Nybakk, E., Crespell, P., & Hansen, E. (2011). Climate for innovation and innovation strategy as drivers for success in the wood industry: moderation effects of firm size, industry sector, and country of operation. Silva Fennica, 45(3), 415-430. http://www.metla.fi/silvafennica/full/sf45/sf453415.pdf
43. Papadas, K. K., Avlonitis, G. J., & Carrigan, M. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 80, 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.024
44. Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human performance, 10(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_5
45. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
46. Potosky, D., & Ramakrishna, H. V. (2002). The moderating role of updating climate perceptions in the relationship between goal orientation, self-efficacy, and job performance. Human Performance, 15(3), 275-297. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1503_03
47. Rangus, K., & Černe, M. (2019). The impact of leadership influence tactics and employee openness toward others on innovation performance. R&D Management, 49(2), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12298
48. Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005
49. Ren, S., & Jackson, S. E. (2020). HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691
50. Renwick, D. W., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x
51. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
52. Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro‐environmental behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 176-194. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1820
53. Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898-921. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0291
54. Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, S., Khan, I., Tahir, M., & Afridi, M. A. (2019). Promoting employee's proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1694
55. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256701
56. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/17.658656
57. Singh, D. A. (2009). Export performance of emerging market firms. International Business Review, 18(4), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.03.002
58. Singh, S., Olugu, E. U., & Fallahpour, A. (2014). Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 16(5), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-013-0676-5
59. Sosik, J. J., & Dinger, S. L. (2007). Relationships between leadership style and vision content: The moderating role of need for social approval, self-monitoring, and need for social power. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(2), 134-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.01.004
60. Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). Transformational leadership and dimensions of creativity: Motivating idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_3
61. Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2012). Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance in SMEs: Empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 109, 483-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1141-1
62. Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
63. Vanalle, R. M., Ganga, G. M. D., Godinho Filho, M., & Lucato, W. C. (2017). Green supply chain management: An investigation of pressures, practices, and performance within the Brazilian automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 250-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.066