PERRE ANTİK KENTİ’NİN TURİZM POTANSİYELİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz

Adıyaman ili sınırları içinde yer alan ve kökleri Kommagene Krallığı’na kadar uzanan Perre Antik Kenti, Roma ve Bizans dönemlerinde de önemini korumuş önemli bir arkeolojik yerleşimdir. Kent; geniş nekropol alanı, su kanalları, mozaikler ve farklı dönemlerin kültürel katmanlarını yansıtan mimari kalıntılarla dikkat çekmektedir. Buna rağmen turizm açısından yeterli ilgiyi görememiştir. Bu çalışma, Perre’nin turizm potansiyelini değerlendirmekte ve özellikle son yıllarda ören yerinde gerçekleştirilen yenilikçi canlandırma projelerine odaklanmaktadır. Türkiye’de ilk kez bir ören yerinde uygulanan hologram teknolojisi, kültürel miras turizmi açısından dönüştürücü bir girişim olarak ele alınmaktadır. Çalışmada SWOT analizi yöntemiyle kentin güçlü ve zayıf yönleri ile karşı karşıya olduğu fırsatlar ve tehditler belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, Perre’nin turizm faaliyetlerine entegrasyonunun etkili tanıtım ve altyapı geliştirmeleriyle desteklenmesi durumunda yalnızca bölgesel kalkınmaya katkı sağlamakla kalmayacağını, aynı zamanda Türkiye’nin kültürel mirasının uluslararası görünürlüğünü de artıracağını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perre Antik Kenti
• Adıyaman
• Turizm Potansiyeli
• Kültür Turizmi

AN EVALUATION OF THE TOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PERRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE

Öz

Perre Ancient City, located within the borders of Adıyaman Province and tracing its origins back to the Kingdom of Commagene, is a significant archaeological settlement that maintained its importance during the Roman and Byzantine periods. The site is distinguished by its extensive necropolis, water channels, mosaics, and architectural remains reflecting the cultural layers of successive eras. Despite this richness, Perre has not received sufficient attention in terms of tourism. This study evaluates the tourism potential of Perre, with a particular focus on recent innovative revitalization projects carried out at the site. The pioneering implementation of hologram technology for the first time in an archaeological site in Turkey is considered a transformative initiative for cultural heritage tourism. Employing a SWOT analysis, the research identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the city as well as the opportunities and threats it faces. The findings indicate that integrating Perre into tourism activities—supported by effective promotion and infrastructural improvements—will not only contribute to regional development but also enhance the international visibility of Turkey’s cultural heritage.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perre Ancient City
• Adıyaman
• Tourism Potential
• Cultural Tourism

Kaynakça

1. Birinci, S., Kaymaz, Ç. K., & Camcı, A. (2018). Evaluation of the archaeological tourism potential of Göbekli Tepe (Şanlıurfa). Atatürk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 22(3), 1351–1367.
2. Blömer, M., & Crowther, C. (2014). Eagles on stags: An underground sanctuary in Perrhe, Commagene. Asia Minor Studien, 73, 343–371.
3. Cohen, E. (1995). Contemporary tourism—Trends and challenges: Sustainable authenticity or contrived postmodernity? In R. Butler & D. Pearce (Eds.), Change in tourism: People, places, processes. London: Routledge.
4. Ezer, S., Yağız, K., Özçiriş, M., & Zorlu, K. (2016). Archaeological survey of Adıyaman Province in the prehistoric and protohistoric periods (2014). In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Excavation, Research and Archaeometry Symposium (pp. 1–20). Ankara.
5. Ezer, S., İlhan, R., & Özçiriş, M. (2023). Archaeological survey of Adıyaman Province in the prehistoric and protohistoric periods (2021). In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Excavation, Research and Archaeometry Symposium (pp. 277–292). Ankara.
6. Erarslan, F. (2003). Rescue excavations of the rock-cut tombs in the necropolis area of Perre Ancient City. In Proceedings of the 13th Museum Studies and Rescue Excavations Symposium (pp. 129–136). Ankara.
7. Erarslan, F. (2009). With Nevruz Esma İnce & Mehmet Alkan. Excavations and cleaning works in the necropolis area of Perre Ancient City (2007). In Proceedings of the 17th Museum Studies and Rescue Excavations Symposium (pp. 171–194). Ankara.
8. Erarslan, F. (2010). With R. Özman, F. Şancı, M. Arslan, M. N. Karaca & M. Alkan. Excavations and cleaning works in the necropolis area of Perre Ancient City (2008). In Proceedings of the 18th Museum Studies and Rescue Excavations Symposium (pp. 91–104). Ankara.

9. Erarslan, F. (2011). With T. H. Zeyrek, R. Özman, F. Şancı, E. Akın, M. Arslan, M. Alkan, M. N. Karaca & M. S. Koca. Excavations and cleaning works in the necropolis area of Perre Ancient City (2009). In Proceedings of the 18th Museum Studies and Rescue Excavations Symposium (pp. 363–377). Ankara.
10. Goeldner, C. R., & Ritchie, J. R. B. (2006). Tourism: Principles, practices, philosophies. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
11. Gürbüzer, E. D., & Çalhan, Ö. (2024). Archaeoparks as open-air recreational areas: The case of Klaros. Anatolia: Journal of Tourism Research, 35(2), 222–235.
12. Mathieson, A., & Wall, G. (1982). Tourism: Economic, physical and social impacts. London: Longman. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. ICOMOS. (1999). International Cultural Tourism Charter: Managing Tourism at Places of Heritage Significance. Mexico: ICOMOS.
14. ICOMOS. (2008). The ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites (Ename Charter). Québec: ICOMOS.
15. Pacifico, D., & Vogel, M. (2012). Archaeological sites, modern communities, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1588–1611.
16. Ross, D., Saxena, G., Correia, F., & Deutz, P. (2017). Archaeological tourism: A creative approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 67, 37–47.
17. Seyhan, B., & Evcim, S. (2012). Tourism in Anatolia during Antiquity. In Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Tourism Research Congress (pp. 219–234).
18. Yağız, K., Alkan, M., Turan, M., Bigeç, Ü., & Ersönmez, Y. (2024). Excavations at Perre in 2022. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Excavation, Research and Archaeometry Symposium (pp. 421–432). Ankara.
19. Yağız, K., Alkan, M., & Tosun, M. (2023). Excavations at Perre in 2021. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Excavation, Research and Archaeometry Symposium, III (pp. 341-356). Ankara.
20. Yağız, K., & Tosun, M. (2024). An evaluation of pithoi/dolia from the Perre 2020–21 excavations. Höyük, Journal of the Turkish Historical Society, 14, 169–198.
21. Yağız, K., Tosun, M., & Doğan, T. (2022). A preliminary assessment of the use phases of workshops in Perre in light of ceramic finds. Höyük, Journal of the Turkish Historical Society, 10, 145-175.
22. Yağız, K., & Doğan, T. (2023). A hypogeum tomb from the necropolis of Perre. Arkeoloji Dergisi, XXXI(2), 49-69.
23. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Tunç, A. (2020). Kommagene Uygarlığı ve Perre Antik Kenti. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
25. Tomay, B., & Değirmencioğlu, H. (2017). Antik Çağ’da Anadolu’da Spor Turizmi. Yalvaç Journal of Academy, 2(2), 9–21.