YENİLİKÇİ YAKLAŞIMLARLA GİRİŞİMCİLİK OGRETIMI: BIR EGITIMCININ PEDAGOJİK BAKIS ACISI

Yıl 2022, Sayı: 40, 166 - 203, 29.04.2022

Sıla Kaya-capoccı

https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.999716

Öz

Bircok öğretim metod ve stratejileri egitim fakultesinde kullanılmasına rağmen buradan iktisat ve isletme gibi farkli bolumlere etkili bir sekilde aktarılmamıştır. Öğrencilerin konuyu öğrenebilmesinde, eğitimcilerin konu bilgisi kadar pedagojik bilgisi de onemli oldugu icin, bu calisma eğitimcilerin, özellikle girisimcilik eğitimcilerinin, pedagojik bilgisini geliştirmeyi ve profesyonel (akademik) gelişimlerini desteklemeyi amaclamaktadir. Bu calismada kisa ve oz olarak girişimcilik anlayışı sunulduktan sonra, işletme ve iktisat gibi bölümlerde kullanılan öğretim metod ve stratejileri özetlenmiştir. Girisimcilik eğitiminin etkinliğini arttırmaya katkida bulunmak icin jigsaw metodu gibi dort tane eğitim literatürü temelli pratik ve yenilikci metod ve strateji onerilmis ve örneklendirilmiştir. Bu çalışma, yüksek basari gosteren, iyi motive olmus girisimcilik niyetini davranisa dönüştürebilecek ogrenciler ortaya cikarmak icin, eğitimcilere pratik ve yenilikci ogretim metod ve stratejileri sunarak alana katkida bulunmaktadir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Egitim, girisimcilik, ogretim yontem ve teknikleri

TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP THROUGH INNOVATIVE APPROACHES: AN EDUCATOR’S PEDAGOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Öz

A variety of teaching methods and strategies are used in the education department, but not transferred effectively from there to the other departments, such as business and economy. As educators’ pedagogical knowledge is as important as their subject knowledge to increase students’ learning of the subject studied, this study aims to improve educators’, particularly entrepreneurship educators’, pedagogical knowledge and support their professional development. In this paper, after presenting a brief understanding of entrepreneurship, teaching methods and strategies that are used in the business and economics departments are summarized. Four practical teaching methods and strategies, such as the jigsaw method, are drawn from education literature and exemplified to contribute to increasing the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education. This study contributes to the field by providing educators with practical and innovative teaching methods and strategies to help create higher-achieving, well-motivated students who have a higher tendency to transfer their entrepreneurial intention to entrepreneurship behaviour.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Education, entrepreneurship, teaching methods and strategies

Kaynakça

• Akçayır, G., and Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers and Education, 126, 334-345.
• Akdemir, H. (2020). Yaratıcı drama yönteminin öğretmen adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutum ve mesleki benlik saygı düzeylerine etkisi. Yaratıcı Drama Dergisi, 15(1), 113-130.
• Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., and Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486.
• Allen, K. R. (2003). Bringing new technology to market. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.
• Amos, A. A., and Onifade, C. A. (2013). The perception of students on the need for entrepreneurship education in teacher education programme. Global Journal of Human Social Science, 13(3), 75–80.
• Aronson, E. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Sage.
• Aykaç, M., and Çetinkaya, G. (2013). Yaratıcı drama etkinliklerinin Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının konuşma becerilerine etkisi. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8/9, 671-682.
• Awidi, I. T., and Paynter, M. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers and Education, 128, 269-283.
• Benton, Jr, R. (2016). Put students in charge: A variation on the jigsaw discussion. College Teaching, 64(1), 40-45.
• Berkovich, I. (2011). No, we won’t! Teachers’ Resistance to Educational Reform, Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 563-578.
• Bhandari, B., Mehta, B., Mavai, M., Singh, Y. R., and Singhal, A. (2017). Medical education/original article jigsaw method: An innovative way of cooperative learning in physiology. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, 61(3), 315-321.
• Birdthistle, N., Costin, Y., and Hynes, B. (2016). Engendering entrepreneurial competencies in the youth of today: a teacher’s perspective. Education+ Training, 58(7/8), 766-782.
• Blenker, P., Frederiksen, S. H., Korsgaard, S., Müller, S., Neergaard, H., and Thrane, C. (2012). Entrepreneurship as everyday practice: towards a personalized pedagogy of enterprise education. Industry and Higher Education, 26(6), 417-430.
• Bliemel, M. J. (2014). Lessons learned from an inside-out flip in entrepreneurship education. Small Enterprise Research, 21(1), 117-128.
• Bruyat, C. and Julien, P.A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180. Doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00043-9.
• Clough, M. P. (2020). Using Stories Behind the Science to Improve Understanding of Nature of Science, Science Content, and Attitudes Toward Science. In Nature of Science in Science Instruction (pp. 513-525). Springer, Cham.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education, New York, NY: Routledge.
• Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation (2018), Enterprise 2025 Renewed: Building resilience in the face of global challenges. Dublin: Department of Business, Enterprise and Innovation. Retrieved from https://enterprise.gov.ie/en/Publications/Publication-files/Enterprise-2025-Renewed.pdf.
• DES (Department of Education and Skills) (2016). Ireland’s National Skills Strategy 2025. (pp. 1–123). Dublin: Communications Unit Department of Education and Science.
• Dewitt, S. (2021). Flipped Jigsaw in Entrepreneurship Education. In Innovating in Teaching Entrepreneurship Business and Management in Higher Education: Best Practices in Times of Change (pp. 129-148). Startup Finance Limited.
• English, L.D., and King, D.T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1). Doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7.
• Erduran, S., Simon, S. and Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse, Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
• Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.
• European Commission (2012). Entrepreneurship education at school in Europe: National strategies, curricula and learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission (EACEA). Doi: 10.2797/80384.
• European Commission (2014). Entrepreneurship Education: A Guide for Educators. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/7465.
• Fayolle, A. (2018). Personal views on the future of entrepreneurship education. In A research agenda for entrepreneurship education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., and Lassas‐Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701-720.
• Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge: London.
• Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., and Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 47(1), 109-114.
• Haase, H. and Lautenschlager A. (2011). The ‘teachability dilemma’ of entrepreneurship, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(2), 145-162.
• Halimah, L., and Sukmayadi, V. (2019). The Role of “Jigsaw” Method in Enhancing Indonesian Prospective Teachers' Pedagogical Knowledge and Communication Skill. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 289-304.
• Heinonen J, and Poikkijoki, S. (2006). An entrepreneurial-directed approach to entrepreneurship education: mission impossible? Journal of Management Development, 25(1), 80-94.
• Hindle, K. (2002). A grounded theory for teaching entrepreneurship using simulation games. Simulation and Gaming, 33(2), 236-241.
• Hisrich, R. D. (1986). Entrepreneurship and Intrapreneurship. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
• Hisrich, R. D., and Peters, M. P. (2002). Entrepreneurship. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill.
• Hodges, G., Jeong, S., McKay, P., Robertson, T., and Ducrest, D. (2016). Opening Access to STEM Experiences One Day at a Time: Successful Implementation of a School-wide iSTEM Day. The American Biology Teacher, 78(3), 200-207. Doi: 10.1525/abt2016.78.3.200.
• Ibáñez, M.-B., and Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 123, 109–123. Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002.
• Karacop, A. (2017). The Effects of Using Jigsaw Method Based on Cooperative Learning Model in the Undergraduate Science Laboratory Practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 420-434.
• Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577-597.
• Lepisto, J., and Ronkko, M. L. (2013). Teacher students as future entrepreneurship educators and learning facilitators. Education + Training Journal, 55(7), 641–653.
• Li L. and Ruppar A. (2021). Conceptualizing Teacher Agency for Inclusive Education: A Systematic and International Review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(1), 42-59.
• Llewellynn, A., and Clarke, D. (2014). How are CSU Advertising students being prepared to be industry-ready graduates? Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 4(1), 73-85.
• Mccallum, E., Weicht, R., Mcmullan, L. and Price, A. (2018). EntreComp into Action - Get inspired, make it happen: A user guide to the European Entrepreneurship Competence Framework. Bacigalupo, M. and O`keeffe, W. (Ed.s). Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, doi:10.2760/574864.
• Morris, M. H., and Liguori, E. (Eds.) (2016). Annals of Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy–2016. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Mwasalwiba, E. S. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: a review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education+ training, 52(1), 20-47.
• Namdar, A. O., and Camadan, F. (2016). Yaratıcı drama uygulamalarının öğretmen adaylarının sosyal becerilerine etkisi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(3).
• Nistor, A., Gras-Velazquez, A., Billon, N., and Mihai, G. (2018). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education Practices in Europe [Scientix Observatory Report]. Brussels: European Schoolnet. Retrieved from: http://www.scientix. eu/observatory.
• ​​O’Leary, M., Scully, D., Karakolidis, A., and Pitsia, V. (2018). The state-of-the-art in digital technology-based assessment. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 160–175. doi: 10.1111/ejed.12271.
• Olotu, A., and Ugwuanyi, P. (2017). Science Education and Entrepreneurship for National Growth and Development. Capital Journal of Educational Studies (CAJES), 5(1), 149-159.
• Omer Attali, M., and Yemini, M. (2017). Initiating consensus: Stakeholders define entrepreneurship in education. Educational review, 69(2), 140-157.
• Onder, A. (2006). Eğitici Dramada Rol Oynamanın Egitim Acisindan Onemi (Importance of Role-Play in Educational Drama for Education). M.Ü. Ataturk Egitim Fakultesi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 24, 133-143.
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S. and Simon, S. (2004) Ideas, evidence and argument in science (IDEAS) project, London: Nuffield Foundation.
• Rindova, V., Barry, D., and Ketchen, D.J. (2009). Entrepreneuring as emancipation. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 477–491.
• Ritz, J. M., and Fan, S.-C. (2015). STEM and technology education: International state-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429-451. doi: 10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z.
• Samuel, A. B., and Rahman, M. M. (2018). Innovative teaching methods and entrepreneurship education: A review of literature. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 10(1), 1807-1813.
• Seikkula‐Leino, J., Ruskovaara, E., Ikavalko, M., Mattila, J. and Rytkola, T. (2010). Promoting entrepreneurship education: the role of the teacher? Education + Training, 52(2), 117-127.
• Sever, R., Yalcinkaya, E. and Mazman, F. (2009). Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretiminde Etkili Bir Öğretim Yöntemi: Dramatizasyon (An Effective Teaching Method at History Teaching: Dramatization). Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13 (1), 155-166.
• Shapero, A. (1975). The displaced, uncomfortable entrepreneur. Psychology today, 9(6), 83-88.
• Sirelkhatim, F., and Gangi, Y. (2015). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic literature review of curricula contents and teaching methods. Cogent Business and Management, 2(1), 1052034.
• Smuts, H., and Hattingh, M. J. (2018, June). Towards a knowledge conversion model enabling programme design in higher education for shaping industry-ready graduates. In Annual Conference of the Southern African Computer Lecturers' Association (pp. 124-139). Springer, Cham.
• Sumbul, A. M. (2011). Öğretim İlke ve Yöntemleri (Teaching Methods and Strategies). 5. Baski. Egitim Akademi: Konya.
• Şimşek, Ü., Doğan, A., and Kılıç, M. A. (2016). Jigsaw Yönteminin Maddenin Tanecikli Yapısı Ünitesinin Öğretiminde Öğrenci Başarısına Etkisi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2), 1357-1379.
• The Board of Education and Discipline (2013). Turkish science curriculum. Ankara: Board of Education and Discipline.
• Ugwuanyi, C. S., Okeke, O. A., and Ene, C. U. (2019). Factorial Validation of Entrepreneurship Mindset Scale of Science Education Undergraduate Students. International Journal of Studies in Education, 16(2), 251-267.
• Vesper, K. H. (1980). New Venture Strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Vesper, K. H., and Gartner, W. B. (1997). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business venturing, 12(5), 403-421.