Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Digital Diplomacy and Cybersecurity

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 82 - 90, 01.06.2022

Öz

Recently, modern concepts have appeared widely in the international arena, these concepts have become widely spoken about, and the reason for this is Instagram, etc., which are now widely used.
Despite the adverse effects of these digital means, the positive results are non-neglectable, as they facilitate communication with the audience and make the world become like a small village. Due to the widespread use of modern digital technology and its various applications such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, especially in digital diplomacy, international diplomacy is spreading widely. Still, in any case, it is not a substitute for traditional diplomacy.
Digital diplomacy, on the other hand, is described as a type of public diplomacy that includes the usage of digital technology, media platforms, social media, and low-cost communication with the public.
Digital diplomacy has many goals that it seeks to achieve, the most important of which is communicating with the audience virtually and providing new communication tools to the public to communicate and influence it using the official means of the state via the Internet. Among the tools of this digital diplomacy are social media, virtual embassies, websites, and the online education of diplomats.

Kaynakça

  • Reference 1 Hayati, AKTAŞ. 2018. Akdeniz University DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN THE 21st CENTURY. Hedling, Elsa, and Niklas Bremberg. 2021. “Practice Approaches to the Digital Transformations of Diplomacy: Toward a New Research Agenda.” International Studies Review 31(2): 1–24. Locke, Gary. 2015. “Cybersecurity, Innovation and the Internet Economy.” Internet Policies and Issues 5(12): 1–54.
  • Reference 2 Mark, Javry. 2016. Cybersecurity Threats Challenges Opportunities. Mateusz, Mads, and Jaszczolt Fritzboeger. 2017. 34 The Development of Public Diplomacy as an International Academic Field in Relation to Practice. Mcy, Kinsey. 2019. “Perspectives on Transforming Cybersecurity.” McKinsey Global Institute 32(March): 1–128. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/McKinsey Solutions/Cyber Solutions/Perspectives on transforming cybersecurity/Transforming cybersecurity_March2019.ashx.
  • Reference 3 Patlolla, Anita K. 2019. DIGITAL ECONOMY REPORT 2019: Value Creation and Capture - Implications for Developing Countries. Rashica, Viona. 2018. “The Benefits and Risks of Digital Diplomacy.” SEEU Review 13(1): 75–89. ———. 2019. “Digital Diplomacy: Aspects, Approaches and Practical Use.” International Scientific Journal on European Perspectives 10(1): 21–39. https://www.europeanperspectives.org/storage/24/DIGITAL-DIPLOMACY_Rashica.pdf.

Digital Diplomacy and Cybersecurity

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 82 - 90, 01.06.2022

Öz

Recently, modern concepts have appeared widely in the international arena, these concepts have become widely spoken about, and the reason for this is Instagram, etc., which are now widely used.
Despite the adverse effects of these digital means, the positive results are non-neglectable, as they facilitate communication with the audience and make the world become like a small village. Due to the widespread use of modern digital technology and its various applications such as Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, especially in digital diplomacy, international diplomacy is spreading widely. Still, in any case, it is not a substitute for traditional diplomacy.
Digital diplomacy, on the other hand, is described as a type of public diplomacy that includes the usage of digital technology, media platforms, social media, and low-cost communication with the public.
Digital diplomacy has many goals that it seeks to achieve, the most important of which is communicating with the audience virtually and providing new communication tools to the public to communicate and influence it using the official means of the state via the Internet. Among the tools of this digital diplomacy are social media, virtual embassies, websites, and the online education of diplomats.

Kaynakça

  • Reference 1 Hayati, AKTAŞ. 2018. Akdeniz University DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN THE 21st CENTURY. Hedling, Elsa, and Niklas Bremberg. 2021. “Practice Approaches to the Digital Transformations of Diplomacy: Toward a New Research Agenda.” International Studies Review 31(2): 1–24. Locke, Gary. 2015. “Cybersecurity, Innovation and the Internet Economy.” Internet Policies and Issues 5(12): 1–54.
  • Reference 2 Mark, Javry. 2016. Cybersecurity Threats Challenges Opportunities. Mateusz, Mads, and Jaszczolt Fritzboeger. 2017. 34 The Development of Public Diplomacy as an International Academic Field in Relation to Practice. Mcy, Kinsey. 2019. “Perspectives on Transforming Cybersecurity.” McKinsey Global Institute 32(March): 1–128. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/McKinsey Solutions/Cyber Solutions/Perspectives on transforming cybersecurity/Transforming cybersecurity_March2019.ashx.
  • Reference 3 Patlolla, Anita K. 2019. DIGITAL ECONOMY REPORT 2019: Value Creation and Capture - Implications for Developing Countries. Rashica, Viona. 2018. “The Benefits and Risks of Digital Diplomacy.” SEEU Review 13(1): 75–89. ———. 2019. “Digital Diplomacy: Aspects, Approaches and Practical Use.” International Scientific Journal on European Perspectives 10(1): 21–39. https://www.europeanperspectives.org/storage/24/DIGITAL-DIPLOMACY_Rashica.pdf.
Toplam 3 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Mustafa Alethawy 0000-0003-0311-9579

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Mart 2022
Kabul Tarihi 18 Nisan 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Alethawy, M. (2022). Digital Diplomacy and Cybersecurity. Ahi Evran Akademi, 3(1), 82-90.