Scale of Social Justice Leadership During Distance Education: A Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

Social justice leadership has become a necessity in education as in many other fields. It is important to see how much this need is met in the world of education, and most importantly, this leadership is seen from the eyes of students. Minimizing the disadvantage in the distance education process is possible with social justice leadership. The aim of this research is to develop a scale of social justice leadership during distance education, based on student opinions. The research was carried out with the participation of 156 students studying in secondary schools in the district of Yerköy, Yozgat. content validity of Scale Of Social Justice Leadership During Distance Education (SSJLDDE) was ensured based on expert opinions. The construct validity of SSJLDDE was evaluated by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyzes (CFA). The reliability of the SSJLDDE and its sub-dimensions was examined by calculating the Cronbach alpha coefficient. As a result of EFA and CFA, it was seen that SSJLDDE has a structure of 13 items and four factors: critical view, active participation, justice and support. As a result of the examination of the Cronbach alpha coefficient values performed on the factors of the SSJLDDE as a whole, it was seen that the SSJLDDE was highly reliable. Based on these findings, it was concluded that SSJLDDE is a valid and reliable data collection tool that can be used to determine the social justice leadership of teachers in the distance education process based on student opinions at schools.

Keywords

• Social Justice Leadership
• Social Justice
• Leadership
• Distance Education Process
• Education

Kaynakça

1. Arslan İ., & Kurtoğlu R. (2021). A research on social responsible consumer behavior. Turkish Studies - Economy, 16(1), 27-50. https://dx.doi.org/10.47644/TurkishStudies.49275
2. Balcı, A. (2001). Etkili okul ve okul geliştirme [Effective school and school development]. (2th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
3. Bozkurt, B. (2018). The relationship between social justice leadership, loyalty to principal and organizational citizenshıp behaviors. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 9(2), 88-102. https://dx.doi.org/10.17275/per.22.30.9.2.
4. Börü, N. (2019). Evaluation of social justice developments in primary schools and leadership behavior of school principals, Journal of Education and Humanities, 10(20), 25-35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338434993
5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
6. Cribb, A., & S. Gerwirtz (2003). Plural conceptions of social justice: implications for policy sociology, Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 499-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210158285
7. Çelik, V. (2015). Eğitimsel liderlik [Educational leadership], Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Ertaş, B. D., & Yüner, B. (2021). Yeni normalde derinleşen uçurum [The deepening chasm in the new normal], The 15th International Congress on Educational Administration Programme Opening Schedule November 5, Gaziantep. http://eyk15.eyedder.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/BO.pdf
8. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.

9. Fraser, K. (2012). Exploring the leadership practices of social justice leaders at urban charter schools. University of San Francisco The Faculty of the School of Education Department of Leadership Studies Organizational and Leadership Program, San Francisco, 14. https://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=diss
10. Fraser, N. (2005). Mapping the feminist imagination: From redistribution to recognition to representation. Constellations, 12(3), 295-307. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1351-0487.2005.00418.x
11. Gören, S. Ç. (2019). Relationshıi between social justice leadership, quality of school life and sense of school belonging, Hacettepe University, Graduate School of Educational Sciences, Educational Administration Supervision Planning and Economy, Ankara.
12. Gürgen, B. (2017). Examining the perception of social justice in schools, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Administration, Supervision, Planning and Economics, Eskişehir.
13. Koçak, S., & Özdemir, M. (2019). Sosyal adalet liderliğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi, International Journal Of Human Sciences, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i4.5871
14. Kondakçı, Y., Kurtay, M. Z., Oldaç, Y. I., & Şenay, H. H. (2016). Türkiye’de okul müdürlerinin sosyal adalet rolleri [Socıal justıce of school heads ın turkey roles] E-Book (ed.), Pegem Akademi, Ankara. http://eyedder.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/eyk-e-kitap.pdf
15. Korkmaz, F., & Zorlu K (2020). Adaptation of the Sustainable Leadership Scale to Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study, Gazi Akademik Bakış, 13(26), 199-213. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1144267
16. Kütküt, B., & Özdemir, M. (2015). Development of social justice leadership scale (sjls): the validity and reliability study, KEFAD, 16(3), 201-218. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1489223
17. Özdemir, M., & Pektaş V. (2017). Examining the relationship between social justice leadership and school academic optimism according to teachers’ opinions, Ege Journal of Education, 2(18). 576-601. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/367956
18. Sincar M., & Yeşil, E. (2021). An analysis on social justice leadership in education, Journal of Contemporary Administrative Science, 8(1), 288-296. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1584996
19. Turhan, M. (2007). The effect of ethical leadership behaviors of high school and vocational high school principals on social justice in schools, Fırat University The Institute of Social Sciences The Main Branch of Educational Sciences, Elazığ.
20. Yüner, B. (2019). School governance scale: the validity and reliability study, Journal of Faculty of Education, 49, 17 1-186. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.431456.