Sağlıklı Bireylerde Servikal Propriosepsiyonla İlişkili Faktörlerin İncelenmesi
Yıl 2023,
Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 275 - 279, 20.12.2023
Anıl Özüdoğru
,
İsmail Ceylan
,
Mehmet Canlı
,
Şafak Kuzu
Öz
Amaç: Bu çalışma, sağlıklı genç yetişkinlerde servikal bölge propriosepsiyon duyusu ile servikal bölge eklem hareket açıklığı ve postür arasında ilişki olup olmadığını araştırmak amacıyla yapıldı.
Araçlar ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu’nda 98 sağlıklı genç yetişkin üzerinde yapıldı. Çalışmaya katılan bireylerin servikal propriosepsiyon duyuları 4 farklı pozisyonda (fleksiyon, ekstansiyon, sol rotasyon ve sağ rotasyon) Servikal Eklem Pozisyon Hata Testi ile değerlendirildi. Ayrıca çalışma katılımcılarının postürleri New York Postür analizi ile servikal bölge eklem hareket açıklığı değerleri ise manuel bir gonyometre ile değerlendirildi. Parametrelerin birbiri ile ilişkisi Pearson Korelasyon Analizi kullanılarak incelendi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya katılan bireylerin yaş ortalaması 20.85±1.68’di. Servikal bölge propriosepsiyon alt parametreleri değerleri ile New York Postür Analizi ve servikal bölge eklem hareket açıklığı alt parametreleri arasında herhangi bir istatistiksel anlamlı ilişki bulunmadı (hepsi için p>0.05).
Sonuç: Servikal propriosepsiyonun postür ve servikal bölge eklem hareket açıklığı ile ilişkili olmadığı sonucuna ulaşıldı. Ancak servikal propriosepsiyon duyusunun, eklem hareket açıklığının ve postürün servikal bölge patolojisine sahip olanlarda incelenmesi gereğini düşünmekteyiz.
Kaynakça
- 1. Strimpakos N, Sakellari V, Gioftsos G, Kapreli E, Oldham J. Cervical joint position sense: an intra-and inter-examiner reliability study. Gait & posture. 2006;23(1):22-31.
- 2. Van der Wal J. The architecture of the connective tissue in the musculoskeletal system-an often-overlooked functional parameter as to proprioception in the locomotor apparatus. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2009; 2(4):9.
- 3. Lee H-Y, Wang J-D, Yao G, Wang S-F. Association between cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and frequency of subclinical neck pain. Manual therapy. 2008;13(5):419-425.
- 4. Valergakis F. Cervical spondylosis: most common cause of position and vibratory sense loss. Geriatrics. 1976;31(7):51-56.
- 5. Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1991;72(5):288-291.
- 6. Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Manual therapy. 2008;13(1):2-11.
- 7. Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: a critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci. 2016;5(1):80-90.
- 8. Özüdoğru A, Canlı M, Kuzu Ş, Aslan M, Ceylan İ, Alkan H. Muscle strength, balance and upper extremity function are not predictors of cervical proprioception in healthy young subjects. Somatosens Mot Res. 2023;40(2):78-82.
- 9. Türkmen C, Çetin H, Dülger E, Bilgin S, Aksoy Sl, Köse N. Sağlıklı Bireylerde Denge Ve Servikal Bölge Eklem Pozisyon Hissi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Vaka Serisi. Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing.2016;3(1):107-107.
- 10. Ulutatar F, Unal-Ulutatar C, Duruoz MT. Cervical proprioceptive impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(12):2043-2051.
- 11. Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabilit Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933-949.
- 12. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Canada:Saunders;1987.
- 13. Otman AS, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Hareketleri. Türkiye:Pelikan Yayıncılık;2014.
- 14. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Betz JJ, et al. Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2003;26(3):139-151.
- 15. Silva AG, Punt TD, Sharples P, Vilas-Boas JP, Johnson MI. Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin: a comparison between patients and pain-free persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(4):669-674.
- 16. Singla D, Veqar Z. Association between forward head, rounded shoulders, and increased thoracic kyphosis: a review of the literature. J Chiropr Med. 2017;16(3): 220-229.
- 17. Hacıömeroğlu Ç. Kronik boyun ağrısı olan olgularda eklem pozisyon hissinin değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2020.
- 18. Heikkilä HV, Wenngren B-I. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervical motion, and oculomotor function in patients with whiplash injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1089-1094.
- 19. Ferlinc A, Fabiani E, Velnar T, Gradisnik L. The importance and role of proprioception in the elderly: a short review. Materia socio-medica. 2019;31(3):219.
Investigation of Factors Related to Cervical Proprioception in Healthy Individuals
Yıl 2023,
Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3, 275 - 279, 20.12.2023
Anıl Özüdoğru
,
İsmail Ceylan
,
Mehmet Canlı
,
Şafak Kuzu
Öz
Purpose: This study was carried out to investigate whether there is a relationship between the sense of cervical region proprioception and cervical region joint range of motion and posture in healthy young adults.
Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 98 healthy young adults in Kırşehir Ahi Evran University School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation. The cervical proprioception senses of the individuals participating in the study were evaluated in 4 different positions (flexion, extension, left rotation and right rotation) using the Cervical Joint Position Error Test. In addition, the posture of the participants was evaluated using the New York Posture Analysis and the cervical region joint range of motion values were evaluated using a manual goniometer. The correlation between parameters was examined using Pearson’s correlation analysis.
Results: The mean age of the individuals participating in the study was 20.85±1.68 years. No statistically significant correlation was found between the cervical region proprioception sub-parameters with the New York Posture Analysis and the cervical region joint range of motion sub-parameters (for all p>0.05).
Conclusion: It was concluded that cervical proprioception was not associated with posture and cervical range of motion. However, we believe that cervical proprioception sense, range of motion and posture should be examined in patients with cervical region pathology.
Kaynakça
- 1. Strimpakos N, Sakellari V, Gioftsos G, Kapreli E, Oldham J. Cervical joint position sense: an intra-and inter-examiner reliability study. Gait & posture. 2006;23(1):22-31.
- 2. Van der Wal J. The architecture of the connective tissue in the musculoskeletal system-an often-overlooked functional parameter as to proprioception in the locomotor apparatus. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2009; 2(4):9.
- 3. Lee H-Y, Wang J-D, Yao G, Wang S-F. Association between cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility and frequency of subclinical neck pain. Manual therapy. 2008;13(5):419-425.
- 4. Valergakis F. Cervical spondylosis: most common cause of position and vibratory sense loss. Geriatrics. 1976;31(7):51-56.
- 5. Revel M, Andre-Deshays C, Minguet M. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with cervical pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1991;72(5):288-291.
- 6. Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Manual therapy. 2008;13(1):2-11.
- 7. Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: a critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci. 2016;5(1):80-90.
- 8. Özüdoğru A, Canlı M, Kuzu Ş, Aslan M, Ceylan İ, Alkan H. Muscle strength, balance and upper extremity function are not predictors of cervical proprioception in healthy young subjects. Somatosens Mot Res. 2023;40(2):78-82.
- 9. Türkmen C, Çetin H, Dülger E, Bilgin S, Aksoy Sl, Köse N. Sağlıklı Bireylerde Denge Ve Servikal Bölge Eklem Pozisyon Hissi Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Vaka Serisi. Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing.2016;3(1):107-107.
- 10. Ulutatar F, Unal-Ulutatar C, Duruoz MT. Cervical proprioceptive impairment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(12):2043-2051.
- 11. Hillier S, Immink M, Thewlis D. Assessing proprioception: a systematic review of possibilities. Neurorehabilit Neural Repair. 2015;29(10):933-949.
- 12. Magee DJ. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. Canada:Saunders;1987.
- 13. Otman AS, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Hareketleri. Türkiye:Pelikan Yayıncılık;2014.
- 14. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Betz JJ, et al. Increasing the cervical lordosis with chiropractic biophysics seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: nonrandomized clinical control trial. J Manip Physiol Ther. 2003;26(3):139-151.
- 15. Silva AG, Punt TD, Sharples P, Vilas-Boas JP, Johnson MI. Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin: a comparison between patients and pain-free persons. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(4):669-674.
- 16. Singla D, Veqar Z. Association between forward head, rounded shoulders, and increased thoracic kyphosis: a review of the literature. J Chiropr Med. 2017;16(3): 220-229.
- 17. Hacıömeroğlu Ç. Kronik boyun ağrısı olan olgularda eklem pozisyon hissinin değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Medipol Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü; 2020.
- 18. Heikkilä HV, Wenngren B-I. Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervical motion, and oculomotor function in patients with whiplash injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1089-1094.
- 19. Ferlinc A, Fabiani E, Velnar T, Gradisnik L. The importance and role of proprioception in the elderly: a short review. Materia socio-medica. 2019;31(3):219.