Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Türkiye’de Yeşil Finans ve Ticari Açıklığında Doğal Kaynak Kullanımının Etkileri

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 146 - 176, 31.12.2025

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’nin 2003-2022 yıllarına ilişkin verileri ile doğal kaynak kullanımının, yeşil finans ve ticaret açıklığı üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Regresyon ve ARIMA analizleri, petrol tüketiminin yeşil finansı pozitif, doğal gaz tüketiminin ise negatif ve anlamlı etkilediğini göstermektedir. Petrol finansman süreçlerinde anahtar rol oynarken, doğal gaz yeşil finans politikalarıyla çelişmektedir. Ayrıca, petrolün ticaret açıklığına etkisi bulunmazken, doğal gazın negatif etkisi maliyetleri düşürerek açığı azaltmaktadır. Bulgular, yerli kaynak kullanımı ve enerji ithalatında çeşitliliğin önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., & Lean, H. H. (2015). The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Natural Hazards, 79(1), 621-644.
  • Ali, S., Yusop, Z., Kaliappan, S. R., & Chin, L. (2020). Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from OIC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 11671-11682.
  • Anderson, J. E., & Neary, J. P. (1992). Trade reform with quotas, partial rent retention, and tariffs. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57-76.
  • Arawomo, O., & Apanisile, J. (2018). Determinants of foreign direct investment in the Nigerian telecommunication sector. Modern Economy, 9(05), 907.
  • Arslan, B., & Ertuğrul, İ. (2022). Çoklu regresyon, ARIMA ve yapay sinir ağı yöntemleri ile Türkiye elektrik piyasasında fiyat tahmin ve analizi. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 20(1), 331-353.
  • Aydin, M., & Turan, Y. E. (2020). The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 43233-43245.
  • Badmus, M., & Ariyo, O. (2011). Forecasting cultivated areas and production of maize in Nigerian using ARIMA model. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(3), 171-176.
  • Barua, S. (2020). Financing sustainable development goals: A review of challenges and mitigation strategies. Business Strategy & Development, 3(3), 277-293.
  • Bayraç, H. N. (2005). Uluslararası petrol piyasasının ekonomik analizi. Finans-Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 499(42), 6-20.
  • Bergman, N. (2018). Impacts of the fossil fuel divestment movement: Effects on finance, policy and public discourse. Sustainability, 10(7), 2529.
  • Berrou, R., Dessertine, P., & Migliorelli, M. (2019). An overview of green finance. The rise of green finance in Europe: opportunities and challenges for issuers, investors and marketplaces, 3-29..
  • Brown, M. T., Protano, G., & Ulgiati, S. (2011). Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Ecological Modelling, 222(3), 879-887.
  • Cheberyako, O., Varnalii, Z., Borysenko, O., & Miedviedkova, N. (2021). “green” finance as a modern tool for social and environmental security. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, The Odesa, The Ukraine.
  • Cheng, X., Yan, C., Ye, K., & Chen, K. (2024). enhancing resource efficiency through the utilization of the green bond market: an empirical analysis of asian economies. Resources Policy, 89, 104623.
  • Chuahan, R., & Chavda, K. (2024). Unveiling the nexus: exploring the ımpact of behavioral finance on green finance ınitiatives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 1(2), 1-12.
  • Das, A., McFarlane, A. A., & Chowdhury, M. (2013). The dynamics of natural gas consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 269-274.
  • Dinçer, İ., Arcaklıoğlu, & Ezan, M. A. (2021). TÜBA Doğal Gaz Raporu. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları TÜBA Raporları No: 44, 1-127.
  • Dowrick, S., & Golley, J. (2004). Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxford review of economic policy, 20(1), 38-56.
  • Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know? The economic journal, 108(447), 383-398.
  • Fatima, S., Chen, B., Ramzan, M., & Abbas, Q. (2020). The nexus between trade openness and GDP growth: Analyzing the role of human capital accumulation. SAGE Open, 10(4).
  • Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (2002). An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. The quarterly journal of economics, 117(2), 437-466.
  • Fujii, E. (2019). What does trade openness measure? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 868-888.
  • Garcia, P. (1999). Income inequality and the real exchange rate (Vol. 54). Banco Central de Chile.
  • Giovanni, J. d., & Levchenko, A. A. (2009). Trade openness and volatility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 558-585.
  • Gray, R. (2002). Of messiness, systems and sustainability: towards a more social and environmental finance and accounting. The British Accounting Review, 34(4), 357-386.
  • Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (Fifth Eds.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Gylfason, T. (2006). Natural resources and economic growth: From dependence to diversification. Economic liberalization and integration policy: Options for Eastern Europe and Russia, 201-231.
  • Harrison, A. (1996). Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of development Economics, 48(2), 419-447.
  • Hassan, W., Hussain, N., & Hussain, S. (2023). Evaluating the contribution of GDP, technological advancements, and renewable energy consumption in carbon emissions to the attainment of sustainable development goals: Insights from China. Global Sociological Review, VIII(II), 293 – 307, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-II).30
  • Hau, H. (2002). Real exchange rate volatility and economic openness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 611-630.
  • Hdom, H. A., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2020). Energy production and trade openness: assessing economic growth, CO2 emissions and the applicability of the cointegration analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 30, 100488.
  • He, F. S., Gan, G. G. G., Al-Mulali, U., & Adebola, S. S. (2019). The ınfluences of economic ındicators on environmental pollution in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 123-131.
  • Höhne, N., Khosla, S., Fekete, H., & Gilbert, A. (2012). Mapping of Green Finance Delivered by IDFC Members in 2011, Ecofys.
  • Huchet‐Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C., & Vijil, M. (2018). the relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), 59-76.
  • Hye, Q. M. A., Wizarat, S., & Lau, W.-Y. (2016). The impact of trade openness on economic growth in China: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(3), 27-37.
  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021), Turkey 2021 Energy Policy Review, retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/turkey-2021
  • Karasimou, M. D., Mousiari, O., & Tsoukalas, L. H. (2021). Renewable energy sources and impact on GDP growth. 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), The Chania Crete, The Greece.
  • Khan, A. A., Mukhtar, M., Siddique, A. B., Bibi, S., Qasim, T. B., & Khan, H. H. (2025). Examining the contribution of trade to GDP: A case study of Pakistan. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 84-93.
  • Khan, R., & Kong, Y. (2020). Effects of energy consumption on GDP: New evidence of 24 countries on their natural resources and production of electricity. Ekonomika, 99(1), 26-49.
  • Koczar, J., Vagizova, V., Agliullina, M., & Agliullina, Z. (2020, March). Application of green finance tools in the system of sustainable interaction between the real and financial economy: opportunities and prospects. In “New Silk Road: Business Cooperation and Prospective of Economic Development”(NSRBCPED 2019) (pp. 604-610). Atlantis Press.
  • Koval, V., Laktionova, O., Atstāja, D., Grasis, J., Lomachynska, I., & Shchur, R. (2022). Green financial Instruments of cleaner production technologies. Sustainability, 14(17), 10536.
  • Krueger, A. O. (1978). Liberalization, direction of bias, and economic growth. In Liberalization attempts and consequences (pp. 277-300). NBER.
  • Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 942-963.
  • Li, S., Zhang, J., & Ma, Y. (2015). Financial development, environmental quality and economic growth. Sustainability, 7(7), 9395-9416.
  • Li, W., & Hu, M. (2014). An overview of the environmental finance policies in China: Retrofitting an integrated mechanism for environmental management. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(3), 316-328.
  • Magazzino, C. (2012). On the relationship between disaggregated energy production and GDP in Italy. Energy & Environment, 23(8), 1191-1207.
  • Magazzino, C. (2024). Ecological footprint, electricity consumption, and economic growth in China: Geopolitical risk and natural resources governance. Empirical Economics, 66(1), 1-25.
  • Migliorelli, M., & Dessertine, P. (2019). The rise of green finance in Europe. Opportunities and challenges for issuers, investors and marketplaces. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2.
  • Miyan, M. S., Cheong, C. W., Sharif, A., & Afshan, S. (2024). Three decades of green finance: The state of the art and way forward. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(6), 88-105.
  • Ohler, A., & Fetters, I. (2014). The causal relationship between renewable electricity generation and GDP growth: A study of energy sources. Energy Economics, 43, 125-139.
  • Önal, M. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmada yenilenebilir enerjinin önemi: Türkiye üzerine bir değerlendirme. Turkish Business Journal, 1(1), 78-97.
  • Önder, H., & Polat, A. (2018). Enerji tüketiminin GSYİH ile ilişkisi: OECD ülkeleri panel veri analizi. Marmara İktisat Dergisi, 2(1), 105-116.
  • Peacock, A., & Wiseman, J. (1967). The Growth of Public Expenditure in The United Kingdom. Taylor & Francis. Pritchett, L. (1996). Measuring outward orientation in LDCs: Can it be done? Journal of development Economics, 49(2), 307-335.
  • Raberto, M., Ozel, B., Ponta, L., Teglio, A., & Cincotti, S. (2019). From financial ınstability to green finance: The role of banking and credit market regulation in the eurace model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(1), 429-465.
  • Reisen, V. A. (1994). Estimation of the fractional difference parameter in the ARIMA (p, d, q) Model using the smoothed periodogram. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 15(3), 335-350.
  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of political economy, 106(5), 997-1032.
  • Sachs, J. D., & Du Toit, H.J. (2015). Earth Calling The Financial Sector. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/sustainability-finance-leaders-byjeffrey-d-sachs-and-hendrik-j--du-toit-2015-02?barrier=accesspaylog. (Accessed March 8, 2025).
  • Sachs, J. D., Woo, W. T., Yoshino, N., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019). Why is green finance important? ADBI Working Paper Series (No:917).
  • Serfaty, C. (2024). Sovereign default and international trade. IMF Economic Review, 72(4), 1449-1501.
  • Soni, K., Kapoor, S., Parmar, K. S., & Kaskaoutis, D. G. (2014). Statistical analysis of aerosols over the Gangetic–Himalayan region using ARIMA model based on long-term MODIS observations. Atmospheric Research, 149, 174-192.
  • Soundarrajan, P., & Vivek, N. (2016). Green finance for sustainable green economic growth in India. Agricultural Economics/Zemědělská Ekonomika, 62(1), 35-44.
  • Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2011). a new measure of trade openness. The world economy, 34(10), 1745-1770.
  • Şahin, B., & Şahin, Y. (2024). Yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları ve yeşil finans alanında yapılan çalışmaların yazın taraması. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(2), 414-426.
  • T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2019). On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), retrieved from https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf
  • T.C. Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu. (2023). 2023 Yılı Petrol Piyasası Sektör Raporu, retrieved from https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/4-14475/duyuru
  • Tao, H., Zhuang, S., Xue, R., Cao, W., Tian, J., & Shan, Y. (2022). Environmental finance: an ınterdisciplinary review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121639.
  • Topcu, E., Altinoz, B., & Aslan, A. (2020). Global evidence from the link between economic growth, natural resources, energy consumption, and gross capital formation. Resources Policy, 66, 101622.
  • Ukoba, K., Olatunji, K. O., Adeoye, E., Jen, T.-C., & Madyira, D. M. (2024). Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial ıntelligence: Review and future prospects. Energy & Environment, 35(7), 3833-3879.
  • Ulucak, R., & Ozcan, B. (2020). Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents. Resources Policy, 69, 101803.
  • Wagner, R. E., & Weber, W. E. (1977). Wagner's law, fiscal ınstitutions, and the growth of government. National Tax Journal, 30(1), 59-68.
  • Wahyudi, S. T. (2017). The ARIMA model for the Indonesia stock price. International Journal of Economics & Management, 11(1), 223-236.
  • Wang, K., Rehman, M. A., Fahad, S., & Linzhao, Z. (2023). Unleashing the ınfluence of natural resources, sustainable energy and human capital on consumption-based carbon emissions in G-7 countries. Resources Policy, 81, 103384.
  • Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311-316.
  • Wu, H. (2022). Trade openness, green finance and natural resources: A literature review. Resources Policy, 78, 102801.
  • Yildirim, E., Saraç, Ş., & Aslan, A. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: Evidence from renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(9), 6770-6774.
  • Zhou, H., Bhattarai, R., Li, Y., Si, B., Dong, X., Wang, T., & Yao, Z. (2022). Towards sustainable coal industry: Turning coal bottom ash into wealth. Science of the Total Environment, 804, 149985.

The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 146 - 176, 31.12.2025

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the effects of natural resource usage in Turkey on green finance and trade openness using data from Türkiye, from 2003 to 2022. Regression and ARIMA analyses show that oil consumption has a positive effect on green finance, while natural gas consumption has a negative and significant effect. While oil plays a key role in financing processes, natural gas conflicts with green finance policies. Furthermore, while oil has no effect on the trade openness, natural gas reduces the deficit by lowering costs, counteracting its usual negative impacts. The findings emphasize the importance of domestic resource use and diversity in energy imports.

Kaynakça

  • Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., & Lean, H. H. (2015). The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Natural Hazards, 79(1), 621-644.
  • Ali, S., Yusop, Z., Kaliappan, S. R., & Chin, L. (2020). Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from OIC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 11671-11682.
  • Anderson, J. E., & Neary, J. P. (1992). Trade reform with quotas, partial rent retention, and tariffs. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 57-76.
  • Arawomo, O., & Apanisile, J. (2018). Determinants of foreign direct investment in the Nigerian telecommunication sector. Modern Economy, 9(05), 907.
  • Arslan, B., & Ertuğrul, İ. (2022). Çoklu regresyon, ARIMA ve yapay sinir ağı yöntemleri ile Türkiye elektrik piyasasında fiyat tahmin ve analizi. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 20(1), 331-353.
  • Aydin, M., & Turan, Y. E. (2020). The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: revisiting the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 43233-43245.
  • Badmus, M., & Ariyo, O. (2011). Forecasting cultivated areas and production of maize in Nigerian using ARIMA model. Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(3), 171-176.
  • Barua, S. (2020). Financing sustainable development goals: A review of challenges and mitigation strategies. Business Strategy & Development, 3(3), 277-293.
  • Bayraç, H. N. (2005). Uluslararası petrol piyasasının ekonomik analizi. Finans-Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 499(42), 6-20.
  • Bergman, N. (2018). Impacts of the fossil fuel divestment movement: Effects on finance, policy and public discourse. Sustainability, 10(7), 2529.
  • Berrou, R., Dessertine, P., & Migliorelli, M. (2019). An overview of green finance. The rise of green finance in Europe: opportunities and challenges for issuers, investors and marketplaces, 3-29..
  • Brown, M. T., Protano, G., & Ulgiati, S. (2011). Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas. Ecological Modelling, 222(3), 879-887.
  • Cheberyako, O., Varnalii, Z., Borysenko, O., & Miedviedkova, N. (2021). “green” finance as a modern tool for social and environmental security. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, The Odesa, The Ukraine.
  • Cheng, X., Yan, C., Ye, K., & Chen, K. (2024). enhancing resource efficiency through the utilization of the green bond market: an empirical analysis of asian economies. Resources Policy, 89, 104623.
  • Chuahan, R., & Chavda, K. (2024). Unveiling the nexus: exploring the ımpact of behavioral finance on green finance ınitiatives. Journal of Environmental Economics and Sustainability, 1(2), 1-12.
  • Das, A., McFarlane, A. A., & Chowdhury, M. (2013). The dynamics of natural gas consumption and GDP in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 269-274.
  • Dinçer, İ., Arcaklıoğlu, & Ezan, M. A. (2021). TÜBA Doğal Gaz Raporu. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Yayınları TÜBA Raporları No: 44, 1-127.
  • Dowrick, S., & Golley, J. (2004). Trade openness and growth: who benefits? Oxford review of economic policy, 20(1), 38-56.
  • Edwards, S. (1998). Openness, productivity and growth: What do we really know? The economic journal, 108(447), 383-398.
  • Fatima, S., Chen, B., Ramzan, M., & Abbas, Q. (2020). The nexus between trade openness and GDP growth: Analyzing the role of human capital accumulation. SAGE Open, 10(4).
  • Frankel, J., & Rose, A. (2002). An estimate of the effect of common currencies on trade and income. The quarterly journal of economics, 117(2), 437-466.
  • Fujii, E. (2019). What does trade openness measure? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 868-888.
  • Garcia, P. (1999). Income inequality and the real exchange rate (Vol. 54). Banco Central de Chile.
  • Giovanni, J. d., & Levchenko, A. A. (2009). Trade openness and volatility. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(3), 558-585.
  • Gray, R. (2002). Of messiness, systems and sustainability: towards a more social and environmental finance and accounting. The British Accounting Review, 34(4), 357-386.
  • Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics (Fifth Eds.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Gylfason, T. (2006). Natural resources and economic growth: From dependence to diversification. Economic liberalization and integration policy: Options for Eastern Europe and Russia, 201-231.
  • Harrison, A. (1996). Openness and growth: A time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of development Economics, 48(2), 419-447.
  • Hassan, W., Hussain, N., & Hussain, S. (2023). Evaluating the contribution of GDP, technological advancements, and renewable energy consumption in carbon emissions to the attainment of sustainable development goals: Insights from China. Global Sociological Review, VIII(II), 293 – 307, retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2023(VIII-II).30
  • Hau, H. (2002). Real exchange rate volatility and economic openness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 611-630.
  • Hdom, H. A., & Fuinhas, J. A. (2020). Energy production and trade openness: assessing economic growth, CO2 emissions and the applicability of the cointegration analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 30, 100488.
  • He, F. S., Gan, G. G. G., Al-Mulali, U., & Adebola, S. S. (2019). The ınfluences of economic ındicators on environmental pollution in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(2), 123-131.
  • Höhne, N., Khosla, S., Fekete, H., & Gilbert, A. (2012). Mapping of Green Finance Delivered by IDFC Members in 2011, Ecofys.
  • Huchet‐Bourdon, M., Le Mouël, C., & Vijil, M. (2018). the relationship between trade openness and economic growth: Some new insights on the openness measurement issue. The World Economy, 41(1), 59-76.
  • Hye, Q. M. A., Wizarat, S., & Lau, W.-Y. (2016). The impact of trade openness on economic growth in China: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 3(3), 27-37.
  • International Energy Agency (IEA). (2021), Turkey 2021 Energy Policy Review, retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/turkey-2021
  • Karasimou, M. D., Mousiari, O., & Tsoukalas, L. H. (2021). Renewable energy sources and impact on GDP growth. 12th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA), The Chania Crete, The Greece.
  • Khan, A. A., Mukhtar, M., Siddique, A. B., Bibi, S., Qasim, T. B., & Khan, H. H. (2025). Examining the contribution of trade to GDP: A case study of Pakistan. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1), 84-93.
  • Khan, R., & Kong, Y. (2020). Effects of energy consumption on GDP: New evidence of 24 countries on their natural resources and production of electricity. Ekonomika, 99(1), 26-49.
  • Koczar, J., Vagizova, V., Agliullina, M., & Agliullina, Z. (2020, March). Application of green finance tools in the system of sustainable interaction between the real and financial economy: opportunities and prospects. In “New Silk Road: Business Cooperation and Prospective of Economic Development”(NSRBCPED 2019) (pp. 604-610). Atlantis Press.
  • Koval, V., Laktionova, O., Atstāja, D., Grasis, J., Lomachynska, I., & Shchur, R. (2022). Green financial Instruments of cleaner production technologies. Sustainability, 14(17), 10536.
  • Krueger, A. O. (1978). Liberalization, direction of bias, and economic growth. In Liberalization attempts and consequences (pp. 277-300). NBER.
  • Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A Sensitivity analysis of cross-country growth regressions. The American Economic Review, 82(4), 942-963.
  • Li, S., Zhang, J., & Ma, Y. (2015). Financial development, environmental quality and economic growth. Sustainability, 7(7), 9395-9416.
  • Li, W., & Hu, M. (2014). An overview of the environmental finance policies in China: Retrofitting an integrated mechanism for environmental management. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(3), 316-328.
  • Magazzino, C. (2012). On the relationship between disaggregated energy production and GDP in Italy. Energy & Environment, 23(8), 1191-1207.
  • Magazzino, C. (2024). Ecological footprint, electricity consumption, and economic growth in China: Geopolitical risk and natural resources governance. Empirical Economics, 66(1), 1-25.
  • Migliorelli, M., & Dessertine, P. (2019). The rise of green finance in Europe. Opportunities and challenges for issuers, investors and marketplaces. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2.
  • Miyan, M. S., Cheong, C. W., Sharif, A., & Afshan, S. (2024). Three decades of green finance: The state of the art and way forward. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(6), 88-105.
  • Ohler, A., & Fetters, I. (2014). The causal relationship between renewable electricity generation and GDP growth: A study of energy sources. Energy Economics, 43, 125-139.
  • Önal, M. (2020). Sürdürülebilir kalkınmada yenilenebilir enerjinin önemi: Türkiye üzerine bir değerlendirme. Turkish Business Journal, 1(1), 78-97.
  • Önder, H., & Polat, A. (2018). Enerji tüketiminin GSYİH ile ilişkisi: OECD ülkeleri panel veri analizi. Marmara İktisat Dergisi, 2(1), 105-116.
  • Peacock, A., & Wiseman, J. (1967). The Growth of Public Expenditure in The United Kingdom. Taylor & Francis. Pritchett, L. (1996). Measuring outward orientation in LDCs: Can it be done? Journal of development Economics, 49(2), 307-335.
  • Raberto, M., Ozel, B., Ponta, L., Teglio, A., & Cincotti, S. (2019). From financial ınstability to green finance: The role of banking and credit market regulation in the eurace model. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(1), 429-465.
  • Reisen, V. A. (1994). Estimation of the fractional difference parameter in the ARIMA (p, d, q) Model using the smoothed periodogram. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 15(3), 335-350.
  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do more open economies have bigger governments? Journal of political economy, 106(5), 997-1032.
  • Sachs, J. D., & Du Toit, H.J. (2015). Earth Calling The Financial Sector. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/sustainability-finance-leaders-byjeffrey-d-sachs-and-hendrik-j--du-toit-2015-02?barrier=accesspaylog. (Accessed March 8, 2025).
  • Sachs, J. D., Woo, W. T., Yoshino, N., & Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2019). Why is green finance important? ADBI Working Paper Series (No:917).
  • Serfaty, C. (2024). Sovereign default and international trade. IMF Economic Review, 72(4), 1449-1501.
  • Soni, K., Kapoor, S., Parmar, K. S., & Kaskaoutis, D. G. (2014). Statistical analysis of aerosols over the Gangetic–Himalayan region using ARIMA model based on long-term MODIS observations. Atmospheric Research, 149, 174-192.
  • Soundarrajan, P., & Vivek, N. (2016). Green finance for sustainable green economic growth in India. Agricultural Economics/Zemědělská Ekonomika, 62(1), 35-44.
  • Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2011). a new measure of trade openness. The world economy, 34(10), 1745-1770.
  • Şahin, B., & Şahin, Y. (2024). Yenilenebilir enerji kaynakları ve yeşil finans alanında yapılan çalışmaların yazın taraması. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(2), 414-426.
  • T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2019). On Birinci Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023), retrieved from https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/On_Birinci_Kalkinma_Plani-2019-2023.pdf
  • T.C. Enerji Piyasası Düzenleme Kurumu. (2023). 2023 Yılı Petrol Piyasası Sektör Raporu, retrieved from https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/4-14475/duyuru
  • Tao, H., Zhuang, S., Xue, R., Cao, W., Tian, J., & Shan, Y. (2022). Environmental finance: an ınterdisciplinary review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121639.
  • Topcu, E., Altinoz, B., & Aslan, A. (2020). Global evidence from the link between economic growth, natural resources, energy consumption, and gross capital formation. Resources Policy, 66, 101622.
  • Ukoba, K., Olatunji, K. O., Adeoye, E., Jen, T.-C., & Madyira, D. M. (2024). Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial ıntelligence: Review and future prospects. Energy & Environment, 35(7), 3833-3879.
  • Ulucak, R., & Ozcan, B. (2020). Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents. Resources Policy, 69, 101803.
  • Wagner, R. E., & Weber, W. E. (1977). Wagner's law, fiscal ınstitutions, and the growth of government. National Tax Journal, 30(1), 59-68.
  • Wahyudi, S. T. (2017). The ARIMA model for the Indonesia stock price. International Journal of Economics & Management, 11(1), 223-236.
  • Wang, K., Rehman, M. A., Fahad, S., & Linzhao, Z. (2023). Unleashing the ınfluence of natural resources, sustainable energy and human capital on consumption-based carbon emissions in G-7 countries. Resources Policy, 81, 103384.
  • Wang, Y., & Zhi, Q. (2016). The role of green finance in environmental protection: Two aspects of market mechanism and policies. Energy Procedia, 104, 311-316.
  • Wu, H. (2022). Trade openness, green finance and natural resources: A literature review. Resources Policy, 78, 102801.
  • Yildirim, E., Saraç, Ş., & Aslan, A. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: Evidence from renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(9), 6770-6774.
  • Zhou, H., Bhattarai, R., Li, Y., Si, B., Dong, X., Wang, T., & Yao, Z. (2022). Towards sustainable coal industry: Turning coal bottom ash into wealth. Science of the Total Environment, 804, 149985.
Toplam 76 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular İşletme
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Şerife Soğancıoğlu 0000-0002-7254-9321

Gamze Şekeroğlu 0000-0003-2280-6470

Gönderilme Tarihi 3 Ekim 2025
Kabul Tarihi 7 Kasım 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Soğancıoğlu, Ş., & Şekeroğlu, G. (2025). The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 146-176.
AMA Soğancıoğlu Ş, Şekeroğlu G. The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye. AEÜİİBFD. Aralık 2025;9(2):146-176.
Chicago Soğancıoğlu, Şerife, ve Gamze Şekeroğlu. “The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9, sy. 2 (Aralık 2025): 146-76.
EndNote Soğancıoğlu Ş, Şekeroğlu G (01 Aralık 2025) The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9 2 146–176.
IEEE Ş. Soğancıoğlu ve G. Şekeroğlu, “The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye”, AEÜİİBFD, c. 9, sy. 2, ss. 146–176, 2025.
ISNAD Soğancıoğlu, Şerife - Şekeroğlu, Gamze. “The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 9/2 (Aralık2025), 146-176.
JAMA Soğancıoğlu Ş, Şekeroğlu G. The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye. AEÜİİBFD. 2025;9:146–176.
MLA Soğancıoğlu, Şerife ve Gamze Şekeroğlu. “The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 146-7.
Vancouver Soğancıoğlu Ş, Şekeroğlu G. The Effects of Natural Resource Consumption on Green Finance and Trade Openness in Türkiye. AEÜİİBFD. 2025;9(2):146-7.