The Transformative Power of Women's Activism: The Case of Ahed Tamimi

Öz

This study aims to analyze the experiences of Ahed Tamimi through the lens of feminist standpoint theory and intersectionality in order to highlight the active role of young Palestinian women in resistance processes. Using a qualitative content analysis of Tamimi's memoir “They Called Me a Lioness: A Palestinian Girl's Fight for Freedom,” an inductive analysis of themes including gender dynamics in resistance, youth activism, family and community roles, body politics, and prison experiences was conducted. The analysis identified four key themes: "embodied resistance against oppression," "intergenerational transmission of knowledge," "growing up under continuous oppression," and "hope and resistance across borders." The findings of the study reveal the crucial role of Tamimi's physical and verbal resistance against the military authority in terms of women's empowerment by overcoming the traditional image of a passive woman. The intergenerational transmission of knowledge and the active participation of family members in the resistance keep the collective memory alive and ensure the continuity of the resistance. Furthermore, Tamimi's experiences illustrate the profound impact of oppression and militarization on the lives of the youth. The emphasis on international solidarity and education reflects the global dimension of Palestinian resistance and reveals a vision for a more hopeful future. This study contributes to shedding light on the multidimensional contributions of young women to resistance movements in processes of social change and emphasizes the importance of intersectionality in analyzing such dynamics. It provides a comprehensive insight into the transformative power of young Palestinian women's activism and broadens the understanding of the interconnected dynamics of gender, age, and national struggle in contexts of oppression.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ahed Tamimi
• feminist standpoint theory
• intersectionality
• gender
• women’s activism

Kadın Aktivizminin Dönüştürücü Gücü: Ahed Tamimi Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışma, Ahed Tamimi'nin deneyimlerinin Feminist Duruş Noktası Teorisi ve kesişimsellik bağlamında incelenmesi suretiyle, Filistinli genç kadınların direniş süreçlerindeki rolünün açıklanmasını amaçlamaktadır. Niteliksel içerik çözümlemesinden yararlanılarak, Tamimi'nin “They Called Me a Lioness: A Palestinian Girl's Fight for Freedom” (Bana Dişi Aslan Derler: Filistinli Bir Kızın Özgürlük Mücadelesi) adlı anı kitabının metinsel içeriği üzerinden direniş süreçlerindeki; toplumsal cinsiyet dinamikleri, gençlik aktivizmi, aile ve toplum rolleri, beden politikaları ve hapishane deneyimleri konuları tümevarımsal olarak incelenmiştir. Söz konusu metinsel içeriklerin sistematik analizi sonucunda; "baskıya karşı bedensel direniş", "kuşaklararası bilgi aktarımı", "sürekli baskı altında büyümek" ve "sınırların ötesinde umut ve direniş" olmak üzere dört tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, Tamimi'nin askeri otoriteye karşı gösterdiği fiziksel ve sözlü direniş sayesinde geleneksel pasif kadın imgesini bertaraf ederek kadınların güçlendirilmesi açısından önemli rol üstlendiğini göstermektedir. Kuşaklararası bilgi aktarımı ve aile üyelerinin direniş süreçlerinde doğrudan yer almaları, kolektif hafızanın canlı tutulması ve direnişin sürekliliğinin sağlanması açısından önem taşımaktadır. Tamimi'nin deneyimleri, baskı ve militarizasyonun gençlerin yaşamları üzerindeki derin etkilerini örneklendirmektedir. Uluslararası dayanışma ve eğitime yapılan vurgu, Filistin direnişinin küresel boyutuna işaret etmekte ve daha umutlu bir gelecek tasavvurunu ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, genç kadınların toplumsal değişim süreçlerinde, özellikle direniş hareketlerindeki çok boyutlu rollerinin anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunmakta ve benzeri süreçlerin analizinde kesişimselliğin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bununla birlikte, Filistinli genç kadınların aktivizminin dönüştürücü gücüne dair kapsamlı bir bakış açısı sunulmakta ve baskı bağlamlarında toplumsal cinsiyet, yaş ve ulusal mücadelenin birbiriyle bağlantılı dinamiklerine dair anlayışın genişletilmesi sağlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ahed Tamimi
• feminist duruş noktası teorisi
• kadın aktivizmi
• kesişimsellik
• toplumsal cinsiyet

Kaynakça

1. Abdallah, S. L. (2022). A history of confinement in Palestine: The prison web. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
2. Abdelkarim, Y. A. (2024). Prosecuting international law: Diagnosing the ınternational legal asthenia concerning the Gaza crisis. Journal of International Criminal Law, 5(1), 1-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.22034/jicl.2024.202181
3. Abu Liel F., Berte D. Z. and Russo S. (2017). Experience of Palestinian children facing consistent intermittent traumatic events: A descriptive phenomenological exploration. Sociology and Anthropology, 5(1), 91-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.13189/sa.2017.050111
4. Abu-Lughod, L. (2013). Do Muslim women need saving? London: Harvard University Press.
5. Abu-Rub, I. (2020). Analyzing Palestinian women’s activism within the online counterpublic: A case study of #tweetyourthobe on Twitter. Master's Thesis, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar.
6. Afana, A. H., Pedersen, D., Rønsbo, H. and Kirmayer, L. J. (2010). Endurance is to be shown at the first blow: Social representations and reactions to traumatic experiences in the Gaza Strip. Traumatology, 16(4), 73-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534765610395663
7. Althusser, L. (2000). İdeoloji ve devletin ideolojik aygıtları. (Y. Alp ve M. Özışık, Çev.). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 1970).
8. Augustin, E. (1992). Changes in structure and politics of the West Bank women's movement during the Intifada. New Political Science, 11(1-2), 69-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07393149208429656

9. Azaizah, A. and Çağlar, D. (2023). The Arab minority in the eyes of the Israeli laws. Russian Law Journal, 11(5), 2238-2250.
10. Balderas, T. L. (2023). Resistance narratives: Storytelling of transnational insurgencies in 1960-70s US and Mexico. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of New Mexico, USA.
11. Ben Shitrit, L. (2013). Women, freedom, and agency in religious political movements: Reflections from women activists in Shas and the Islamic movement in Israel. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 9(3), 81-107. https://dx.doi.org/10.2979/jmiddeastwomstud.9.3.81
12. Betancourt, T. S., Borisova, I., Williams, T. P., Meyers‐Ohki, S. E., Rubin‐Smith, J. E., Annan, J. and Kohrt, B. A. (2013). Research Review: Psychosocial adjustment and mental health in former child soldiers–a systematic review of the literature and recommendations for future research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(1), 17-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02620.x
13. Bilge, S. (2010). Recent feminist outlooks on intersectionality. Diogenes, 57(1), 58–72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0392192110374245
14. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
15. Britton, D. M. (2003). At work in the iron cage: The prison as gendered organization. New York: New York University Press.
16. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. London: Routledge.
17. Carpenter, M. (2018). Palestinian popular struggle: Unarmed and participatory. London: Routledge.
18. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Choo, H. and Ferree, M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129-149. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x
20. Collins, P. H. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Where’s the power? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(2), 375–381. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495162
21. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
22. Collins, P. H. (2015). Intersectionality's definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 1-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
23. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1229039
24. Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? New York: Seven Stories Press.
25. DeYoung, T. (2017). The disguises of the mind: Recent Palestinian memoirs. Review of Middle East Studies, 51(1), 5-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/rms.2017.24
26. Dingo, R. (2018). Speaking well: The benevolent public and rhetorical production of neoliberal political economy. Communication and the Public, 3(3), 232-246. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2057047318794964
27. Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., Huesmann, L. R., Shikaki, K., Landau, S., Gvirsman, S. D., and Ginges, J. (2009). Exposure to conflict and violence across contexts: Relations to adjustment among Palestinian children. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(1), 103–116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15374410903401153
28. Dugard, J. and Reynolds, J. (2013). Apartheid, international law, and the occupied Palestinian territory. European Journal of International Law, 24(3), 867–913. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht045
29. Elo, S. and Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
30. Engida, Y. M. (2021). The three dimensional role of education for women empowerment. Journal of Social Sciences, 17(1), 32-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2021.32.38
31. Enloe, C. (2000). Maneuvers: The international politics of militarizing women’s lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
32. Foucault, M. (2006). Hapishanenin doğuşu. (M.A. Kılıçbay, Çev.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. (Orijinal çalışma basım tarihi 1975).
33. Gluck, S. B. (1995). Palestinian women: Gender politics and nationalism. Journal of Palestine Studies, 24(3), 5–15. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2537876
34. Graneheim, U. H. and Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
35. Hahn Herrera, L. (2020). The production of solidarity frames in contested fields in the digital age: the case of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign. Doctoral Dissertation, SOAS University of London, UK.
36. Hajjar, L. (2005). Courting conflict: The Israeli military court system in the West Bank and Gaza. London: University of California Press.
37. Hamayel, L., Hammoudeh, D. and Welchman, L. (2017). Reproductive health and rights in East Jerusalem: the effects of militarisation and biopolitics on the experiences of pregnancy and birth of Palestinians living in the Kufr ‘Aqab neighbourhood. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(sup1), 87–95. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1378065
38. Hammami, R. (1990). Women, the hijab and the Intifada. Middle East Report, 164/165, 24–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3012687
39. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
40. Harding, S. (2004). Introduction: Standpoint theory as a site of political, philosophic, and scientific debate. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.
41. Hartsock, N. C. M. (1997). Comment on Hekman’s “Truth and method: Feminist standpoint theory revisited”: Truth or justice? Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 22(2), 367–374. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495161
42. Hartsock, N. C. M. (2004). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding (Ed.), The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies (pp. 35–54). New York: Routledge.
43. Heck, M. C. (1980). The ideological dimension of media message. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe and P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies 1972-79 (pp. 122–127). London: Hutchinson.
44. Hennawi, L. S. (2011). Education as resistance: Detention of Palestinian university students under Israeli occupation and Palestinian political-cultural responses. Doctoral Dissertation, Boston College, USA.
45. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2014). Feminist research practice: A primer (2nd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
46. Hooks, B. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End Press.
47. Hooks, B. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. New York: South End Press.
48. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
49. Hooks, B. (2012). Writing beyond race. New York: Routledge.
50. Houge, A. B. (2014). Sexualized war violence: Subversive victimization and ignored perpetrators. In I. Lander, S. Ravn and N. Jon (Eds.), Control, vulnerability and risk-taking: Masculinities in the criminological field (pp. 165–183). Farnham: Ashgate.
51. Imperiale, M. G., Phipps, A., Al-Masri, N. and Fassetta, G. (2017). Pedagogies of hope and resistance: English language education in the context of the Gaza Strip, Palestine. In E. J. Erling (Ed.), English across the fracture lines (pp. 31–38). London: British Council.
52. Jad, I. (2018). Palestinian women's activism: Nationalism, secularism, Islamism. New York: Syracuse University Press.
53. Jaysawal, N. and Saha, S. (2023). Role of education in women empowerment. International Journal of Applied Research, 9(4), 8-13. https://dx.doi.org/10.22271/allresearch.2023.v9.i4a.10710
54. Jaraisy, R. and Feldman, T. (2013). Protesting for human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory: Assessing the challenges and revisiting the human rights defender framework. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 5(3), 421–434. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hut021
55. Johnson, P. and Kuttab, E. (2001). Where have all the women (and men) gone? Reflections on gender and the second Intifada. Feminist Review, 69(1), 21–43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014177800110070102
56. Jones, R. A. (2009). Philosophical methodologies of critical race theory. Georgetown Journal of Law & Modern Critical Race Perspectives, 1(1), 17-40.
57. Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
58. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
59. Kuttab, E. (2008). Palestinian women's organizations: Global co-option and local contradiction. Cultural Dynamics, 20(2), 99–117. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0921374008094283
60. Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance society: Monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
61. Machel, G. (2001). The impact of war on children. London: Hurst & Company.
62. Mahmood, S. (2006). Feminist theory, agency, and the liberatory subject: Some reflections on the Islamic revival in Egypt. Temenos-Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 42(1), 31-71. https://dx.doi.org/10.33356/temenos.4633
63. Maqboul, F. (2024). Voices behind bars: Exploring the experiences of Palestinian women in Israeli prisons. Master's Thesis, University College Stockholm, Sweden.
64. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089
65. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. London: Routledge.
66. Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12/13, 333–358. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/302821
67. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). “Under Western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs, 28(2), 499–535. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/342914
68. Narayan, U. (1997). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third-world feminism. New York: Routledge.
69. Nazzal, A., Stringfellow, L. and Maclean, M. (2023). Webs of oppression: An intersectional analysis of inequalities facing women activists in Palestine. Human Relations, 77(2), 265-295. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00187267221144904
70. Okay, A. and Balçıkanlı, C. (2024). From university to schools: Insights from novice language teachers into teacher autonomy. In M. Jiménez Raya, B. Manzano Vázquez and F. Vieira (Eds.), Pedagogies for autonomy in language teacher education (pp. 152–168). New York: Routledge.
71. Peteet, J. (1991). Gender in crisis: Women and the Palestinian resistance movement. New York: Columbia University Press.
72. Pherali, T. and Turner, E. (2018). Meanings of education under occupation: The shifting motivations for education in Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(4), 567-589. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2017.1375400
73. Ramazanoglu, C. and Holland, J. (2002). Feminist methodology: Challenges and choices. London: Sage.
74. Ramsay, N. J. (2014). Intersectionality: A model for addressing the complexity of oppression and privilege. Pastoral Psychology, 63(4), 453-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11089-013-0570-4
75. Ratliff, C. (2006). Feminist standpoint theory. In E. M. Trauth (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gender and information technology (pp. 335–340). Hershey: Idea Group.
76. Reshi, I. A., Sudha, T. and Dar, S. A. (2022). Women’s access to education and its impact on their empowerment: A comprehensive review. Morfai Journal, 1(2), 446–450. https://dx.doi.org/10.54443/morfai.v1i2.760
77. Richter-Devroe, S. (2018). Women's political activism in Palestine: Peacebuilding, resistance, and survival. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
78. Sagar, R. K. (2021). Imperatives of decolonization: Insights from Fanon, Quijano, and Mignolo on colonial legacy. Social Science Chronicle, 1, 1-20. https://dx.doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2021.002
79. Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. London: Sage Publications.
80. Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2009). Militarization and violence against women in conflict zones in the Middle East: A Palestinian case-study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2015). Security theology, surveillance and the politics of fear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. Shalhoub-Kevorkian, N. (2019). Incarcerated childhood and the politics of unchilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Sharifi, N. (2018). Female bodies and sexuality in Iran and the search for defiance. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
84. Shilling, C. (2012). The body and social theory (3rd Ed.). London: Sage Publications.
85. Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
86. Spellman, R. (2024). Palestinian women’s experiences and feminist activism: Mobilizing under neoliberal, neopatriarchal, and colonial realities. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Arizona, USA.
87. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
88. Tamimi, A. and Takruri, D. (2022). They called me a lioness: A Palestinian girl's fight for freedom. New York: One World.
89. Terriquez, V., Brenes, T. and Lopez, A. (2018). Intersectionality as a multipurpose collective action frame: The case of the undocumented youth movement. Ethnicities, 18(2), 260-276. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468796817752558
90. Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.
91. United Nations. (2014). Report of the special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967 (A/69/301). Retrieved from https://undocs.org/A/69/301 on 01.12.2024.
92. van Teeffelen, T. and Giacaman, F. (2017). Sumud - Resistance in daily life. In T. van Teeffelen (Ed.), Challenging the wall: Toward a pedagogy of hope (pp. 20–30). Bethlehem: Arab Educational Institute.
93. Veronese, G. and Cavazzoni, F. (2020). “I hope I will be able to go back to my home city”: Narratives of suffering and survival of children in Palestine. Psychological Studies, 65(1), 51-63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12646-019-00502-5
94. Veronese, G., Mahamid, F. and Bdier, D. (2023). Transgenerational trauma and collective resilience: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of settler-colonial violence among three generations of Palestinian refugees. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 69(7), 1814-1824. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00207640231175787
95. Williams, V. (2020). Indigenous peoples: An encyclopedia of culture, history, and threats to survival. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
96. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.