Araştırma Makalesi

Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 21 Temmuz 2020
PDF İndir
TR EN

Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence

Öz

Since 1980s, firms’ asset investments have more or less tended to shift from tangible to intangible investments. This tendency is also valid for Turkish manufacturing firms. Despite the increasing importance of intangible asset investments, their role on financial performance is subject to considerable debate. These investments are riskier compared to tangible asset investments, and cannot easily be used as collateral in corporate borrowing. Tangible assets offering high guarantee are pledged as the primary source of collateral in corporate borrowing. Consequently, a firm with higher asset tangibility is likely to lower external financing costs, leading higher financial performance. This paper analyzes the effect of asset tangibility on financial performance of Turkish manufacturing sector covering 1990.Q3-2016.Q4. The stationarity of series and the cointegration relationship among them are tested by ADF (1979; 1981), KPSS (1992), and Zivot and Andrews (1992) unit root tests, and one-break Gregory and Hansen (1996) cointegration test. Long-run coefficients estimated by Stock and Watson (1993)’s DOLS methodology posit that while asset tangibility, financial leverage, liquidity and operating efficiency have significant and positive effects on financial performance till (and including) the break date; from this break date on, they affect financial performance negatively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Abor, J. (2007). Debt policy and performance of SMEs: Evidence from Ghanaian and South Africa firms. Journal of Risk Finance, 8(4), 364-379.
  2. Abuzayed, B. (2012). Working capital management and firms’ performance in emerging markets: The case of Jordan. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 8(2), 155-179.
  3. Acharya, V., Bharath, S. and Srinivasan, A. (2007). Does industry-wide distress affect defaulted firms? Evidence from creditor recoveries. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 787-821.
  4. Almeida, H. and Campello, M. (2007). Financial constraints, asset tangibility, and corporate investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(5), 1429-1460.
  5. Andrews, D. and Criscuolo C. (2013). Knowledge-based capital, innovation and resource allocation. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1046, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  6. Andrews, D. and de Serres, A. (2012). Intangible assets, resource allocation and growth: A framework for analysis. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 989, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  7. Andrews, D., Criscuolo, C. and Gal, P. N. (2016). The best versus the rest: The global productivity slowdown, divergence across firms and the role of public policy. OECD Productivity Working Papers No. 5, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  8. Ang, J. S., Cole, R. A. and Lin, J. W. (2000). Agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Finance, 55(1), 81-106.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

21 Temmuz 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Mayıs 2020

Kabul Tarihi

2 Temmuz 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
İltaş, Y., & Demirgüneş, K. (2020). Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.731079
AMA
1.İltaş Y, Demirgüneş K. Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020;6(2):345-364. doi:10.31592/aeusbed.731079
Chicago
İltaş, Yüksel, ve Kartal Demirgüneş. 2020. “Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 6 (2): 345-64. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.731079.
EndNote
İltaş Y, Demirgüneş K (01 Temmuz 2020) Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 6 2 345–364.
IEEE
[1]Y. İltaş ve K. Demirgüneş, “Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence”, Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 6, sy 2, ss. 345–364, Tem. 2020, doi: 10.31592/aeusbed.731079.
ISNAD
İltaş, Yüksel - Demirgüneş, Kartal. “Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 6/2 (01 Temmuz 2020): 345-364. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.731079.
JAMA
1.İltaş Y, Demirgüneş K. Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020;6:345–364.
MLA
İltaş, Yüksel, ve Kartal Demirgüneş. “Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence”. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 6, sy 2, Temmuz 2020, ss. 345-64, doi:10.31592/aeusbed.731079.
Vancouver
1.Yüksel İltaş, Kartal Demirgüneş. Asset Tangibility and Financial Performance: A Time Series Evidence. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 01 Temmuz 2020;6(2):345-64. doi:10.31592/aeusbed.731079

Cited By