Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü'ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları

Berrin Akbulut; Murat Açıl

doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398

TR EN

Öz

Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü'ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları

Öz

1 Ağustos 2024 tarihinde yürürlüğe giren Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü, Birlik değerlerine aykırı olan ve temel hakları ihlal etme potansiyeli bulunan bazı yapay zekâ sistemlerinin piyasaya sürülmesini, hizmete sunulmasını ve kullanımını yasaklamıştır. Bu yasaklar, Tüzük’ün 5’inci maddesinde “subliminal, amaçlı olarak manipülatif veya yanıltıcı teknikler kullanan yapay zekâ sistemleri”, “kırılganlıkları istismar eden yapay zekâ sistemleri”, “sosyal puanlama yapan yapay zekâ sistemleri”, “kişilerin suç işleme riskini değerlendirmeyi veya tahmin etmeyi amaçlayan yapay zekâ sistemleri”, “internetten veya CCTV görüntülerinden rastgele yüz görüntüleri toplamak sureti ile yüz tanıma veri tabanları oluşturan sistemler”, “duygu tanıma sistemleri”, “biyometrik sınıflandırma sistemleri” ve “gerçek zamanlı uzaktan biyometrik tanımlama sistemleri” olmak üzere sekiz kategori altında toplanmıştır. Söz konusu yasakları ihlal eden aktörlere farklı miktarlarda idari para cezası verilmesi öngörülmüştür. Bu çalışmada, Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’nün risk temelli yaklaşımı özetlendikten sonra her bir yasaklanmış yapay zekâ sistemi kategorisi ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü , Yasaklanmış yapay zekâ sistemleri , Sosyal puanlama sistemleri , Duygu tanıma sistemleri , Biyometrik tanımlama sistemleri

Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices Under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act

Abstract

The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, which entered into force on 1 August 2024, prohibits the placing on the market, the putting into service, or the use of certain artificial intelligence systems that are contrary to the Union’s values and have the potential to violate fundamental rights. These prohibitions are set out in Article 5 of the Act and cover eight categories of AI systems: “AI systems deploying subliminal, purposefully manipulative, or deceptive techniques”, “AI systems exploiting vulnerabilities”, “AI systems used for social scoring”, “AI systems intended to assess or predict a person’s risk of committing a crime”, “systems that create facial recognition databases by collecting facial images from the internet or CCTV footage”, “emotion recognition systems”, “biometric categorisation systems”, and “real-time remote biometric identification systems”. Actors who violate these prohibitions are subject to administrative fines of varying amounts. In this study, after summarising the risk-based approach of the Artificial Intelligence Act, each category of prohibited AI systems is examined in detail.

Keywords

EU Artificial Intelligence Act , Prohibited artificial intelligence systems , Social scoring systems , Emotion recognition systems , Biometric identification systems

Kaynakça

Access Now/European Digital Rights (EDRi)/Bits of Freedom/Article 19/IT-Pol, Prohibit Remote Biometric Categorisation in Publicly Accessible Spaces, and Any Discriminatory Biometric Categorisation. (https://www.accessnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Prohibiting-Biometric-Categorisation-updated-version-January-2023.docx.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 02.05.2025)
Aksoy, Mehmet Ali, “2005/29/AT Haksız Ticari Uygulamalar Direktifinde Düzenlenen Haksız Rekabet Halleri ve Uygulama Örnekleri”, İÜHFM, 2015, C. LXXIII, S. 1, s. 279-318.
Albal Ulaş, Hilal/ Tunç, Aybike, “Yapay Zekâ Tabanlı Yüz Tanıma Sistemlerine İlişkin Hukuki Tartışmalar”, Yapay Zekâ Hukuku (Kamu), Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2024, s. 411-447 (Editörler: Budak, Tamer/Aşkın, Uğur).
ALLAI (Muller, Catelijne/Dignum, Virginia), Artificial Intelligence Act: Analysis & Recommendations, 06.08.2021, s. 1-26. (https://allai.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EU-Proposal-for-Artificial-Intelligence-Act-Analysis-and-Recommendations.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2025)
ALLAI (Muller, Catelijne/Talvitie, Christofer/van Ree, Rosa), AIA In-Depth: Prohibited AI Practices (Article 5), 24.02.2022, s. 1-15. (https://allai.nl/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/AIA-in-depth-2-Prohibited-AI-Practices.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2025)
Amendments Adopted by the European Parliament on 26 March 2026 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Regulations (EU) 2024/1689 and (EU) 2018/1139 as regards the Simplification of the Implementation of Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) (COM(2025)0836 – C10-0304/2025 – 2025/0359(COD), (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2026-0098_EN.html, Erişim Tarihi: 06.04.2026).
An EU Artificial Intelligence Act for Fundamental Rights: A Civil Society Statement, 30.11.2021. (https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Political-statement-on-AI-Act.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2025)
Article 19, Emotional Entanglement: China’s Emotion Recognition Market and Its Implications for Human Rights, 2021. (https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ER-Tech-China-Report.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 25.04.2025)
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Opinion 3/2012 on Developments in Biometric Technologies, 00720/12/EN-WP193, 27.04.2012. (https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2012/wp193_en.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 01.05.2025)
Atalan, Sultan Ebrar, Uluslararası Hukuk Bağlamında Avrupa'da Yapay Zekaya İlişkin Düzenlemeler ve Kişisel Verilerin Korunması, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul 2024.

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (NL) – Department for the Coordination of Algorithmic Oversight (DCA), AI Systems for Emotion Recognition in the Areas of Workplace or Education Institutions, 2024. (https://www.autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl/en/system/files?file=2024-10/Call%20for%20input_emotion%20recognition_DCA-2024-02.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 29.04.2025)
Barkane, Irena, “Questioning the EU Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act: The Need for Prohibitions and a Stricter Approach to Biometric Surveillance”, Information Polity, 2022, Vol. 27, Issue 2, s. 147-162.
Barkane, Irena/Buka, Lolita, “Prohibited AI Surveillance Practices in the Artificial Intelligence Act: Promises and Pitfalls in Protecting Fundamental Rights”, Critical Perspectives on Predictive Policing: Anticipating Proof?, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, 2025, s. 110-129 (Editörler: Galis, Vasilis/Gundhus, Helene O.I./ Vradis, Antonis).
Başyiğit, Ahmet Semih, Temel İnsan Hakları Bağlamında Risk Temelli Yapay Zekâ, Yetkin Yayınları, Ankara 2024.
Benzer, Ekrem, “Yapay Zekâ’nın AB Hukuk Düzenindeki Görünümü: AB Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü”, Bilişim Hukuku Dergisi, 2025, C. 7, No. 1, s. 187-221.
Bişkin, Ferdi, Subliminal A.Ş.: Tüket-İtaat Et, Elma Yayınevi, Ankara, 2014.
Bozkurt Yüksel, Armağan Ebru, “Sokak Fotoğrafçılığı ve Kişisel Verilerin Korunması”, Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 2020, S. 42, s. 525-566.
Bozkurt Yüksel, Armağan Ebru, “Avrupa Komisyonu’nun Yapay Zekâ Tüzük Teklifi’ne Genel Bir Bakış”, Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, 2022, S. 51, s. 19-46.
Burgess, Matt, Europe Makes the Case to Ban Biometric Surveillance: Companies Are Racing to Track Your Emotions, How You Walk and Your Voiceprint-Should Europe Ban Biometric Tracking Entirely?, 07.07.2021. (https://www.wired.com/story/europe-ai-biometrics/, Erişim Tarihi: 02.05.2025)
Carroll, Micah/ Chan, Alan/ Ashton, Henry/ Krueger, David, “Characterizing Manipulation from AI Systems”, EAAMO '23: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, Article No: 6, s. 1-13.
Confortini, Claudia, Emotions Recognition Systems and Data Economy. (https://art.torvergata.it/retrieve/b6eb5d34-ff4e-40c7-a305-48743c816b6d/EmotionsRecognitionSystemsAndDataEconomy.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 25.04.2025)
Council of the European Union, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts - Analysis of the Final Compromise Text with a View to Agreement, 26.01.2024. (https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5662-2024-INIT/en/pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 08.05.2025)
Ćemalović, Uroš, “Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices According to Article 5 of the European Union’s Regulation on AI: Between the ‘Too Late’ and the ‘Not Enough’, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 2024, Vol. 32, s. 1-13.
Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti Devlet Konseyi, State Council Notice Concerning Issuance of the Planning Outline for the Construction of a Social Credit System (2014-2020), GF No. (2014) 21, 14.07.2014 (Çevirmen: Creemers, Rogier). (https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/planning-outline-for-the-construction-of-a-social-credit-system-2014-2020/, Erişim Tarihi: 19.03.2025)
Das, Shanti, “Facial Recognition Cameras in Supermarkets ‘Targeted at Poor Areas’ in England”, 27.01.2024. (https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jan/27/facial-recognition-cameras-in-supermarkets-targeted-at-poor-areas-in-england, Erişim Tarihi: 14.05.2025)
De Almeida, Patricia Gomes Rêgo/dos Santos, Carlos Denner/Farias, Josivania Silva, “Artificial Intelligence Regulation: A Framework for Governance”, Ethics and Information Technology, 2021, Vol. 23, s. 505-525.
Deckker, Dinesh/Sumanasekara, Subhashini, “Safeguarding Human Dignity: A Narrative Review of Prohibited AI Practices under the EU AI Act”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2025, Vol. 26, No. 3, s. 243–260. Díaz González, Gustavo Manuel, “Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices (Chapter II)”, The EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence: A Commentary, Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano, 2025, s. 33-77 (Editör: Huergo Lora, Alejandro).
Dul, Camilla, “Facial Recognition Technology vs Privacy: The Case of Clearview AI”, Queen Mary Law Journal, 2022, Vol. 3, s. 1-24.
Ebers, Martin/ Hoch, Veronica R. S./ Rosenkranz, Frank/ Ruschemeier, Hannah/ Steinrötter, Björn, “The European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act: A Critical Assessment by Members of the Robotics and AI Law Society (RAILS)”, Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 2021, Vol. 4, No. 4, s. 589-603.
Ebers, Martin, “Truly Risk-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence: How to Implement the EU’s AI Act”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2025, Vol. 16, Issue 2, s. 684-703.
EDPB/EDPS, Joint Opinion 5/2021 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), 18.07.2021. (https://www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/edpbedps-joint-opinion/edpb-edps-joint-opinion-52021-proposal_en, Erişim Tarihi: 02.04.2025)
Ekman, Paul/ Friesen, Wallace W., Unmasking the Face: A Guide to Recognizing Emotions from Facial Expressions, Malor Books, Cambridge 2003.
Erdoğan, Irmak, Yapay Zekâ ve Profilleme Teknolojilerinin Ceza Muhakemesinde Kişisel Veri İşlenmesine Etkileri, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara 2022.
Escajedo San-Epifanio, Leire, “Biometric Recognition in the Artificial Intelligence Act: Exemptions, Prohibitions and High-Risk Specialties”, The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: A Systematic Commentary, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2025, s. 181-239 (Editörler: Cotino Hueso, Lorenzo/Galetta, Diana-Urania).
EUCPN (Majsa Storbeck), Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Policing: Risks and Challenges, Brussels, 2022. (https://eucpn.org/sites/default/files/document/files/PP%20%282%29.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05.04.2025)
European Commission, Annex to the Communication to the Commission Approval of the Content of the Draft Communication from the Commission - Commission Guidelines on Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices Established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act), C(2025) 884, Brussels, 04.02.2025. (https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/commission-publishes-guidelines-prohibited-artificial-intelligence-ai-practices-defined-ai-act, Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2025)
European Commission, COM (2020) 65, White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European Approach to Excellence and Trust, Brussels, 19.2.2020.
European Digital Rights (EDRi)/Access Now/Article 19/Bits of Freedom/the Chaos Computer Club (CCC)/Digitale Gesellschaft CH/the IT-Political Association of Denmark (IT-Pol), Prohibit All Remote Biometric Identification (RBI) in Publicly Accessible Spaces. (https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Prohibit-RBI-in-publicly-accessible-spaces-Civil-Society-Amendments-AI-Act-FINAL.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2025)
European Digital Rights (EDRi), European Commission Adoption Consultation: Artificial Intelligence Act, Brussels, 03.08.2021, s. 1-39. (https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/European-Digital-Rights-EDRi-submission-to-European-Commission-adoption-consultation-on-the-Artificial-Intelligence-Act-August-2021.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 13.03.2025)
European Parliament, Amendments Adopted by the European Parliament on 14 June 2023 on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts (COM(2021)0206 — C9-0146/2021 — 2021/0106(COD)), OJ C 2024/506, 23.01.2024.
European Parliamentary Research Service (Tambiama Madiega and Hendrik Mildebrath), Regulating Facial Recognition in the EU, Brussels, 2021. (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2021/698021/EPRS_IDA(2021)698021_EN.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2025)
Fair Trials, Automating Injustice: The Use of Artificial Intelligence & Automated Decision-Making Systems in Criminal Justice in Europe. (https://www.fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2021/11/Automating_Injustice.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 06.04.2025)
Finck, Michèle, The EU Artificial Intelligence Act: A Commentary, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2026.
Falcıoğlu, Mete Özgür, “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Yasası’nın Genel Değerlendirmesi”, Yapay Zekâ Hukuku (Özel), Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2024, s. 159-186 (Editörler: Budak, Tamer/Aşkın, Uğur).
García Majado, Patricia, “Prohibited AI Practices under the EU AI Act”, Artificial Intelligence and Fundamental Rights: The AI Act of the European Union and Its Implications for Global Technology Regulations, Verein für Recht und Digitalisierung e.V., Trier 2025, s. 35-55 (Editörler: Raue/von Ungern-Sternberg/Kumkar/Rüfner).
Gikay, Asress Adimi, What Is EU Doing on AI Facial-Scraping Recognition — and Is It Enough?, 27.01.2025. (https://euobserver.com/digital/ar4c69411a, Erişim Tarihi: 17.04.2025)
González de la Garza, Luis Miguel, “The Content of the So-Called “Subliminal Techniques” and the Vulnerabilities of Specific Groups of People in the Artificial Intelligence Act”, The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: A Systematic Commentary, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli 2025, s. 257-287 (Editörler: Cotino Hueso, Lorenzo/Galetta, Diana-Urania).
Görentaş, Muhammed Burak/ Çiftçi, Hamza, “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Yasası Çerçevesinde Yargılamada Yapay Zekâ Kullanımının Değerlendirilmesi”, İzmir Barosu Dergisi, 2024, S. 1, s. 177-203.
Gözler, Kemal, “Yorum İlkeleri”, Anayasa Hukukunda Yorum ve Norm Somutlaşması, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Yayınları, Ankara 2012, s. 15-120.
Gremsl, Thomas/ Hödl, Elisabeth, “Emotional AI: Legal and Ethical Challenges”, Information Polity, 2022, Vol. 27, Issue 2, s. 163-174.
Gstrein, Oskar J./ Haleem, Noman/ Zwitter, Andrej, “General-Purpose AI Regulation and the European Union AI Act”, Internet Policy Review, 2024, Vol. 13, Issue 3, s. 1-26.
Güçlütürk, Osman Gazi, “Kodlar ve Kanunlar: Yapay Zekânın Regülasyon Rotası ve AB Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü”, Yapay Zekâ Teknolojilerine Akademik Bakış, Adalet Yayınevi, Ankara 2025, s. 109-178 (Editör: Bilir, Faruk).
Gültekin-Várkonyi, Gizem, “Navigating Data Governance Risks: Facial Recognition in Law Enforcement under EU Legislation”, Internet Policy Review, 2024, Vol. 13, Issue 3, s. 1-36.
Independent High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intellıgence Set up by the European Commission, Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, Brussels, 2019. (https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html, Erişim Tarihi: 27.02.2025)
International Biometrics + Identity Association, IBIA Comments on City of Portland Draft Bills Prohibiting Public and Private Use of Facial Recognition Technology, 2020. (https://www.ibia.org/download/datasets/5356/IBIA-CommentsonPendingPortlandFacialRecognitionProposals-1%20(1).pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 02.05.2025)
International Working Group on Data Protection in Technology, Working Paper on Facial Recognition Technology, Discussed and Adopted at the 70th Meeting on 29th-30th November 2022 and 71st Meeting on 7th-8th June 2023. (https://www.bfdi.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Berlin-Group/20230608_WP-Facial-Recognition-Tech-EN.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2, Erişim Tarihi: 15.04.2025)
Kapısız, Bilal, İnsan Hakları Hukuku Bağlamında Yapay Zeka Sistemleri, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir Bakırçay Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, İzmir 2024.
Kayser-Bril, Nicolas, Personal Scoring in the EU: Not Quite Black Mirror Yet, at Least if You’re Rich, 07.08.2019, (https://algorithmwatch.org/en/personal-scoring-in-the-eu-not-quite-black-mirror-yet-at-least-if-youre-rich/, Erişim Tarihi: 31.07.2025).
Karadeniz, Salih, “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Kanunu’nun Risk Grupları ve İlgililerin Yükümlülükleri Bağlamında İncelenmesi”, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2025, C. 29, S. 1, s. 307-365.
Kindt, Els J./Jasserand, Catherina, “Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices”, The EU AI Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act: A Commentary, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2015, s. 105-192 (Editörler: Pehlivan, Ceyhun Necati/Forgo, Nikolaus, Valcke, Peggy).
Kosinski, Michal, “Facial Recognition Technology Can Expose Political Orientation from Naturalistic Facial Image”, Scientific Reports, 2021, Vol. 11, s. 1-7.
Leiser, Mark, “Psychological Patterns and Article 5 of the AI Act: AI-Powered Deceptive Design in the System Architecture and the User Interface”, Journal of AI Law and Regulation, 2024, Vol. 1, Issue 1, s. 5-23.
Mac Síthigh, Daithí/ Siems, Mathias, “The Chinese Social Credit System: A Model for Other Countries?”, EUI Working Paper LAW 2019/01, 2019, s. 1-34. (https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/60424/LAW_2019_01.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed =y, Erişim Tarihi: 20.03.2025)
Malgieri, Gianclaudio/ Rebrean, Maria-Lucia “Vulnerability in the AI Act: Building an Interpretation”, Working Paper, 28.11.2024, s. 1-35. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5058591, Erişim Tarihi: 12.03.2025) Manav Özdemir, A. Eda/ Aydın, “Beyza, Avrupa Birliği’nin 2024/1689 Sayılı Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’nün İş İlişkileri Üzerindeki Etkileri”, İstanbul Hukuk Mecmuası, 2025, C. 85, S. 3, s. 1741-1769.
Mitka, Aleksander, “The Use of ‘Real-Time’ Remote Biometric Identification Systems for Law Enforcement – Comments in Light of Legislative Work on the Artificial Intelligence Act”, Review of International, European and Comparative Law, 2023, Vol. XXI, s. 183-202.
Neuwirth, Rostam J., “Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices in the Proposed EU Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA)”, Computer Law & Security Review, 2023, Vol. 48, s. 1-14.
Neuwirth, Rostam J./ Migliorini, Sara, “Unacceptable Risks in Human-AI Collaboration: Legal Prohibitions in Light of Cognition, Trust and Harm”, Proceedings of the Workshop on Ethics and Trust in Human-AI Collaboration: Socio-Technical Approaches (ETHAICS 2023) co-located with 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2023) Macao, August 21, 2023. (https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3547/paper4.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 02.03.2025)
Nicolás Lucas, Asunción, “Codes of Conduct and Guidelines (Chapter X)”, The EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence: A Commentary, Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano, 2025, s. 539-580 (Editör: Huergo Lora, Alejandro).
Novelli, Claudio/ Hacker, Philipp/ Morley, Jessica/ Trondal, Jarle/ Floridi, Luciano, “A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities”, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2024, Vol. 16, Issue 2, s. 1-25.
Özçelik, Ş. Barış, “Yapay Zekanın Veri Koruma, Sorumluluk ve Fikri Mülkiyet Açısından Ortaya Çıkardığı Hukuki Gereksinimler”, Adalet Dergisi, 2021, S. 66, s. 87-116.
Park, Peter S./ Goldstein, Simon/ O’Gara, Aidan/ Chen, Michael/ Hendrycks, Dan, “AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutions”, Patterns, 2024, Vol. 5, Issue 5, s. 1-26.
Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies (Codagnone, Cristiano/Liva, Giovanni/Rodriguez de las Heras Ballell, Teresa), Identification and Assessment of Existing and Draft EU Legislation in the Digital Field, Ocak 2022. (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/703345/IPOLSTU(2022) 703345_EN.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 27.04.2025)
Presno Linera, Miguel Ángel, “The Prohibition of Artificial Intelligence Systems That Evaluate and Classify People Based on Data That Are Unrelated to the Context in which They Were Generated and That Lead to Discrimination”, The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: A Systematic Commentary, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli, 2025, s. 241-255 (Editörler: Cotino Hueso, Lorenzo/Galetta, Diana-Urania).
Rodríguez Cembellín, Diego, “Enforcement (Chapter IX, Section 3)”, The EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence: A Commentary, Wolters Kluwer Italia, Milano 2025, s. 473-502 (Editör: Huergo Lora, Alejandro).
Simón Castellano, Pere, “The Remaining Artificial Intelligence Systems Prohibited or Unacceptable in the Artificial Intelligence Act”, The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act: A Systematic Commentary, Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli 2025, s. 283-297 (Editörler: Cotino Hueso, Lorenzo/Galetta, Diana-Urania).
Söderlund, Kasia/ Larsson, Stefan, “Enforcement Design Patterns in EU Law: An Analysis of the AI Act”, Digital Society, 2024, Vol. 3, Issue 3, s. 1-21.
Smuha, Nathalie/ Ahmed-Rengers, Emma/ Harkens, Adam/ Li, Wenlong/ Maclaren, James/ Piselli, Riccardo/ Yeung, Karen, How the EU Can Achieve Legally Trustworthy AI: A Response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artifıcial Intelligence Act, 05.08.2021, s. 1-59. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3899991, Erişim Tarihi: 07.03.2025)
Sousa e Silva, Nuno, The Artificial Intelligence Act: Critical Overview, 30.08.2024, s. 1-36. (https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00264, Erişim Tarihi, 22.07.2025)
Tatar, Samet, “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü Kapsamında Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı: Türk Hukukuna Öneriler”, Adalet Dergisi, 2026, S. 76, s. 285-306.
Turan Başara, Gamze, “Avrupa Dijital Düzenleme Sisteminde Yapay Zekâ Yasası”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2024, C. 73, S. 4, s. 2983-3016.
UNESCO, Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, 23. 11.2021. (https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137, Erişim Tarihi: 08.03.2025)
Van Dam, Clara, “Guidance Documents of the European Commission: A Typology to Trace the Effects in the National Legal Order”, Review of European Administrative Law, 2017, Vol. 19, No. 2, s. 75-91.
Veale, Michael/ Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik, “Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Act: Analysing the Good, the Bad, and the Unclear Elements of the Proposed Approach”, Computer Law Review International, 2021, Vol. 22, No. 4, s. 97-112.
Voigt, Paul/Hullen, Nils, “What AI Practices Are Prohibited?”, The EU AI Act: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, s. 37-46 (Editörler: Voigt, Paul/Hullen, Nils).
Wachter, Sandra, “Limitations and Loopholes in the EU AI Act and AI Liability Directives: What This Means for the European Union, the United States, and Beyond”, Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 2024, Vol. 26, Issue 3, s. 671-718.
Wang, Yilun/ Kosinski, Michal, “Deep Neural Networks Are More Accurate Than Humans at Detecting Sexual Orientation From Facial Images”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2018, Vol. 114, No. 2, s. 246-257.
Yeşiltuna, Oğuzhan, “AB Yapay Zekâ Yasası Uyarınca Deployer Kavramı: Yasama Sürecindeki Seyri, Getirdikleri ve Türkçe Karşılığı Sorunu”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 2025, C. 33, S. 4, s. 2607-2649.
Yıldız, İlkay Ata, “Çin’in Sosyal Kredi Sistemi: Nedir, Ne Değildir?”, Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2023, C. 15, S. 4, s. 375-390.
Yılmaz, İlay/ Sözer, Can/ Elver, Ecem, “Yapay Zekâ İle İlgili Güncel Düzenlemeler: Avrupa Birliği ve Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinde Alınan Aksiyonlar Işığında Bir Değerlendirme”, Adalet Dergisi, 2021, S. 66, s. 445-469.
Zhong, Huixin, “Implementation of the EU AI Act Calls for Interdisciplinary Governance”, AI Magazine, 2024, Vol. 45, Issue 3, s. 333-337.
Zhong, Huixin/O’Neill, Eamonn/Hoffmann, Janina A., “Regulating AI: Applying Insights from Behavioural Economics and Psychology to the Application of Article 5 of the EU AI Act”, Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Vancouver, 2024, s. 20001-20009 (Editörler: Wooldridge, Michael/Dy, Jennifer/ Natarajan, Sriraam).

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

Bilişim ve Teknoloji Hukuku

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Berrin Akbulut
0000-0001-8045-2784
Türkiye

Murat Açıl ^*
0000-0002-0333-3121
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

23 Nisan 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Mayıs 2025

Kabul Tarihi

13 Nisan 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83AY69UX

APA

Akbulut, B., & Açıl, M. (2026). Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(2), 995-1058. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398

AMA

1.Akbulut B, Açıl M. Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları. HBV-HFD. 2026;30(2):995-1058. doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398

Chicago

Akbulut, Berrin, ve Murat Açıl. 2026. “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 30 (2): 995-1058. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398.

EndNote

Akbulut B, Açıl M (01 Nisan 2026) Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 30 2 995–1058.

IEEE

[1]B. Akbulut ve M. Açıl, “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları”, HBV-HFD, c. 30, sy 2, ss. 995–1058, Nis. 2026, doi: 10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398.

ISNAD

Akbulut, Berrin - Açıl, Murat. “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 30/2 (01 Nisan 2026): 995-1058. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398.

JAMA

1.Akbulut B, Açıl M. Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları. HBV-HFD. 2026;30:995–1058.

MLA

Akbulut, Berrin, ve Murat Açıl. “Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 30, sy 2, Nisan 2026, ss. 995-1058, doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398.

Vancouver

1.Berrin Akbulut, Murat Açıl. Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü’ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları. HBV-HFD. 01 Nisan 2026;30(2):995-1058. doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1704398

Öz

Öz

Avrupa Birliği Yapay Zekâ Tüzüğü'ne Göre Yasaklanmış Yapay Zekâ Uygulamaları

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices Under the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster