NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY

Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3 1 Temmuz 2011
PDF İndir
TR EN

NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY

Öz

Regardless of its specifi c title in each country, the concept of national human rights institutions is used for the national institutions, which have made the accreditation demonstrating the compliance with the international standards. Having applied to the accreditation procedures, there are many institutions that acquired the quality of national human rights institution as ombudsman and commission model. Although dressed with a wide authorization to choose the institutional models the countries are expected to meet the international standards in line with the model chosen. The subject of this study will be to examine in which models compliant to the international standards national human rights institutions exist, what are the factors taken into consideration by the countries to determine the institution choice and what sort of an institutional structure must be preferred for Turkey

Anahtar Kelimeler

National Human Rights Institutions,human rights,ombudsman,human rights commission,national institutions

Kaynakça

  1. Act governing the Establishment of the Danish Centre for International Studies and Human Rights, Act no. 411 of 06/06/2002, Chapter 1.
  2. Amnesty International’s Recommendations on National Human Rights Institution, National Human Rights Institutions, Amnesty International’s Recommendations for effective protection and promotion of human rights, AI INDEX: IOR 40/007/2001, 1 October 2001
  3. Anna-Elina Pohjolainen, The Evolution of National Human Rights Institutions The Role of the United Nations, The Danish Institute for Human Rights, Copenhagen, Denmark, January 2006
  4. Canada Human Rights Act 1985, Part II, Human Rights Commission.
  5. Canadian Human Rights Commission, Human Rights Commission and Public Policy: The Role of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in Advancing Sexual Orientation Equality Rights in Canada, Prepared by Annette Nierobitsz, Mark Searl, Charles, Thêroux, 2008.
  6. Chart of The Status of National Institutions, Accredited by The International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Accreditation status as of 2 June 2009.
  7. Chart of The Status of National Institutions, Accredited by The International Coordinating Committee of National Institutions for the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Accreditation status as of June 2010.
  8. Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, CommDH/ Omb-NHRI (2007) 1 Rev 3, “Effective Protection of Human Rights in Europe: Enhanced Co-operation between Ombudsman, National Human Rights Institution and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights”, Athens, 12-13 April 2007.
  9. Commonwealth Secretariat, National Human Rights Institutions, Best Practice, 2001.
  10. Disability Right Commission, Annual Report and Accounts, April to September 2007, s.4-5.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eren, A. (2011). NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(3), 165-198. https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA
AMA
1.Eren A. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY. HBV-HFD. 2011;15(3):165-198. https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA
Chicago
Eren, Abdurrahman. 2011. “NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15 (3): 165-98. https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA.
EndNote
Eren A (01 Temmuz 2011) NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15 3 165–198.
IEEE
[1]A. Eren, “NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY”, HBV-HFD, c. 15, sy 3, ss. 165–198, Tem. 2011, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA
ISNAD
Eren, Abdurrahman. “NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 15/3 (01 Temmuz 2011): 165-198. https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA.
JAMA
1.Eren A. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY. HBV-HFD. 2011;15:165–198.
MLA
Eren, Abdurrahman. “NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 15, sy 3, Temmuz 2011, ss. 165-98, https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA.
Vancouver
1.Abdurrahman Eren. NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTITUTIONAL MODELS IN COMPARATIVE LAW AND THE CASE OF TURKEY. HBV-HFD [Internet]. 01 Temmuz 2011;15(3):165-98. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA39FX84KA