Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk ve Terörizme Karşı Nükleer Silahların Kullanımı

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 899 - 922, 01.07.2014

Saeed Bagherı

Öz

Günümüzde uluslararası terörizm, ortaya çıkardığı etkiler ile uluslararası barış ve güvenliği tehdit eden unsurların başını çeker duruma gelmiştir. Söz konusu durumun uluslararası hukuk yapısını etkilemesi kaçınılmaz olmuştur. Gerek terörizmin kendisi gerek terörizme karşı devletlerin başvurduğu operasyonlar, uluslararası hukukun mevcut kurallarını tekrar tartışmaya açmıştır. Terörizme karşı mücadelede kuvvet kullanılarak, uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk kurallarının bu tür eylemlere uygulanabilirliği tartışılabilir hale gelmiştir.Çalışmamızın ilk bölümünde terörle mücadelede İnsancıl Hukukun uygulanması, İnsancıl Hukukun uygulama kapsamı ve terörizmle mücadele konusundaki uluslararası andlaşmalar, İnsancıl Hukukun terörist eylemlerine uygulanması ve BM Güvenlik Konseyi’nin konuya ilişkin kararları ele alınacaktır. Çalışamanın temelini oluşturan ikinci bölümde ise, terörle mücadele sırasında nükleer silah kullanımının gayri meşruluğu hususu değerlendirilecektir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Terörizm, Uluslararası İnsancıl Hukuk, nükleer silahlar, kuvvet kullanma, BM Güvenlik Konseyi

INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW AND USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS AGAINST TERRORISM

Öz

Nowadays international terrorism has come to the forefront of threat to peace and security by the effects that it has created. This status has also infl uenced the structure of international law. Terrorism by itself or the operations done against terrorism by the states, have opened way for disputes over the status quo of international law. Dispute have arisen whether international humanitarian law principles are applicable to the use of force in the fi ght against terrorism.In the fi rst part of the present study, the application of humanitarian law in the fi ght against terrorism, the scope of humanitarian law, international conventions regarding fi ght against terrorism, the application of humanitarian law to terrorist operations and UN Security Council decisions regarding the discussions will be overviewed. In the second and most prominent part of the study the illegality of the use of nuclear weapons in the fi ght against terrorism will be investigated

Anahtar Kelimeler

Terrorism, International humanitarian law, nuclear weapons, use of force, UN Security Council

Kaynakça

• - Bal, İhsan, Terörizm: Terör, Terörizm ve Küresel Terörle Mücadelede Ulusal ve Bölgesel Deneyimler, USAK Yayınları, 1. Baskı, Ankara, 2006.
• - H. Başeren, Sertaç, Uluslararası Hukuk Açısından Terörizm, Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Terör, Ed. Tarhan, Ali, Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Merkez Bankası Yayınları, 1. Baskı, 2002.
• - Bilder, Richard, Nuclear Weapons and International Law, in: Arthur SELWYN and Martin FEINRIDERS, Nuclear Weapons and LAw, Westport: Greenwood Press, 1984.
• - Butfoy, Andy, “Nuclear Strategy”, in: Craig A. SNYDER, Contemporary Security and Strategy, 2nd Edition, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
• - Comras, Victor D., Flawed Diplomacy: The United Nations & the War on Terrorism, Washington: Potomac Books, Inc, 2010.
• - Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
• - Henckaerts, Jean-Marie & DOSWALD-BECK, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law, Vol. I: Rules, London: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
• - Higgins, Rosalind & FLORY, Maurice, Terrorism and International Law, London: Routledge, 1997.
• - Kaya, İbrahim, Terörle Mücadele ve Uluslararası Hukuk, Ankara: USAK Yayınları, 2005.
• - Münkler, Herfried, The New Wars, London: Polity Press, 2005.
• - Mutalik, Gururaj, Crude Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation and the Terrorist Threat, Cambridge: IPPNW, 1996.
• - Taşdemir, Fatma, Uluslararası Terörizme Karsı Devletlerin Kuvvete Başvurma Yetkisi, Ankara: USAK Yayınları, 2006.
• - T.C Genel Kurmay Başkanlığı, Silahlı Çatışma Hukuku ile İlgili Uluslararası Metinler, Ankara: Genel Kurmay Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2010.
• - A. Finch, George, The Nuremberg Trial and International Law, AJIL, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1947, ss. 20- 37.
• - Baharçiçek, Abdulkadir ve TUNCEL, Gökhan, Terörle Mücadelenin Zorlukları ve Bu Zorlukları Aşmada Farklı Bir Yaklaşım: Demokratik Mücadele Yöntemi, Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Terörizm Dergisi, Cilt: 2 (2), 2001, ss. 1-15.
• - Borelli, Silvia, Casting Light on the Legal Black Hole: International law and Detentions Abroad in the War on Terror, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 857, March 2005, ss. 39-48.
• - F. Gravelle, James, The Falkland (Malvinas) Islands: An International Law Analysis of the Dispute Between Argentina and Great Britain, Military Law Review, Vol. 107, 1985, ss. 5-69.
• - Finch, George A., The Nuremberg Trial and International Law, AJIL, Vol. 41, No. 1, 1947, ss. 20- 37.
• - Greenwood, Christopher, International Law and the “War AgainstTerrorism”, International Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 2, 2002, ss. 301-317.
• - Halatçı, Ülkü, 11 Eylül Terörist Saldırıları Ve Afganistan Operasyonu’nun Bir Değerlendirmesi, Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt: 2, No. 7, 2006, ss. 80-98.
• - Ratner, Steven R., The War on Terrorism and International Humanitarian Law, Michigan State Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, 2006, ss. 19-26.
• - Roberts, Adam, Counter-terrorism, Armed Force and the Laws of War, Survival (quarterly journal of IISS, London), Vol. 44, No. 1, 2002, ss. 7-32.
• - Rona, Gabor, Interesting Times for International Humanitarian Law: Challenges from the War on Terror, The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2003, ss. 55-74.
• - Roth, Kenneth, The Law of War in The War on Terror, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 83, 2004, ss. 2-7.
• - Sulmasy, M. Glenn, The Law of Armed Confl ict in the Global War on Terror: International Lawyers Fighting the Last War, Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, Vol. 19, 2005, ss. 309-316.
• Watkin, Kenneth, Controlling the Use of Force: A Role For Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Confl ict, AJIL, C.98, No.1, 2004, ss. 1-34.
• - Thornhill, John & Spiegel, Peter, France Delivers Nuclear Threat, Financial Times, erişim için bkz. http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e805e2d4-88e6- 11da-94a6-0000779e2340.html#axzz2Wbb10LgY. [19.06.2013].
• - Moore, Molly, Chirac: Nuclear Response to Terrorism Is Possible, Washington Post Foreign Service, January 20, 2006, erişim için bkz. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/19/ AR2006011903311.html. [19.06.2013].
• - Vönkey, Silja, The Fight Against Terrorism and the Rules of International Law of Warfare, in: Walter Christian et al., (eds), Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law: Security versus Liberty, Berlin: Springer, 2003, erişim için bkz. http://edoc.mpil.de/conference%20onterrorism/index.cfm, s. 4. [23.06.2013].
• - Hall, B. Welling, Addendum Relating to Self-Defense, ASIL Insights: Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, American Society of International Law (September 2001), erişim için bkz. http://www. asil.org/insigh77.cfm. [25.06.2013].
• - “International Humanitarian Law and Terrorism: Questions and Answers”, ICRC, Resource Centre, 01-01-2011, erişim için bkz. http://www. icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/faq/terrorism-faq-050504.htm. [29.06.2013].
• - Ware, Alyn, Terrorism and Nuclear Disarmament, 11 September 2001, erişim için bkz. http://lcnp.org/disarmament/index.htm. [19.06.2013].
• - Borelli, Silvia, Casting Light on the Legal Black Hole: International law and Detentions Abroad in the War on Terror, International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 87, No. 857, March 2005, s. 42, erişim için bkz. http:// www.icrc.org/eng/assets/fi les/other/irrc_857_borelli.pdf. [03.07.2013].
• - Mc Cluskey, Jim, The Arguments Against Nuclear Weapons (and the arguments for), Russell Press, s. 7, erişim için bkz. http://inlapwcp.webplus. net/BOOKLET%201%20-%20ARGUMENTS%20AGAINST%20 NUCLEAR%20WEAPONS%20-%20PP.pdf. [06.07.2013].
• Weeramantry, Christopher, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Weeramantry, s. 230, erişim için bkz. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/fi les/95/7521.pdf. [03.07.2013].
• - Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) ICJ Reports (1986).
• - Human Rights Committee, General Comment 14, Article 6 (Twenty-third session, 1984), Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 18 (1994), erişim için bkz. http://www.unhchr.ch/ tbs/doc.nsf/(Symbol)/9c882008fd898da7c12563ed004a3b08?Opendoc ument. [02.07.2013].
• - Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1996, erişim için bkz. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/ fi les/95/7495.pdf. [03.07.2013].
• - Nuclear Age Peace Fundation: Ten Facts About Nuclear Weapons, erişim için bkz. http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2009/09/facts_myths. pdf. [22.06.2013].
• - United Nations S/RES/1368, adopted by the Security Council at its 4370th meeting, on 12 September 2001, erişim için bkz. http://daccess-ods. un.org/TMP/9605749.24945831.html. [02.07.2013].
• - United Nations S/RES/1373, adopted by the Security Council at its 4385th meeting, on 28 September 2001, erişim için bkz. http://daccess-ods. un.org/TMP/5511724.94888306.html. [29.06.2013].
• - United Nations S/RES/1456, adopted by the Security Council at its 4688th meeting, on 20 January 2003, erişim için bkz. http://www.un.org/ga/ search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1456(2003). [29.06.2013].
• - The International Institute of Humanitarian Law and The International Committee of the Red Cross, XXVIIth Round Table on Current Problems of International Humanitarian Law: International Humanitarian Law and Other Legal Regimes: Interplay in Situations of Violence, (Summary Report Prepared by the International Committe of the Red Cross), November 2003.