BİRLEŞMİŞ MİLLETLER ULUSLARARASI SATIM SÖZLEŞMESİ VE YENİ TÜRK BORÇLAR KANUNU’NA GÖRE HASARIN GEÇİŞİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 4, 91 - 116, 01.10.2012

Seda İrem Çakırca

Öz

01 Ağustos 2011 tarihinden itibaren, Türkiye için iç hukuk niteliğinde olan Birleşmiş Milletler Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmesi’nin (CISG) hasarın geçişine ilişkin kurallarının ve bu kuralların sonuçlarının ortaya konulması, Türk hukuku açısından özel bir önem arz etmektedir. Öte yandan 6098 sayılı Türk Borçlar Kanunu’nun yürürlüğe girmesiyle birlikte, Türk satım hukukunda edim ve karşı edim hasarının alıcıya geçişine dair düzelenmelerde köklü ve CISG ile paralel değişilikler meydana gelmiştir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı; (CISG) ve yeni Türk Borçlar Kanunu’nun (TBK) hasarın geçişine ilişkin hükümlerini karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyip, paralellikleri ve farklılıkları ortaya koymaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Hasarın geçişi, Birleşmiş Milletler Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmesi, Uluslararası ticaret, Satım sözleşmesi, Türk Borçlar Kanunu.

PASSING OF RISK ACCORDING TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS AND THE NEW TURKISH CODE OF OBLIGATIONS FROM A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Öz

The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) entered into force in Turkey on 01 August 2011, making the CISG an applicable national law regarding the international sale of goods, therefore rules on passing of risk according to CISG and its consequences have special importance for Turkish law. On the other hand, when the new Turkish Code of Obligations (TBK) numberred 6098, enters into force rules on passing of risk will fundamentaly change analogous with the CISG. In this respect, this paper aims to analyse the diferrences and correspondencies between the CISG and the TBK

Anahtar Kelimeler

Passing of risk, The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, international trade, sale contract, Turkish Code of Obligations

Kaynakça

• Akkanat Halil, “Gefahrtragung beim internationalen Versendungskauf nach UN- Kaufrecht”, Annales de la Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul, Vol.35, No. 52, 2003, pp. 269-281.
• Akıntürk Turgut, Satım Akdinde Hasarın İntikali, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları No: 212., Ankara, 1966.
• Atamer Yeşim, Uluslararası Satım Sözleşmelerine İlişkin CISG Uyarınca Satıcının Yükümlülükleri ve Sözleşmeye Aykırılığın Sonuçları, Beta, İstanbul, 2005 (citied: Atamer, CISG).
• Atamer Yeşim, “Taşınır Satımı Sözleşmesi”, Türk Borçlar Kanunu Sempozyumu Makaleler-Tebliğler, Ed. Murat İnceoğlu, XII Levha, İstanbul, 2012, pp. 187-221 (cited: Atamer, Taşınır Satımı)
• Beckmann Roland Michael, J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen Buch 2 Recht der Schuldverhaeltnisse §§ 433-487; Leasing (Kaufrecht und Leasingrecht), Sellier-de Gruyter, Berlin, 2004 (cited: Staudinger/Beckmann).
• Bridge Michael, “The Transfer of Risk under the UN Sales Convention 1980 (CISG)”, Sharing International Commercial Law across National Boundaries: Festschrift for Albert H. Kritzer on the Occasion of his Eightieth Birthday, ed. by Camilla B. Andersen & Ulrich G. Schroeter, 2008, pp. 77- 105 (cited: Bridge, The Transfer of Risk).
• Bridge Michael, The International Sale of Goods Law and Practice, 2. ed., Oxford Univesity Press, 2007 (cited: Bridge, The International Sale of Goods).
• Bucher Eugen, “Notizen zu Art. 185 OR (Gefahrtragung durch den Käufer)”, ZSR, Bd. 89, 1970, pp. 281-294.
• Butler Allison E., A Practical Guide to the CISG: Negotiations Through Litigation, Aspen Publishers, 2007.
• Cenini Marta/Parisi Francesco, “An Economic Analysis of the CISG”, CISG Methodology, ed. by André Janssen/Olaf Meyeri, Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009, pp. 151-170.
• Çetiner Bilgehan, “Yeni Türk Borçlar Kanunu’nda Yarar ve Hasarın İntikali İle Satıcının Ayıptan Sorumluluğuna İlişkin Hükümlerin Değerlendirilmesi”, İÜHFM., C.: LXVII, S.1-2, 2009, pp. 97-114.
• DiMatteo Larry A./Dhooge Lucien J./Greene Stephanie/Maurer Virginia G./Pagnattaro Marisa Anne, International Sales Law A Critical Analysis of CISG Jurisprudence, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
• Erauw Johan, “CISG Articles 66-70: The Risk of Loss and Passing It”, 25. J.L.& Com. 203, 2005-2006, pp. 203-217.
• Ferrari Franco, “General Principles and International Uniform Commercial Law Conventions: A Study of the 1980 Vienna Sales Convention and the 1988 Unidroit Conventions on International Factoring and Leasing”, Pace Int’l L. Rev. 10, 1998, pp. 157-185.
• Fountoulakis Christiana, “Remedies for breach of contract under the United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods”, ERA Forum 12, 2011, pp. 7-23.
• Hager Günter, Die Gefahrtragung beim Kauf Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung, Alfred Metzner Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, 1982 (cited: Hager, Gefahrtragung).
• Hager Günter, “Gefahrtragung nach UN- Kaufrecht im Vergleich zu EKG und BGB”, Einheitliches Kaufrecht und nationales Obligationenrecht Referate und Diskussionen der Fachtagung Einheitliches Kaufrecht am 16./17. 2. 1987, ed. by Peter Schlechtriem, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1987, pp. 387-413 (cited: Hager, Einheitliches Kaufrecht).
• Honnold, Risk of Loss, Parker School of Foreign & Comparative Law (Galston & Smit eds.), International Sales: The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, New York: Matthew-Bender, 1984; http://www.cisg.law.pace.edu/cisg/biblio/honnold5.html (accessed at 17.05.2012)
• Kommentar zum UN-Kaufrecht Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen über Vertraege über den Internationalen Warenkauf (CISG), 2. ed. by Heinrrich Honsell, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010 (cited: Honsell/author).
• UN-Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), ed. by Kröll Stefan/Mistelis Loukas/Viscasillas Pilar Perales, C.H. Beck, München, 2011 (cited: Kröll/Mistelis/Perales Viscasillas/author) .
• Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, Band 3, Schuldrecht Besonderer Teil, §§ 433-610, Finanzierungsleasing, HeizkostenV, BetriebskostenV, CISG, ed. by Krüger Wolfgang/Westermann Harm Peter, C.H. Beck, München, 2012 (cited: MünchKommBGB/author CISG) .
• Magnus Ulrich, J. von Staudingers Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen Wiener UN-Kaufrecht (CISG), Sellier-de Gruyter, Berlin, 2005 (cited: Staudinger/Magnus).
• Özdemir, Hayrunnisa, “Satış Sözleşmesinde Yarar ve Hasarın İntikali”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi Özel Hukuk Sempozyumu Özel Sayısı, Prof. Dr. Cevdet Yavuz’a Armağan, 2011, pp. 359-379.
• Posch Willibald, Bürgerliches Recht Band VII Internationales Privatrecht,5. ed., Springer Wien, New York, 2010.
• Pfund Peter H., Contributing to Progressive Development of Private International Law: The International Process and the United States Approach, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994.
• Ramberg Jan, “To What Extent do INCOTERMS 2000 Vary Article 67 (2), 68 and 69?”, 25 J.L. & Com. Vol. 25, 2005- 2006, pp. 219-222.
• Romein Annemieke, The Passing of Risk A comparison between the passing of risk under the CISG and German law, http://www.cisg.law.pace. edu/cisg/biblio/romein.html. (accessed at 17.05.2012) .
• Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 3. ed. by. Peter Schlechtriem/Ingeborg Schwenzer, Oxford University Press, 2010 (cited: Schlechtriem/Schwenzer/author).
• Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 2. ed. by. Peter Schlechtriem/Ingeborg Schwenzer, Oxford University Press, 2005 (cited: Schlechtriem/Schwenzer/author).
• Schlechtriem Peter, Internationales UN-Kaufrecht, 2. ed., Mohr Siebeck, 2003.
• Schwenzer Ingeborg/Fountoulakis Christiana, International Sales Law, Routledge-Cavendish, London, New York, 2007.
• Schwenzer Ingeborg / Hachem Pascal, “The CISG- Success and Pitfalls”, American Journal of Comperative Law, Volume 57, Issue 2, 2009, pp. 457-478.
• Visser Evelien, “Favor Emptoris Does The CISG favor the Buyer?”, 67 UMKC. L. Rev. 77, 1998-1999, pp. 77-92.