BİR İNANÇ MESELESİ OLARAK İNSAN ONURU: KAVRAMIN DİNİ VE SEKÜLER TEMELLENDİRMELERİ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 1, 477 - 536, 31.01.2022

Ahmet Ekinci

https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1065428

Öz

Bu çalışmada, insan onuru kavramının seküler ve dini izahları arasındaki temel benzerlikler ve farklılıklar ele alınmaktadır. Seküler ve dini izahlar arasındaki en temel benzerlikler, insanların özgür iradeye sahip olması, rasyonaliteye sahip olması ve insanlar arasındaki eşitliktir. Çalışmada seküler ve dini açıklamaları birbirinden ayıran iki temel farklılık tespit edilmiştir. Bunlardan ilki insan onurunun temelleri ile ilgilidir. Seküler temeller, onuru insanın içsel bir değeri olarak açıklarken, İbrahimi dinler, onuru Tanrı'nın bir armağanı olarak açıklar. Bunun doğal bir sonucu olarak, ilkinde insan hakları, doğrudan insanın iradesinden ya da menfaatlerinden türetilirken, İbrahimi dinlerde insan eylemleri dini emirleri ihlal etmemelidir. İnsan, ancak Allah'ın emirlerini araştırmak ve öğrenmek için özgür iradesini ve akılcılığını kullandığında özgür eylem ayrıcalığı kazanır. O zaman denilebilir ki eğer bir hak varsa, o da Tanrı tarafından tespit edilmelidir. İkinci fark ise insan hakları ve toplumsal menfaatler ile ilgilidir. İbrahimî dinler insanı toplumdan ayrı görmez ve insan eylemlerini toplumsal menfaatlere aykırı olmadığı sürece meşru kabul eder. Buna karşın seküler açıklamalar insanın haklarını önceler ve hakları toplumsal menfaatler karşısında ikincil olmayan bir konuma yerleştirir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

insan onuru, insanın kutsallığı, insan haklarının temeli, semavi dinlerde insan onuru, özgür irade.

HUMAN DIGNITY AS A BELIEF ISSUE: RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR FOUNDATIONS OF THE CONCEPT

Öz

In this study, basic similarities and differencies between secular and religious explanations of the concept of human dignity is handled. Main similarities are that human has free will and rationality and there is not any hierarchy among people. In the study, two main differences that separate secular and religious explanations are detected. One of them is about the foundation of human dignity. Secular views explains the dignity as an intrinsic value of the human while Abrahamic religions explain the dignity as a gift of God. As a natural conclusion of that, human rights are inferred directly from the human’s interests or will according to secular explanations. However human actions shouldn’t violate religious orders in Abrahamic religions. Human can attain free action privilege only when (s)he uses his/her rationality and free will to search and find out God's orders. Then it can be said that if there is a right, it must be had given too by the God. The second difference is about relationship between human rights and societal interests. Abrahamic religions don’t see human apart from the society and recognizes human acts as legitimate insofar as they are not against the societal interests. However secular explanations prioritize the human rights and accomodate the rights in a non-subsidiary position to interests.

Anahtar Kelimeler

human dignity, sacredness of the human, foundation of the human rights, human dignity in Abrahamic religions, free will.

Kaynakça

• Ağaoğulları M A, Batı’da Siyasal Düşünceler, İletişim Yayınları, 2014.
• Akyol M, Özgürlüğün İslami Yolu, Doğan Kitabevi, 2011.
• Arslan A, “İnsan Hakları ve İslam”, Liberal Düşünce, 1997 (6), s. 118-131.
• Arslan A, Felsefeye Giriş, Serbest Akademi Yayınları, 2021.
• Avineri S, “The Paradox of Religion and the Universality of Human Rights” in Andres Sajo (ed.), Human Rights with Modesty, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2004, s. 317-237.
• Aziz-Said A, “Precept and Practice of Human Rights in Islam”, Universal Human Rights, 1 (1), 1979, s. 63-79.
• Bagaric M/ Allan J, “The Vacuous Concept of Dignity”, Journal of Human Rights, 5 (2), 2006, s. 257-270.
• Balano V, “Catholic Social Teaching, Theology, and Sociology: Exploring the Common Ground”. Religions,10, 2019, <doi: 10.3390/rel10100557> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Balhan M J, “European Values, Fundamental Rights and Christianity” in Angelo Santagostino ( ed.), The Idea and Values of Europe, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2020, s. 21-39.
• Bardakoğlu A, “Hak”, TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi, <https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/hak> Erişim Tarihi 18 Şubat 2021.
• Barre E, “Reconciled to Liberty: Catholics, Muslims, and the Possibility of Overlapping Consensus”, Florida State University Libraries-Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations, Florida, 2009.
• Barroso L R, “Here, There, and Everywhere: Human Dignity in Contemporary Law and in the Transnational Discourse”, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 35 (2), 2012, s. 331-393.
• Berman H J, “The Religious Foundations of Western Law”, Catholic University Law Review. 24 (3), 1975, s. 490-508.
• Beyleveld D, “The Principle of Generic Consistency as the Supreme Principle of Human Rights”, Human Rights Review, 13 (1), 2012, s. 1-18.
• Beykeveld D/ Brownsword R, “Human Dignity, Human Rights, and Human Genetics”, The Modern Law Review, 61 (5), 1998, s. 661-680.
• Bielby P, “Gewirth’s Theory of Agenct Rights”, Competence and Vulnerability in Biomedical Research, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2008.
• Bill C, “Vatican Says Catholic Church Cannot Bless Same-Sex Marriages”, <https://www.npr.org/2021/03/15/977415222/illicit-for-catholic-church-to-bless-same-sex-marriages-vatican-says> Erişim Tarihi 14 Temmuz 2021.
• Butler G, “Essence of Human Rights: A Religious Critique”, University of Richmond Law Review, 33, 2009, s. 1255-1318.
• Cahill L S, “Toward a Christian Theory of Human Rights”, Journal of Religious Ethics, 8 (2), 1980, s. 277-301.
• Clapham A, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors, Oxford University Press, 2006.
• Coughlin J J, “Pope John Paul II and the Dignity of the Human Being”, Harvard Jornal of Law and Public Policy, 27, 2003, s. 65-80.
• Doğan İ, “İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Temel Kavramları ve Özellikleri”, in İlyas Doğan (ed.), İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Astana Yayınları, 2015, s. 43-79.
• Delacoura K, Islam, Liberalism and Human Rights, Third Edition, I.B. Tauris, 2007.
• Den Hartogh G, “Is Human Dignity the Ground of Human Rights?”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 200-207.
• Donnelly J, “Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analytic Critiqueof Non-Western Concepts of Human Rights”, The American Political Science Review, 76 (2), 1982, s. 303-316.
• Donnelly J, “Human Dignity and Human Rights”, Agenda for Human Rights, Swiss Initiative to Commemorate the 60th Anniversary of the UDHR, 2009, <https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/e80bda/pdf/> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Douzinas C, Human Rights and Empire, Routledge and Cavendish, 2007.
• Duran M S, “Kant’ın Ödev Ahlakı Üzerine”, Temaşa: Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi, 6, 2017.
• Düwell M, “Human Dignity: Concepts, Discussions, Philosophical Perspectives”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, 2014, s. 23-53.
• Dworkin R, Taking Rights Seriously, Harvard University Press, 1978.
• Dworkin R, Life’s Dominion, Alfred A. Knopf, 1993.
• Elshtain J B, “The Dignity of the Human Person and the Idea of Human Rights: Four Inquiries”, Journal of Law and Religion, 14 (1), 1999, s. 53-65.
• Emon A M, “Huquq Allah and Huquq al-Ibad: A Legal Heuristic for a Natural Rights Regime”, Islamic Law and Society, 13 (6), 2006.
• Erdoğan M, Anayasa Mahkemesine Bireysel Başvuruda Temel Hak ve Özgürlüklerin Yorumu, Lykeon Yayınları, 2019.
• Fakhry M, A History of Islamic Philosophy, Third Edition, Columbia University Press, 2004.
• Feron H, “Human Rights and Faith: A ‘World Wide Secular Religion’?”, Ethics & Global Politics, 7 (4), 2014, s. 181-200.
• Feinberg J, “The Nature and Value of Rights”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 1970, s. 243-260.
• Freeman M, “The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights”, Human Rights Quartely, 16 (3), 1994, s. 491-514.
• Freeman M, “The Problem of Secularism in Human Rights Theory”, Human Rights Quarterly, 26, 2004, s. 375-400.
• Gewirth A, The Community of Rights, University of Chicago Press, 1998.
• Gordon L P, The Evolution of International Human Rights Visions Seen, Third Edition, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.
• Gözkan H B, Kant’ın Şemsiyesi, Yapı Kredi Yayınları, 2020.
• Griffin J, On Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2008.
• Habermas J, “A Conversation About God and World: Interview with Eduardo Mendieta”, in Eduardo Mendieta (ed.), Religion and Rationality, Polity Press, 2002, s. 147-168.
• Habermas J, “The Concept of Human Dignity and The Realistic Utopia of Human Rights”, Metaphilosophy, 41 (4), 2010, s. 464-480.
• Hallaq W, “God Cannot Be Harmed: On Huquq Allah/Huquq al-Ibad Continuum”, <https://www.academia.edu/26412704/_God_Cannot_be_Harmed_On_%E1%B8%A4uq%C5%ABq_All%C4%81h_%E1%B8%A4uq%C5%ABq_al-Ib%C4%81d_Continuum> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Harman Ö F, “Evrensel Dinlerin İnsan Haklarına Bakışı”, Diyanet İlmi Dergi, 34 (3), 1998, s. 3-16.
• Hart H L A, Hukuk, Özgürlük ve Ahlak, 3. Baskı, Dost Kitabevi, 2014.
• Helmholz R H, “Human Rights in the Canon Law” in Frank Alexander, John Witte (eds.), Christianity and Human Rights: An Intduction, Cambridge University Press, 2010, s. 99-112.
• Hollenbach D, “Human Rights and Religious Faith in the Middle East: Reflections of a Christian Theologian”, Human Rights Quartely. 4 (1), 1982, s. 94-109.
• Hollenbach D, “The Common Good Revisited”, Theological Studies, 1989 (50), s. 70-94.
• Hollenbach D, “Human Dignity in Catholic Thought”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 250-259.
• Idleman S C, “The Limits of Religious Values in Judicial Decisionmaking”, Marquette Law Review, 1998, 81 (2), s. 537-657.
• Imbach R, “Human Dignity in the Middle Ages (Twelfth to Fourteenth Century), in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 64-74.
• Ignatieff M, “Human Rights as Political Human Rights as Idolatry”, Princeton University, 2000, <https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/i/Ignatieff_01.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Önsöz, <https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/cescr.aspx> Erişim Tarihi: 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Işıktaş Y, Hukuk Felsefesi, Filiz Kitabevi, 2006.
• İncil, <https://incil.info/arama/Yaratilis+1:26-27> Erişim Tarihi 8 Aralık 2020.
• İnsan Hakları Evrensel Bildirgesi (Universal Declaration of Human Rights), Önsöz, <https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Jaede M, “The Concept of Common Good”, Working Paper Series of the Political Settlements Research Programme (PSRP) of the University of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, UK, 2017), <https://www.britac.ac.uk/sites/ default/files/Jaede.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Karen Lee M Y, “Religion, Human Rights and the Role of Culture”, The International Journal of Human Rights, 15 (6), 2011, s. 887-994.
• Kocaoğlu M, John Rawls-Adalet Teorisi ve Temel Kavramları, İmaj Yayınları, 2015.
• Kohen A, “The Possibility of Secular Human Rights: Alan Gewirth and the Principle of Generic Consistency”, Human Rights Review, 7(1), 2005, s. 49-75.
• Kohen A, “The Problem of Secular Sacredness Ronald Dworkin, Michael Perry and Human Rights Foundationalism”, Journal of Human Rights, 5, 2006, s. 235-256
• Köksal A C, “İnsan Haklarının Felsefi Krizi: İslami Bir Perspektif”, Marmara Üniversitesi İlâhiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 58, 2020, s. 25-67.
• Kuçuradi İ, İnsan Hakları: Kavramları ve Sorunları, Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu, 2018.
• Kur’an Meali, <https://www.kuranmeali.com/AyetKarsilastirma.php?sure=17&ayet=70> Erişim Tarihi 2 Kasım 2021.
• Kur’an-ı Kerim, <https://kuran.diyanet.gov.tr/tefsir>, Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Kuzmicz K, “The Kantian Model of the State Under Rule of Law”, Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 19(2), 2009, s. 13-20.
• Lewis M, “A Brief History of Human Dignity: Idea nad Application” in Jeff Malpas, Norelle Lickiss (eds.), Perspectives on Human Dignity, Springer, 2007, s. 93-108.
• Locke J, Second Treatise of Government, C. B. Macpherson (ed.), Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 1980.
• Lorberbaum Y, “Human Dignity in the Jewish Tradition”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 135-147.
• Loughlin J, “Human Dignity: The Foundation of Human Rights and Religious Freedom”, Memoria y Civilizacion, 19, 2016, s. 313-343.
• Maritain J, “Person and the Common Good”, The Review of Politics, 8 (4), 1946, s. 419-455.
• Maritain J, “Introduction” in Human Rights, Comments and Interpretations, A Symposium Edited by UNESCO, 1948, <https://e-docs.eplo.int/phocadownloadpap/userupload/aportinou-eplo.int/Human%20rights%20comments%20and%20interpretations.compressed.pdf> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021.
• Martin R/Woodward M R/Atmaja D S, Defenders of Reason in Islam, Oneworld Publication, 1997.
• McCrudden C, “Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights”, The European Journal of International Law, 19 (4) 2008, s. 655-674.
• Mieth D, “Human Dignity in Late-Medieval Spiritual and Political Conflicts”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 74-84.
• Mill J S, Hürriyet Üzerine, 2. Baskı, M. Osman Dostel (çev.), Ömer Çaha (sadeleştiren), Liberte Yayınları, 2009.
• Novak M, “The Judeo-Christian Foundation of Human Dignity, Personal Liberty, and the Concept of the Person”, Journal of Markes & Morality, 1(2), 1998, s. 107-121.
• Oh I, The Rights of God-Islam, Human Rights, and Comparative Ethics, Georgetown Univeristy Press, 2007.
• Opwis F, “Public Interest” in Patricia Crone, Wadad Kadi, Devin J. Stewart, Muhammad Qasim Zaman, (eds.), The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought, Princeton University Press, 2012, s. 435-436.
• Osiatynski W, “On the Universality of Universal Decleration of Human Rights” in Andres Sajo (ed.), Human Rights with Modesty, Springer-Science+Business Media, 2004, s. 33-50.
• Özgenç İ, Türk Ceza Hukuku Genel Hükümler, 15. Baskı, Seçkin Kitabevi, 2019.
• Öztürk M, “Teslimiyet ve Hürriyet Sarkacında Din”, Yetkin Düşünce, 1, 2018, s. 143-150.
• Perry M, The Idea of Human Rights Four Inquiries, Oxford University Press, 1998.
• Perry M, Toward a Theory of Human Rights: Religion, Law, Courts, Cambridge University Press, 2006.
• Pharo L K, “The Council of Valladolid (1550-1551): A European Disputation About the Human Dignity of Indıgenuous Peoples of the Americas”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 95-100.
• Piar D F, “Morality as a Legitimate Government Interest”, Penn State Law Review, 2012, 117 (1), s. 139-169.
• Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, <http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html#> Erişim Tarihi 24 Şubat 2021.
• Pope Paul VI, “Dignitatis Humanae”, 1965, <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decl_19651207_dignitatis-humanae_en.html> Erişim Tarihi 24 Şubat 2021.
• Rawls J, “The Idea of An Overlapping Consensus”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7 (1), 1987, s. 1-23.
• Rawls J, “The Domain of Political and Overlapping Consensus”, New York Law Review, 64 (2), 1989, s. 233-255.
• Rawls J, The Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, 1999.
• Roberts T A, “Law, Morality and Religion in a Christian Society”, Religious Studies, 1984, 20 (1), s. 79-98.
• Rorty R, “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality”, Truth and Progress Philosophical Papers, Cambridge Universty Press, 1998, <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625404.010> Erişim Tarihi 16 Temmuz 2021, s. 167-185.
• Sachedina A, Islam and The Challenge of Human Rights, Oxford University Press, 2009.
• Sajo A, “Introduction” in Andres Sajo (ed.), Human Rights with Modesty, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2004, s. 1-34.
• Savage R, “Pope Francis' LGBT+ views, as Vatican opposes same-sex blessings”, <https://www.reuters.com/article/us-vatican-lgbt-unions-idUSKBN2B82MN> Erişim Tarihi 14 Temmuz 2021.
• Schoreder D, “Human Rights and Human Dignity An Appeal to Separate the Conjoined Twins”, Ethic Theory Moral Prac, 15, 2012, s. 323-335.
• Shultziner D, “Human Dignity: Functions and Meanings” in Jeff Malpas, Norelle Lickiss (eds.), Perspectives on Human Dignity, Springer, 2007, s. 73-92.
• St John E C/Blackler S, “Religion and Dignity: Assent and Dissent” in Jeff Malpas, Norelle Lickiss (eds.), Perspectives on Human Dignity, Springer, 2007, s. 127-134.
• Steenbackers P, “Human Dignity in Renaissance Humanism”, in Marcus Düwell, Jens Braarvig, Roger Brownsword, Dietmar Mieth (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity-Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, s. 85-95.
• Traer R, “Human Rights in Islam”, Islamic Studies, 28 (2), 1989, s. 117-129.
• Uzun E, “Ahlâksızlığın Cezalandırılması: Devlin-Hart Tartışması” in Serdar Gürler (ed.), H.L.A. Hart ve Hukuk-Ahlak Ayrımı, Tekin Yayınevi, 2015, s. 65-99.
• Villa-Vicencio C, “Christianity and Human Rights”, Journal of Law and Religion”,14, 1999, s. 578-600.
• Waldron J, “Is Dignity the Foundation of Human Rights?” in Rowan Cruft, S. Matthew Liao, Massimo Renzo, (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, Cambridge University Press, 2015, s. 117-137.
• Watkins E, “What Is, for Kant, a Law of Nature?”, Kant-Studien, 105(4), 2014, s. 471-490.
• Wood J, “Religion and Religious Liberty”, Journal of Church and State, 33 (2), 1991, s. 225-230.
• Zaman M Q, “The Ulama of Contemporary Islam and Their Conceptions of the Common Good” in Armando Salvatore, Dalf F. Eickelman (eds.), Public Islam and the Common Good, 2004, s. 129-156.