Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 399 - 441, 24.04.2023

Sezen Kama Işık

https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335

Öz

İngiliz anayasal sistemi, anayasa hukuku teorisinde her daim önemli örneklerden biri olagelmektedir. Söz konusu sistemi anlamak gayreti de bu çalışmanın temelini oluşturmaktadır.
Bunun için öncelikle sistemin en kendine özgü yanlarından olan yazısız anayasayı anlamak başlangıç noktasıdır. Bu anayasa, mevzuat, önemli içtihatlar, anayasal teamüller ve birçok konvansiyondan oluşmakta ve özünde kısmen yazılı ancak tamamen kodifiye edilmemiş bir teamül düzenini barındırmaktadır. Dolayısıyla sistemin anayasal kaynaklarını ortaya koymak da bu anlamak gayretinin aşamalarındandır. İlaveten sistemin yazılı ayağını da oluşturan ve tarihsel düzlemde karşımıza çıkan temel anayasal metinlerin incelenmesi de gerekmektedir. Bu kendine özgü sistemin üzerine inşa edildiği “Parlamento Egemenliği” ve “Hukukun Üstünlüğü” ilkeleri de İngiliz anayasa hukukundaki özgün anlamları ile ortaya konulmalıdır.
İşte bu sebep ve çerçevede çalışmada, yaşayan bir enstrüman olan organik anayasa, 21. Yüzyılın İngiltere’ye getirdiği siyasi ve toplumsal nedenlerle geçirmekte olduğu dönüşümle ele alınacak ve zamanla çok ırklı ve çok kültürlü bir şekle evrilen İngiltere’de AB’ye üye olma, yetki devirleri, AB’den ayrılma gibi pek çok köklü olay neticesinde yazılı anayasaya süregelen bir eğilimin mevcudiyeti tartışılacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İngiliz Anayasal Sistemi Yazısız Anayasa Anayasal Teamül Parlamento Egemenliği Hukukun Üstünlüğü

Kaynakça

  • George Burton Adams, “The Origin of the English Constitution, II”, The American Historical Review, 13(4), 1908, s. 713- 730.
  • Alder J, General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
  • Allard- Tremblay Y, “Proceduralism, Judicial Review and the Refusal to Royal Assent”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 2013, s. 379- 400.
  • Anayurt Ö, Anayasa Hukuku Genel Kısım- Temel İlkeler, Kavram ve Kurumlar, 4. Bası, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2021. Barnett H, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 5th edn., Cavendish Publishing, 2004.
  • Batum S, Yılmaz D, Köybaşı S, Anayasa Hukuku- Temel Kavramlar ve Genel Esaslar, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2021.
  • Beyazıt Ö, “Interpretation and Lawmaking by the Courts in English Common Law System”, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, (6), 2015, s. 79- 95.
  • Bhutia T K, “Provisions of Oxford”, Britannica, <https://www.britannica.com/event/Provisions-of-Oxford>, Erişim Tarihi: 13 Ocak 2023. Blackburn R, “Britain’s Unwritten Constitution”, Magna Carta Today, British Library, 13 March 2015, <https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/britains-unwritten-constitution#>, Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2022. Blackstone W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, A Strahan, 1809.
  • Blaustein A, Flanz, G., (eds.), Constitutions of the Countries of the World, Oceana Publications, 1992. Bogdanor V, The New British Constitution, Hart Publishing, 2009. Bogdanor V, “The EU Referandum shows how the sovereignty of Britain’s people can now trump its Parliament”, The Telegraph, 26 Haziran 2016, <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/26/the-eu-referendum-shows-how-the-sovereignty-of-britains-people-c/>, Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2023. Bogdanor V, "Brexit and Our Unprotected Constitution”, The Constitution Society Report, The Constitution Society, 2018.
  • Bradley A W and Ewing K D, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 14. Bası, Essex, Pearson Longman, 2007. Caird J S, “Legislating for Brexit: the Great Repeal Bill”, House of Commons Briefing Paper, No: 7793, 2 Mayıs 2017, <https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/ documents/CBP-7793/CBP-7793.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Eylül 2022. Çınarlı S, “İskoçya Yerinden Yönetim Deneyimine Genel Bir Bakış”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 11 (2), 2011, s. 299- 307.
  • Delaney E F, “Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom”, Northwestern University Law Review, 108/ 2, 2014, s. 543- 606. Derdiman R C, Anayasa Hukuku, 2. Bası, Alfa Akademi, 2011. De Smith S A, R Brazier, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Penguin Books, 1989.
  • Dicey A V, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Macmillan, 1915. Dinçkol B, “İngiltere’de Parlamenter Monarşinin Erken Dönemi”, MÜHF-HAD, 27(2), 2021, s. 877- 897. Douglas-Scott S, “Brexit, Article 50 and the Contested British Constitution”, The Modern Law Review, 79, 2016, s. 1019- 1089. Döner A, Anayasa Hukuku (Genel Esaslar), Doğu Ciltevi Yayınevi, 2022. Edelman M, “The New Israeli Constitution”, Middle Eastern Studies, 36(2), 2000, s. 1- 27.
  • Elliot M, “Constitutional Adjudication and Constitutional Politics in the United Kingdom: The Miller II Case in Legal and Political Context”, European Constitutional Law Review, 16/4, 2020, s. 625- 646.
  • Elliot M, “Controversial Constitutional Cases: Miller II”, The Constitutional Law Matters Project, Centre for Public Law, University of Cambridge, 27 Ocak 2022, <https://constitutionallawmatters.org/2022/01/controversial-constitutional-cases-miller-ii/>, Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2023. Erdos D, “Charter 88 and the Constitutional Reform Movement: a Retrospective”, Parliamentary Affairs, 62 (4), 2009, s. 537- 551.
  • Eren A, Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri- Genel Esaslar – Türk Anayasa Hukuku, 3. Bası, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2021. Eroğul C, Anayasayı Değiştirme Sorunu, AÜSBF Yayınları, 1974.
  • Fallenfeldt J, “Good Friday Agreement”, Britannica, <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Good-Friday-Agreement>, Erişim Tarihi 18 Ocak 2023.
  • Gözler K, Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Teorisi, C. I, 2. Bası, Ekin Yayınevi, 2020. Gözler K, Kurucu İktidar, Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım, 2016.
  • Gözübüyük Ş, Anayasa Hukuku, 16. Bası, Turhan Kitabevi, 2008.
  • Gülgeç Y B, Normlar Hiyerarşisi, On İki Levha Yayınları, 2018.
  • Hazell R and Renwick A, “Brexit: Its Consequences for Devolution and the Union”, UCL Constitution Unit Briefing Paper, The Constitution Unit, 19 Mayıs 2016. Hazeltine H D, “The Influence of Magna Carta on Americ an Constitutional Development”, Online Library of Liberty Essays, <https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/magna-carta-and-the-us-constitution>, Erişim Tarihi: 6 Ağustos 2022.
  • House of Commons, Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, The UK Constitution- A summary with options for reform, Mart 2015, <https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-committees/political-and-constitutional-reform/The-UK-Constitution.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Eylül 2022.
  • Institute for Public Policy Research, “The Constitution of the United Kingdom”, IPPR Report, 1991. İba Ş, Anayasa Hukuku ve Siyasal Kurumlar, 2. Bası, Turhan Kitabevi, 2008. Kaboğlu İ Ö, Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri (Genel Esaslar), 16. Bası, Legal Yayıncılık, 2021.
  • Kama S, “Parlamenter Hükümet Sistemi Olarak Westminster Modeli Britanya Örneği Üzerine Bir Deneme”, MÜHF-HAD, 22(2), 2016, s. 161- 201. Kanadoğlu O K, Duygun A M, Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Esasları, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2021.
  • Keskin E, “İngiliz Anayasa Hukukunda Parlamentonun Üstünlüğü İlkesi, Sınırları ve Brexit”, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 2021, s. 47- 99.
  • Kubalı H N, Anayasa Hukuku Genel Esaslar ve Siyasi Rejimler, Ersa Matbaacılık Koll. Şti., 1965.
  • Lester A, “Fundamental Rights in the United Kingdom: The Law and the British Constitution”, University of Pennsylyvania Law Review, 125(1) 1976, s. 337- 363.
  • Leyland P, The Constitution of the United Kingdom, Hart Publishing, 2007.
  • Lijphart A, Patterns of Democracy Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2. Bası, Yale University Press, 2012.
  • Limbach J, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern Law Review, 64(1), 2001, s. 1- 10. Loughlin M, The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Ludwikowski R R, “Two Firsts: A Comperative Study of the American and the Polish Constitutions”, Michigan Journal of International Law, 8(1) 1987, s. 117- 156.
  • McConalogue J, The British Constitution Resettled- Parliamentary Sovereignty Before and After Brexit, Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
  • McSweeny T J, “Magna Carta and the Right to Trial by Jury”, Magna Carta- Muse& Mentor, Thomson Reuters, Library of Congress, 2014, s. 139- 157.
  • Muratoğulları H, “Birleşik Krallık Anayasası’nda Yürütmenin Prorogasyon İmtiyazı ve Yüksek Mahkeme’nin 24 Eylül 2019 Tarihli Cherry/ Miller Kararı”, Anayasa Yargısı, 36/2, 2019, s. 291- 348.
  • Murkens J E K, “Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution”, LSE Legal Studies Working Papers, No: 8, 2017, s. 42- 58.
  • Nolan L, Sedley S, The Making & Remaking of the British Constitution, Blackstone Press, 1997.
  • Oder B E, Avrupa Birliği’nde Anayasa ve Anayasacılık, Anahtar Kitaplar Yayınevi, 2004.
  • Özbudun E, “İngiltere’de Parlamento Egemenliği Teorisi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 1968, s. 59- 79.
  • Özbudun E, Anayasalcılık ve Demokrasi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2017.
  • Öztürk N K, Anayasa Hukuku, 3. Bası, Seçkin Yayınevi, 2021. Pazarcı H, Uluslararası Hukuk, Yetkin, 2010.
  • Parau C E, “Core Principles of the Traditional British Constitutions”, <https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/Core_Principles_of_the_British_Constitutions.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022.
  • Parau C E, “The Politics of a Written Constitution for Britain”, Politics in Spire, 12 Şubat 2015, <http://politicsinspires.org/politics-written-constitution-britain/>, Erişim Tarihi 15 Ağustos 2022.
  • Patterson J, The Bill of Rights Politics Religion and the Quest for Justice, Universe Inc., 2004.
  • Peers S, “Jurisdiction upon and after the UK’s Withdrawal: The Perspective from the UK Constitutional Order”, European Parliament Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Briefing, <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/596831/IPOL_BRI(2018)596831_EN.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 14 Ocak 2023.
  • Pound R, “Common Law and Legislation”, Harvard Law Review, 21(6) 1908, s. 383- 407.
  • Queiroz Barboza E M, Kozicki K, “Common Law and Civil Law: Convergences Beyond a Written Constitution”, Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional, 40(1) 2019, s. 39- 73.
  • Richardson H. G., G. O. Sayles, “The Provisions of Oxford: A Forgotten Document and Some Comments”, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 17(2), 1933, s. 291- 321; Ridley F F, “Defining Constitutional Law in Britain”, Anglo- Amerikan Law Review, 20(2) 1991, s. 101- 115.
  • Robertson G, “Magna Carta and Jury Trial”, Magna Carta Today, British Library, <https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-and-jury-trial>, Erişim Tarihi 16 Ocak 2023.
  • Ryan M & S Foster, Unlocking Constitutional and Administrative Law, Routledge, 2014.
  • Sav Ö, “İngiliz Anayasa Reformu”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 67(4), 2009, s. 135- 145.
  • Scarman L, Scarman B, Why Britain Needs a Written Constitution, Charter 88, 1992.
  • Sharpe J, Parliamentary Conventions, The Constitution Society Report, 2020.
  • Slapper G, Kelly, D., English Law, Routledge- Cavendish, 2009.
  • Taylor J, “Comparing the US and the UK Constitutions”, Politics Review, 27(1) 2017, s. 1-4.
  • Teziç E, Anayasa Hukuku (Genel Esaslar), 25. Bası, Beta, 2021, Torrance D, “Introduction to devolution in the UK”, House of Commons Research Briefing, 14 April 2020, <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8599/>, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ağustos 2022.
  • Torrance D, “How is a Prime Minister Appointed?”, Insight, House of Commons Library, 20 Ekim 2022, <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/how-is-a-prime-minister-appointed/>, Erişim Tarihi 12 Ocak 2023. Treharne R F, “The Significance of he Baronial Reform Movement, 1258- 1267”, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 25, 1943, s. 35- 72.
  • Tunç H, Anayasa Hukuku Genel Esaslar, 2. Bası, Gazi Kitabevi, 2019.
  • Turpin C, Tomkins A, British Government and the Constitution, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Twomey A, “Constitutional monarchy and royal assent for government bills”, Sydney Law School Opinion, 31 Ocak 2019, <https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2019/01/31/constitutional-monarchy-and-royal-assent-for-government-bills.html>, Erişim Tarihi 11 Ağustos 2022.
  • Wallington P, Lee R G, Blacstone’s Statutes of Public Law and Human Rights, Oxford, 2006.
  • Ward I, The English Constitution: Myths and Realities, Hart Publishing, 2004.
  • Wilson L, “The Robustness of the Convention in a time of Modernisation and Change”, Public Law, 2004, s. 407- 420.
  • Woodhouse D, “United Kingdom The Constitutional Reform Act 2005- Defending Judicial Independence the English Way”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5/1, 2007, s. 153- 165.
  • Yolcu S, İngiltere’de Kuvvetler Ayrılığı ve Yargı Bağımsızlığı Alanındaki Gelişmeler, Seçkin Yayınevi, 2011.
  • Yücel B, Parlamenter Hükümet Sisteminin Rasyonelleştirilmesi ve Türkiye Örneği, Ankara, Adalet Yayınevi, 2009.
  • ‘Scotland seeks independence again after U.K. -Brexit- vote’, <https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/brexit-referendum/scotland-could-seek-independence-again-after-u-k-brexit-vote-n598166>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022.
  • ‘Scottish independence: Will there be a second referendum?’, <https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-50813510>, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ağustos 2022.
  • ‘Scottish referendum: Scotland votes -No- to independence’, <https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-29270441>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022. ‘The Monarch and Parliament’, <http://www.parliament.uk/education/about-yo-ur-parliament/mps-lords- monarch/the-monarch-and-parliament/>, Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2022. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1991/65/contents>, Erişim Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2022.
  • European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/contents/enacted>, Erişim Tarihi 12 Ağustos 2022.
  • European Union Referandum Act, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ukpga/2015/36/introduction/enacted, Erişim Tarihi 19 Ocak 2023.
  • Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/contents>, Erişim Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2022.
  • Human Rights Act 1998, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents>, Erişim Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2022.
  • Northern Ireland Peace Agreement, United Nations Peace Maker, Peace Agreements Database, <https://peacemaker.un.org/uk-ireland-good-friday98>, Erişim Tarihi 18 Ocak 2023.
  • R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, 24 Ocak 2017, <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2016-0196-judgment.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 12 Ağustos 2022. R (Miller) v The Prime Minister Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, 24 Eylül 2019, <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0192-judgment.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 11 Ocak 2023.
  • The Belfast Agreement: An Agreement Reached at the Multi-Party Talks on Northern Ireland, Nisan 1998, <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1034123/The_Belfast_Agreement_An_Agreement_Reached_at_the_Multi-Party_Talks_on_Northern_Ireland.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2023.

THE SUI GENERIS NATURE OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM IN CHANGING ASPECTS AND THE FUTURE OF THE UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 399 - 441, 24.04.2023

Sezen Kama Işık

https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335

Öz

The British constitutional system has long been regarded as a model for constitutional law theory. The effort to comprehend the system in question serves as the foundation for this research.
Understanding the unwritten constitution, which is one of the most unique aspects of the system, is the starting point for this. This constitution includes legislation, significant jurisprudence, constitutional customs, and numerous conventions, as well as a customary order that is partially written but not fully codified. As a result, one stage of this understanding effort is revealing the system's constitutional resources. Furthermore, the basic constitutional texts that comprise the written leg of the system and that we encounter in the historical plane must be examined. The principles of "Parliamentary Sovereignty" and "Rule of Law" that underpin this one-of-a-kind system should be revealed in their original meanings in English constitutional law.
For this reason and in this context, the organic constitution, which is a living instrument, will be discussed in conjunction with the transformation that England is undergoing as a result of the political and social reasons brought about by the twenty-first century. Furthermore, as a result of many rooted events such as EU membership, delegation of powers, and leaving the EU, the existence of an ongoing tendency towards a written constitution in the UK, which has evolved into a multi-ethnic and multicultural form over time, will be discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

British Constitutional System Unwritten Constitution Constitutional Custom Parliamentary Sovereignity Rule of Law

Kaynakça

  • George Burton Adams, “The Origin of the English Constitution, II”, The American Historical Review, 13(4), 1908, s. 713- 730.
  • Alder J, General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
  • Allard- Tremblay Y, “Proceduralism, Judicial Review and the Refusal to Royal Assent”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 2013, s. 379- 400.
  • Anayurt Ö, Anayasa Hukuku Genel Kısım- Temel İlkeler, Kavram ve Kurumlar, 4. Bası, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2021. Barnett H, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 5th edn., Cavendish Publishing, 2004.
  • Batum S, Yılmaz D, Köybaşı S, Anayasa Hukuku- Temel Kavramlar ve Genel Esaslar, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2021.
  • Beyazıt Ö, “Interpretation and Lawmaking by the Courts in English Common Law System”, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, (6), 2015, s. 79- 95.
  • Bhutia T K, “Provisions of Oxford”, Britannica, <https://www.britannica.com/event/Provisions-of-Oxford>, Erişim Tarihi: 13 Ocak 2023. Blackburn R, “Britain’s Unwritten Constitution”, Magna Carta Today, British Library, 13 March 2015, <https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/britains-unwritten-constitution#>, Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2022. Blackstone W, Commentaries on the Laws of England, A Strahan, 1809.
  • Blaustein A, Flanz, G., (eds.), Constitutions of the Countries of the World, Oceana Publications, 1992. Bogdanor V, The New British Constitution, Hart Publishing, 2009. Bogdanor V, “The EU Referandum shows how the sovereignty of Britain’s people can now trump its Parliament”, The Telegraph, 26 Haziran 2016, <https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/26/the-eu-referendum-shows-how-the-sovereignty-of-britains-people-c/>, Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2023. Bogdanor V, "Brexit and Our Unprotected Constitution”, The Constitution Society Report, The Constitution Society, 2018.
  • Bradley A W and Ewing K D, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 14. Bası, Essex, Pearson Longman, 2007. Caird J S, “Legislating for Brexit: the Great Repeal Bill”, House of Commons Briefing Paper, No: 7793, 2 Mayıs 2017, <https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/ documents/CBP-7793/CBP-7793.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Eylül 2022. Çınarlı S, “İskoçya Yerinden Yönetim Deneyimine Genel Bir Bakış”, Ege Akademik Bakış, 11 (2), 2011, s. 299- 307.
  • Delaney E F, “Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom”, Northwestern University Law Review, 108/ 2, 2014, s. 543- 606. Derdiman R C, Anayasa Hukuku, 2. Bası, Alfa Akademi, 2011. De Smith S A, R Brazier, Constitutional and Administrative Law, Penguin Books, 1989.
  • Dicey A V, An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, Macmillan, 1915. Dinçkol B, “İngiltere’de Parlamenter Monarşinin Erken Dönemi”, MÜHF-HAD, 27(2), 2021, s. 877- 897. Douglas-Scott S, “Brexit, Article 50 and the Contested British Constitution”, The Modern Law Review, 79, 2016, s. 1019- 1089. Döner A, Anayasa Hukuku (Genel Esaslar), Doğu Ciltevi Yayınevi, 2022. Edelman M, “The New Israeli Constitution”, Middle Eastern Studies, 36(2), 2000, s. 1- 27.
  • Elliot M, “Constitutional Adjudication and Constitutional Politics in the United Kingdom: The Miller II Case in Legal and Political Context”, European Constitutional Law Review, 16/4, 2020, s. 625- 646.
  • Elliot M, “Controversial Constitutional Cases: Miller II”, The Constitutional Law Matters Project, Centre for Public Law, University of Cambridge, 27 Ocak 2022, <https://constitutionallawmatters.org/2022/01/controversial-constitutional-cases-miller-ii/>, Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2023. Erdos D, “Charter 88 and the Constitutional Reform Movement: a Retrospective”, Parliamentary Affairs, 62 (4), 2009, s. 537- 551.
  • Eren A, Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri- Genel Esaslar – Türk Anayasa Hukuku, 3. Bası, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2021. Eroğul C, Anayasayı Değiştirme Sorunu, AÜSBF Yayınları, 1974.
  • Fallenfeldt J, “Good Friday Agreement”, Britannica, <https://www.britannica.com/topic/Good-Friday-Agreement>, Erişim Tarihi 18 Ocak 2023.
  • Gözler K, Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Teorisi, C. I, 2. Bası, Ekin Yayınevi, 2020. Gözler K, Kurucu İktidar, Ekin Basın Yayın Dağıtım, 2016.
  • Gözübüyük Ş, Anayasa Hukuku, 16. Bası, Turhan Kitabevi, 2008.
  • Gülgeç Y B, Normlar Hiyerarşisi, On İki Levha Yayınları, 2018.
  • Hazell R and Renwick A, “Brexit: Its Consequences for Devolution and the Union”, UCL Constitution Unit Briefing Paper, The Constitution Unit, 19 Mayıs 2016. Hazeltine H D, “The Influence of Magna Carta on Americ an Constitutional Development”, Online Library of Liberty Essays, <https://oll.libertyfund.org/page/magna-carta-and-the-us-constitution>, Erişim Tarihi: 6 Ağustos 2022.
  • House of Commons, Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, The UK Constitution- A summary with options for reform, Mart 2015, <https://www.parliament.uk/globalassets/documents/commons-committees/political-and-constitutional-reform/The-UK-Constitution.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Eylül 2022.
  • Institute for Public Policy Research, “The Constitution of the United Kingdom”, IPPR Report, 1991. İba Ş, Anayasa Hukuku ve Siyasal Kurumlar, 2. Bası, Turhan Kitabevi, 2008. Kaboğlu İ Ö, Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri (Genel Esaslar), 16. Bası, Legal Yayıncılık, 2021.
  • Kama S, “Parlamenter Hükümet Sistemi Olarak Westminster Modeli Britanya Örneği Üzerine Bir Deneme”, MÜHF-HAD, 22(2), 2016, s. 161- 201. Kanadoğlu O K, Duygun A M, Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Esasları, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2021.
  • Keskin E, “İngiliz Anayasa Hukukunda Parlamentonun Üstünlüğü İlkesi, Sınırları ve Brexit”, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 2021, s. 47- 99.
  • Kubalı H N, Anayasa Hukuku Genel Esaslar ve Siyasi Rejimler, Ersa Matbaacılık Koll. Şti., 1965.
  • Lester A, “Fundamental Rights in the United Kingdom: The Law and the British Constitution”, University of Pennsylyvania Law Review, 125(1) 1976, s. 337- 363.
  • Leyland P, The Constitution of the United Kingdom, Hart Publishing, 2007.
  • Lijphart A, Patterns of Democracy Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, 2. Bası, Yale University Press, 2012.
  • Limbach J, “The Concept of the Supremacy of the Constitution”, Modern Law Review, 64(1), 2001, s. 1- 10. Loughlin M, The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2013.
  • Ludwikowski R R, “Two Firsts: A Comperative Study of the American and the Polish Constitutions”, Michigan Journal of International Law, 8(1) 1987, s. 117- 156.
  • McConalogue J, The British Constitution Resettled- Parliamentary Sovereignty Before and After Brexit, Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
  • McSweeny T J, “Magna Carta and the Right to Trial by Jury”, Magna Carta- Muse& Mentor, Thomson Reuters, Library of Congress, 2014, s. 139- 157.
  • Muratoğulları H, “Birleşik Krallık Anayasası’nda Yürütmenin Prorogasyon İmtiyazı ve Yüksek Mahkeme’nin 24 Eylül 2019 Tarihli Cherry/ Miller Kararı”, Anayasa Yargısı, 36/2, 2019, s. 291- 348.
  • Murkens J E K, “Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution”, LSE Legal Studies Working Papers, No: 8, 2017, s. 42- 58.
  • Nolan L, Sedley S, The Making & Remaking of the British Constitution, Blackstone Press, 1997.
  • Oder B E, Avrupa Birliği’nde Anayasa ve Anayasacılık, Anahtar Kitaplar Yayınevi, 2004.
  • Özbudun E, “İngiltere’de Parlamento Egemenliği Teorisi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 1968, s. 59- 79.
  • Özbudun E, Anayasalcılık ve Demokrasi, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2017.
  • Öztürk N K, Anayasa Hukuku, 3. Bası, Seçkin Yayınevi, 2021. Pazarcı H, Uluslararası Hukuk, Yetkin, 2010.
  • Parau C E, “Core Principles of the Traditional British Constitutions”, <https://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/Core_Principles_of_the_British_Constitutions.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022.
  • Parau C E, “The Politics of a Written Constitution for Britain”, Politics in Spire, 12 Şubat 2015, <http://politicsinspires.org/politics-written-constitution-britain/>, Erişim Tarihi 15 Ağustos 2022.
  • Patterson J, The Bill of Rights Politics Religion and the Quest for Justice, Universe Inc., 2004.
  • Peers S, “Jurisdiction upon and after the UK’s Withdrawal: The Perspective from the UK Constitutional Order”, European Parliament Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs Briefing, <https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/596831/IPOL_BRI(2018)596831_EN.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 14 Ocak 2023.
  • Pound R, “Common Law and Legislation”, Harvard Law Review, 21(6) 1908, s. 383- 407.
  • Queiroz Barboza E M, Kozicki K, “Common Law and Civil Law: Convergences Beyond a Written Constitution”, Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional, 40(1) 2019, s. 39- 73.
  • Richardson H. G., G. O. Sayles, “The Provisions of Oxford: A Forgotten Document and Some Comments”, Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 17(2), 1933, s. 291- 321; Ridley F F, “Defining Constitutional Law in Britain”, Anglo- Amerikan Law Review, 20(2) 1991, s. 101- 115.
  • Robertson G, “Magna Carta and Jury Trial”, Magna Carta Today, British Library, <https://www.bl.uk/magna-carta/articles/magna-carta-and-jury-trial>, Erişim Tarihi 16 Ocak 2023.
  • Ryan M & S Foster, Unlocking Constitutional and Administrative Law, Routledge, 2014.
  • Sav Ö, “İngiliz Anayasa Reformu”, Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 67(4), 2009, s. 135- 145.
  • Scarman L, Scarman B, Why Britain Needs a Written Constitution, Charter 88, 1992.
  • Sharpe J, Parliamentary Conventions, The Constitution Society Report, 2020.
  • Slapper G, Kelly, D., English Law, Routledge- Cavendish, 2009.
  • Taylor J, “Comparing the US and the UK Constitutions”, Politics Review, 27(1) 2017, s. 1-4.
  • Teziç E, Anayasa Hukuku (Genel Esaslar), 25. Bası, Beta, 2021, Torrance D, “Introduction to devolution in the UK”, House of Commons Research Briefing, 14 April 2020, <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-8599/>, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ağustos 2022.
  • Torrance D, “How is a Prime Minister Appointed?”, Insight, House of Commons Library, 20 Ekim 2022, <https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/how-is-a-prime-minister-appointed/>, Erişim Tarihi 12 Ocak 2023. Treharne R F, “The Significance of he Baronial Reform Movement, 1258- 1267”, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 25, 1943, s. 35- 72.
  • Tunç H, Anayasa Hukuku Genel Esaslar, 2. Bası, Gazi Kitabevi, 2019.
  • Turpin C, Tomkins A, British Government and the Constitution, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • Twomey A, “Constitutional monarchy and royal assent for government bills”, Sydney Law School Opinion, 31 Ocak 2019, <https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2019/01/31/constitutional-monarchy-and-royal-assent-for-government-bills.html>, Erişim Tarihi 11 Ağustos 2022.
  • Wallington P, Lee R G, Blacstone’s Statutes of Public Law and Human Rights, Oxford, 2006.
  • Ward I, The English Constitution: Myths and Realities, Hart Publishing, 2004.
  • Wilson L, “The Robustness of the Convention in a time of Modernisation and Change”, Public Law, 2004, s. 407- 420.
  • Woodhouse D, “United Kingdom The Constitutional Reform Act 2005- Defending Judicial Independence the English Way”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5/1, 2007, s. 153- 165.
  • Yolcu S, İngiltere’de Kuvvetler Ayrılığı ve Yargı Bağımsızlığı Alanındaki Gelişmeler, Seçkin Yayınevi, 2011.
  • Yücel B, Parlamenter Hükümet Sisteminin Rasyonelleştirilmesi ve Türkiye Örneği, Ankara, Adalet Yayınevi, 2009.
  • ‘Scotland seeks independence again after U.K. -Brexit- vote’, <https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/brexit-referendum/scotland-could-seek-independence-again-after-u-k-brexit-vote-n598166>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022.
  • ‘Scottish independence: Will there be a second referendum?’, <https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-50813510>, Erişim Tarihi: 10 Ağustos 2022.
  • ‘Scottish referendum: Scotland votes -No- to independence’, <https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-29270441>, Erişim Tarihi 9 Ağustos 2022. ‘The Monarch and Parliament’, <http://www.parliament.uk/education/about-yo-ur-parliament/mps-lords- monarch/the-monarch-and-parliament/>, Erişim Tarihi 5 Ağustos 2022. Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1991/65/contents>, Erişim Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2022.
  • European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/16/contents/enacted>, Erişim Tarihi 12 Ağustos 2022.
  • European Union Referandum Act, https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ ukpga/2015/36/introduction/enacted, Erişim Tarihi 19 Ocak 2023.
  • Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/14/contents>, Erişim Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2022.
  • Human Rights Act 1998, <https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents>, Erişim Tarihi 8 Ağustos 2022.
  • Northern Ireland Peace Agreement, United Nations Peace Maker, Peace Agreements Database, <https://peacemaker.un.org/uk-ireland-good-friday98>, Erişim Tarihi 18 Ocak 2023.
  • R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, 24 Ocak 2017, <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2016-0196-judgment.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 12 Ağustos 2022. R (Miller) v The Prime Minister Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, 24 Eylül 2019, <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0192-judgment.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 11 Ocak 2023.
  • The Belfast Agreement: An Agreement Reached at the Multi-Party Talks on Northern Ireland, Nisan 1998, <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1034123/The_Belfast_Agreement_An_Agreement_Reached_at_the_Multi-Party_Talks_on_Northern_Ireland.pdf>, Erişim Tarihi 17 Ocak 2023.
Toplam 73 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Hukuk
Bölüm KAMU HUKUKU
Yazarlar

Sezen Kama Işık 0000-0001-9654-9118

Yayımlanma Tarihi 24 Nisan 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kama Işık, S. (2023). DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 399-441. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335
AMA Kama Işık S. DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ. AHBVÜ-HFD. Nisan 2023;27(2):399-441. doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335
Chicago Kama Işık, Sezen. “DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 27, sy. 2 (Nisan 2023): 399-441. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335.
EndNote Kama Işık S (01 Nisan 2023) DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 27 2 399–441.
IEEE S. Kama Işık, “DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ”, AHBVÜ-HFD, c. 27, sy. 2, ss. 399–441, 2023, doi: 10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335.
ISNAD Kama Işık, Sezen. “DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 27/2 (Nisan 2023), 399-441. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335.
JAMA Kama Işık S. DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ. AHBVÜ-HFD. 2023;27:399–441.
MLA Kama Işık, Sezen. “DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ”. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 27, sy. 2, 2023, ss. 399-41, doi:10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1206335.
Vancouver Kama Işık S. DEĞİŞEN YÖNLERİYLE SUI GENERIS BİR ÖRNEK OLARAK İNGİLİZ ANAYASAL SİSTEMİ VE YAZISIZ ANAYASANIN GELECEĞİ. AHBVÜ-HFD. 2023;27(2):399-441.