Design Of Development Scenarios For Şanlıurfa Region Based On Geodesign

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 92 - 117, 14.09.2020

Fred Ernst , Mehmet Alı Çullu , Sedat Benek , Esra Siverekli , Saffet Erdoğan , Aydın Aydemir , İbrahim Yenigün , Abdulkadir Memduhoglu , Abdullah Izzeddin Karabulut , Ömür Aybike Yıldırım , Galip Muhammet Karagöz

Öz

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become an indispensable part of urban and regional planning since the 90ies. Yet, one of the limitations of classical GIS is the lack to directly support the way how the planning process is carried out. They lack the capability to encourage the cooperation of stakeholders that have very different levels of computer literacy and come from very divers sectors. For this, different approaches for participatory planning have been developed among them Geodesign. It is a methodology that combines tools of design, GIS and web 2.0 to foster participatory planning. A complete framework for conducting Geodesign as applied to regional landscape studies has been generated by Carl Steinitz. With GeodesignHub (GDH), his framework was converted into its digital representation that enables a digital design workflow online. The purpose of this paper is to show how different development scenarios can be developed for an underdeveloped region in Southeastern Turkey based on the anticipatory change model defined by Steinitz”s Geodesign framework.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Geodesign, GIS, regional planning, virtual reality

Destekleyen Kurum

EU ERASMUS Program

Proje Numarası

2017-1-TR01-KA203-046007

Kaynakça

• 1. Arciniegas, G., & Janssen, R. (2012). Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops. Landscape Urban Plan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 107 (3), 332-342. Doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.06.004
• 2. Aydyn, Y., Cetinkökü, O., Kanber R., Özekici, B., Özmen, S., Steduto, P., Ünlü, M. (2003). Growth, yield and periodicity of pistachio under different water and nutritional levels: investigation in the Southeastern Anatolia project region (GAP). In: Hamdy, A. (ed.). Regional Action Programme (RAP): Water resources management and water saving in irrigated agriculture (WASIA PROJECT). (pp. 183-201) (Options Méditerranéennes : Série B. Etudes et Recherches; n. 44). Bari :CIHEAM.
• 3. Bakır, N. Y., Doğan, U., Güngör, M.K., Bostancı, B. (2018). Planned development versus unplanned change: The effects on urban planning in Turkey. Land Use Policy, 77, September 2018, 310-321.
• 4. Ballal, H. (2015). Collaborative planning with digital design synthesis. Doctoral dissertation. University College London.
• 5. Benek, S., Elmastaş, N., Yetmen, H., Özcanlı, M., Şahinalp, M. S., Aytaç, A. S., Şahap, A. (2016). Harran Üniversitesi Osmanbey Kampüsü'nün Coğrafi Etüdü. Istanbul, Turkey: Kriter Yayınevi.
• 6. Campagn, M., Steinitz, C., Di Cesare, E.A., Cocco, C., Ballal, H., Canfield, T. (2016). Collaboration in planning: The Geodesign approach. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 35: 55–72.
• 7. Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Savenije, H.H.G., Gautam, R. (2005). The water footprint of cotton consumption. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 18. 2601 DA Delft, The Netherlands: UNESCO-IHE Delft.
• 8. Çelik, Ş. (2013). Türkiye’de Gecekondu Sorunu ve Gecekondu Sorunun Sinemaya yansıtılması. Yazılar ve Vakainamele. Retrieved June 27, 2019 from https://safiicelik.blogspot.com/2013/11/turkiyedegecekondu-sorunu-ve-gecekondu.html
• 9. Ernst, F. (2016). GEODESIGN – THE FUTURE OF GIS. 6. UZAKTAN ALGILAMA-CBS SEMPOZYUMU (UZAL-CBS 2016), pp. 510-519. 5-7 Ekim 2016, Adana/Turkey. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from http://uzalcbs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/2016_1036.pdf.
• 10. Ernst, F., Şenol, H.İ., Akdağ, S., Barutcuoglu, ö. (2019). Virtual Reality for City Planning. 1st International Conference on Virtual Reality. 4.-5.4.2019, Şanlıurfa/Turkey, pp.146-153. Retrieved 24.7. from virtualreality.harran.edu.tr
• 11. Ernst, F. B., Erdoğan, S., Yılmaz, M., Ulukavak, M., Şenol, H. İ., Memduhoğlu, A. and Çullu, M. A. (2019). Geodesign for Urban Planning: A Case Study from Harran University’s Campus Master Plan. International Journal of Environmental Trends (IJENT), 2019: 3(1), pp 17-30.
• 12. ESRI (2020). ArcGIS Online – Mapping and analysis: location intelligence for everyone. Retrieved July 21, 2020, from https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-online/overview
• 13. FAO/GEF (2016). Project Document: Conservation and Sustainable Management of Turkey’s Steppe Ecosystems, 128 pages. Retrieved July 30, 2019 from https://www.thegef.org/project/conservation-and-sustainable-management-turkeys-steppe-ecosystems.
• 14. Fisher, F. (2001a). Building bridges between citizens and local governments to work more effectively together through participatory planning. Part I Concept and strategies. UN-HABITAT, 140 pp.
• 15. Fisher, F. (2001b). Building bridges between citizens and local governments to work more effectively together through participatory planning. Part II. Toolkit. UN-HABITAT, 83 pp.
• 16. Halvorsen, K. E. (2001). Assessing public participation techniques for comfort, convenience, satisfaction, and deliberation. Environmental Management, 28(2), pp. 179–186. Doi: 10.1007/s002670010216.
• 17. Harris, B. & Batty, M. (1993). Locational Models, Geographic Information and Planning Support Systems. Journal of Planning, Education and Research, 12 (1993), pp. 184-198. Doi: 10.1177/0739456X9301200302.
• 18. hotels solutions (2014). WILTSHIRE & SWINDON VISITOR ACCOMMODATION FUTURES, Final Report. Coleby, Lincoln, UK. 183 pp.
• 19. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Hampshire: McMillan Press Limited.
• 20. Smith, A., Dodge, M., Doyle, S. (1998). Visual Communication in Urban Planning and Urban Design. London, UK. Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (CASA).
• 21. IGC (n.d.). IGC International Geodesign Cooperation. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from https://www.envizz1.com
• 22. Innes, J. & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. Doi: 10.1080/1464935042000293170.
• 23. International Energy Agency (2016). Country Report – Turkey. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from https://iea-shc.org/country-report-turkey
• 24. International Renewable Energy Agency (2017). Solar Atlas of the Mediterranean countries. Retrieved Retrieved July 21, 2020 from https://irena.masdar.ac.ae/GIS/?map=748
• 25. Jamei, E., Mortimer, M., Seyedmahmoudian, M., Horan, B. Stojcevski, A. (2017). Investigating the Role of Virtual Reality in Planning for Sustainable Smart Cities. Sustainability, 9, 2006; doi: 10.3390/su9112006
• 26. Karacadağ Kalkınma Ajansı (2018). İstatiklerle Şanlıurfa 2018. Retrieved Retrieved July 21, 2020 from https://www.karacadag.gov.tr/Dokuman/Dosya/www.karacadag.gov.tr_306_FO6F86VU_istatistiklerle_sanliurfa_2018.pdf
• 27. Kim, M. (2017). Teaching Coastal Resilience Using Geodesign: A Study of Virginia Beach. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 2. 279-286.
• 28. Kingston, R. (2007). Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping. The Cartographic Journal, 44(2), 138–144. Doi: 10.1179/000870407X213459.
• 29. Klostermann, R.E. (1997). Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-aided Planning. Journal of Planning, Education and Research, 17 (1), 45-54.
• 30. Knitter, D., Braun, R., Clare, L., Nykamp, M. & Schütt, B. (2019). Göbekli Tepe: A Brief Description of the Environmental Development in the Surroundings of the UNESCO World Heritage Site. Land, 8 (72), 16 p. Doi: 10.3390/land8040072
• 31. Kunzmann, K. (1993). Geodesign: Chance oder Gefahr? Planungskartographie und Geodesign. In Bundesforschungsanstalt für Landeskunde und Raumordnung (Ed.). Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 7, no page numbers, Bonn.
• 32. Manning, W. H. (1923). A National Plan Study Brief. Landscape Architecture, 13 (July 1923). 3-24.
• 33. Moura, A.C., Marino, T., Ballal, H., Ribeiro, S., Motta, S. (2016). Interoperability and visualization as a support for mental maps to face differences in scale in Brazilian Geodesign processes. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna, 35, 89–102.
• 34. Nedjeljko, F. (2011). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems. Kartografija i Geoinformacije, 10(15). 178.
• 35. OECD (2013). Water and Climate Change Adaptation: Policies to Navigate Uncharted Waters, OECD Studies on Water, OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264200449-en.
• 36. Pettit, C. J., Cartwright, W., Berry, M. (2006). GEOGRAPHICAL VISUALIZATION: A PARTICIPATORY PLANNING SUPPORT TOOL FOR IMAGINING LANDSCAPE FUTURES. APPLIED GIS, 2 (3), Victoria, Australia: MONASH UNIVERSITY EPRESS, Clayton 3800.
• 37. pv magazine (2018). Turkey identifies potential sites for new PV tender, critical details still missing. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from https://www.pv-magazine.com/2018/04/06/turkey-identifies-potential-sites-for-new-pv-tender-critical-details-still-missing/
• 38. Rivero, R.; Smith, A.; Ballal, H.; Steinitz, C. (2015). Promoting Collaborative Geodesign in a Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Environment. Coastal Georgia 2050, USA. In: Peer reviewed proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture 2015 at Anhalt University of Applied Sciences. Berlin: Wichmann, pp. 42–58. Retrieved July 21, 2020 from http://gispoint.de/fileadmin/user_upload/paper_gis_open/53755 5005.pdf,
• 39. Steinitz, C. A. (2012). Framework for Geodesign. Redlands, CA; ESRI Press.
• 40. Tomlinson, R. F. & Tooney, M. A. G. (1999). GIS and LIS in Canada. In McGrath, G. & Sebert, L. (Eds.), Mapping a Northern Land: The Survey of Canada 1947 – 1994. Montreal – Quebec: McGill Queens University Press.
• 41. USIAD (2008). GAP Raporu GAP’ta Ne Oldu. Bölgede Ekonomik, Stratejik ve Siyasal Gelişmeler. 1. Baskı: Mart 2008 ISBN 978-975-98399-3-2 Yayınlayan: USİAD Ulusal Sanayici ve İşadamları Derneği Editör: Dursun YILDIZ Hazırlayan: ADA Strateji 0312. 417 0041
• 42. Vakali, A., Anthopoulos, L., Krco, S. (2014). Smart Cities Data Streams Integration: Experimenting with Internet of Things and social data flows. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS14), 2–4 June 2014, p. 60 Thessaloniki, Greece.
• 43. Villanueva,F.J., Aguirre,C., Villa,D., Santofimia,M.J., López,J.C. (2014). Smart City data stream visualization using Glyphs. In Proceedings of the IEEE Eighth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), 2–4 July 2014, pp. 399–403. Birmingham - UK.
• 44. Yeh, A.G.O. (1999). Urban Planning and GIS. In Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D. & Rhind, D. (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Applications, and Management, Second Edition (pp. 877-888). New York: John Wiley.
• 45. Yeh, A.G.O. (2008). GIS as a Planning Support System for the Planning of Harmonious Cities. UN-HABITAT Lecture Award Series, No. 3. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT). Nairobi.
• 46. Yesilnacar, M.I., Yenigun, I. (2011). Effect of Irrigation on a Deep Aquifer: A Case Study from the Semi-Arid Harran Plain, GAP Project, Turkey. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 70, 213–221.
• 47. Zittis, G., Hadjinicolaou, P., Fnais, M., Lelieveld. J. (2016). Projected changes in heat wave characteristics in the eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East. Reg Environ Change, 16 (1863–1876). Doi: 10.1007/s10113-014-0753-2