THE MATTER OF CONSISTENCY WITHIN THE EUROPEAN UNION: WHY DID THE EU FAIL TO DEVISE A COHERENT POLICY IN THE BOSNIAN WAR?
Abstract
The Bosnian War witnessed horrifying humanitarian crimes; particularly systematic rapes perpetrated by Serbs against Bosnian women. More than 35,000 women and children were subjected to such atrocities in Serb-run "rape/death camps." Additionally, the fall of Srebrenica resulted in the loss of thousands of civilian lives. International intervention to halt the Bosnian War faced challenges and complexities. Various countries involved in the matter held differing interpretations of the conflict, leading to diverse views on potential solutions. This lack of consensus and political will hindered the effectiveness of the European Union's intervention efforts. This work critically examines the international intervention in the Bosnian War, focusing on the approaches of key EU countries: France, Germany, and the UK. These countries' divergent policies and objectives impacted the EU's ability to adopt a coherent stance towards the conflict. The study employs Nuttall and Duke's theoretical approach to consistency in decision-making within the EU to explain why a consistent approach was not achieved during the intervention. By analysing the complexities of the EU's intervention in the Bosnian War, this study seeks to answer the question of what went wrong and provides insights into the challenges of decision-making and consensus-building within the European Union.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Andreatta, F. (1997). The Bosnian War and the New World Order: Failure and Success of Inter-national Intervention. Institute for Security Studies, Western European Union.
- Bellamy, A. (2002). Unravelling the Balkan Dilemmas? International Peacekeeping, 9(3), 143-148.
- Brunborg, H., Lyngstad, T.H., and Urdal, H. (2003). Accounting for Genocide: How many were killed in Srebrenica? European Journal of Population, 19(3), 229-248.
- Cornish, P. and Edwards, G. (2005). The Strategic Culture the European Union: a progress report. International Affairs 81(4), 801-820.
- Crawford, B. (1998). An Empty Nest? Reconciling European Security Institutions in the Bosnian Crisis. V.K. Aggarwal (Ed.). Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Lin-kages, and Nesting (Chp.3). Cornell University Press.
- Cox, M. (1998). Cluster of Competence The rehabilitation of war-torn societies: Strategic App-roaches to International Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/102388/1998_10_Strategic_Approaches_to_International_Intervention.pdf
- Council of the European Union. (2004). European Security Strategy- Bosnia and Herzegovina / Comprehensive Policy.
- Dover, R. (2005). The EU and the Bosnian Civil War 1992-95: The Capabilities-Expectations Gap at the Heart of the EU Foreign Policy. European Security, 14(3), 297-318.
- Duke, S. (1999). Consistency as an Issue in EU External Activities. Working Paper. 99/W/06. European Institute of Public Administration.1-39.
- Duke, S. (2000). Is Being Consistently Inconsistent, Being Consistent? EIPASCOPE (1), 1-2.