The former government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (hereinafter referred to as the Islamic Republic) and the Islamic Taliban Movement (hereinafter referred to as the Taliban) attached great deal of importance to media coverage of the intra-Afghan peace negotiations (can also be called Doha peace talks) that took place in Doha, the capital of the State of Qatar, between September 2020 and August 2021. They, for their part, claimed that the local media in particular had been taking sides and disseminating propaganda throughout the peace negotiations. This comparative case study has used mixed method to elaborate on how the local and international media covered Doha peace talks on Afghanistan. Using John Galtung’s model of peace and war journalism as its theoretical framework, this article analysed 229 stories—including news articles, roundtables, interviews, and Op-Eds—published on the English websites of TOLOnews, CNN, and Al Jazeera during the peace negotiations. Consequently, it was revealed that though the war journalism continued to be the predominant reporting approach for all selected media outlets, TOLOnews, as a local media, relatively deployed peace journalism compared to CNN and Al Jazeera, two worldwide major media outlets. Finally, it is recommended to explore why local media, despite being directly affected by the conflict, failed to adequately apply peace journalism in their coverage of the intra-Afghan peace negotiations.
Peace Journalism War Journalism Intra-Afghan Peace Talks Local Media
The former government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (hereinafter referred to as the Islamic Republic) and the Islamic Taliban Movement (hereinafter referred to as the Taliban) attached great deal of importance to media coverage of the intra-Afghan peace negotiations (can also be called Doha peace talks) that took place in Doha, the capital of the State of Qatar, between September 2020 and August 2021. They, for their part, claimed that the local media in particular had been taking sides and disseminating propaganda throughout the peace negotiations. This comparative case study has used mixed method to elaborate on how the local and international media covered Doha peace talks on Afghanistan. Using John Galtung’s model of peace and war journalism as its theoretical framework, this article analysed 229 stories—including news articles, roundtables, interviews, and Op-Eds—published on the English websites of TOLOnews, CNN, and Al Jazeera during the peace negotiations. Consequently, it was revealed that though the war journalism continued to be the predominant reporting approach for all selected media outlets, TOLOnews, as a local media, relatively deployed peace journalism compared to CNN and Al Jazeera, two worldwide major media outlets. Finally, it is recommended to explore why local media, despite being directly affected by the conflict, failed to adequately apply peace journalism in their coverage of the intra-Afghan peace negotiations.
Peace Journalism War Journalism Intra-Afghan Peace Talks Local Media
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Uyuşmazlık Çözümü |
| Bölüm | Araştırma Makalesi |
| Yazarlar | |
| Gönderilme Tarihi | 30 Ocak 2025 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 11 Mart 2025 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2025 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2025 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 |