Climate change and threatened plant species: A bibliometric analysis of endangered, endemic, and rare plants

Öz

Climate change and endangered plant species are critical research areas at global and local scales in terms of sustainability of ecosystems and conservation of biodiversity. The present study aims to evaluate the scientific research on endemic (EnP), endangered (EndP) and rare (RP) plant species, as well as climate change, by means of a bibliometric approach. For this purpose, a comprehensive review of 1429 studies on the subject in the WOS database was conducted. The research trends, co-country collaborations, most cited studies, author networks and distribution of research areas of these studies were analysed.The analyses were carried out using VOSviewer software.The results demonstrate that scientific production on these topics has increased since the 2000s. The majority of research areas are concentrated in the environmental sciences and ecology, plant sciences, and biodiversity conservation.Concurrently, the fact that the majority of studies are within the scope of Sustainable Development Goals such as Life on Land (Goal 15), Climate Action (Goal 13) reveals that scientific production in this field is in line with global conservation strategies. The current findings indicate a rising trend in scientific research related to climate change and endangered plant species. However, promotiong interdisciplinary collaborations and international policies is identified as a key area for improvement. In this context, the development of conservation strategies, the enhancement of collaboration between policymakers and researchers, and the more effective support for scientific research are emphasised as crucial elements.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate change
• endemic plant
• bibliometric analysis
• VOSviewer

İklim değişikliği ve tehdit altındaki bitki türleri: Tehlike altındaki, endemik ve nadir bitkiler üzerine bibliyometrik bir analiz

Öz

İklim değişikliği ve tehlike altındaki bitki türleri, ekosistemlerin sürdürülebilirliği ve biyolojik çeşitliliğin korunması açısından küresel ve yerel ölçekte kritik bir araştırma alanıdır. Bu araştırma endemik (EnP), tehlike altındaki (EndP) ve nadir (RP) bitki türleri ile iklim değişimi üzerine yapılan bilimsel araştırmaları bibliyometrik bir yaklaşımla değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla, WOS veri tabanında yer alan konuyla ilgili 1429 çalışmanın kapsamlı bir incelemesi yapılmış ve bu çalışmaların araştırma eğilimleri, ülkeler arası iş birlikleri, en fazla atıf alan çalışmalar, yazar ağları ve araştırma alanlarının dağılımı analiz edilmiştir. Analizler VOSviewer yazılımı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, bu konulardaki bilimsel üretimin 2000’li yıllardan itibaren arttığını göstermektedir. Araştırma alanlarının büyük çoğunluğunun çevre bilimleri ve ekoloji, bitki bilimleri, biyoçeşitliliğin korunması gibi alanlarda yoğunlaştığı görülmektedir. Aynı zamanda, çalışmaların büyük kısmının Karasal Yaşam (Hedef 15), İklim Eylemi (Hedef 13) gibi Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Hedefleri kapsamında yer alması, bu alandaki bilimsel üretimin küresel koruma stratejileri ile uyumlu olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Mevcut bulgular, iklim değişimi ve tehlikedeki bitki türleri konularında bilimsel araştırmaların artış eğiliminde olduğunu, ancak disiplinler arası işbirliklerinin ve uluslararası politikaların daha fazla teşvik edilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda, koruma stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi, politika yapıcılar ile araştırmacılar arasındaki işbirliğinin artırılması ve bilimsel araştırmaların daha etkin bir şekilde desteklenmesi önemlidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İklim değişikliği
• endemik bitki
• bibliyometrik analiz
• VOSviewer

Kaynakça

1. Appio FP, Cesaroni F, Di Minin A (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics 101: 623-661. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0
2. Baars C, Barbir J, Eustachio JHPP (2023). How can climate change impact human health via food security? A bibliometric analysis. Environments 10(11): 196. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/environments10110196
3. Baker DR (1990). Citation analysis: A methodological review. Social Work Research and Abstracts 26(3): 3-10.
4. Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012). Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecology Letters 15: 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x
5. Buchanan GM, Butchart SHM, Chandler G, Gregory RD (2020). Assessment of national-level progress towards elements of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ecological Indicators 116: 106497.
6. Bukar UA, Sayeed MS, Razak SFA, Yogarayan S, Amodu OA, Mahmood RAR (2023). A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX 11: 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339
7. Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle, RM, Palmer TM (2015). Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Science Advances 1, e1400253.
8. Chen M, Yao T, Wang K (2023). The economic impact of climate change: a bibliometric analysis of research hotspots and trends. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 47935-47955.

9. Demir A (2022). Turkey evaluation at the paris agreement and the 26th Conference of the Parties (COP 26): obligations and responsibilities. Biological Diversity and Conservation 15(2): 162-170. https://doi.org/10.46309/biodicon.2022.1088410
10. Di Matteo G, Nardi P, Grego S, Guidi C (2018). Bibliometric analysis of climate change vulnerability assessment research. Environment Systems and Decisions 38: 508-516.
11. Díaz S, Malhi Y (2022). Biodiversity: concepts, patterns, trends, and perspectives. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 47: 31-63. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-054300
12. Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 133: 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
13. Essl F, Dullinger S, Plutzar C, Willner W, Rabitsch W (2011). Imprints of glacial history and current environment on correlations between endemic plant and invertebrate species richness. Journal of Biogeography 38: 604-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02425.x
14. Fu HZ, Waltman L (2022). A large-scale bibliometric analysis of global climate change research between 2001 and 2018. Climatic Change 170: 36.
15. Haunschild R, Bornmann L, Marx W (2016). Climate change research in view of bibliometrics. PLoS ONE 11(7): e0160393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160393
16. Hayırsever Topçu F (2012). Biyolojik çeşitlilik sözleşmesi: Müzakereden uygulamaya. Marmara Üniversitesi Avrupa Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Avrupa Araştırmaları Dergisi 20(1): 57-97. https://doi.org/10.29228/mjes.127
17. IPBES (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. S Díaz, J Settele, ES Brondízio ES, HT Ngo, M Guèze, J Agard, A Arneth, P Balvanera, KA Brauman, SHM Butchart, KMA Chan, LA Garibaldi, K Ichii, J Liu, SM Subramanian, GF Midgley, P Miloslavich, Z Molnár, D Obura, A Pfaff, S Polasky, A Purvis, J Razzaque, B Reyers, R Roy Chowdhury, YJ. Shin, IJ Visseren-Hamakers, KJ Willis, and CN Zayas (eds.). Bonn: IPBES secretariat.
18. IPCC (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. [Masson-Delmotte V, P Zhai, HO, Pörtner D, Roberts J, Skea, PR, Shukla A, Pirani W, Moufouma-Okia C, Péan R, Pidcock S, Connors JBR, Matthews Y, Chen X, Zhou MI, Gomis E, Lonnoy T, Maycock M, Tignor and T Waterfield (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 616 pp. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/9781009157940.
19. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [HO Pörtner, DC Roberts, M Tignor, ES Poloczanska, K Mintenbeck, A Alegría, M Craig, S, Langsdorf, S Löschke, V Möller, A Okem, B Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009325844
20. Işık K (2011). Rare and endemic species: Why are they prone to extinction? Turkish Journal of Botany 35(4): 411-417. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1012-90
21. Kirby A (2023). Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a preliminary research tool. Publications. 11(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010010
22. McAllister JT, Lennertz L, Atencio Mojica Z (2022). Mapping a discipline: A guide to using VOSviewer for bibliometric and visual analysis. Science & Technology Libraries 41(3): 319-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2021.1991547
23. Muluneh MG (2021). Impact of climate change on biodiversity and food security: a global perspective-a review article. Agriculture & Food Security 10: 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-021-00318-5
24. Myers AA, Grave SD (2000). Endemism: origins and implications. Vie et Milieu 50(4): 195-204.
25. O’Connor B, Secades C, Penner J, Sonnenschein R, Skidmore A, Burgess ND, Hutton JM (2015). Earth observation as a tool for tracking progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 1(1): 19-28.
26. Parmesan C, Hanley ME (2015). Plants and climate change: Complexities and surprises. Annals of Botany 116(6): 849-864. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv169
27. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01286
28. Qian H, Zhang J, Zhao J (2022). How many known vascular plant species are there in the world? An integration of multiple global plant databases. Biodiversity Science 30(7): 1-5.
29. Reyes-Gonzalez L, Gonzalez-Brambila CN, Veloso F (2016). Using co-authorship and citation analysis to identify research groups: a new way to assess performance. Scientometrics 108: 1171-1191.
30. Samset BH, Fuglestvedt JS, Lund MT (2020). Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation. Nature Communications 11:3261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17001-1
31. Sant’Anna WM, Ferreira ML, Silva LF, Côrtes PL (2025). Climate change and arbovirus : A review and bibliometric analysis. Climate 13(2): 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli13020035
32. Savaresi A (2016). The Paris agreement: A new beginning? Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 34(1): 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983
33. Schmeller DS, Bridgewater P (2016). The ıntergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES): progress and next steps. Biodiversity and Conservation 25(5): 801-805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1095-9
34. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2000). Cartagena protocol on biosafety to the convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
35. Smith D, Hinz H, Mulema J, Weyl P, Ryan MJ (2018). Biological control and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing–a case of effective due diligence. Biocontrol Science and Technology 28(10): 914-926. Sustainable Development Goals, https://sdgs.un.org/goals [accessed 01 February 2025]
36. Tautiva JAD, Huaman J, Oliva RDP (2024). Trends in research on climate change and organizations: a bibliometric analysis (1999–2021). Management Review Quarterly 74: 227-261.
37. Thomas C (1992). The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) of 1992 in Context. Environmental Politics 1(4): 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019208414053
38. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB, Sykes MT, Prentice IC (2005). Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 8245-8250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409902102
39. Türkeş M (2006). Küresel iklimin geleceği ve Kyoto Protokolü. Jeopolitik 29: 99-107.
40. van Eck NJ, Waltman L (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84: 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
41. Waltman L, van Eck NJ, Noyons ECM (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics 4: 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
42. Wang B, Pan SY, Ke RY, Wang K, Wei YM. (2014). An overview of climate change vulnerability: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards 74: 1649-1666.
43. Wang Z, Zhao Y, Wang B (2018). A bibliometric analysis of climate change adaptation based on massive research literature data. Journal of Cleaner Production 199: 1072-1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.183
44. Wani ZA, Akhter F, Ridwan Q, Rawat YS, Ahmad Z, Pant S (2023). A bibliometric analysis of studies on plant endemism during the period of 1991–2022. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens 4: 692-710. https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg4040049
45. Wani ZA, Pant S, Bhat JA, Tariq M, Siddiqui S, Alshaharni MO (2024). Bibliometric analysis of studies on threat assessment and prioritization of species for conservation. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 7: 1374120. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1374120
46. Xu J, Xiao, P, Li TT, Wang Z (2022). Research Progress on endangered plants: a bibliometric analysis. Biodiversity and Conservation 31: 1125-1147.
47. Yuan BZ, Sun J (2022). Bibliometric analysis of rice and climate change publications based on Web of Science. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 150: 347-362.