Gypsophila davisii üzerinde anatomik, palinolojik, morfolojik, karyolojik ve ekolojik araştırmalar

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 39 - 45, 01.05.2018

Metin Armağan , Fevzi Özgökçe

https://doi.org/10.30616/ajb.379122

Cited By: 2

Öz

Muğla'ya endemik bir tür
olan Gypsophila davisii Barkoudah,
anatomik, morfolojik, ekolojik ve palinolojik açıdan bir bütün olarak ilk kez
incelenmiştir. Bilinenin aksine incelenen örneklerin kök ve gövdelerinde hiçbir
druz kristaline rastlanmamıştır. Tohumlar armut şeklinde olup yüzeyinde parlak
düz tüberküller vardır. Polen taneleri, çok porlu, küremsi,
granül-mikroekinat-mikroperforattır. G.
davisii'nin 30 somatik kromozomu vardır (2n = 30). Örnekler morfolojik
açıdan Türkiye Florası’ndaki betim ile karşılaştırılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kromozom sayısı, Anatomi, ekoloji, Gypsophila davisii, morfoloji, palinoloji

Anatomical, palynological, morphological, karyological, and ecological investigations on Gypsophila davisii

Öz

Gypsophila davisii Barkoudah,
an endemic species from Muğla (Turkey), was investigated for the first time as
a whole in terms anatomy, morphology, ecology, karyology, and palynology. No
druse crystals were observed in stems and roots of examined specimens in
contrast to the known. Seeds are pyriform with shiny, smooth grooves on the
surface. The pollen grains are polyporate, spheroidal, granulate-microechinate-microperforate.
G. davisii has 30 somatic chromosomes
(2n=30). The samples are compared morphologically with the description given in
Flora of Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

chromosome number, Anatomy, ecology, Gypsophila davisii, morphology, palynology

Kaynakça

• Akman Y (2011). İklim ve Biyoiklim (Biyoiklim Metodları ve Türkiye İklimleri). Palme Yayıncılık, Ankara, Turkey.
• Anonymous (2018). https://tr.climate-data.org/location/19315/ date of acces: 11.01.2018.
• Armağan M, Özgökçe F, Çelik A (2017). Notes on the genus Gypsophila (Caryophyllaceae) in Turkey, with a description of G. guvengorkii sp. nov. Phytotaxa 295 (3): 271-279.
• Atasagun B, Aksoy A, Martin E (2016). Anatomical, palynological and karyological remarks of Silene brevicalyx and Silene ozyurtii (Caryophyllaceae). Phytotaxa 270 (2): 116-126.
• Ataşlar E (2000). Gypsophila L. In: Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Başer KHC (Eds.). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (Suppl. 2). Vol. 11, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
• Ataşlar E, Potoğlu Erkara İ, Tokur S (2009). Pollen morphology of some Gypsophila L. (Caryophyllaceae) species and its taxonomic value. Turkish Journal of Botany 33: 335-351.
• Ataşlar E, Ocak A (2017). Anatomy and micromorphology of the endemic Gypsophila osmangaziensis (Caryophyllaceae) and taxonomic contributions for the genus Gypsophila. Phytotaxa 31(1): 84-92.
• Barkoudah YI (1962). A revision of Gypsophila, Bolanthus, Ankyropetalum and Phryna. Wentia 9: 1-203.
• Bittrich V (1993). Caryophyllaceae. Vol. 2: 206-236, The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants (Ed. Kubitzki at all.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg-Germany.
• Carlquist S (1995). Wood anatomy of the Caryophyllaceae: ecological, habital, systematic, and phylogenetic implications. Aliso 14(1): 1-17.
• Darlington CD, La Cour LF (1976). The handling of chromosomes. Sixth edition. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London, UK.
• Davis PH, Mill RR, Tan K (1988). Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands, Vol.10, (Suplement I) Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
• Ekim T (2012). Gypsophila L. In: Güner A, Aslan S, Ekim T, Vural M, Babaç MT (Eds.) Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi and Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Press, İstanbul, Turkey.
• Elçi Ş (1994). Sitogenetikte Araştırma Yöntemleri ve Gözlemler. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Yayınları, yayın no: 18, Van, Turkey.
• Hesse M, Halbritter H, Zetter R, Weber M, Buchner R, Frosch-Radivo A, Ulrich S (2009). Pollen Terminology, an illustrated handbook. Springer-Verlag, Wien, Austria.
• Huber-Morath A (1967). Gypsophila L. In: Davis PH (Ed.). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 2, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK.
• IUCN (2014). Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 11. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf
• Korkmaz M, Özçelik H, İlhan V (2012). Türkiye’nin Bazı Gypsophila L. (Caryophyllaceae) Taksonlarının Habitat Özellikleri. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 5(2): 111-125.
• Korkmaz M, Özçelik H (2013). Soil-plant relations in the annual Gypsophila (Caryopyhllaceae) taxa of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany 37: 85-98.
• Linnaeus C (1753). Species Plantarum. Tomus I, Holmiae, Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, Sweden.
• Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1957). Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Leaves, Stem and Wood in Relation to Taxonomy with Notes on Economic Uses. Vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
• Sharma AK (1970). Annual report, 1967-1968. Res. Bull. Univ. Calcutta Cytogenetics Lab. 2: 1–50.
• Stearn WT (1983). Botanical Latin (Third edition, revised). David & Charles, London, UK.
• Thiers B (2016). Index herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. Available from: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ (accessed 23 Aug 2017).
• Vettori L, Schiff S, Tani C, Pasqualetto P, Bennici A (2015). Morphological and cytological observations of wild species and hybrids of Gypsophila. Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 149(2): 322-328.
• Wodehouse RP (1935). Pollen Grains. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.