THE REASONS FOR UNETHICAL BEHAVIOURS IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: WHAT SHOULD BE DONE?

Öz

Bu araştırma, müdür görüşlerine göre öğretmenlerin mesleğini icra ederken öğrencilere, meslektaşlarına, velilere ve okul yöneticilerine yönelik etik dışı davranışlarının nedenlerini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma nitel araştırma geleneği içerisinde durum çalışması deseni kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma, 2021-2022 eğitim-öğretim yılında Düzce ilindeki lise okullarında gerçekleştirilmiş olup, araştırma sorularına cevap bulmak için on yedi okul müdürünün görüşlerine başvurulmuştur. Çalışma grubu amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden ölçüt örnekleme ve kartopu örnekleme kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Okul müdürü görüşlerinin analizinde nitel veri analiz tekniklerinden betimsel analiz ve içerik analizi yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre öğretmenlerin etik dışı davranışlarının nedenleri; Bunlar mesleki yetersizlikten kaynaklanan nedenler, sistem ve yönetimden kaynaklanan nedenler ve kişisel nedenler olmak üzere üç alt temada gruplandırılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular çerçevesinde uygulayıcılara ve araştırmacılara önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ethics
• teaching professional ethics
• reasons for ethical violations

THE REASONS FOR UNETHICAL BEHAVIOURS IN EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: WHAT SHOULD BE DONE?

Öz

This research was conducted to reveal, according to the opinions of the principals, the reasons for the unethical behavior of teachers towards students, colleagues, parents and school administrators while performing their profession. The research was conducted using the case study design within the qualitative research tradition. The research was conducted in high school schools in Düzce province in the 2021-2022 academic year, and the opinions of seventeen school principals were consulted to find answers to the research questions. The study group was determined using criterion sampling and snowball sampling, which are purposeful sampling methods. Descriptive analysis and content analysis methods, which are qualitative data analysis techniques, were used to analyze the school principal's opinions. According to the findings, the reasons for teachers' unethical behavior are; They were grouped into three sub-themes: reasons arising from professional inadequacy, reasons arising from the system and management, and personal reasons. Recommendations were made to practitioners and researchers within the framework of the findings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ethics
• teaching professional ethics
• reasons for ethical violations

Kaynakça

1. Akbağ, M. and Celebi, N. (2012). A study to determine the ethical behaviors of teachers working in general high schools, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 425-441.
2. Akbaşlı, S. (2010). Opinions of primary education supervisors about teacher competencies. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 39-50.
3. Alacapinar, F. G. (2018). Opinions of prospective teachers on professional ethical values that a teacher should have. KEFAD, 19(1), 467-479.
4. Arslan N., N. (2017). The level of compliance of classroom teachers with professional ethical principles. Journal of International Social Research, 10 (49), 389-395.
5. Atalay B., Saban M. (2005). The importance of ethics and ethical behavior for management accountants, Accounting and Auditing Overview, 5(16), 50-60.
6. Ateş, N. (2012). Professional ethics and professional values in teaching. Journal of Education and Humanities: Theory and Practice, 3(6), 3 -18.
7. Aydin, I. (2006). Ethics in education and training. Ankara: Pegem Publishing.
8. Aydin, I. (2021). Ethics in education and training. Pegem Publishing House: Ankara.

9. Burden, P.R. (2003). Classroom Management: Creating a Successful Learning Community. 2nd Edition New York: Wiley/Jossey-Bass.
10. Caesar, S. (2018). The effects of teachers' classroom management attitudes on students' development: A phenomenological analysis. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Education.33 (2), 54-549.
11. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. S. Turan, Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Publication Distribution.
12. Dokmen, U. (1988). Measuring empathy based on a new model and developing it with psychodrama. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, 21(1-2), 155-190.
13. Durmus, E., Kıran, A. B. and Sucu, N. N. (2019). An investigation on the causes of loss of reputation in the teaching profession. International Journal of Social Sciences in Turkish Cultural Geography, 4 (1), 8-13.
14. Ekiz D. (2009). Scientific research methods. Ankara: Memoir Publishing.
15. Erdemli, O. & Güner Demir, T. (2018). Receiving gifts in terms of teaching profession ethics: Evaluation on the axis of case studies. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 15(1), 611-637.
16. Eryılmaz, B. (2008). Developing an ethical culture. Turkish Journal of Administration, 459, 1-12. Fat, M. (2001). Introduction to Teaching. Ankara: Pegem A Publications.
17. Golubeva, M. & Kanins, V. (2017). ETINED council of Europe platform on ethics, transparency and integrity in education: Volume 4, codes of conduct for teachers in Europe: A background study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
18. Gonulacar,S.(2019). Ethical principles and violations. Access address: https://www.academia.edu/9326934/Etik_ilkeler_ve_ihlaller Erişim 06.11.2021
19. Gözütok, F. D. (1999). Ethical behavior of teachers. Journal of Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences, 32(1–2), 83–99.
20. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30 (4), 233-252.
21. Gul, H. (2006). Unethical Behaviors and Its Rationalization: An application in public hospitals. Selcuk University İ.İ.B.F. Magazine. 9(10), 65-79.
22. Korkut, F. (2005). Communication skills training for adults. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 28, 143-149.
23. Kosem. and Demirel. (2014). Student views on teachers' role modeling. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 4 (1), 08-18.
24. Memişoğlu, A. P. (2005). Teacher behaviors that lead to undesirable behaviors in the classroom environment. Journal of Contemporary Education, 323, 32-39.
25. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: A guide to design and practice (S. Turan, Trans. Ed.) Istanbul: Nobel Academic Publishing.
26. Mocan R. (2002). Ethics and professional ethics, YDK Journal of Supreme Audit, 1(1), http://www.ydk.gov.tr/dergi/dergi1.htm#_etik_ve_meslek (29.06.2021).
27. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd edition. Sage Publications, Inc.
28. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How To Use Qualitative Methods In Evaluation. Newbury Park,
29. Pelit, E. and Gucer, E. (2005). Perceptions of trade and tourism vocational course teacher candidates about unethical behaviors related to the teaching profession. II. Ethics in Politics and Administration Symposium, 18–19 November 2005 (p. 71-85). Sakarya: Sakarya University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences.
30. Seferoglu, S. S. (2001). Classroom Teachers' Views, Expectations and Suggestions Regarding Their Own Professional Development. Journal of National Education, Issue 149, 12-18.
31. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage.
32. Tenbrunsel, A. E. & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223-236
33. Toprakci, E. (2009). A comparative analysis of teachers' crime report on the scale of 1-judicial determined newspaper news. IV. National Education Management Congress, 14-15 May 2009, 475-487, Denizli: Pamukkale University Faculty of Education.
34. Tournier, B., Chimier, C., Childress, D., & Raudonyte, I. (2019).Teacher career reforms: Learning from experience. Paris: IIEP-UNESCO
35. Unal, A. and Driver, A. (2018). Examination of teacher behaviors that increase and decrease student motivation. International Journal of Society Studies, 8 (8), 1-43.
36. Usta, M. E., Kaya, A. & Özyurt, D. (2018). Organizational gossip management. Harran Journal of Education, 3 (2), 1-13.
37. Yanpar, T. (1992). Educational needs of secondary school teachers in Ankara primary schools regarding the teaching profession and subject areas. Unpublished master's thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
38. Yesilyurt, E., & Kliç, M.E. (2014). Evaluation of teachers' compliance with ethical values according to secondary school students' perceptions. Ekev academy journal, 18(60), 471-786.
39. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2008). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.