Çevrim İçi Öğrenmede Öz-düzenleme Becerisinin Akademik Başarıya Etkisi

Öz

Öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme, öğrencilerin kendi öğrenme hedefleri doğrultusunda öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyonları, bilişsel süreçleri ile davranışlarını gözleme, düzenleme ve denetlemeye çalıştıkları süreçtir. Çevrim içi uzaktan öğrenmede öz-düzenleme becerilerinin önemi vurgulanmakta, akademik başarıyla ilişkili olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Ancak araştırmalar çevrim içi öz-düzenlemeli öğrenmenin başarıya etkilerine ilişkin çelişkili sonuçlar ortaya koymaktadır. Mevcut araştırmanın amacı, bir üniversitede eğitim gören öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenlemeli çevrim içi öğrenme düzeylerini ve bu becerilerin akademik başarıya etkisini irdelemektir. Araştırmanın evrenini, 2020-2021 akademik yılında X Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nde 2, 3 ve 4. sınıflarda farklı bölümlerde aktif olarak öğrenim gören 1152 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini basit tesadüfi örnekleme ile seçilmiş öğretmen adayları arasından geri dönen 207 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Öğretmen adaylarının Öz-düzenlemeli çevrim içi öğrenme becerilerine ilişkin veriler ‘Öz-düzenlemeli Çevrim İçi Öğrenme Ölçeği (SOL-Q)’ ile toplanmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının akademik başarıları çevrim içi eğitim gördükleri 2020-2021 akademik yılı Güz dönemi not ortalamalarıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analizler öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenlemeli çevrim içi öğrenme düzeylerinin orta düzeyde olduğunu, kadın öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme ortalamalarının erkek öğretmen adaylarından yüksek olduğunu ve öz-düzenleme becerisinin çevrim içi öğrenmede akademik başarının anlamlı bir yordayıcısı olduğunu göstermiştir. Bulgular literatürde var olan benzer araştırmalarla tutarlı sonuçlar ortaya koymakla birlikte çevrim içi öğrenme süreçlerinde öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme geleneksel öğrenme ortamlarına göre farklı sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• öz-düzenleme
• uzaktan eğitim
• öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme
• eğitim fakültesi
• çevrim içi öğrenme

The Effect of Self-regulated Online Learning Skills on Academic Achievement

Öz

Self-regulated learning is an active process during which students attempt to monitor, control, and regulate their cognitive motivation and behavior according to their goals. Self-regulated learning skills are significant in online learning and with students’ academic success. However, studies reveal conflicting results. As such, this study aims to determine the level of university students’ self-regulated online learning skills and to investigate the effect of their self-regulated online learning skills on their academic achievement. The population consists of 1152 students studying at second, third and fourth grades of Kütahya Dumlupınar University Faculty of Education during the 2020-2021 academic year. The sample consists of 207 students selected by random sampling. Data were gathered using the 'Self-regulated Online Learning Scale (SOL-Q)'. The academic achievement was evaluated over the grade point averages in the Fall semester of 2020-2021 academic year. Statistical analysis revealed that the self-regulated online learning skills of the students were moderate; the averages of the male students were relatively lower than the females’. Self-regulated online learning skills were a significant predictor of academic success. Although these findings were supported by previous research in traditional learning environments, present results also caution that self-regulated online learning could yield different results from self-regulated traditional learning.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• self-regulation
• online learning
• distance education
• self-regulated learning
• education faculty

Kaynakça

1. Artino, A. R. (2008). Learning online: Understanding academic success from a self-regulated learning perspective [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
2. Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M, Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet and Higher Education, 12, 1–6. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005.
3. Barnard, L., Paton, V., & Lan, W. (2010). Profiles in self-regulated learning in the online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(1), 61–80. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v11i1.769.
4. Bradley, R. L., Browne, B. L., & Kelley, H. M. (2017). Examining the influence of self-efficacy and self-regulation in online learning. College Student Journal, 51(4), 518–530.
5. Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004.
6. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.
7. Bidjerano, T. (2005, October). Gender differences in self-regulated learning. Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Kerhonkson, NY. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490777.
8. Bowen, V. S. (1996). The relationship of locus of control and cognitive style to self-instructional strategies, sequencing, and outcomes in a learner-controlled multimedia environment [Unpublished Dissertation]. University of Georgia.

9. Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.525.
10. Carter, R. A., Rice, M., Yang, S., & Jackson, H. A. (2020). Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: strategies for remote learning. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 321-329. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0114.
11. Carson, A.D. (2011). Predicting student success from the LASSI for learning online (LLO). Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45(4), 399–414. Retrieved June 9, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.45.4.b.
12. Chang, M.M. (2007). Enhancing web-based language learning through self-monitoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 187–196. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00203.x.
13. Chang, M.M. (2010). Effects of self-monitoring on web-based language learner's performance and motivation. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 298–310.
14. Cho, M.-H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 290–301. Retrieved June 9, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835770.
15. Cunningham, C. A., & Billingsley, M. (2003). Curriculum Webs: A practical guide to weaving the Web into teaching and learning. Allyn and Bacon.
16. Fontana, R., Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2015). Measuring self-regulated learning in the workplace. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 32–52. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12046.
17. Gaskill, P. J., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2002). Self-Efficacy and self-regulated learning: The dynamic duo in school performance. In Improving Academic Achievement (pp. 185–208). Academic Press.
18. Gömleksiz, M. N., & Demiralp, D. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının öz-düzenleyici öğrenme becerilerine ilişkin görüşlerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından değerlendirilmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 777–795. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/223332 adresinden 1.5.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir
19. Gul, F., & Shehzad, S. (2012). Relationship between metacognition, goal orientation and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1864-1868. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.914.
20. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22-26. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030009022.
21. Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers & Education, 160, 1-19. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031.
22. Hodges, C.B., & Kim, C. (2010). Email, self-regulation, self-efficacy, and achievement in a college online mathematics course. Journal of Educational Computing Research,43(2), 207–223. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.2.d.
23. Jansen, R. S., Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Kester, L., & Kalz, M. (2017). Validation of the self-regulated online learning questionnaire. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(1), 6–27. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9125-x.
24. Johnson, R.D., Gueutal, H., & Falbe, C.M. (2009). Technology, trainees, metacognitive activity and e-learning effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(6), 545–566. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910974125.
25. Karakose, T. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on higher education: Opportunities and implications for policy and practice. Educational Process: International Journal, 10(1), 7-12. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.101.1.
26. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (36. Baskı). Nobel Akademi. Klingsieck, K.B., Fries, S., Horz, C., & Hofer, M. (2012). Procrastination in a distance university setting. Distance Education, 33(3), 295–310. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2012.723165.
27. Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: Effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218−230. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.4.218-231.
28. Liepins, A. S., & Hanson, C. (2020). Strategies for academic success: an early intervention approach for building metacognitive skills in first-year undergraduate students. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/PCEEA/article/view/14188.
29. Littlejohn, A., Hood, N., Milligan, C., & Mustain, P. (2016). Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 40–48 Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.003.
30. McSporran, M., & Young, S. (2001). Does gender matter in online learning?. Research in Learning Technology, 9(2), 3–15. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v9i2.12024.
31. Michinov, N., Brunot, S., Le Bohec, O., Juhel, J., & Delaval, M. (2011). Procrastination, participation, and performance in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 56(1), 243–252. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.025.
32. Ng, B. (2016). Towards Lifelong Learning: Identifying Learner Profiles on Procrastination and Self-Regulation. New Waves-Educational Research and Development Journal, 19(1), 41-54.
33. Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(4), 406-422. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1027.
34. Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Educational psychology at the millennium: A look back and a look forward. Educational Psychologist, 34, 221-226. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3504_01.
35. Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). Academic Press.
36. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72–89. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640802039024.
37. Sarı, A., & Akınoğlu, O. (2009). Öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme: Modeller ve uygulamalar. MÜ Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 29, 139-154. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1835 adresinden 4.5.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
38. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C, Shaw, S. M, et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93-135. Retrieved May 1, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093.
40. Tsai, Y.-H., Lin, C.-H., Hong, J.-C., & Tai, K.-H. (2018). The effects of metacognition on online learning interest and continuance to learn with MOOCs. Computers & Education, 121, 18–29. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.011.
41. UNESCO (2020), “COVID-19 impact on education”, Retrieved May 18, 2021, from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/education%20response
42. Üredi, I. ve Üredi, L. (2005). İlköğretim 8.sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının matematik başarısını yordama gücü. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 250–260. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mersinefd/issue/17391/181765 adresinden 8.6.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
43. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J.J. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17(5), 532–548. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003.
44. Vilkova, K., & Shcheglova, I. (2021). Deconstructing self-regulated learning in MOOCs: In search of help-seeking mechanisms. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 17-33. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10244-x.
45. Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4-5), 356-373, Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084.
46. Yavuzalp, N., & Özdemir, Y. (2020). Öz-Düzenlemeli Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ölçeğini Türkçe'ye Uyarlama Çalışması. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 10(3), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.19.512415 adresinden 8.6.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
47. Yükseltürk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12-22. Retrieved June 8, 2021, from https://avesis.metu.edu.tr/yayin/60c28331-3541-4631-b571-40c4bf33b4d4/gender-differences-in-self-regulated-online-learning-environment
48. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press.
49. Zimmerman, B.J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B.J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 1-37). Erlbaum.
50. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. Retrieved May 4, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
51. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D. H. Schunk & B. J.
52. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 267-296). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51. Retrieved July 6, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51.