7.Sınıf Fen Bilimleri Ders Kitabının Öğrenme ve Yenilik Becerileri Açısından Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Geleceğin tasarımcıları olan öğrencilerin çağımızda meydana gelen değişimlere uyum sağlayabilmeleri ve bir sonraki eğitim kurumuna ya da iş hayatına hazır olabilmeleri için 21. yüzyılın ileriye dönük becerilerine ihtiyaçları vardır. 21. yüzyıl becerilerinin bireylere en etkili şekilde kazandırılabilmesi için eğitim sistemine entegre edilmesi gerekmektedir. Eğitim ve öğretim süreci kapsamında öğretmen ve öğrenciler tarafından sıklıkla kullanılan ders kitapları 21. becerilerinin kazandırılmasında büyük öneme sahiptir. Bu araştırmanın amacı ortaokul 7. sınıf Fen Bilimleri ders kitabının 21. yüzyıl öğrenme ve yenilik becerileri açısından öğretmen görüşleri doğrultusunda değerlendirilmesidir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2021-2022 eğitim-öğretim yılında Gaziantep ili merkez ilçelerinde bulunan Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı ortaokullarda görev yapan 7. sınıf Fen Bilimleri ders kitabını kullanan 30 Fen Bilimleri öğretmeni oluşturmaktadır. Nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden olgubilim deseninin benimsendiği araştırmada veriler, araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan 10 sorudan oluşan yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizi ve betimsel analiz yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada Fen Bilimleri öğretmenlerinin görüşleri doğrultusunda 7. Sınıf Fen Bilimleri ders kitabının 21. yüzyıl öğrenme ve yenilik becerilerini tam olarak geliştirmediği, öğrenme ve yenilik becerileri açısından yetersiz olduğu ve becerilerin ders kitabında düzensiz bir dağılım gösterdiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 21. yüzyıl becerileri
• Fen Bilimleri ders kitabı
• Öğretmen görüşleri

Evaluation 7thGrade Science Textbook in terms of Learning and Innovation Skills According to Teachers' Opinions

Öz

Students, who are the designers of the future, need the forward-looking skills of the 21st-century to adapt to the changes occurring in our age and to be ready for the next educational institution or business life. 21st-century skills need to be integrated into the education system for individuals to gain them most effectively. Textbooks, which are frequently used by teachers and students within the scope of the education and training process, are of great importance in acquiring these skills. The aim of this study is to evaluate the secondary school 7th-grade Science textbook in terms of 21st-century learning and innovation skills in line with teachers' opinions. The study group consists of 30 Science teachers working in secondary schools affiliated with Gaziantep province in the 2021-2022 academic year and using 7th-grade Science textbooks. In the research, phenomenological design and qualitative research methods were adopted, and the data were collected with a semi-structured interview form consisting of 9 questions prepared by the researcher. The data were analyzed using content and descriptive analysis method. The study, in line with the opinions of Science teachers, was concluded that 7th-grade Science textbook does not fully develop 21st-century learning and innovation skills, insufficient, skills are distributed irregularly in the textbook.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• 21st-century skills
• Science textbook
• teacher opinions

Kaynakça

1. Ahmed, S. D., & Taha, F. K. A. (2021). Analysis of the Chemistry book for the third grade medium on the skills of the 21st century. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1237-1246.Retrieved June 24, 2022, from, https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.2441
2. Akçay, A. (2019). An analysis of elt coursebooks in terms of 21st century skills: Communication, collaboration, critical thinking, creativity (Publication No. 573192) [Master Thesis, Akdeniz University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved November 19, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
3. Akçay, B., Akçay H., ve Kahramanoğlu E. (2017). Ortaokul fen bilimleri ders kitaplarının bloom taksonomisine göre incelenmesi [Evaluation of Elementary Science Textbooks According to Bloom Taxonomy]. Journal of Uludağ University Faculty of Education, 30(2), 521-549. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from, https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.368965
4. Akçay, H, Kapici, H., & Akçay, B. (2020). Analysis of the representations in Turkish middle school science textbooks from 2002 to 2017. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 192-216. Retrieved February 16, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.42.7.3
5. AlJaafil, E., & Şahin, M. (2019). Critical thinking skills for primary education: The case in Lebanon. Turquoise International Journal of Educational Research and Social Studies, 1(1), 1–7. Retrieved November 22, 2021, from, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598279.pdf
6. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 8, 2021, from, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
7. Arslan, Y. (2019). 5. sınıf fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı ve ders kitabının STEM yaklaşımı bağlamında incelenmesi [The inspection of the science lesson teaching program and course book of the 5th classes in the context of STEM] (Publication No. 618105) [Master Thesis, Kütahya Dumlupınar University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved March 9, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
8. Aybek, B., Çetin, A., ve Başarır, F. (2014). Fen ve Teknoloji ders kitabının eleştirel düşünme standartları doğrultusunda analiz edilmesi [Analysis of the science and technology textbook in accordance with the standards of critical thinking]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 3(1), 313-325.Retrieved December 13, 2021, from, http://www.jret.org/FileUpload/ks281142/File/30.aybek.pdf

9. Ayvacı, Ş. H., ve Ernas, S. (2009). Öğretmen kılavuz kitaplarının yapılandırmacı kurama göre öğretmen görüşlerine dayalı olarak değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of teacher guide books based on teachers’ views under constructivism learning theory]. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(2), 212-225. Retrieved February 20, 2021, from, http://www.ajindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423909611.pdf
10. Bakar, E., Keleş, Ö., ve Koçakoğlu, M. (2009). Öğretmenlerin MEB 6. sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji dersi kitap setleriyle ilgili görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the teachers’ views about grade 6th science and technology text book set]. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 10(1), 41-50. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1494906
11. Bal, M. (2018). Türkçe dersinin 21. yüzyıl becerileri açısından incelenmesi [Investigation On The 21st Century Skills Of Turkish Language Course]. Turkish Studies, 13(4), 49-64. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from,https://doi.org/10.7827
12. Baltacı, A. (2017). Nitel veri analizinde Miles-Huberman modeli [Miles-Huberman Model in Qualitative Data Analysis]. Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 3(1), 1-14. Retrieved June 11, 2022, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/318527
13. Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: Nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır? [The Qualitative Research Process: How to Conduct a Qualitative Research?]. Ahi Evran University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 5(2), 368-388.Retrieved May 23, 2021, from, https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299
14. Barası, M. (2020). 2018 ortaokul Türkçe dersi öğretim programının 21. yüzyıl becerileri açısından incelenmesi [Analysis of 2018 secondary school Turkish course program in terms of 21st century skills] (Publication No. 644533) [Master Thesis, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved August 1, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
15. Bedir, H. (2019) Pre-service ELT teachers’ beliefs and perceptions on the 21st century learning and innovation skills (4Cs). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 231-246. Retrieved December 14, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547718
16. Beers, S. (2011). 21st century skills: Preparing students for their future.Retrieved March 28, 2022, from, https://cosee.umaine.edu/files/coseeos/21st_century_skills.pdf
17. Belet Boyacı, Ş. D., ve Güner Özer, M. (2019). Öğrenmenin geleceği: 21. yüzyıl becerileri perspektifiyle Türkçe dersi öğretim programları [The Future of Learning: Turkish Language Course Curricula From The Perspective of 21st Century Skills]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 9 (2), 708-738.Retrieved May 3, 2021, from, https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.578170
18. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2010). Draft white paper 1: Defining 21st century skills.Retrieved December 21, 2021, from, https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/citizenship/socioeconomic/docs/ATC21S_Exec_Summary.pdf
19. Bouzid, H. A. (2016). Boosting 21 st century skills through Moroccan ELT textbooks. Journal of English language teaching and linguistics, 1(2), 97-108. Retrieved September 26, 2021, from, http://dx.doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v1i2.24
20. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., ve Demirel F. (2020). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education] (28th ed.). Pegem Akademi.
21. Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1-16. Retrieved December 16, 2021, from,https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1183407.pdf
22. Çalışkan, N., ve Toyran, M. (2020). Birleşik Krallık’taki okullarda ders kitabı kullanımı: Mevcut Durum, çalışmalar, gelecek planları [Textbook Usage at Schools in the UK: Current Status, Studies, Future Plans]. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 22(3), 693-705. Retrieved April 7, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.573580
23. Çelik, H., Başer Baykal, N., ve Kılıç Memur, H. N. (2020). Nitel veri analizi ve temel ilkeleri [Qualitative Data Analysis and Fundamental Principles]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 379-406.Retrieved May 23, 2021, from, https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.16m
24. Çepni, S. (2018). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project studies] (8th ed.). Celepler.
25. Çolak, M. (2018). Ortaokul fen bilimleri dersinin 21.yüzyıl becerilerini kazandırmadaki etkililiğine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Kayseri ili örneği) [Teachers' opinions about effectiveness of secondary school science classes on equipping students with 21st century skills (Kayseri province sample)] (Publication No. 490559) [Master Thesis, Erciyes University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved July 10, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
26. Dede, C. (2009). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. 21st century skills. Retrieved December 20, 2021, from, http://sttechnology.pbworks.com/f/Dede_(2010)_Comparing%20Frameworks%20for%2021st%20Century%20Skills.pdf
27. Dökme, İ. (2005). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (MEB) İlköğretim 6. sınıf Fen Bilgisi ders kitabının bilimsel süreç becerileri yönünden değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of 6th Grade Science Textbook Published by the Turkish Ministry of Education in Terms of Science Process Skills]. Elementary Education Online, 4(1), 7-17.Retrieved February 13, 2021, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/91080
28. Drakopoulou, M., Skordoulis, C., & Halkia, K. (2005). History of science in 20th c. Greek science textbooks of primary education. In Proceedings International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Conference, (12). Retrieved November 10, 2021, from, https://www.academia.edu/502484/HISTORY_of_SCIENCE_In_20TH_C_GREEK_SCIENCE_TEXTBOOKS_of_PRIMARY_EDUCATION
29. Drysielski, R. (2015). CTE alignment with 21st century skills (UMI No. 10139829)[Doctoral dissertation, St.John's University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Retrieved August 1, 2021, from, https://about.proquest.com/en/dissertations/
30. Dündar, H. (2019). İlkokul üçüncü sınıf fen bilimleri ders kitabındaki ünite sonu değerlendirme sorularının revize edilmiş bloom taksonomisi bağlamında kapsam geçerliliği [The content validity of the unit end evaluation questions in the third grade science course book by the context of revised bloom taxonomy] (Publication No. 558070) [Master Thesis, Giresun University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved November 3, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
31. Ekici, G., Abide, Ö. F., Canbolat, Y., ve Öztürk, A. (2017). 21. Yüzyıl becerilerine ait veri kaynaklarının analizi [Analysis of Resources on 21st Century Skills]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 6(1), 1-12. Retrieved December 13, 2021, from, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Yusuf-Canbolat/publication/325595003_ANALYSIS_OF_RESOURCES_ON_21ST_CENTURY_SKILLS/links/5b1796df0f7e9b1912b3fe01/ANALYSIS-OF-RESOURCES-ON-21ST-CENTURY-SKILLS.pdf
32. Fan, L. H., & Kaeley, G. S. (2000). The influence of textbook on teaching strategies: An empirical study. Mid-Western Educational Researcher,13(4), 2-9.Retrieved March 5, 2022, from,https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ620449
33. Gray, A. (2016). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the fourth industrial revolution. Paper presented at the World Economic Forum.Retrieved November 7, 2021, from,https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/
34. Güneş, Y. İ., Sağdıç, F., ve Şimşek, C. L. (2018). Ortaokul Fen Bilimleri ders kitaplarındaki etkinliklerin araştırmaya dayalı öğrenmeyi destekleme durumlarının belirlenmesi [Determination of the Activities in Secondary School ScienceTextbooks to Supporting Inquiry Based Learning]. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 2(2), 28-38. Retrieved February 19, 2021, from,https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/569265
35. Güneş, Y., Çelikler, Y., ve Gökalp, Y. M. (2008). İlköğretim I. kademedeki yeni Fen ve Teknoloji ders kitapları konusunda sınıf öğretmenlerinin görüşleri [Classroom teachers' opinions about the new Science and Technology textbooks in Primary Education I level]. Çukurova University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 193-210.Retrieved February 23, 2021, from,https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/50478
36. Hançer, A. H., Şensoy, Ö., ve Yıldırım, H. İ. (2003). İlköğretimde çağdaş Fen Bilgisi öğretiminin önemi ve nasıl olması gerektiği üzerine bir değerlendirme [An evalation about the importance of contemporary science education at elemantary schools and how this kind of science teaching must be].Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 1(13), 80-88. Retrieved January 15, 2021, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/114822
37. Irmak, Z. (2017). 7. sınıf Fen Bilimleri ders kitabının öğretim programındaki kazanımlara ulaşmada yeterlik düzeyinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluatıon of 7th grade science textbook’s level of competence in science curriculum attainments according to science teachers’ views] (Publication No. 485952) [Master's Thesis, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved December 16, 2021, from,https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
38. Jacobson-Lundeberg, V. (2016). Pedagogical implementation of 21st century skills. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, (27), 82-100. Retrieved July 7, 2021, from,https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094407
39. Kaçar, H. (2020). An exploratıon of english as a foreign language (efl) teachers’ perceptions on 21st century learning and innovatıon skills (Publication No. 628231) [Master's Thesis, Çukurova University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved November 12, 2021, from,https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
40. Kalemkuş, J. (2021). Fen Bilimleri dersi öğretim programı kazanımlarının 21.yüzyıl becerileri açısından incelenmesi [Investigation of Science Curriculum Learning Outcomes in Terms of 21st Century Skills]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 11(1), 63-87. Retrieved June 25, 2022, from, https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.800552
41. Kara Kılıç, N. (2019). MEB 5.sınıf fen bilimleri ders kitabının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the Ministry of exacution 5th grade science course book according to teachers' opinions] (Publication No. 567997) [Master's Thesis, Gazi University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
42. Karslı, E. (2013). Dördüncü sınıf fen ve teknoloji ders kitabının görsel ögelerin tasarımıve sayfa tasarımı ilkelerine göre değerlendirilmesi [The Evaluatıon of 4th Grade Science and Technology Textbook Based on Visual and Page Designs Principles] (Publication No. 344651) [Master's Thesis, Uşak University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved March 15, 2021, from,https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
43. Kartikasari, A., Roemintoyo, R., & Yamtinah, S. (2018). The effectiveness of science textbook based on science technology society for elementary school level. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 7(2), 127-131. Retrieved February 14, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7i2.13022
44. Kaya, E. (2016). İlkokul 3. sınıf fen bilimleri ders kitabının yapılandırmacılık ve bilimsel süreç becerilerini geliştirmesi açısından incelenmesi [An examination of 3rd grade science books in terms of constructivism and supporting science process skills] (Publication No. 441256) [Master's Thesis, Adıyaman University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved March 12, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
45. Kayhan, E., Altun, S., ve Gürol, M. (2019). Sekizinci sınıf Türkçe öğretim programı (2018)’nın 21. yüzyıl becerileri açısından değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the eighth grade Turkish curriculum (2018) in terms of 21st century skills]. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 20-35.Retrieved October 10, 2021, from,https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/904668
46. Kivunja, C. (2014). Do you want your students to be job-ready with 21st century skills? Change pedagogies: A pedagogical paradigm shift from vygotskyian social constructivism to critical thinking, problem solving and siemens' digital connectivism. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(3), 81-91. Retrieved December 18, 2021, from,http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p81
47. Kristanto, Y. D., & Santoso, E. B. (2020). Towards a mathematics textbook for supporting 21st century learning: The student perspective. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657, 012037. Retrieved October 2, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012037
48. Küçüközer, H., Bostan, A., Kenar, Z., Seçer, S., ve Yavuz, S. (2008). Altıncı sınıf Fen ve Teknoloji ders kitaplarının yapılandırmacı öğrenme kuramına göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of six grade science textbooks according to constructivist learning theory].Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 111-126. Retrieved February 18, 2021, from, https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/90975
49. Louis, R. C. (2012). A case study exploring technology integration and incorporation of 21 st century skills in elementary classrooms [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northeastern University.Retrieved December 21, 2021, from, https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:1190/fulltext.pdf
50. McDonald, C. V. (2015). Evaluating junior secondary science textbook usage in Australian schools. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 481-509. Retrieved November 11, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9468-8
51. MEB (2018). Fen Bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Science curriculum (Primary and secondary school grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8)]. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.Retrieved September 6, 2021, from, http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937- FEN%20B%C4%B0L%C4%B0MLER%C4%B0%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf
52. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2th ed.). Sage Publications. Retrieved June 4, 2022, from, https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=U4lU_-wJ5QEC&oi=fnd&pg=PA10&dq=miles+ve+huberman+1994&ots=kFXH3DOZ_Q&sig=UWwnVk7lSWFncBoLcq3bj1RkCJ0&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=miles%20ve%20huberman%201994&f=false
53. Nacaroğlu, O., ve Bektaş, O. (2018). Ortaokul beşinci sınıf Fen Bilimleri ders kitabının öğretmen görüşlerine göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of the fifth grade science textbook based on teacher's views]. Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 6(73), 546-563. Retrieved March 6, 2021, from, https://avesis.erciyes.edu.tr/yayin/218c53a5-72cb-4415-8b44-2a6102ca4297/ortaokul-besinci-sinif-fen-bilimleri-ders-kitabinin-ogretmen-goruslerine-gore-degerlendirilmesi
54. Nwafor, C. E., & Umoke, C. C. (2016). Evaluation of some approved basic Science and Technology textbooks in use in junior secondary schools in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(14), 69-78. Retrieved November 10, 2021, from,https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1103026.pdf
55. Oates, T. (2014). Why textbooks count: A policy paper. Cambridge Assessment, 10.Retrieved February 19, 2022, from,https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/181744-why-textbooks-count-tim-oates.pdf
56. Onat Kocabıyık, O. (2016). Olgubilim ve gömülü kuram: Bazı özellikler açısından karşılaştırma [Phenomenology and Grounded Theory: A Comparison in Terms of Some Features]. Trakya Journal of Education, 6(1), 55-66. Retrieved May 3, 2021, from,https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200424
57. Özdemir, H. (2020). Fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin ders kitabı dışında kaynak kullanıp kullanmadıkları üzerine bir araştırma [A survey on whether or not science fiction teachers, use a source book except a text book] (Publication No. 643709) [Master's Thesis, Atatürk University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved March 9, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
58. Özkan Elgün, İ. (2021). Analysis of the 8th grade English course in terms of 21st century skills (Publication No. 669866) [Master's Thesis, Ufuk University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved October 10, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
59. P21 (2009). P21 framework definitions. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (P21).Retrieved December 22, 2021, from,https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519462.pdf
60. Pektaş, M., İncikabı, L., & Yaz, Ö. (2015). An Analysis of Middle School Science Textbooks in terms of TIMSS Program Framework. Adıyaman University Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 29-48. Retrieved March 27, 2021, from,http://dx.doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.08288
61. Rakhmawati, D.M., & Priyana, J. (2019). A Study on 21st century skills integration in the English textbook for senior high school.Journal of English Educators Society, 4(1), 9-16. Retrieved September 21, 2021, from,http://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v4i1.1873
62. Rinekso, A. B. (2021). The representation of 21st century skills in an Indonesian EFL textbook. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(1), 191-211. Retrieved October 3, 2021, from, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c1c/0cb8aabd1ba561a8eaec8bab426c1c066e9f.pdf?_ga=2.96284379.612784187.1658414128-249418487.1606157937
63. Schleicher, A. (2012). Ed., Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the World, OECD Publishing.Retrieved March 21, 2022, from,http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264xxxxxx-en
64. Sefa, A. (2009). 7. sınıf ilköğretim matematik ders kitabının; görsel, duyuşsal ve akademik yönden incelenmesi [Investigating visual, affective and academic aspects of 7th year mathematics text book] (Publication No. 245762) [Master's Thesis, Selçuk University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved February 14, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
65. Sothayapetch, P., Lavonen, J., & Juuti, K. (2013). An analysis of Science textbooks for grade 6: The electric circuit lesson. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 9(1), 59-72.Retrieved December 16, 2021, from,http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2013.916a
66. Sun, L., & Li, L. (2021). The alignment between third-grade primary school Science textbooks and curriculum standards in China and Japan. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(3), 507-518. Retrieved October 7, 2021, from,https://dx.doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.507
67. Swanepoel, S. (2010). The assessment of the quality of Science Education textbooks: Conceptual framework and ınstruments for analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Africa. Retrieved December 20, 2021, from,https://uir.unisa.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10500/4041/thesis_swanepoel_s.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
68. Tor, H., & Erden, O. (2004). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin bilgi teknolojilerinden yararlanma düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma [A research about primary school students level who takes advantage from information technology]. The turkish online journal of educational technology, 3(1), 120-130.Retrieved December 16, 2021, from, http://www.tojet.net/articles/v3i1/3116.pdf
69. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21stcentury skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
70. Uluhan, G. (2019). An Evaluation of a coursebook for 21st century's learning and innovation skills (Publication No. 573641) [Master's Thesis, Çağ University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved November 23, 2021, from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
71. Uyar, A., & Çiçek, B. (2021). Farklı branşlardaki öğretmenlerin 21.yüzyıl becerileri [21st Century Skills of Different Field Teachers]. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, (9), 1-11. Retrieved December 19, 2021, from, https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.822410
72. Uzuntiryaki, E., & Boz, Y. (2006). Öğretmen adaylarının ders kitabı kullanımıyla ilgili görüşleri [Pre-service teachers' opinions on the use of textbooks]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 31(31), 212-220. Retrieved February 25, 2021, from,https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500439132
73. Work, N. (2014). Rosetta Stone: Compatible with proficiency-oriented language instruction and blended learning. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 35-52. Retrieved September 30, 2021, from,https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213436.pdf
74. Yalman, D. (2020). İletişim ve işbirliği [Communication and Collaboration]. Öğretir Özçelik, A., & Tuğluk, M. N. (Ed.), Inside 21st Century Skills in Education and Industry (4th ed., p. 29-50). Pegem Akademi.
75. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (11th ed.). Seçkin.
76. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri[Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (12th ed.). Seçkin.
77. Yıldırım, S. (2010). İlköğretim 4.-5. sınıf öğretmenlerinin fen ve teknoloji ders kitabının öğretim boyutunu yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma göre değerlendirmeleri [Assessment of the educational aspect of science and technologies text book according to the constructive approach by 4th and 5th grade elementary school teachers] (Publication No. 249820) [Master's Thesis, Selçuk University]. YÖK National Thesis Center. Retrieved March 16, 2021 from, https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
78. Yıldız, E., & Tatar, N. (2012). An analysis of the activities in elementary science and technology textbooks according to science process skills and structural characteristics. Education and Science, 37(164), 108-125. Retrieved February 9, 2021, from,https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288622730_An_Analysis_of_the_Activities_in_Elementary_Science_and_Technology_Textbooks_according_to_Science_Process_Skills_and_Structural_Characteristics