EFL Teachers’ Professional Development Needs: Implications for Online Training Design

Öz

This study investigated the professional development (PD) needs of in-service English language teachers in Türkiye and explored their perceptions of an effective online in-service training program. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 322 public school English teachers across 12 NUTS regions via a needs analysis questionnaire. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with 20 teachers purposively selected to represent different regions and school levels. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, while qualitative data were examined through open and axial coding, supported by intercoder agreement and triangulation. Findings revealed that teachers prioritized PD in four main domains: speaking skills, ELT methodology, classroom management, and material development, particularly digital resources. Speaking was consistently identified as the most pressing need, reflecting limited opportunities for communicative language use in Türkiye’s EFL context. Teachers also stressed the importance of updated methodological training, practical classroom management strategies, and support in developing interactive materials. Regarding online PD design, participants emphasized that programs should be needs-based, practice-oriented, interactive, and collaborative. They valued flexible timing, accessible digital materials, and voluntary participation over mandatory attendance. The study highlights the necessity of designing PD programs that are context-sensitive, grounded in teachers’ realities, and aligned with principles of adult learning. These findings have implications for both pre-service and in-service teacher education, suggesting the need for systemic changes in program design. By integrating teachers’ voices, the study contributes to the development of needs-driven, practice-based online professional learning models that can enhance teacher effectiveness and support improved English language outcomes in Türkiye.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• English language teachers
• needs analysis
• online professional development

Kaynakça

1. Akçor, G., & Ergül, H. (2025). A needs analysis study of novice EFL teachers’ professional development in Türkiye. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 19(1), 117–136. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1469608.pdf
2. Al-Qahtani, H., M. (2015) Teachers’ voice: A needs analysis of teachers’ needs for professional development with the emergence of the current English textbooks. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 128-141.
3. Al-Thani, N., Ahmed, Z., & Bhadra, J. (2025). Concurrent training and reflection model (CTRM) for in-service teachers. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1583071. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1583071
4. Ameen, R. M., Zahir, H. O., Majid, K. B., & Salam, B. H. (2024). Challenges faced by novice English language teachers in Raparin territory during their initial years of teaching. Journal of Ecohumanism. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3642
5. Arslan, S. (2018). Designing an in-service teacher training program for English teachers in non-formal education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
6. Asterhan, C. S. C., & Lefstein, A. (2023). The search for evidence-based features of effective teacher professional development: A critical analysis of the literature. Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2283437
7. Aşıksoy, G. (2018). ELT students' attitudes and awareness towards the use of Web 2.0 technologies for language learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 240–251.
8. Barrientos-Moncada, M. I., Carvajal-Castaño, N. A., & Aristizabal-Cardona, H. S. (2023). EFL Teacher Professional Development Needs: Voices from the Periphery. HOW, 30(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.30.2.761

9. British Council & TEPAV. (2013). Türkiye national needs assessment of state school English language teaching. British Council.
10. Burns, A. (2017). Innovating Teacher Development: Transformative Teacher Education Through Classroom Inquiry. In: Gregersen, T., MacIntyre, P. (eds) Innovative Practices in Language Teacher Education. Educational Linguistics, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51789-6_9
11. Canaran, Ö. & Mirici, İ. H. (2020). A new model of team teaching for teacher professional development: A case study of in-service English teachers. Education and Science, 45(201), 247-271. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8430
12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018) Research methods in education (8th ed.). London: Routledge.
13. Cotes, J., & Ugarte, S. (2019). A systemic and strategic approach for training needs analysis for the International Bank. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.05.002
14. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
15. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
16. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publication Inc.
18. Çapan, S. A. (2021). Problems in foreign language education in the Turkish education system: pre-service teachers’ accounts. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 397-419. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.911469
19. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/teacher-prof-dev
20. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
21. Dikilitaş, K., & Tanış, A. (2018). Turkish EFL instructors’ engagement in professional development: Reflections from a community of practice. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(2), 255–284.
22. Dille, K. B., & Røkenes, F. M. (2021). Teachers’ professional development in formal online communities: A scoping review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, Article 103431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103431
23. Education First. (2024). EF English Proficiency Index. Retrieved May 15, 2025 from https://www.ef.com/assetscdn/WIBIwq6RdJvcD9bc8RMd/cefcom-epi-site/reports/2024/ef-epi-2024-english.pdf
24. Gabršček, S., Roaders, R., & Klić, G. (2013). Improving the Quality of In-Service Teacher Training System [Scholarly project]. In Analysis of the existing ETTA INSETT system and assessment of the needs for in-service training of teachers.
25. Gosling, D. (2014). Collaborative peer-supported review of teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 13–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5_2
26. Gravani, M. N. (2012). Adult learning principles in designing learning activities for teacher development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(4), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.663804
27. Gull, S., Khan, T., & Jabbar, M. (2022). Effectiveness of In-Service Teaching Training on Job Performance of Teachers: An Empirical Study. Global Educational Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-i).31
28. Gültekin Talayhan, Ö., & Babayiğit, M. V. (2023). Foreign language teaching in Türkiye: Historical development, problems and solutions. Uluslararası Bilim Ve Eğitim Dergisi, 6(3), 246-260. https://doi.org/10.47477/ubed.1342598
29. Gürsoy, E. (2013). Improving practicum for a better teacher training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 420–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.214
30. Ha, X. V., & Murray, J. C. (2021). The impact of a professional development program on EFL teachers' beliefs about corrective feedback. System, 96, Article 102405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102405
31. Hajjar, S., & Alkhanaizi, M. (2018). Exploring the Factors That Affect Employee Training Effectiveness: A Case Study in Bahrain. SAGE Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018783033
32. Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, Article 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286
33. Heap, T., Thompson, R., & Fein, A. (2020). Designing teacher professional development programs to support a rapid shift to digital. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3447–3459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09863-5
34. Kalinowski, E., Egert, F., Grostaj, A., & Vock, M. (2020). Professional development on fostering students’ academic language proficiency across the curriculum: A meta-analysis of its impact on teachers’ cognition and teaching practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102971
35. Kandemir, A. N. (2020). Öğretmenlerin EBA, Morpa Kampüs, Okulistik benzeri eğitim ortamları kullanımının teknoloji kabul ve kullanım birleştirilmiş modeli 2 ile açıklanması (Unpublished master’s thesis). Gaziantep University, Gaziantep.
36. Kımav, A., U. (2019). İngilizce öğretiminde teknopedagojik becerileri geliştirmeye yönelik harmanlanmış bir hizmet içi eğitim program tasarısı (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
37. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
38. Kusumoto, Y. (2008). Needs analysis: Developing a teacher training program for elementary school homeroom teachers in Japan. Second Language Studies, 26(2), 1-44.
39. Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of educational research, 86(4), 1111-1150.
40. Lay, C. D., Allman, B., Cutri, R. M., & Kimmons, R. (2020). Examining a decade of research in online teacher professional development. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 573129. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.573129
41. Karlberg, M., & Bezzina, C. (2020). The professional development needs of beginning and experienced teachers in four municipalities in Sweden. Professional Development in Education, 48(4), 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1712451
42. Mago, N., & Andal, E. (2024). In-service training programs: Impact on teachers’ teaching competencies. International Journal of Applied Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.56293/ijasr.2024.6205
43. Mahmood, S., Butt, M., & Manzoor, A. (2022). The impact of in-service training on teachers' teaching and students' learning. Global Educational Studies Review. VII(I), 322-335. https://doi.org/10.31703/gesr.2022(vii-i).32
44. McChesney, K., & Aldridge, J. M. (2019). What gets in the way? A new conceptual model for the trajectory from teacher professional development to impact. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 834–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1667412
45. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Nazar, S., & Nordin, N. R. M. (2020). Impact of teacher training programs on teachers’ performance: a case of in-service English language secondary school teachers in Pakistan. Linguistic Forum-A Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 19-22.
47. Nguyen, T. V., & Sit, H. (2025). In-service teacher professional development: challenges and opportunities for innovating the trichronous modality of delivery in Vietnam’s EFL education. Education Sciences, 15(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010019
48. Özer, B. (2004). In-service training of teachers in Türkiye at the beginning of the 2000s. Journal of In-service education, 30(1), 89-100.
49. Öztürk, G., & Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2021). Flipped learning design in EFL classrooms: Implementing self-regulated learning strategies to develop language skills. Smart Learning Environments, 8(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00146-x
50. Parker, V., & Tang, A. (2025). Exploring the landscape of EFL teachers’ professional development in China: A scoping review. Research Synthesis in Applied Linguistics, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/29984475.2025.2562410
51. Pasternak, D. L., Hallman, H. L., Caughlan, S., Renzi, L., Rush, L. S., & Meineke, H. (2016). Learning and teaching technology in English teacher education: Findings from a national study. Contemporary Issues in Technology & Teacher Education, 16(1), 373-387.
52. Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., McKenney, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(5), 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8
53. Poonpon, K. (2022). Professional development needs of in-service English language teachers in Thailand. Thailand TESOL Journal, 34(2), 1–25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1332304.pdf
54. Porcenaluk, S., O’Neachtain, A., & Connolly, C. (2023). Reimagining a framework for teachers’ continuous professional development during curriculum reform. Irish Educational Studies, 42(4), 931-948. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2250765
55. Powell, C. G., & Bodur, Y. (2019). Teachers’ perceptions of an online professional development experience: Implications for a design and implementation framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.004
56. Qamariah, H., & Hercz, M. (2025). The impact of professional development programs on English as a foreign language instructors in higher education institutions. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1071. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081071
57. Rogers, J. (2007). Adults Learning. (5th ed.). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
58. Russell, M., Carey, R., Kleiman, G., & Venable, J. (2019). Face-to-face and online professional development for mathematics teachers: A comparative study. Online Learning. https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V13I2.1669
59. Saldaña, J. & Omasta, M. (2018). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
60. Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
61. Shokpour, N., Eslampanah, N., Asadi, V., O'Neill, S., Dann, C., & Wang, J. (2024). Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' professional development needs in educational contexts: Exploring the challenge of reflective practice. Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 12(4), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2024.103180.1995
62. Sims, S., & Fletcher-Wood, H. (2021). Identifying the characteristics of effective teacher professional development: A critical review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1772841
63. Stavermann, K. (2025). Online teacher professional development: A research synthesis on effectiveness and evaluation. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 30(1), 203–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09792-9
64. Tekin-Sitrava, R., Özel, Z., Işıksal-Bostan, M., & Yemen-Karpuzcu, S. (2024). How does online professional development program enriched with collaborative discussion develop teachers’ noticing skills?. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23, 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10461-7
65. Tenenberg, J. (2016). Learning through observing peers in practice. Studies in Higher Education, 41(4), 756–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.950954
66. Uzorka, A., Kalabuki, K., & Odebiyi, O. A. (2024). The effectiveness of in-service teacher training programs in enhancing teaching quality and student achievement. Forum for Education Studies, 2(3), 1465. https://doi.org/10.59400/fes.v2i3.1465
67. Uztosun, M. S. (2017). In-service teacher education in Turkey: English language teachers’ perspectives. Professional Development in Education, 44(4), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1374989
68. Stevens, T. M., Day, I. N. Z., den Brok, P. J., Prins, F. J., Assen, H. J. H. E., ter Beek, M., … Vermunt, J. D. (2023). Teacher professional learning and development in the context of educational innovations in higher education: A typology of practices. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(2), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2246412
69. Ventista, O. M., & Brown, C. (2023). Teachers' professional learning and its impact on students' learning outcomes: Findings from a systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), Article 100565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100565
70. Younas, A., Fàbregues, S., Durante, A., & Ali, P. (2022). Providing English and native language quotes in qualitative research: A call to action. Nursing open, 9(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1115
71. Yurkofsky, M. M., Blum-Smith, S., & Brennan, K. (2019). Expanding outcomes: Exploring varied conceptions of teacher learning in an online professional development experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.002
72. Yücedağ, Z., & Şevik, M. (2021). Perceptions of EFL teachers from Turkey, Germany and Spain on professional development and their professional development activities: Perceptions of EFL teachers from Turkey, Germany and Spain. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2), 1389-1426.
73. Zhang, W. (2022). The role of technology-based education and teacher professional development in English as a foreign language classes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 910315. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.910315