The Relationship Between School Adjustment of Preschool Children and Parenting Style Attitude

Öz

The research was carried out using the explanatory sequential mixed method design of the mixed method designs. In the quantitative part of the study, the sample group consisted of 380 children, their families and teachers, and the qualitative part participants consisted of 9 children, 9 families and 9 teachers. As a result of the study, it was concluded that there was a statistically significant difference between the employment status of the mothers and the overprotective parent attitudes. Teachers stated that there were children in their classroom who did not like school and showed the behavior of not wanting to come to school and that these were caused by reasons such as family problems, over-dependence on the mother and absenteeism. The conclusion has been reached that some teachers were not aware of children who have problems with school adjustment. It was found that a part of the parents stated that their children did not want to go to school because of reasons such as getting caught up in play at home, sleeping problems (being unable to wake up in the morning) and making excuses not to go.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pre-school education,early childhood education,parental attitude,school adjustment,mixed method

Kaynakça

1. Başaran, S., Gökmen, B., & Akdağ, B. (2014). Okul öncesi eğitimde okula uyum sürecinde öğretmenlerin karşilaştiği sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri [The problems teachers faced during the preschool adjustment period and recommendations regarding solutions]. International Turkish Educational Sciences Journal, 2(2). 197-222.
2. Başar, H. (1999). Sınıf yönetimi [Classroom management]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları [Ministry of National Education Publications].
3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (20.baskı)[Data analysis handbook for social sciences (20th edition)], Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.
4. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development, (pp. 993–1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5. Bilir, A. (2005). İlköğretim birinci sinif öğrencilerinin özellikleri ve ilk okuma yazma öğretimi [Characteristics of students in the first grade of primary school and initial teaching of reading and writing]. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 1, 87- 100.
6. Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G.W. (1997). The Teacher-child relationship & children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 61-79.
7. Coplan, R. J., & Arbeau, K. A. (2008). The stresses of a “Brave New World”: Shyness and school adjustment in Kindergarten. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(4), 377-389. doi: 10.1080/02568540809594634.
8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches S.B. Demir (Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Eğiten Books.

9. Çeliktürk, Z. (2011). İlköğretim birinci sınıfa uyum haftasına ilişkin öğretmen ve veli görüşleri [The views of teachers and parents to the first grade of primary school adaptation week]. (Unpublished master thesis), Anadolu University, Educational Sciences Institute, Eskişehir. Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi.
10. Demir Karabulut, E. & Şendil, G. (2008). Ebeveyn tutum ölçeği( ETÖ) [Parent ATTITUDE SCALE (PAS)]. Turkish Psychological Articles, 11(21), 15.
11. Dinçer, Ç. (2005). Çocukların yaşam değişikliklerine uyumu. Okul öncesi eğitimde güncel konular [Adaptation of children to life changes. Current issues in pre-school education]. Istanbul: Morpa Publications.
12. Doğan, S., Kelleci, M., Sabancıoğulları, S., & Aydın, D. (2008). Bir ilköğretim okulunda öğrenim gören çocuklarda ruhsal uyum sorunları [Mental adaptation problems of children in a primary school]. Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 7(1), 47-52.
13. Ekiz, D. (2013). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri: Yaklaşım, yöntem ve teknikler [Scientific research methods: Approaches, methods and techniques]. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
14. Ewing, A. R., & Taylor, A. R. (2009). The role of child gender and ethnicity in teacher–child relationship quality and children’s behavioral adjustment in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24(1), 92-105.
15. Gülay Ogelman, H. & Erten Sarıkaya, H. (2013). Examination of school adjustment levels of children receiving preschool education at ages of 5 and 6: A two-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(7), 417-434. doi: 10.9761/jasss1658.
16. Üstünoğlu, Ü. (1991). Aile eğitiminde farklı yaklaşımlar [Different approaches in family education]. Ankara: Family Education. Turkish Republic Prime Ministry Family Research Institute Publications, 80-89.
17. Kandır, A. & Koçak Tümer, N. B. (2013). Farklı sosyo-ekonomik düzeydeki beș-altı yaș çocuklarının erken öğrenme becerilerinin incelenmesi [An examination of early learning skills of children aged between five and six at different socio-economic levels]. Social Policy Studies, 7, 46-59.
18. Kaya, Ö. S. & Akgün, E. (2016). Okul öncesi dönemdeki çocukların okula uyum düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [The study of school adjustment of preschool children in the point of some variables). Elementary Education Online, 15(4).
19. Kaya, M., Genç, M., Kaya, B. & Pehlivan, E. (2007). Tıp fakültesi ve sağlık yüksek okulu öğrencilerinde depresif belirti yaygınlığı, stresle başa çıkma tarzları ve etkileyen faktörler [Prevalence of depressive symptoms, ways of coping, and related factors among medical school and health services higher education students]. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 18(2), 137–146.
20. Ladd, G., Buhs, E., & Seid, M. (2000). Children’s initial sentiments about kindergarten: Is school liking an antecedent of early childhood participation and achievement? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 255 – 279.
21. Ladd, G.W. (2003). Probing the adaptive singificance of children’s behavior and relationships in the school context: A child by environment perspective. In R. Kail (Ed.) Advances in child behavior and development (pp. 43-104), NewYork: Wiley.
22. Ladd, G. W. & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment? Child Development, 72, 1579-1601.
23. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education]. (2015). Basic education general directorate. http://tegm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2012_09/07042052_okulncesi uyumprogram2012eyll.pdf. (Access Date: 04.15.2015)
24. Mulhall, A. (2003). Methodological issues in nursing research: In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 306-313.
25. Oktay, A. (2007). Yaşamın sihirli yılları: Okul öncesi dönem (Magic years of life: Pre-school period). 6th Edition, Epsilon Publications, Istanbul.
26. Özden, M. S., & Celen, N. (2014). The relationship between inherent and acquired characteristics of human development with marital adjustment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140(0), 48-56.
27. Özel, İ. (2012). Street children in terms of family and religion [Aile ve din ilişkisi açısından sokak çocukları]. Journal of Ondokuz Mayıs University Theology Faculty, 32(32), 177-217.
28. Shields, A., Dickstein, S., Seifer, R., Giusti, L., Dodge Magee, K., & Spritz, B. (2001). Emotional competence and early school adjustment: A study of preschoolers at risk. Early Education & Development, 12(1), 73-96. doi: 10.1207/s15566935eed1201_5.
29. Sümbüloğlu, K., & Sümbüloğlu, V. (2007). Biyoistatistik [Biostatistics]. Ankara: Hatiboğlu.
30. Şeker, B. S., & Özdemir, E. (2014). Investigation of “Orientation and preparatory studies” of mathematics and social studies activities in terms of basic skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(0), 4062-4068. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2014.01.891.
31. Önder, A. & Gülay, H. (2010). Reliability and validity of the teacher rating scale of school adjustment for 5-6 years of children. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 204-224.
32. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks.
33. Punch, K. F. (2011). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd Edition). D. Bayrak, H. Bader Arslan & Z. Akyüz (Trans.) Ankara: Siyasal Bookstore.
34. United Nations Children’s Fund, (UNICEF) (2012). School readiness and transitions. http://www.unicef.org/publications/files/CFS_School_Readiness_E_web.pdf (Access Date: 05.17.2017).
35. Yalçın, V. (2017, May). A pilot study on pre-school education adaptation of a Syrian refugee child in Turkey. (Öz). IVth International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Pamukkale University, Denizli. Retrieved from http://ejercongress.org/pdf/ bildiriozetleri2017ejer.pdf.
36. Yaşar, Ş. (2009). Çocukları ilköğretime hazırlamada aile, okul, öğretmen ve çevreye düşen görev ve sorumluluklar [Duties and responsibilities of family, school, teacher and environment in preparing children for primary education]. Ş. Yaşar. (Ed.) Preperation for primary education and primary education programs. Eskişehir: Anadolu University Open Education Faculty Publications.
37. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (6. baskı) [Qualitative research methods (6th Edition)]. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
38. Yoleri, S. & Tanış, H. M. (2015). Determination of the Factors Affecting Adjustment Levels of First Class Students at Elementary School. Karabuk University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 4(2), 2014, 130-141
39. Yüksel, M. Y., Kurt, B., Gülsu, N., Akdağ, C., Aydın, F., & Erdoğan, F. (2016). Okula uyum sağlamakta güçlük çeken çocukların çizdikleri okul resimleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma [A qualitative study on the school pictures drawn by children having difficulty in adapting to school]. “Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 12(2): 642-658” DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17860/efd.03342.