Farklı yaş sınıfı dağılımına sahip kızılçam ormanlarında odun üretimi ve karbon birikimi fonksiyonlarının doğrusal programlama tekniği ile optimizasyonu

Öz

Çalışmanın temel amacı, farklı yaş sınıfı dağılımlarına sahip kızılçam ormanlarının odun üretimi ve karbon birikimi fonksiyonlarını birlikte ele alan optimizasyon modellerinin geliştirilmesidir. Bu kapsamda öncelikle, farklı yaş sınıfı dağılımlarına sahip hipotetik kızılçam ormanları oluşturulmuştur. Daha sonra, odun üretimi ve karbon birikimi değerleri sayısallaştırılarak, uzun dönem için çok amaçlı orman amenajmanı planlama modellemesi yapılmıştır. Planlama modellerine karbon birikimi fonksiyonun dahil edilmesinin, planlama süresi sonunda ilgili ormandan elde edilecek toplam net bugünkü değer üzerine olan katkıları ortaya konulmuştur. Çok amaçlı orman amenajmanı planlama problemi, doğrusal programlama tekniğine dayalı olarak modellenmiştir. Planlama süresi 100 yıl ve planlama periyodu 10 yıl olarak alınmıştır. Farklı özelliklere sahip planlama senaryolarının çözümü sonucunda, ormanların sunmuş olduğu iki önemli fonksiyon olan odun üretimi ve karbon birikimi üzerinde, aktüel orman kuruluşlarının önemli etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İklim değişikliği
• modelleme
• net bugünkü değer
• orman amenajmanı
• sürdürülebilirlik

Optimization of wood production and carbon sequestration functions in Turkish red pine forests with different age-classes distribution with linear programming technique

Öz

The main purpose of the study is to develop optimization models that deal with the wood production and carbon sequestration functions of Turkish red pine forests with different age-classes distribution. In this context, first of all, hypothetical red pine forests with different forest structures created. Then, wood production and carbon sequestration values were quantified and multi-purpose forest management planning modeling for the long term was made. The contribution of the inclusion of the carbon sequestration value to the planning models on the total net present value to be obtained from the relevant forest at the end of the planning period has been revealed. The multi-purpose forest management planning problem is modeled based on the linear programming technique. The planning horizon is taken as 100 years and the planning period as 10 years. As a result of the solution of planning scenarios with different characteristics, it has been seen that the current forest ecosystem structures have a significant effect on wood production and carbon sequestration which are two important values provided by forests.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Climate change
• modeling
• net present value
• forest management
• sustainability

Kaynakça

1. Asante, P., Armstrong, G.W., 2012. Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: a comparative statics analysis. Journal of Forest Economics, 18, 145-156.
2. Backéus, S., Wikström, P., Lämås, T., 2005. A model for regional analysis of carbon sequestration and timber production, Forest Ecology and Management, 216, 28–40.
3. Başkent, E.Z., Keleş, S., Yolasığmaz, H.A., 2008. Comparing multi-purpose forest management with timber management in incorporating timber, carbon and oxygen values: A case study. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23 (2), 105-120.
4. Baskent, E.Z., Keleş, S., 2009. “Developing alternative forest management planning strategies incorporating timber, water and carbon values: an examination of their interactions. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 14, 467–480.
5. Başkent, E.Z., Keleş, S., Kadıoğulları, A.İ., Bingöl, Ö., 2011. Quantifying the effects of forest management strategies on the production of forest values: timber, carbon, oxygen, water and soil. Environmental Modelling and Assessment, 16, 145-152.
6. Cacho, O.J., Hean, R.L., Wise, R.M., 2003.Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives”, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 47 (2), 153-179.
7. Creedy, J., Wurzbacher, A.D., 2001. The economic value of a forested catchment with timber, water and carbon sequestration benefits. Ecological Economics, 38, 71-83.
8. Diaz-Balteiro, L., Romero, C., 2003. Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: a goal programming approach. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 447-457.

9. Diaz-Balteiro, L., Rodriguez, L.C.E., 2006. Optimal rotations on Eucalyptus plantations including carbon sequestration- A comparison of results in Brazil and Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 229, 247-258.
10. Dong, L., Lu, W., Liu, Z., 2018. Developing alternative forest Spatial management plans when carbon and timber values are considered: a real case from northeastern China. Ecological Modelling, 385, 45-57.
11. Hoen, H.F., Solberg, B., 1994. Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. Forest Science, 40, 429-451.
12. Keleş, S., Başkent, E.Z., 2007. Modeling and analyzing timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: A case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 16 (3), 473-479.
13. Keleş, S., 2008. Designing and developing a decision support system for forest management planning. Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Trabzon, Türkiye, 209 s.
14. Keleş, S., 2010. Forest optimization models including timber production and carbon sequestration values of forest ecosystems: a case study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 17 (6), 468-474.
15. Keleş, S., 2015. Optimum cutting ages in hybrid poplar plantations including carbon sequestration: a case study in Turkey. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente, 22 (3), 339-349.
16. Keleş, S., 2017. Determining optimum cutting ages including timber production and carbon sequestration benefits in Turkish Pine Plantations. Sains Malaysiana, 46 (3), 381-386.
17. Keleş, S., Derelli, Y., Erciyez, T.N., 2018. Farklı konumsal özelliklerin orman amenajman planlama modeline dahil edilmesi: Örnek bir uygulama. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 114-121.
18. Meng, F.R., BourQue, C.P.A., Oldford, S.P., Swift, D.E., Smith, H.C., 2003. Combining carbon sequestration objectives with timber management planning. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 8, 371-403.
19. Pohjola, J., Valsta, L., 2007. Carbon credits and management of Scots pine and Norway spruce stands in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 9 (7), 789-798.
20. Qin, H., Dong, L., Huang, Y., 2017. Evaluating the effects of carbon prices on trade-offs between carbon and timber management objectives in forest Spatial harvest scheduling problems: a case study from northeast China. Forests, 8, 43.
21. Raymer, A.K.P., Gobakken, T., Hoen, H.F., Solberg, B. 2005. Optimal forest management and cost-effectiveness when increasing the carbon benefit from a forest area*A case study of Hedmark County in Norway. Manuscript. In A. K. P. Raymer, Modeling and analyzing climate gas impacts of forest management, PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
22. Raymer, A.K., Gobakken, T., Solberg, B., Hoen, H.F., Bergseng, E., 2009. A forest optimisation model including carbon flows: application to a forest in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 579-589.
23. Tolunay, D. 2011. Total carbon stock and carbon accumulation in living tree biomass in forest ecosystems of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35 (3), 265–279.
24. Tolunay, D. 2013. Coefficients that can be used to calculate biomass and carbon amounts from increment and growing stock in Turkey. Proceedings of the International Symposium for the 50th Anniversary of the Forestry Sector Planning in Turkey, Antalya, Turkey, pp.240–251.
25. Ünsal, A., 2007. Construction of biomass tables of redpine in Karaisalı Forest Administration in Adana Forest Regional Directorate. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bartın Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi, BARTIN, 62 s.
26. Yeşil, A., 1992. Değişik sıklık ve bonitetteki kızılçam meşcerelerinin yaşa göre gelişimi. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 179 s.