Determination of Total Carbon Storage using Sentinel-2 and Geographic Information Systems in Mixed Forests

Öz

In terrestrial ecosystems, forests have great importance in terms of carbon storage. Determination of carbon storage quantities is a key parameter for monitoring global climate change and global warming. The aim of this study to determine coniferous and broadleaf areas in the mixed stands (MS) by supervised classification generated from Sentinel-2 satellite image and to calculate the total carbon storage (TCS) of the MS using carbon coefficients. The results demonstrated that the TCS values of the MS in the study area vary between 50.52 and 175.32 ton/ha^-1. The TCS values per hectares of the pure coniferous stands, pure broadleaf stands and MS were 173.52, 143.52 and 74.21 ton/ha^-1, respectively. Carbon storage amounts per hectare of MS were found to be less because the tree species included in the mixture were decreased the growing stock volume value per hectare. Also, the structure of the MS in the study area played an effective role in obtaining these results. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Supervised classification,Total carbon storage,Mixed forest,Sentinel-2 satellite image

Kaynakça

1. Cusack, D. F., Axsen, J., Shwom, R., Hartzell-Nichols, L., White, S., and Mackey, K. R. 2014. An interdisciplinary assessment of climate engineering strategies. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 280–287.doi: 10.1890/130030
2. Değermenci, A.S. and Zengin, H., 2016. Ormanlardaki karbon birikiminin konumsal ve zamansal değişiminin incelenmesi: Daday planlama birimi örneği. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, e-ISSN: 2146-698X, 17 (2):177-187.
3. Fleming, T. L., and Freedman, B. 1998. Conversion of natural, mixed-species forests to conifer plantations: implications for dead organic matter and carbon storage. Ecoscience, 5(2), 213-221.
4. Gonzalez, P., Asner, G.P.,Battles, J.J., Kefsky, M.A., Waring, K.M. and Palace, M. 2010 Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, QuickBird and fielde measurements in California . Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 1561-1575.
5. Hao, H., Li, W., Zhao, X., Chang Q. and Zhao, P. 2019. Estimating the Aboveground Carbon Density of Coniferous Forests by Combining Airborne LiDAR and Allometry Models at Plot Level. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10.
6. Kadıoğulları, A.İ. and Karahalil, U., 2013. Spatiotemporal change of carbon storage in forest biomass: a case study in Köprülü Canyon National Park, Kastamonu Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 13 (1): 1-14.
7. Kauranne, T., Joshi, A., Gautam, B., Manandhar, U., Nepal, S., Peuhkurinen, J., et al. 2017. LiDAR-assisted multi-source program (LAMP) for measuring above ground biomass and forest carbon. Remote Sens. 9:154.doi: 10.3390/Rs9020154
8. Lee, S. K., Son, Y. H., Noh, N. J., Heo, S. J., Yoon, T. K., Lee, A. R., ... & Lee, W. K. 2009. Carbon storage of natural pine and oak pure and mixed forests in Hoengseong, Kangwon. Journal of Korean Forestry Society.

9. Lu D. 2007. The potential and challenge of remote sensing-based biomass estimation. Int J Remote Sens. 27:1297–1328.
10. Mitchard, E. T. a, Feldpausch, T. R., Brienen, R. J. W., LopezGonzalez, G., Monteagudo, A., Baker, T. R. 2014. Markedly Divergent Estimates Of Amazon Forest Carbon Density From Ground Plots And Satellites. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23(8): 935-946.
11. Redondo-Brenes, A., and Montagnini, F. 2006. Growth, productivity, aboveground biomass, and carbon sequestration of pure and mixed native tree plantations in the Caribbean lowlands of Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management, 232(1-3), 168-178.
12. Seki, M., Sakıcı, O.E., Büyükterzi, M. ve Sağlam, F., 2017. Taşköprü Orman İşletme Müdürlüğü ormanlarında karbon stoğunun zamansal değişimi, Uluslararası Taşköprü Pompeiopolis Bilim Kültür Sanat Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, 10-12 Nisan 2017, Taşköprü.
13. Sivrikaya, F. ve Bozali, N., 2012. Karbon depolama kapasitesinin belirlenmesi: Türkoğlu planlama birimi örneği, Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 14: 69-76.
14. Sivrikaya, F., Keleş, S. and Çakır, G., 2007. Spatial distribution and temporal change of carbon storage in timber biomass of two different forest management units, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132:429438.
15. Tolunay, D., 2011. Total carbon stocks and carbon accumulation in living tree biomass in forest ecosystems of Turkey. Turkish J. Agric. For. 35, 265-279.
16. Walle, I. V., Mussche, S., Samson, R., Lust, N., and Lemeur, R. 2001. The above-and belowground carbon pools of two mixed deciduous forest stands located in East-Flanders (Belgium). Annals of Forest Science, 58(5), 507-517.
17. Wang, Q. K., Wang, S. L., and Zhong, M. C. 2013. Ecosystem carbon storage and soil organic carbon stability in pure and mixed stands of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Michelia macclurei. Plant and soil, 370(1-2), 295-304.
18. Watson, R., Noble, I., Bolin, B. and 32 co-authors 2000. Summary for policymakers: land-use, land-use change and forestry. In: A special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Cambridge University Press.
19. Yolasığmaz, H.A. and Keleş, S. 2009. Changes in carbon storage and oxygen production in forest timber biomass of Balci Forest Management Unit in Turkey between 1984 and 2006, African Journal of Biotechnology, 8 (19): 4872-4883.