Araştırma Makalesi

Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2018
PDF İndir
EN TR

Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey

Öz

Urban soils in Çankırı city have a high potential impact on water and air quality in residential areas. High heavy metal contents of these soils may pose considerable risk to the urban residences as most of the soils are bare due to inappropriate conditions for plant growth. We evaluated vertical and horizontal distribution of heavy metals concentrations in soils along the highway crossing the city in NE to SW direction. Each of ten sampling sites was sampled at five soil depths (0-2,5; 2,5-7,5; 7,5-12,5;12,5-17,5; 17,5-30 cm). The concentrations of heavy metals were measured using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS). Means of heavy metal concentrations were Fe>Mg>Mn>Ni>Cr>Zn>Cu>Ca>Co> Pb>Na>K>Cd>Hg. Concentrations of Fe and Mg were higher than critical values set for their maximum threshold soil concentrations for human health. The spatial distributions of Mg, Cr, Mn,
Fe, Co, Ni, K, and Ca concentrations gradually decreased from NE to SW. Concentrations of Hg was far greater in the NE-half than SW-half, while concentration of Na was far greater in the SW-half of the transect than its NE- half. Concentrations of Cd, Cu, and Pb showed patchy distribution, and greater Zn concentrations occurred at both ends of the transect compared to values closer to city center. No significant correlation was found between pH and concentration of any of the studied heavy metals. In general, horizontal variation of heavy metals were greater compared to their vertical variation. Concentration of Mg was far greater than that of Ca and this was attributed to the parent material of the soils, which comprises considerable amount of serpentine. Potential contamination indices of the soil samples were: Fe, Mg, Na, Ca, K, Cr, Ni, Co, Cu, Mn, Zn, Cd, Pb, and Hg in decreasing order. Integrated pollution index showed that Fe and Mg concentrations of all samples were greater than 1, suggesting that these heavy metals have a significant risk on health of city residents.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Anonymous, 2017. Çankırı meteoroloji bülteni, T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Devlet Meteoroloji İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Kayıtları, Ankara.
  2. Bilos, C., Colombo, J.C., Skorupka, C.N., Rodrigues, P.M.J., 2001. Sources, distribution and variability of airbone trace metal in La Plata City area, Argentina. Environ. Pollut., 111, 149–158. doi:org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00328-0
  3. Brady, N.C., Weil, RR., 2011. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Upper Saddle River, NJ,Prentice-Hall.
  4. Burgos, P., Madejón, M., Pérez-de-Mora, A., Cabrera, F., 2008. Horizontal and vertical variability of soil properties in a trace element contaminated area. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation & Geoinformation, 10, 11–25.
  5. Chen, T., Zheng, Y., Lei, M., Huang, Z., Wu, H., Chen, H., Fan, K., Yu, K., Wu, X. Tian, Q. 2005. Assessment of heavy metal pollution in surface soils of urban parks in Beijing, China, Chemosphere, 60, 542–551.
  6. Douay, F., Roussel, H., Fourrier, H., Heyman C., Chateau G., 2007. Investigation of heavy metal concentrations on urban soil, dust and vegetables nearby a former smelter site in Mortagne du Nord, Northern France. Journal of Soil and Sediments, 7, 143–146.
  7. Facchinelli, A., Sacchi, E., & Mallen, L., 2001. Multivariate statistical and GIS-based approach to identify heavy metal sources in soils. Environmental Pollution, 114, 313–324.
  8. Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. p. 383–411. In A. Klute (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Agron. Manag. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Kasım 2018

Kabul Tarihi

2 Ocak 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Erşahin, S., Karahan, G., Gül, E., Sünal, S., & Dikmen, Ü. (2018). Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 133-143. https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS
AMA
1.Erşahin S, Karahan G, Gül E, Sünal S, Dikmen Ü. Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey. AOAD. 2018;4(2):133-143. https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS
Chicago
Erşahin, Sabit, Gülay Karahan, Ebru Gül, Seval Sünal, ve Ülkü Dikmen. 2018. “Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey”. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 (2): 133-43. https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS.
EndNote
Erşahin S, Karahan G, Gül E, Sünal S, Dikmen Ü (01 Aralık 2018) Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 2 133–143.
IEEE
[1]S. Erşahin, G. Karahan, E. Gül, S. Sünal, ve Ü. Dikmen, “Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey”, AOAD, c. 4, sy 2, ss. 133–143, Ara. 2018, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS
ISNAD
Erşahin, Sabit - Karahan, Gülay - Gül, Ebru - Sünal, Seval - Dikmen, Ülkü. “Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey”. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi 4/2 (01 Aralık 2018): 133-143. https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS.
JAMA
1.Erşahin S, Karahan G, Gül E, Sünal S, Dikmen Ü. Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey. AOAD. 2018;4:133–143.
MLA
Erşahin, Sabit, vd. “Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey”. Anadolu Orman Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 4, sy 2, Aralık 2018, ss. 133-4, https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS.
Vancouver
1.Sabit Erşahin, Gülay Karahan, Ebru Gül, Seval Sünal, Ülkü Dikmen. Spatial Distribution of Some Toxic Elements in Some Urban Soils of Çankırı, Turkey. AOAD [Internet]. 01 Aralık 2018;4(2):133-4. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA26ZY39MS