Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TÜKETİM DAVRANIŞININ ETKENLERİ: TÜRKİYE'DE Z KUŞAĞI ÜZERİNE BİR SAHA ARAŞTIRMASI

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 21, 1 - 21, 28.04.2023

Oğuz Yıldız Alpaslan Kelleci

https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154
Cited By: 2

Öz

Günümüzde iklim değişikliği ve sosyal eşitsizlikler gibi çevresel ve toplumsal sorunlar giderek kötüleşmektedir. Her derde deva bir çözüm gibi durmasa da sürdürülebilir tüketim ve üretim, çevresel ve sosyal sorunların üstesinden gelme yollarından biri olarak görünmektedir. Şimdiye dek, mevcut çalışmalar, sürdürülebilir tüketim üzerinde etkisi olan faktörleri çevresel bir bakış açısıyla ele almış ve sadece sınırlı sayıda araştırma, sürdürülebilirliğin sosyal boyutunu dikkate almıştır. Bu doğrultuda makale, sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışının bileşenlerini ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal açıdan daha bütünsel bir şekilde ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, yüz yüze anket yöntemiyle toplanan 350 anketi işlemek için tutarlı kısmi en küçük kareler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (PLS-SEM) kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada sürdürülebilir tüketimi etkileyen dokuz faktörden üçü öne çıkmaktadır. Bunlar (i) varolan bilgi düzeyi, (ii) kişisel imaj ve (iii) ağızdan ağıza iletişimdir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sürdürülebilirlik sürdürülebilrlik pazarlaması sürdürülebilir tüketim Z Jenerasyonu tüketici davranışı

Destekleyen Kurum

bulunmamaktadır.

Proje Numarası

bulunmamaktadır.

Teşekkür

bulunmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  • Al-Swidi, A.K., Gelaidan, H.M., Saleh, R.M., (2021). The joint impact of green human resource management, leadership and organizational culture on employees' green behavior and organizational environmental performance. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128112
  • Bamberg, S., and Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new metaanalysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol. Stud. 2(2), 285–309.
  • Belz, Frank-Martin and Peattie, Ken (2012), Sustainability marketing, West Sussex: Wiley
  • Cerri, J.; Testa, F.; Rizzi, F. (2018). The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers' attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products. J. Clean. Prod., 175, 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.054
  • Crawford, A. (2022, 27 August). Türkiye'de plastik atık ithalat yasağı: İngiltere bundan sonra çöplerini nereye gönderecek? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-57696138.
  • Fishbein, and M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley: Massachusetts.
  • Forster J.J. (2001). Sample surveys: nonprobability sampling. In: N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (pp 13453–13458). Elsevier/Permagon.
  • Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., Smith, T., (2011). The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy 39, 7684-7694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002
  • Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., Marticotte, F., (2010). E-WOM scale: word-of-mouth measurement scale for e-services context. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 27(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.129
  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M., Bergh, B.V. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
  • Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002
  • Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747- 014-0403-8
  • Jaiswal, D., and Kant, R. (2018). Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
  • Joshi, Y., and Rahman, Z. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.02.002
  • Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., Chan, H.K., (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 528-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.062
  • Kelleci, A, and Yıldız, O., (2021). A guiding framework for levels of sustainability in marketing. Sustainability 13(4) 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041644
  • Kilbourne, W. E. (2004). Sustainable communication and the dominant social paradigm: Can they be integrated? Marketing Theory, 4(3), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931040455
  • Koch, L. eMarketer. (2019, 13 March). D2C brands attract young consumers with sustainability initiatives. (Accessed on August 27, 2022). https://www.emarketer.com/content/d2c-brands-attract- young-consumers-with-sustainability-initiatives adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collaborat. 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  • Kozar, J. M., and Hiller Connell, K. Y. (2013). Socially and environmentally responsible apparel consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Social responsibility journal, 9(2), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2011-0076
  • Köksal, D, and Strähle, J. (2021). Social sustainability in fashion supply chains—understanding social standard implementation failures in Vietnam and Indonesia using agency theory. Sustainability, 13, 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042159
  • Kumar, P., and Ghodeswar, B. M. (2015). Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2014-0068
  • Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1– 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004
  • Lee, K., (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers. Mark. Intell. Plan. 26(6), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839
  • Liobikiene, G., and Bernatoniene, J. (2017). Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.204
  • Liobikiene, G.; Mandravickaite, J.; Bernatoniene, (2016). J. Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A Cross-Cultural Study. Ecol. Econ. 125, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.008
  • Malhotra N. K., Dash S. (2011). Marketing research an applied orientation. London: Pearson Publishing. Matsumoto, M., Chinen, K., Endo, H., (2017). Comparison of U.S. and Japanese consumers' perceptions of remanufactured auto parts. J. Ind. Ecol., 21(4), 966-979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12478
  • McLellan, M. (2013). Sustainable aviation: What do you mean? In P. Upham, J. Maughan, D. Raper, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Towards Sustainable Aviation (pp. 225-228). Earthscan.
  • Mittelstaedt, J. D., Shultz, C. J., Kilbourne, W. E., Peterson, M. (2014). Sustainability as megatrend. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 253– 264. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467135205
  • Mostafa, M.M., (2007). A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer. Psychology and Marketing, 24(5), 445-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20168
  • Nikookar, G., Rahrovy, E., Razi, S., Ghassemi, R.A. (2015). Investigating influential factors on word of mouth in service industries: the case of Iran airline company. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 177, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.392
  • Park, J. and Ha, S. (2012), Understanding pro-environmental behaviour: a comparison of sustainable consumers and apathetic consumers, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40(5), 388-403. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211222367
  • Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.1.31
  • Rajadurai, J., Wan Hanafi, W. N., Bathmanathan, V., Daud, S., & Azami, N. (2021). Developing nexus eco-purchasing behaviour index (NEPBI) for Malaysia by using partial least square analysis. Quality & Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01094-x
  • Ringle, C., Wende, S. and Becker, J. (2015) SmartPLS 3 (Version 3.2.3), SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt, Germany.
  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Hair, J.F.( 2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Christian Homburg, Martin Klarmann, Arnd Vomberg (Ed.) Handbook of Market Research, (Chp. 15, pp.2–40). Cham: Springer.
  • Suki, M.N. (2016). Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. Br. Food J., 118, 2893-2910. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0295
  • Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer attitude - behavioral intention gap. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005- 5485-3 WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wijekoon, R, and Sabri. M.F., (2021). Determinants that influence green product purchase intention and behavior: A literature review and guiding framework. Sustainability 13(11) 6219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116219
  • Yadav, R., Pathak, G.S., (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
  • Yeung, S.PM. (2004). Teaching approaches in geography and students’ environmental attitudes. Environmentalist 24, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-004-4801-1
  • Yıldız, O. (2021). A PLS-SEM approach to the consumer adoption of shopping via mobile apps. Int. J. Mobile Communications. 19(5), 589–614. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2021.117380
  • Yıldız, O. (2022a). How can business enterprises use sustainability-oriented innovations as a strategic tool? in Gh. Popescu, C.R. (Eds.): Handbook of Research on SDGs for Economic Development, Social Development, and Environmental Protection, (pp.167-183). IGI Global
  • Yıldız, O. (2022b). PLS-SEM bias: traditional vs consistent. Qual Quant https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01289-2
  • Yıldız, O., & Kelleci, A. (2022). Exploratory research on the factors affecting the sustainable consumption behaviour of gen Z. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(4), 1474–1491. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2134
  • Zhao, H.H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y.P., Wang, Y., Zhu, X.D., (2014). What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao. J. Clean. Prod. 63, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021

DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 21, 1 - 21, 28.04.2023

Oğuz Yıldız Alpaslan Kelleci

https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154
Cited By: 2

Öz

Today, environmental and societal issues, such as climate change and social inequities, have been worsening. Sustainable consumption and production, though not a panacea, seem one of the ways to tackle environmental and social problems. So far, extant studies have sought to determine the factors that have an impact on sustainable consumption from an environmental perspective, and limited research has taken the social dimension of sustainability into account. Thus, this paper aims to address components of sustainable consumption behavior in a more holistic way, from an economic, environmental, and social standpoint. The present study employs consistent partial least squares structural equation (PLS-SEM) modeling to process 350 questionnaires which have been collected through a face-to-face survey method. In this study, three significant determinants, out of a total of nine, make a considerable difference toward sustainable consumption behavior: (i) knowledge, (ii) personal image, and (iii) word-of-mouth, respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sustainability sustainability marketing sustainable consumption Gen Z consumer behavior

Proje Numarası

bulunmamaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  • Al-Swidi, A.K., Gelaidan, H.M., Saleh, R.M., (2021). The joint impact of green human resource management, leadership and organizational culture on employees' green behavior and organizational environmental performance. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128112
  • Bamberg, S., and Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new metaanalysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol. Stud. 2(2), 285–309.
  • Belz, Frank-Martin and Peattie, Ken (2012), Sustainability marketing, West Sussex: Wiley
  • Cerri, J.; Testa, F.; Rizzi, F. (2018). The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers' attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products. J. Clean. Prod., 175, 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.054
  • Crawford, A. (2022, 27 August). Türkiye'de plastik atık ithalat yasağı: İngiltere bundan sonra çöplerini nereye gönderecek? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-57696138.
  • Fishbein, and M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley: Massachusetts.
  • Forster J.J. (2001). Sample surveys: nonprobability sampling. In: N. J. Smelser, P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, (pp 13453–13458). Elsevier/Permagon.
  • Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., Smith, T., (2011). The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy 39, 7684-7694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.09.002
  • Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., Marticotte, F., (2010). E-WOM scale: word-of-mouth measurement scale for e-services context. Can. J. Adm. Sci. 27(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.129
  • Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M., Bergh, B.V. (2010). Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
  • Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002
  • Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747- 014-0403-8
  • Jaiswal, D., and Kant, R. (2018). Green purchasing behaviour: A conceptual framework and empirical investigation of Indian consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 41, 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.008
  • Joshi, Y., and Rahman, Z. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.02.002
  • Kanchanapibul, M., Lacka, E., Wang, X., Chan, H.K., (2014). An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 528-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.062
  • Kelleci, A, and Yıldız, O., (2021). A guiding framework for levels of sustainability in marketing. Sustainability 13(4) 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041644
  • Kilbourne, W. E. (2004). Sustainable communication and the dominant social paradigm: Can they be integrated? Marketing Theory, 4(3), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931040455
  • Koch, L. eMarketer. (2019, 13 March). D2C brands attract young consumers with sustainability initiatives. (Accessed on August 27, 2022). https://www.emarketer.com/content/d2c-brands-attract- young-consumers-with-sustainability-initiatives adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. Int. J. e-Collaborat. 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  • Kozar, J. M., and Hiller Connell, K. Y. (2013). Socially and environmentally responsible apparel consumption: knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Social responsibility journal, 9(2), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2011-0076
  • Köksal, D, and Strähle, J. (2021). Social sustainability in fashion supply chains—understanding social standard implementation failures in Vietnam and Indonesia using agency theory. Sustainability, 13, 2159. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042159
  • Kumar, P., and Ghodeswar, B. M. (2015). Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2014-0068
  • Kumar, B., Manrai, A. K., Manrai, L. A. (2017). Purchasing behaviour for environmentally sustainable products: A conceptual framework and empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 34, 1– 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.09.004
  • Lee, K., (2008). Opportunities for green marketing: young consumers. Mark. Intell. Plan. 26(6), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810902839
  • Liobikiene, G., and Bernatoniene, J. (2017). Why determinants of green purchase cannot be treated equally? The case of green cosmetics: Literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.204
  • Liobikiene, G.; Mandravickaite, J.; Bernatoniene, (2016). J. Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A Cross-Cultural Study. Ecol. Econ. 125, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.008
  • Malhotra N. K., Dash S. (2011). Marketing research an applied orientation. London: Pearson Publishing. Matsumoto, M., Chinen, K., Endo, H., (2017). Comparison of U.S. and Japanese consumers' perceptions of remanufactured auto parts. J. Ind. Ecol., 21(4), 966-979. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12478
  • McLellan, M. (2013). Sustainable aviation: What do you mean? In P. Upham, J. Maughan, D. Raper, & C. Thomas (Eds.), Towards Sustainable Aviation (pp. 225-228). Earthscan.
  • Mittelstaedt, J. D., Shultz, C. J., Kilbourne, W. E., Peterson, M. (2014). Sustainability as megatrend. Journal of Macromarketing, 34(3), 253– 264. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467135205
  • Mostafa, M.M., (2007). A hierarchical analysis of the green consciousness of the Egyptian consumer. Psychology and Marketing, 24(5), 445-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20168
  • Nikookar, G., Rahrovy, E., Razi, S., Ghassemi, R.A. (2015). Investigating influential factors on word of mouth in service industries: the case of Iran airline company. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 177, 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.392
  • Park, J. and Ha, S. (2012), Understanding pro-environmental behaviour: a comparison of sustainable consumers and apathetic consumers, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40(5), 388-403. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551211222367
  • Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: Opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.30.1.31
  • Rajadurai, J., Wan Hanafi, W. N., Bathmanathan, V., Daud, S., & Azami, N. (2021). Developing nexus eco-purchasing behaviour index (NEPBI) for Malaysia by using partial least square analysis. Quality & Quantity. doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01094-x
  • Ringle, C., Wende, S. and Becker, J. (2015) SmartPLS 3 (Version 3.2.3), SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt, Germany.
  • Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Hair, J.F.( 2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Christian Homburg, Martin Klarmann, Arnd Vomberg (Ed.) Handbook of Market Research, (Chp. 15, pp.2–40). Cham: Springer.
  • Suki, M.N. (2016). Green product purchase intention: Impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. Br. Food J., 118, 2893-2910. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0295
  • Vermeir, I. and Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer attitude - behavioral intention gap. J Agric Environ Ethics 19, 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005- 5485-3 WCED. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wijekoon, R, and Sabri. M.F., (2021). Determinants that influence green product purchase intention and behavior: A literature review and guiding framework. Sustainability 13(11) 6219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116219
  • Yadav, R., Pathak, G.S., (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: extending the theory of planned behavior. J. Clean. Prod. 135, 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
  • Yeung, S.PM. (2004). Teaching approaches in geography and students’ environmental attitudes. Environmentalist 24, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-004-4801-1
  • Yıldız, O. (2021). A PLS-SEM approach to the consumer adoption of shopping via mobile apps. Int. J. Mobile Communications. 19(5), 589–614. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMC.2021.117380
  • Yıldız, O. (2022a). How can business enterprises use sustainability-oriented innovations as a strategic tool? in Gh. Popescu, C.R. (Eds.): Handbook of Research on SDGs for Economic Development, Social Development, and Environmental Protection, (pp.167-183). IGI Global
  • Yıldız, O. (2022b). PLS-SEM bias: traditional vs consistent. Qual Quant https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01289-2
  • Yıldız, O., & Kelleci, A. (2022). Exploratory research on the factors affecting the sustainable consumption behaviour of gen Z. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 10(4), 1474–1491. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i4.2134
  • Zhao, H.H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y.P., Wang, Y., Zhu, X.D., (2014). What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao. J. Clean. Prod. 63, 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021
Toplam 49 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Tüm Sayı
Yazarlar

Oğuz Yıldız 0000-0003-2164-975X

Alpaslan Kelleci 0000-0003-1589-2905

Proje Numarası bulunmamaktadır.
Yayımlanma Tarihi 28 Nisan 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Şubat 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 21

Kaynak Göster

APA Yıldız, O., & Kelleci, A. (2023). DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 10(21), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154
AMA Yıldız O, Kelleci A. DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z. Akademik Hassasiyetler. Nisan 2023;10(21):1-21. doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154
Chicago Yıldız, Oğuz, ve Alpaslan Kelleci. “DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10, sy. 21 (Nisan 2023): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154.
EndNote Yıldız O, Kelleci A (01 Nisan 2023) DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10 21 1–21.
IEEE O. Yıldız ve A. Kelleci, “DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z”, Akademik Hassasiyetler, c. 10, sy. 21, ss. 1–21, 2023, doi: 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154.
ISNAD Yıldız, Oğuz - Kelleci, Alpaslan. “DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z”. Akademik Hassasiyetler 10/21 (Nisan 2023), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154.
JAMA Yıldız O, Kelleci A. DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2023;10:1–21.
MLA Yıldız, Oğuz ve Alpaslan Kelleci. “DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z”. Akademik Hassasiyetler, c. 10, sy. 21, 2023, ss. 1-21, doi:10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1255154.
Vancouver Yıldız O, Kelleci A. DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR: A FIELD STUDY ON TURKISH GEN Z. Akademik Hassasiyetler. 2023;10(21):1-21.

Cited By

Sürdürülebilir Havayollarının Tüketici Tarafından Kabulünü Etkileyen Teşvik Edici Faktörler
İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1341309
SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TÜKETİMİ SAĞLAMAK İÇİN ÇEVRESEL DUYARLILIK ETKİLİ BİR FAKTÖR MÜDÜR?
Erciyes Akademi
https://doi.org/10.48070/erciyesakademi.1343768
 Kapak Resmi İndir

MAKALE DEĞERLENDİRME SÜRECİ

Yazar tarafından gönderilen bir makale, gönderim tarihinden itibaren 10 gün içinde dergi sekreteri tarafından makalenin, telif sözleşmesinin ve benzerlik raporunun (Turnitin programı) eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden incelenir. İstenilen bu dosyalar eksiksiz ve düzgün bir şekilde gönderilmiş ise makale; ikinci aşamada derginin yayın çizgisine uygun olup olmadığı yönünden değerlendirilir. Bu süreçte makale yayın çizgisine uygun değilse yazara iade edilir. Makale yayın çizgisine uygun ise şablona uygun bir şekilde gönderilip gönderilmediği yönünden değerlendirilir. Şayet makale şablona uyarlanıp gönderilmemiş ise değerlendirme sürecine alınmaz. Bu süreçte yazarın derginin belirlediği şartlara uygun bir şekilde sisteme makale yüklemesi beklenir. Makale şablona uygun bir şekilde hazırlanıp gönderilmiş ise son aşamada makale derginin yayın ilkeleri, yazım kuralları, öz, abstract, extented abstract, kaynakça gösterimi vb. yönlerden incelenir. Bu ayrıntılarda makalede bir sorun varsa yazarın bu hususları tamamlaması istenir ve verilen süre içerisinde eksiksiz bir şekilde yeniden makaleyi göndermesi istenir.
Tüm bu aşamaları geçen makale, editör tarafından bilimsel yeterliliğinin denetlenmesi amacıyla ikinci 7 günlük süre içerisinde çalışmaya uygun iki hakeme değerlendirmeleri için gönderilir. Hakemlerin değerlendirme süreleri 15 gündür. Bu süre zarfında hakemlik görevini tamamlamayan bir hakem olursa ilgili hakeme değerlendirmeyi tamamlaması için 7 günlük ek süre verilebilir. Bu süre zarfında hakem görevini yerine getirmezse yerine yeni bir hakem ataması yapılır. En az iki hakemden gelen raporlar olumlu ise makale yayın aşamasına alınır. Hakem raporlarından birisi olumlu diğeri olumsuz ise makale üçüncü bir hakeme gönderilir. Üçüncü hakem raporu da olumsuz ise makale ret edilir. Üçüncü hakemin değerlendirmesi olumlu ise makaleyle ilgili hakem raporları dergi alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından incelenir. Makalenin yayınlanmasıyla ilgili nihai karar alan editörlerinden oluşan Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Hakem raporlarının yetersiz ve tatmin etmekten uzak olması veya İngilizce editör tarafından abstract ve extented abstract’ın yetersiz görülmesi hallerinde de yine makaleyle ilgili son karar Editörler Kurulu tarafından verilir. Tüm bu aşamalardan geçen bir makale en yakın sayıya yayınlanmak üzere eklenir. İlgili sayıda yer kalmaması halinde makalenin yayımı bir sonraki sayıya kaydırılır. Bu durumda ve tüm değerlendirme sürecinde yazar isterse makalesini geri çekme hakkına sahiptir. Ancak bu durumu dergiye bildirmesi gerekir. Makale gönderim tarihinden makalenin yayına kabul tarihine kadar tüm bu işlemler için ortalama 3 aylık bir süre öngörülmektedir.