TÜRKİYE'NİN AB ÜYELİĞİ KİŞİ BAŞINA GSYİH'NİN YÜKSEK GELİRLİ EKONOMİYE YAKINSAMASINI SAĞLAYACAK MI?

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 23, 136 - 166, 31.12.2023

Metin Gürler , Funda Kara

https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1340080

Öz

Bu çalışma, AB'ye yeni üye olan ülkelerin 2000'li yıllardaki ekonomik performanslarını inceleyerek, Türkiye'nin Avrupa Birliği'ne (AB) tam üye olması durumunda Türkiye ekonomisinde yaşanabilecek olası gelişmeleri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, 2000'li yıllarda AB'ye tam üye olarak kabul edilen on üç üye ülkeyi ve AB'ye aday ülke olan Türkiye'yi kapsamaktadır. Yeni üyelerin sekizi (çalışma yapıldığı esnada yedi üye vardı) aynı zamanda Euro (Avro) Bölgesi'nde yer almaktadır. Yeni üyelerin 11'i Orta ve Doğu Avrupa'da yer alırken, Malta ve Kıbrıs Rum Kesimi Akdeniz'de yer alan iki ada ülkesidir. Ülke seti için kişi başına düşen Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla (GSYİH)'nın normallik testi yapıldıktan sonra ülke verileri arasındaki korelasyon incelenmiştir. Üye ülkelerin üyelik öncesi ve üyelik sonrası kişi başına düşen GSYİH değerlerinin büyüme yakınsama denklemi ile büyüme performansı ve farklı birim kök testleri ile de kırılma noktaları zaman serileri ve panel verilerle analiz edilmiştir. 1995-2021 döneminde kişi başına düşen gelir artışında en iyi performansı Litvanya gösterirken, Romanya ikinci, Letonya ise üçüncü en iyi performansa sahip ülke olmuştur. Yakınsama teoremi nedeniyle, yeni üye ülkeler 1995-2021 döneminde kişi başına düşen gelirde AB ve Euro Bölgesi'nden daha yüksek büyüme hızına sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kişi başına düşen Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla (GSYİH), Yakınsama, Kırılma noktaları, Ab üyeliği

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Teşekkür

Yok.

WILL THE MEMBERSHIP OF TÜRKİYE TO THE EU SPUR CONVERGENCE OF GDP PER CAPITA TO HIGH-INCOME ECONOMY?

Öz

This study aims to investigate possible developments in the Turkish economy, in case Türkiye becomes a full member of the European Union (EU), by examining the economic performances of the new members of the EU in the 2000s. The study covers thirteen-member countries that were accepted as full members of the EU in the 2000s and Türkiye, which is a candidate country to the EU. Eight (there were seven members when the study was done) of the new members are also in the Euro Area (Eurozone). While eleven of the new members are located in Central and Eastern Europe, Malta and Cyprus are two island countries located in the Mediterranean. After testing the normality of GDP per capita for the country set, the correlation between the countries was investigated. The growth performance with growth convergence equation and breakpoints with different unit root tests in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of the member countries before and after the membership were also analysed by time series and panel data. Lithuania has the best performance in income per capita increase in 1995-2021 period whereas Romania has the second and Latvia has the third best performance. Due to the convergence theorem, new member countries have highest growth rate than the EU and Euro Area in income per capita in 1995-2021 period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

GDP per capita, Convergence, Breakpoints, EU membership

Proje Numarası

Yok

Kaynakça

• Akıncı, M. and Yılmaz, Ö. (2012). Türkiye ile AB arasındaki kişi başına gelir yakınması: Faklardaki fark analizi. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar. 49(567), 15-26.
• Akkoç, U. & Şahin, H. (2019). Income convergence between countries: Estimation of beta convergence by dynamic panel data method. Eurasian Business and Economics Journal, 20, 194-212.
• Andreano, M.S., Laureti, L. & Postiglione, P. (2013). Economic growth in MENA countries: Is there convergence of per-capita GDPs? Journal of Policy Modeling. 35(4), 669-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.02.005
• Bai, J.S. & Perron, P. (1995). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Department of Economics Working Papers, No. 95-17.
• Bai, J.S. & Perron, P. (1998). Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica, 66(1), 47–78.
• Barro, R.J. & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic Growth. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
• Baumol, W. (1986). Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: What the long-run data show. American Economic Review, 76(5), 1072-1085.
• Bernard, A. & Durlauf, S. (1996). Interpreting tests of the convergence hypothesis. Journal of Econometrics, 71, 161-73.
• Borsi, M.T. & Metiu, N. (2015). The evolution of economic convergence in the European Union. Empirical Economics, 48(2), 657-681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-014-0801-2
• Cabral, R., & Castellanos-Sosa, F.A. (2019). Europe’s income convergence and the latest global financial crisis. Research in Economics, 73(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2019.01.003
• Carlino, G. A. & Mills L. O. (1993). Are U.S. regional incomes converging?: A time series analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(2), 335-346.
• Cartone, A., Postiglione, P. & Hewings. G.J.D. (2021). Does economic convergence hold? A spatial quantile analysis on European regions. Economic Modelling, 95, 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.008
• Cass, D. (1965). Optimum growth in an aggregative model of capital accumulation. The Review of Economic Studies, 32(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295827
• Cavallaro, E. & Villani, I. (2021). Real income convergence and the patterns of financial integration in the EU. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 56, 101337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101337
• Ceylan, R., Telatar, E. & Telatar, F. (2013). Real convergence in selected OECD countries. Ege Academic Review, 13(2). 209-214.
• Ceylan, R. & Abiyev, V. (2016). An examination of convergence hypothesis for EU-15 countries. International Review of Economics and Finance, 45, 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.05.007
• Chang, T., Lee, C.-H., Chou, P.-I., & Wang, S.-C. (2012). Purchasing power parity for transition countries: Further evidence from panel SURADF test with a fourier function. Eastern European Economics, 50(4), 42-59.
• Cheung, Y.-W., & Pascual, A.G. (2004). Testing for output convergence: A re-examination. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(1), 45-63.
• Cieślik, A. & Wciślik, D.R. (2020). Convergence among the CEE-8 economies and their catch-up towards the EU-15. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 55, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.07.006
• De Long, J.B. (1988). Productivity growth, convergence and welfare: Comment. The American Economic Review, 78(5), 1138-1154.
• Desli, E. & Gkoulgkoutsika, A. (2021). Economic Convergence Among The World’s Top-İncome Economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 841-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.03.001
• Diaz del Hoyo, J.L., Dorrucci, E., Heinz, F.F., & Muzikarova, S. (2017). Real convergence in the Euro Area: A long-term perspective. ECB Research papers- Occasional papers, No 203. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. Retrieved on 2022, November 18 from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecb.op203.en.pdf
• Dowrick, S. & Nguyen, D.-T. (1989). OECD comparative rconomic growth 1950-85: Catch-up and convergence. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 1010-1030.
• European Commission (2022). European Commission /EU regional and urban development/Regional Policy/Funding/ Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). Retrieved on 2022, April 19 from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/funding/ipa/
• Eurostat (2022). Data Browser/Main GDP aggregates per capita. Retrieved on 2022, April 19 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/nama_10_pc/default/table?lang=en
• EViews (2022). Innovative Solutions for econometric analysis, forecasting & simulation. Retrieved on 2022, February 9 from https://www.eviews.com/home.html
• Glawe, L., & Wagner, H. (2021). Divergence tendencies in the European integration process: A danger for the sustainability of the E(M)U? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14030104
• Karatay Gögül, P. & Koralp, L. (2014). Ekonomik yakınsama olgusunun sınanması üzerine yeni bulgular: OECD örneği. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 4(2), 60-73.
• Gujarati, D. N. & Porter, D.C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 5th edition, p. 98 & p. 888. Retrieved on 2022, February 9 from https://cbpbu.ac.in/userfiles/file/2020/STUDY_MAT/ECO/1.pdf
• Gürler, M. (2016). Rekabetçiliğin orta gelir tuzağından çıkıştaki etkisi: Türkiye analizi. [doktora tezi]. Marmara Üniversitesi
• Ho, T. W. (2015). Income inequality may not converge after all: Testing panel unit roots in the presence of cross-section cointegration. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 56, 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2014.10.005
• IBM (2022). IBM Db2 Warehouse on Cloud/Statistics-parametric and nonparametric. Retrieved on 2022, February 9 from https://www.ibm.com/docs/vi/db2woc?topic=procedures-statistics-parametric-nonparametric
• Im, K.S. & P. Schmidt (2008). More efficient estimation under non-normality when higher moments do not depend on the regressors, using residual augmented least squares. Journal of Econometrics, 144(1), 219-233.
• Islam, N. (1995). Growth empirics: A panel data approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/2946651
• Kant, C. (2019). Income convergence and the catch-up index. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.07.017
• Khatun, N. (2021). Applications of normality test in statistical analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 11, 113-122. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2021.111006
• Kocenda, E. (2001). Macroeconomic convergence in transition countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1696
• Korap, L. (2010). OECD ülkeleri için ekonomik yakınsama öngörüsünün zaman serisi panel birim kök yöntemleri ile sınanması [An essay upon testing economic convergence hypothesis with time series panel unit root method. MPRA Paper 29644, University Library of Munich, Germany. Retrieved on 2023, October 1 from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/29644/1/MPRA_paper_29644.pdf
• Kutan, A. M. & Yiğit, T. (2004). Nominal and real stochastic convergence of transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.008
• Kvedaras, V. & Cseres-Gergely, Z. (2020). Convergence of income distributions: Total and inequality-affecting changes in the EU. Economics Letters. 188, 108946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.108946
• Li, Q. & Papell, D.H. (1999). Convergence of international output time series evidence for 16 OECD countries. International Review of Economics & Finance, 8(3), 267-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1059-0560(99)00020-9
• Lim, L. K., & McAleer, M. (2004). Convergence and catching up in ASEAN: A comparative analysis. Applied Economics, 36(2), 137-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0003684042000174038
• Liviu-Stelian, B., S. Silvia, and C. Oana (2014). The effect of economic crisis upon convergence and cohesion in the European Union. Procedia Economics and Finance, 10, 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00288-3
• Maddison, A. (1982). Phases of capitalist development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Mankiw, G., Romer, D. & Weil, D. (1992). A Contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
• Micallef, B. (2020) Real convergence in Malta and in the EU countries after the financial crisis. Journal of Economic Integration, 35(2): 215-239. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2020.35.2.215
• Minitab. (2015). Choosing between a Nonparametric Test and a Parametric Test. Retrieved on 2022, December 30 from https://blog.minitab.com/en/adventures-in-statistics-2/choosing-between-a-nonparametric-test-and-a-parametric-test
• Nahar, S. & Inder, B. (2002). Testing convergence in economic growth for OECD Countries. Applied Economics, 34(1), 2011-2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110117837
• OECD (2022). OECD Statistics. National Accounts: GDP. Retrieved on 2022, April 19 from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SNA_TABLE1
• Otoiu, A. & Titan, E. (2015). Socio-economic convergence in the EU at national and regional level. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1090-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00333-0
• Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361-1401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712
• Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics (CWPE). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.5113
• Pesaran, M.H. (2007). "A pair-wise approach to testing for output and growth convergence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, 138(1), 312-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.05.024
• Phillips, P.C.B. & Sul, D. (2007). Some empirics on economic growth under heterogeneous technology. Journal of Macroeconomics, 29(3), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2007.03.002
• Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). The classical approach to convergence analysis. Center Discussion Paper, No. 734. Yale University, Economic Growth Center, New Haven, CT, USA. Retrieved on 2022, March 14 from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/160651/1/cdp734.pdf
• Saraçoğlu, B. & Doğan, N. (2005). Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Avrupa Birliğine aday ülkelerin yakınsama analizi. 7. Ulusal Ekonometri ve İstatistik Sempozyumuna Sunulan Tebliğ, 26-27 Mayıs, İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.
• Savacı, S. & Karşyakalı, B. (2016). Ülkeler arası gelir yakınsaması analizi: AB ülkeleri ve Türkiye. Akdeniz İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 16(33), 237-257.
• Shrestha, M.B. & Bhatta, G.R. (2018). Selecting appropriate methodological framework for time series data analysis. The Journal of Finance and Data Science, 4(2), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2017.11.001
• Simionescu, M. (2014). Testing sigma convergence across EU-28. Economics & Sociology, 7(1), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-1/5
• Solow, R. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
• Strazicich, M.C., Lee, J. & Day, E. (2004). Are incomes converging among OECD countries? Time series evidence with two structural breaks. Journal of Macroeconomics, 26(1), 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2002.11.001
• Summers, R. & Heston, A. (1988). A new set of international comparisons of real product and price levels estimates for 130 countries, 1950-1985. Review of Income and Wealth, 34(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1988.tb00558.x
• Swan, T.W. (1956), Economic growth and capital accumulation, Economic Record, 32(2), 334-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1956.tb00434.x
• The EC (European Commission) (2022). Economy and Finance: Home/The euro/Enlargement of the euro area/Convergence criteria for joining. Retrieved on 2022, November 18 from https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/euro/enlargement-euro-area/convergence-criteria-joining_en
• The World Bank (2022). Data. Retrieved on 2022, April 19 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD
• Tunali, Ç.B. & Yilanci, V. (2010). Are per capita incomes of MENA countries converging or diverging? Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(21), 4855-4862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.06.053
• Von Lyncker, K. & Thoennessen, R. (2017). Regional club convergence in the EU: evidence from a panel data analysis. Empirical Economics, 52, 525–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1096-2
• Völlmecke, D., Jindra, B. & Marek, P. (2016). FDI human capital and income convergence-Evidence for European regions. Economic Systems, 40(2), 288-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2015.11.001
• World Economic Forum (WEF) (2014). The Global Competitiveness Report, 2014-2015. Retrieved on 2022, April 19 from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2014-15.pdf
• Yaya, O.S., Furuoka, F., Pui, K.L., Jacob, R.I., Ezeoke, C.M. (2020). Investigating Asian regional income convergence using fourier unit root test with break. International Economics, 161, 120-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2019.11.008
• Yeşilyurt, F. (2014). Yakınsama hipotezinin OECD ülkelerinde ikili yaklaşımla test edilmesi. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14(27), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.30976/susead.302232
• Yilanci, V. & Canpolat-Gokce, E. (2020). OECD ülkelerinde yakınsama hipotezinin geçerliliği: Kalıntılarla genişletilmiş panel fourier SURADF birim kök testi. Sosyoekonomi, 28(44), 395-407. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2020.02.18
• Yin, L., Zestos, G. K., and Michelis, L. (2003). Economic convergence in the European Union. Journal of Economic Integration, 18(1), 188–213.