BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Arab Spring Uprisings: Revolutionary Patterns and Theoretical Explanations

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 41 - 62, 25.07.2014

Öz

Literature on authoritarianism and democratization in the Arab world lacks the required political shrewdness to predict and explain the trajectory of current Arab uprisings. In this paper, I briefly highlight theoretical explanations of concurrent Arab uprisings through a literature review on the writings of democratization, authoritarianism in the Middle East and third generation insights on the causes of revolutions. Theoretical explanations are supported with empirical evidences from State Fragility, and Transformation Index on the democracy status of eight Arab countries: Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, Bahrain, Jordan, Libya, Yemen, and Algeria. The paper seeks to illustrate differences of revolutionary patterns among those countries, how this can be theoretically explained, and how concurrent upheavals would draw a new political map for the region. Through theoretical discussion to Arab uprisings, and available empirical evidences the paper argues that revolutionary situation is more likely to emerge due to level of elite’s solidarity, autonomy of armed forces, national unity and geopolitics of the region compared with other factors like coercion, and economic, and political structure of the state.

Kaynakça

  • NAIM, Abd Allah Ahmad (2001), Human Rights in the Arab World: A Regional Perspective, Human Rights Quarterly ( 23: 3).
  • JAMAL, Amany and TESSLER, Mark (2008), Attitudes in the Arab World, Journal of Democracy (19:1).
  • BAYAT, Asef (2011), The Paradoxes of Arab Refo-lutions, Jadaliyya, March, http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/contributors/7739
  • LAYACHI, Azzedine (2011), Algeria’s Rebellion by Installments, Middle East Report, March, http://merip.org/mero/mero031211
  • LUST-OKAR, Ellen and JAMAL, Amany (2002), Rulers and Ruled: Reassessing the Influence of Regime Type on Electoral Law Formation, Comparative Political Studies (35:3).
  • LUST, Ellen (2009), Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East, Journal of Democracy (20: 3).
  • LUST-OKAR, Ellen (2004), Divided They Rule: The Management and Manipulation of Political Opposition, Comparative Politics (36: 2).
  • GOLDBERG, Ellis (2011), Mubarakism without Mubarak: Why Egypt’s Military Will Not Embrace Democracy, Foreign Affairs, February.
  • BELLIN, Eva (2004), The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective, Comparative Politics (36:2).
  • GAUSE, F. Gregory (2011), “The Middle East Academic Community and the “Winter of Arab Discontent”: Why Did We Miss It?”. (Unpublished article).
  • USHER, Graham (2011), “The Reawakening of Nahda in Tunisia”, Middle East Report, April, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero043011
  • OKRUHLIK, Gwenn (2004), “Rentier Wealth, Unruly Law, and the Rise of Opposition: The Political Economy of Oil States”, Comparative Politics ( 31:3)
  • ALBRECHT, Holger and SCHLUMBERGER, Oliver (2004), “Waiting for Godot: Regime Change without Democratization in the Middle East”, International Political Science Review (25:4).
  • BROWNLEE, Jason (2007), “Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies”, World Politics (59).
  • GOLDSTONE, Jack A. (1980), “Theories of Revolution: The Third Generation”, World Politics (32:3).
  • STACHER, Joshua (2011), “Egypt without Mubarak”, Middle East Report, April, http://merip.org/mero/mero040711
  • KAUSCH, Kristina (2010), “Managed Successions and Stability in the Arab World”, Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), Madrid Spain, www.fride.org/publication/837/managed-successions-and-stabilityin-the-arab-world
  • DIAMOND, Larry (2010), “Why Are There No Arab Democracies?”, Journal of Democracy (21:1 )
  • ANDERSON, Lisa (2011), “Demystifying the Arab Revolt: Understanding the Differences between Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya”, Foreign Affairs, June.
  • ANDERSON, Lisa (2001) “Arab Democracy: Dismal Prospects”, World Policy Journal (18:3).
  • POSUSNEY, Marsha Pripstein (2004), “Enduring Authoritarianism: Middle East lessons for Comparative Theory”, Comparative Politics (36:2).
  • POSUSNEY, Marsha Pripstein (2002), “Multiparty Elections in the Arab World: Institutional Engineering and Oppositional Strategies”, Studies in Comparative International Development (36:4).
  • BRATTON, Michael and VAN DE WALLE, Nicolas (1994), “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa”, World Politics (46:4).
  • EL-GHOBASHY, Mona (2011), “The Praxis of the Egyptian Revolution”, Middle East Report, April, http://merip.org/mer/mer258/praxis-egyptian-revolution
  • MARSHALL, Monty G. and COLE, Bejamin R. (2009), “State Fragility and Matrix 2009”, Center for Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/SFImatrix2009c.pdf
  • PELHAM, Nicholas (2011), “Jordan’s Balancing Act”, Middle East Report, February, http://merip.org/mero/mero022211
  • ROSEN, Nir (2011), “How it Started in Yemen: From Tahrir to Taghyir”, Jadaliyya, March, http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/935/how-it-started-inyemen_from-tahrir-to-taghyir
  • EL-MAHDI, Rabab (2009), “Enough! Egypt's Quest for Democracy”, Comparative Political Studies (42: 3)
  • SNYDER, Richard (1992), Explaining Transitions from Neopatrimonial Dictatorships, Comparative Politics (24:4).
  • CARAPICO, Sheila (2011), “Yemen’s Existential Crisis”, Middle East Report, May, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero050311-1
  • KING, Stephen J. (2007), “Sustaining Authoritarianism in the Middle East and North Africa”. Political Science Quarterly (122:3) …….. (2009). The Arab State and Human Security – Performance and Prospects, Arab Human Development Report Challenges to Human Security in the Arab Countries, http://www.arabhdr.org/contents/index.aspx?rid=5
  • BTI Transformation Index Data Set, http://www.bertelsmanntransformation-index.de/en/bti/ranking/

Arap Baharı Başkaldırıları: Devrimci Motifler ve Teorik Açıklamalar

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 41 - 62, 25.07.2014

Öz

Arap dünyası üzerine olan otoriterizm ve demokratikleşme literatürü, Arap ayaklanmalarını tahmin edecek ve açıklayabilecek siyasi akıldan mahrumdur. Bu makalede Ortadoğu demokratikleşmesi ve otoriterizmi üzerine yazılanlar üzerinden bir literatür kritiği yaparak ve üçüncü kuşağın devrimlerin sebepleri üzerine görüşleri üzerinden Arap ayaklanmalarının teorik izahatını yapacağım. Teorik tezler State Fragility ve Transformation Index'den 8 Arap ülkesi (Mısır, Tunus, Suriye, Bahreyn, Ürdün, Libya, Yemen, Cezayir) için alınan ampirik bulgulardan desteklenmektir. Bu makale söz konusu ülkelerdeki devrim modellerinin farklarını, bunun nasıl teorik bir dil ile açıklanabileceğini ve bu eş zamanlı büyük değişimlerin bölgede nasıl bir yeni siyasi harita çizebileceğini anlatmayı amaçlamaktadır. Arap ayaklanmaları üzerine teorik tartışmalar ve mevcut ampirik bulgular üzerinden bu makalede devrimlerin cebir, ekonomik zorluklar ve devletin siyasi yapısından ziyade seçkin sınıfın dayanışması, silahlı güçlerin özerkliği, milli birlik ve bölge jeopolitiğine karşın ortaya çıktığı savunulmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • NAIM, Abd Allah Ahmad (2001), Human Rights in the Arab World: A Regional Perspective, Human Rights Quarterly ( 23: 3).
  • JAMAL, Amany and TESSLER, Mark (2008), Attitudes in the Arab World, Journal of Democracy (19:1).
  • BAYAT, Asef (2011), The Paradoxes of Arab Refo-lutions, Jadaliyya, March, http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/contributors/7739
  • LAYACHI, Azzedine (2011), Algeria’s Rebellion by Installments, Middle East Report, March, http://merip.org/mero/mero031211
  • LUST-OKAR, Ellen and JAMAL, Amany (2002), Rulers and Ruled: Reassessing the Influence of Regime Type on Electoral Law Formation, Comparative Political Studies (35:3).
  • LUST, Ellen (2009), Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East, Journal of Democracy (20: 3).
  • LUST-OKAR, Ellen (2004), Divided They Rule: The Management and Manipulation of Political Opposition, Comparative Politics (36: 2).
  • GOLDBERG, Ellis (2011), Mubarakism without Mubarak: Why Egypt’s Military Will Not Embrace Democracy, Foreign Affairs, February.
  • BELLIN, Eva (2004), The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective, Comparative Politics (36:2).
  • GAUSE, F. Gregory (2011), “The Middle East Academic Community and the “Winter of Arab Discontent”: Why Did We Miss It?”. (Unpublished article).
  • USHER, Graham (2011), “The Reawakening of Nahda in Tunisia”, Middle East Report, April, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero043011
  • OKRUHLIK, Gwenn (2004), “Rentier Wealth, Unruly Law, and the Rise of Opposition: The Political Economy of Oil States”, Comparative Politics ( 31:3)
  • ALBRECHT, Holger and SCHLUMBERGER, Oliver (2004), “Waiting for Godot: Regime Change without Democratization in the Middle East”, International Political Science Review (25:4).
  • BROWNLEE, Jason (2007), “Hereditary Succession in Modern Autocracies”, World Politics (59).
  • GOLDSTONE, Jack A. (1980), “Theories of Revolution: The Third Generation”, World Politics (32:3).
  • STACHER, Joshua (2011), “Egypt without Mubarak”, Middle East Report, April, http://merip.org/mero/mero040711
  • KAUSCH, Kristina (2010), “Managed Successions and Stability in the Arab World”, Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), Madrid Spain, www.fride.org/publication/837/managed-successions-and-stabilityin-the-arab-world
  • DIAMOND, Larry (2010), “Why Are There No Arab Democracies?”, Journal of Democracy (21:1 )
  • ANDERSON, Lisa (2011), “Demystifying the Arab Revolt: Understanding the Differences between Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya”, Foreign Affairs, June.
  • ANDERSON, Lisa (2001) “Arab Democracy: Dismal Prospects”, World Policy Journal (18:3).
  • POSUSNEY, Marsha Pripstein (2004), “Enduring Authoritarianism: Middle East lessons for Comparative Theory”, Comparative Politics (36:2).
  • POSUSNEY, Marsha Pripstein (2002), “Multiparty Elections in the Arab World: Institutional Engineering and Oppositional Strategies”, Studies in Comparative International Development (36:4).
  • BRATTON, Michael and VAN DE WALLE, Nicolas (1994), “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa”, World Politics (46:4).
  • EL-GHOBASHY, Mona (2011), “The Praxis of the Egyptian Revolution”, Middle East Report, April, http://merip.org/mer/mer258/praxis-egyptian-revolution
  • MARSHALL, Monty G. and COLE, Bejamin R. (2009), “State Fragility and Matrix 2009”, Center for Systemic Peace, http://www.systemicpeace.org/SFImatrix2009c.pdf
  • PELHAM, Nicholas (2011), “Jordan’s Balancing Act”, Middle East Report, February, http://merip.org/mero/mero022211
  • ROSEN, Nir (2011), “How it Started in Yemen: From Tahrir to Taghyir”, Jadaliyya, March, http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/935/how-it-started-inyemen_from-tahrir-to-taghyir
  • EL-MAHDI, Rabab (2009), “Enough! Egypt's Quest for Democracy”, Comparative Political Studies (42: 3)
  • SNYDER, Richard (1992), Explaining Transitions from Neopatrimonial Dictatorships, Comparative Politics (24:4).
  • CARAPICO, Sheila (2011), “Yemen’s Existential Crisis”, Middle East Report, May, http://www.merip.org/mero/mero050311-1
  • KING, Stephen J. (2007), “Sustaining Authoritarianism in the Middle East and North Africa”. Political Science Quarterly (122:3) …….. (2009). The Arab State and Human Security – Performance and Prospects, Arab Human Development Report Challenges to Human Security in the Arab Countries, http://www.arabhdr.org/contents/index.aspx?rid=5
  • BTI Transformation Index Data Set, http://www.bertelsmanntransformation-index.de/en/bti/ranking/
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Doha Mustafa Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Temmuz 2014
Gönderilme Tarihi 25 Temmuz 2014
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Mustafa, D. (2014). Arab Spring Uprisings: Revolutionary Patterns and Theoretical Explanations. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 6(2), 41-62.

Creative Commons Lisansı

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi (AID) bilginin paylaşımı için Açık Erişim Politikasına uymaktadır.