Postcolonialism in International Relations Theory: Ethics, Knowledge and Orientalism

Öz

For Scot (1999), postcolonialism has a critical constructionist dimension; that is, it does not merely seek out points of convergence on planes of understanding of already-existing norms. Postcolonialism aspires to produce new forms of politics based on contingent and empathetic understandings of the trajectories of human societies. In this sense, postcolonialism conveys a sense of ethical and political possibilities after colonialism. It favors an ethos of egalitarianism, social justice, and solidarity. It has faith in its own reasonableness and decency (Scott, 1999). Postcolonialism is also certain of its responsibility and duty toward other members of the international community. Postcolonialism, in fact, aspires to a different kind of universalism, one based on deliberation and contestation among diverse political entities, with the aim of reaching functional agreement on questions of global concern. This kind of universalism differs from one resulting from universal injunctions by self-assured subjects. In these regards, postcolonialism maintains consistent positions on politics that do not distinguish between the domestic, national, and international spheres. In the international instance, postcolonialism is mindful of the failure of hegemonic powers to integrate post-colonial states into the decision-making processes of the international system.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Political Theory
• Postcolonialism
• Ethics
• International Relations

Kaynakça

1. Asad, T. (1993), Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
2. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., and Tiffin, H. (1990), The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-colonial Literatures (New York: Routledge).
3. Bensmaia, R. (2003), Experimental Nations: Or, the Invention of the Maghreb (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
4. Bhabha, H. (1994), The Location of Culture (New York: Routledge).
5. Bhaskar, R. (1978), A Realist Theory of Science (Hassocks: Harvester Press).
6. Biswas, Shampa (2001), ‘“Nuclear apartheid” as political position: race as a postcolonial resource?’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political , 26/4 pp. 485(38).
7. Césaire, A. (2000), Discourse on Colonialism , translated by J. Pinkham (New York: Monthly Review Press).
8. Chakrabarty, D. (2000), Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

9. Chowdry, G. and Nair, S (2002) (eds.), Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations; Reading Race, Gender and Class (London and New York: Routledge, Advances in International Relations & Global Politics).
10. Cohn B. S. (1996), Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
11. Darby, Phillip (2000), At the Edge of International Relations: Postcolonialism, Gender and Dependency (Cambridge: Continuum International Publishing Group).
12. Fanon, F. (1968), Wretched of the Earth, translated by C. Farrington (New York: Grove Press).
13. Galeano, E. (1985), Genesis, Memory of Fire Trilogy, Part 1 (New York: Norton).
14. Grovogui, Siba N (2013), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity ed. by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith: Oxford University Press Pages 247-265
15. Grovogui, Siba N. (2006), Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
16. Hulme, P. (1992), Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797 (New York: Routledge).
17. John M. Hobson, “The Other Side of the Westphalian Frontier,” in Seth (ed.), Postcolonial Theory and International Relations, op. cit, pp. 32–48.
18. Krishna, Sankaran (1999), Postcolonial Insecurities: India, Sri Lanka, and the Question of Nationhood (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Borderlines series.
19. Ling, L.H.M. (2002), Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire Between Asia and the West, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
20. Lynn Doty, Roxanne (1996) Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, Borderlines Series).
21. Michael Doyle (1997), Ways of War and Peace (New York: N.N. Norton).
22. Moreiras, A. (2001), The Exhaustion of Difference: The Politics of Latin American Cultural Studies (Durham, OH: Duke University Press).
23. Russett, B. (1993), Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
24. Said, E. (1979), Orientalism (New York: Vintage).
25. Scott, D. (1999), Refashioning Futures: Criticism after Postcoloniality (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
26. Spivak, Gayatri Chakavorty (1999), A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present (Cambridge: Harvard University Press). Trouillot, M.R. (1997), Silencing the Past (Boston, MA: Beacon Press).