Evaluation of Risk Factors for Glaucoma Development in Patients with Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Öz

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine the risk factors that may lead to the development of glaucoma in patients undergoing Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV) surgery. Material and Methods: Patients who undwent PPV and had a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included in this retrospective study. Intraocular pressure was measured with an applanation tonometer at 1, 6, and 12 months. Patients were divided into two groups as those who developed glaucoma after PPV and those who did not. The two groups were compared based on demographics (age and gender), indication for PPV, presence of intraoperative neovascularization, tamponade type (silicone oil or gas), use of laser photocoagulation, and concurrent phacoemulsification (PHACO). Results: 289 patients were included in the study. While the 1st month IOP value was higher in the glaucoma group (p=0.042), the 6th month, 1st year and last measured IOP values did not show any significant difference between the two groups. The reason for vitrectomy was macular hole in the non-glaucoma group; the rate of retinal detachment (RD) with tears and vitreous hemorrhage due to other causes was significantly higher in the glaucoma group (p<0.05). RD before PPV was detected more in the glaucoma group (p<0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of neovascularization after PPV. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of whether the lens was phakic, pseudophakic or aphakic (p>0.05). The rate of silicone added to PPV in the glaucoma group and the rate of gas added to PPV in the non-glaucoma group were statistically higher (p=0.000). The rate of laser therapy/application was significantly higher in the glaucoma group (p<0.05). Conclusions: Long-term (at least one year) cautious follow-up for glaucoma should be done if PPV was performed because of retinal detachment, if more than one PPV was performed, if silicone or laser was added to PPV, and if complications developed after PPV.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Glaucoma
• Intraocular Pressure
• Pars Plana Vitrectomy

Pars Plana Vitrektomi Yapılan Hastalarda Glokom Gelişimi için Risk Faktörlerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

ÖZ Amaç: Pars Plana Vitrektomi (PPV) cerrahisi geçiren hastalarda glokom gelişimine neden olabilecek risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesi. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak planlanan çalışmaya PPV olan ve en az 12 ay takip süresi bulunan hastalar dahil edildi. Tüm hastaların rutin göz muayeneleri yanında applanasyon tonometresi ile göz içi basınçları ölçülmüştü. Hastalar PPV sonrası glokom gelişen ve gelişmeyen olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. İki grubun demografik verileri, PPV yapılma sebepleri, operasyon sonrası neovaskülarizasyon varlığı, PPV cerrahisinde silikon ya da gaz kullanılması, lazer fotokoagülasyon eklenmesi, PPV ile aynı seansta fakoemülsifikasyon (FAKO) yapılması risk faktörleri olarak incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 289 hasta dahil edildi. Glokom olan grupta birinci ay göz içi basıncı (GİB) değeri daha yüksekken (p=0.042); altıncı ay, birinci yıl ve son ölçülen GİB değeri iki grup arasında anlamlı farklılık göstermemiştir. Glokom olmayan grupta makula deliği, glokom olan grupta yırtıklı retina dekolmanı ve diğer sebeplere bağlı vitre içi kanama oranı anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p<0.05). PPV sonrası neovaskülarizasyon açısından iki grup arasında fark yoktu. İki grup arasında lensin fakik, pseodofakik ya da afakik olması açısından fark saptanmamıştır (p>0.05). Glokom olan grupta silikon tamponadı, glokom olmayan grupta ise gaz tamponadı istatistiksel olarak daha fazlaydı (p=0.000). Glokom olan grupta lazer oranı glokom olmayan gruptan anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p<0.05). Sonuçlar: Bu çalışmada PPV sebebinin retina dekolmanı olması, tekrarlayan PPV’ler, cerrahi sırasında silikon ve lazer kullanılması ve cerrahi sonrası komplikasyon meydana gelmesi PPV sonrası glokom gelişimi için risk faktörleri olarak tespit edildi. Bu risk faktörlerinin eşlik ettiği olguların en az bir yıl glokom gelişimi açısından dikkatli takibinin önemli olduğunu düşünmekteyiz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Glokom
• Göz İçi Basıncı
• Pars Plana Vitrektomi

Kaynakça

1. Kolipaka GP, Rao A. Secondary glaucoma following vitreo-retinal surgeries. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 71(1):18-25.
2. Mi CW, Thompson Jt. Long-Term Follow-Up Of Intraocular Pressure After Vıtrectomy In Eyes Wıthout Preexıstıng Glaucoma. Retina 2015; 35(12):2543-51.
3. Mansukhani SA, Barkmeier AJ, Bakri SJ, Iezzi R, Pulido JS, Khanna CL, Bennett JR, Hodge DO, Sit AJ. The Risk of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Following Vitreoretinal Surgery-A Population-based Study. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 193:143-55.
4. Güngel H, Öztürker ZK, Zırtıloğlu S, Eltutar K. The correlation between visual acuity outcomes and optical coherence tomography parameters following surgery for diabetic epiretinal membrane and taut posterior hyaloid. Clin Ophthalmol 2015; 9:1483-90.
5. Ryoo NK, Kim SY, Woo SJ, Park KH. Localized versus 360-degree laser photocoagulation with limited pars plana vitrectomy in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22(1):399.
6. Koreen L, Yoshida N, Escariao P, Niziol LM, Koreen IV, Musch DC, Chang S . Incidence of, risk factors for, and combined mechanism of late-onset open-angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Retina 2012; 32(1):160-7.
7. Chang S. LXII Edward Jackson lecture: open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141(6):1033-43.
8. Tsuchiya S, Higashide T, Udagawa S, Sugiyama K. Glaucoma-related central visual field deterioration after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane: topographic characteristics and risk factors. Eye (Lond) 2021; 35(3):919-28.

9. Lalezary M, Kim SJ, Jiramongkolchai K, Recchia FM, Agarwal A, Sternberg P Jr. Long-term trends in intraocular pressure after pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 2011;31(4):679-85.
10. Miele A, Govetto A, Fumagalli C, Donati S, Biagini I, Azzolini C, Rizzo S, Virgili G. Ocular Hypertension And Glaucoma Following Vitrectomy: A Systematic Review. Retina 2018; 38(5):883-90.
11. Wu L, Berrocal MH, Rodriguez FJ, Maia M, Morales-Canton V, Figueroa M, Serrano M, Roca JA, Arévalo JF, Navarro R, Hernández H, Salinas S, Romero R, Alpizar-Alvarez N, Chico G . Intraocular pressure elevation after uncomplicated pars plana vitrectomy: results of the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study Group. Retina 2014; 34(10):1985-9.
12. Sahoo NK, Balijepalli P, Singh SR, Jhingan M, Senthil S, Chhablani J. Retina and glaucoma: surgical complications. Int J Retina Vitreous 2018; 4:29.
13. Yau GL, Silva PS, Arrigg PG, Sun JK. Postoperative Complications of Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Diabetic Retinal Disease. Semin Ophthalmol 2018; 33(1):126-33.
14. Ge L, Su N, Fan W, Yuan S. Risk Factors and Management of Intraocular Pressure Elevation After Vitrectomy Combined with Silicone Oil Tamponade. Int J Gen Med 2024; 17:447-56.
15. Honavar SG, Goyal M, Majji AB, Sen PK, Naduvilath T, Dandona L. Glaucoma after pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil injection for complicated retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(1):169-76.
16. Jabbour E, Azar G, Antoun J, Kourie HR, Abdelmassih Y, Jalkh A. Incidence and Risk Factors of Ocular Hypertension following Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Silicone Oil Injection. Ophthalmologica 2018; 240(3):129-34.
17. Shaikh N, Srishti R, Khanum A, Thirumalesh MB, Dave V, Arora A, Bansal R, Surve A, Azad S, Kumar V. . Vitreous hemorrhage - Causes, diagnosis, and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 2023; 71(1):28-38.
18. Valentín-Bravo FJ, García-Onrubia L, Andrés-Iglesias C, Valentín-Bravo E, Martín-Vallejo J, Pastor JC, Usategui-Martín R, Pastor-Idoate S. Complications associated with the use of silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100(4):e864-e880.
19. Holekamp NM, Shui YB, Beebe DC. Vitrectomy surgery increases oxygen exposure to the lens: a possible mechanism for nuclear cataract formation. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139(2):302-10.
20. Luk FO, Kwok AK, Lai TY, Lam DS. Presence of crystalline lens as a protective factor for the late development of open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Retina 2009; 29(2):218-24.
21. Lalezary M, Shah RJ, Reddy RK, Kammer JA, Kuchtey RW, Joos KM, Cherney EF, Recchia FM, Kim SJ. Prospective Retinal and Optic Nerve Vitrectomy Evaluation (PROVE) study: twelve-month findings. Ophthalmology 2014; 121(10):1983-9.