Türkiye Kaynaklı Bilimsel Dermatoloji Yayınlarının Analizi: Sosyal Ağ Analizi, Metin Madenciliği ve Kümeleme

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 79 - 86, 01.01.2020

Kemal Hakan Gülkesen

Öz

Amaç: 1998-2017 yılları arasında Türkiye’den, Web of Science WoS dermatoloji kategorisinde yayımlanan makaleleri ağ analizi yöntemi ile incelemek. Gereç ve Yöntemler: “Dermatoloji” kategorisinde yayımlanan tüm SCI-E dergileri seçilerek tanımlayıcı analizler WoS ClarivateAnalytics ile yapılmıştır. Metin madenciliği, ortak sözcüklerin kümelenmesi ve sonuçların görselleştirilmesi için VOSviewer kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Türkiye’den 20 yılda toplam 3319 makale yayımlanmıştır. Dermatoloji kategorisindeki makale sayısında 2006 yılına kadar yükselen bir eğilim olmakla birlikte, bu tarihten sonra makale sayısının stabilize olduğu görülmüştür. 2002-2017 yılları arasında, Dermatoloji kategorisindeki Türkiye kaynaklı makalelerin %3,5 civarında olduğu görüldü. İstanbul Üniversitesi, Gülhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara Numune Hastanesi gibi beş büyük tıbbi kurum Türkiye kaynaklı dermatoloji makalelerinin %30’unu üretmektedir. Makale başına ortalama 9,5 atıf yapılmaktadır. Atıf sayısı artış eğilimi göstermiş ve 2017 yılında 3.500’e yaklaşmıştır. Ortak yazarlık analizinde beş küme saptanmıştır. Kurumların işbirliğinde, coğrafi uzaklığın önemli bir faktör olduğu görülmüştür. Metin madenciliği ile 43.030 terim saptanmış, bunlar işlendikten sonra, en önemli 64 terim beş küme altında toplanmıştır Sonuç: Türkiye’nin dermatoloji araştırma çıktısı, son on yılda durgunlaşmakla birlikte artmaktadır. Bu yayınların önemli bir bölümü İstanbul ve Ankara’daki köklü kurumlar tarafından yapılmaktadır. Türkiye’den yapılan yayınlar hem niteliksel, hem de niceliksel olarak psoriasis ve Behçet hastalığı üzerine yoğunlaşmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dermatoloji, Türkiye, Bibliyometri, Metin madenciliği, Küme Analizi, Behçet Hastalığ

Analysis of Scientific Publications from Turkey in Dermatology: Social Network Analysis, Text Mining, and Clustering

Öz

Objective: To perform network analysis of publications from Turkey under the Dermatology category of the Web of Science WoS between 1998 and 2017.Material and Methods: We selected all SCI-E journals listed in the WoS under the “Dermatology” category. For descriptive analyses, Clarivate Analytics of WoS was used. VOSviewer was used for text mining, co-word clustering, and visualizing the obtained results.Results: A total of 3319 articles from Turkey were published over the span of 20 years. There is an increasing trend of publications under the “Dermatology” category until 2006, after which point the number seems to stabilize. Between 2002 and 2017, the average percentage of articles from Turkey is around 3.5% in the Dermatology category of WoS. Five large medical institutions such as Istanbul University, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Hacettepe University, Ankara University, and Ankara Numune Hospital produced 30% of the dermatology articles from Turkey. The average number of citations per article is 9.5. The number of citations shows an increasing trend, reaching almost 3,500 in 2017. We obtained five clusters by co-authorship analysis. Generally, we have seen that geographic distance is an important factor for collaboration of institutions. Via text mining, 43,030 terms were obtained. After processing, the most important 64 terms were collected under five clusters. Conclusion: The dermatology research output of Turkey is increasing, although it has slowed in the last decade. An important fraction of these publications originate from older institutions in Istanbul and Ankara. The publications from Turkey are both qualitatively and quantitatively concentrated on psoriasis and Behçet’s disease

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dermatology, Turkey, Bibliometrics, Text Mining, Cluster Analysis, Behcet Syndrome

Kaynakça

• 1. Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity.J Wash AcadSci 1926; 16:317–23.
• 2. Hood WW, Concepción SW. The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. Scientometrics 2001; 52:291-314.
• 3. Kosten J. A classification of the use of research indicators. Scientometrics 2016; 108:457-64.
• 4. Meaney C, Moineddin R, Voruganti T, O’Brien MA, Krueger P, Sullivan F. Text mining describes the use of statistical and epidemiological methods in published medical research. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 74:124-32.
• 5. Huang F, Zhou Q, Leng BJ, Mao QL Zheng LM, Zuo MZ. A bibliometric and social network analysis of pelvic organ prolapse during 2007-2016. J Chin Med Assoc 2018; 81(5):450-7.
• 6. Šubelj L, van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Clustering scientific publications based on citation relations: A systematic comparison of different methods. PLoS One 2016; 11(4):e0154404.
• 7. Ertam I. The history of dermatology, venereology and dermatopathology in different countries - Turkey. Glob Dermatol 2015; 2: doi: 10.15761/GOD.1000S015
• 8. Koslu A, Ekmekci TR. German dermatologists and their contributions to Turkish dermatology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2006; 4(10):894-7.
• 9. Sehiralti M, Dinc G. Celalettin Muhtar Ozden (1865- 1947): his life, works and contributions to the study of dermatophytes. Int J Dermatol 2010; 49(6):705-10.
• 10. Saylan T. Life story of Dr. Hulusi Behçet. Yonsei Medical Journal 1997; 38:327-32.
• 11. Şenel E, Demir E, Artüz RF. Bibliometric evaluation of global productivity of teledermatology publications between 1975 and 2017 with a 3-year update. Indian J Dermatol 2018; 63(5):437-9.
• 12. Trettel A, Eissing L, Augustin M. Telemedicine in dermatology: Findings and experiences worldwide - a systematic literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32(2):215-24.
• 13. Smith DR. Bibliometrics, dermatology and contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2008; 59(3):133-6.
• 14. Şenel E, Demir E, Alkan RM. Bibliometric analysis on global Behçet disease publications during 1980-2014: is there a Silk Road in the literature? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31(3):518-22.
• 15. Shahram F, Jamshidi AR, Hirbod-Mobarakeh A, Habibi G, Mardani A, Ghaemi M. Scientometric analysis and mapping of scientific articles on Behcet’s disease. Int J Rheum Dis 2013; 16(2):185-92.
• 16. Sako E, Famenini S, Wu JJ. Trends in type of original psoriasis publications by Decade, 1960 to 2010. Perm J. 2016; 20(4):15-60.
• 17. Leshem YA, Pavlovsky L, Mimouni FB, David M, Mimouni D. Trends in pemphigus research over 15 years. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24(2):173-7.
• 18. Tasli L, Kaçar N, Argenziano G. A scientometric analysis of dermoscopy literature over the past 25 years.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2012; 26(9):1142-8.
• 19. Al-Mutawakel K, Scutaru C, Shami A, Sakr M, Groneberg DA, Quarcoo D. Scientometric analysis of the world-wide research efforts concerning Leishmaniasis. Parasit Vectors 2010; 3(1):14.
• 20. Wilgus ML, Adcock PA, Takashima A. Volume, trend and citation analyses of skin related publications from 1966 to 2003. J Dermatol Sci 2005; 37(3):125-36.
• 21. Chen SY, Wu JT. Global productivity of dermatological research: A bibliometric analysis from 1985 to 2014. Br J Dermatol 2017; 176(1):234-6.
• 22. Belinchón Romero I. Bibliometric Indicators of the Status of Clinical Research in Dermatology in Spain: Implications for the future. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2018; 109(1):2.
• 23. Martin-Clavijo A, Roberts CM, Ilchyshyn A. Decline of dermatological publications in the UK: truth or myth? Clin Exp Dermatol 2010; 35(8):910-3.
• 24. Firoozabadi MR, Firooz A, Gorouhi F, Dowlati Y. Iran’s contribution to the dermatology literature. Int J Dermatol 2007; 46(6):659-60.
• 25. Martins Mda C, Carneiro MG, Utzig JB, KaledNeta EL, Pachnicki MA, Silva de Castro CC. Scientific output of Brazilian dermatologists during the last 25 years in the five highest impact factor journals in dermatology. An Bras Dermatol 2012; 87(5):714-6.
• 26. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010; 84(2):523-38.
• 27. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, eds. Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Springer, 2014; 285-320.
• 28. Apache OpenNLP Developer Documentation. Apache OpenNLP Development Community, The Apache Software Foundation, 2019 (http://opennlp.apache.org/ docs/1.9.1/manual/opennlp.html).
• 29. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. ISSI Newsletter 2011; 7(3):50-4.
• 30. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, Talamini R, Corona R, Sera F, Binder M, Cerroni L, De Rosa G, Ferrara G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Landthaler M, Menzies SW, Pehamberger H, Piccolo D, Rabinovitz HS, Schiffner R, Staibano S, Stolz W, Bartenjev I, Blum A, Braun R, Cabo H, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Fleming MG, Grichnik JM, Grin CM, Halpern AC, Johr R, Katz B, Kenet RO, Kittler H, Kreusch J, Malvehy J, Mazzocchetti G, Oliviero M, Ozdemir F, Peris K, Perotti R, Perusquia A, Pizzichetta MA, Puig S, Rao B, Rubegni P, Saida T, Scalvenzi M, Seidenari S, Stanganelli I, Tanaka M, Westerhoff K, Wolf IH, Braun-Falco O, Kerl H, Nishikawa T, Wolff K, Kopf AW. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 48(5):679-93.
• 31. Davatchi F, Assaad-Khalil S, Calamia KT, Crook JE, Sadeghi-Abdollahi B, Schirmer M, Tzellos T, Zouboulis CC, Akhlagi M, Al-Dalaan A, Alekberova ZS, Ali AA, Altenburg A, Arromdee E, Baltaci M, Bastos M, Benamour S, Ghorbel I, Boyvat A, Carvalho L, Chen W, Ben-Chetrit E, Chams-Davatchi C, Correia J, Crespo J, Dias C, Dong Y, Paixao-Duarte F, Elmuntaser K, Elonakov AV, Grana Gil J, Haghdoost AA, Hayani RM, Houman H, Isayeva AR, Jamshidi AR, Kaklamanis P, Kumar A, Kyrgidis A, Madanat W, Nadji A, Namba K, Ohno S, Olivieri I, VazPatto J, Pipitone N, de Queiroz MV, Ramos F, Resende C, Rosa CM, Salvarani C, Serra MJ, Shahram F, Shams H, Sharquie KE, Sliti-Khanfir M, Tribolet de Abreu T, Vasconcelos C, Vedes J, Wechsler B, Cheng YK, Zhang Z, Ziaei N. The international criteria for Behçet’s Disease (ICBD): A collaborative study of 27 countries on the sensitivity and specificity of the new criteria. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 28(3):338-47.
• 32. Azizlerli G, Köse AA, Sarica R, Gül A, Tutkun IT, Kulaç M, Tunç R, Urgancioğlu M, Dişçi R. Prevalence of Behçet’s disease in Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42(10):803-6.
• 33. Dalgard FJ, Gieler U, Tomas-Aragones L, Lien L, Poot F, Jemec GBE, Misery L, Szabo C, Linder D, Sampogna F, Evers AWM, Halvorsen JA, Balieva F, Szepietowski J, Romanov D, Marron SE, Altunay IK, Finlay AY, Salek SS, Kupfer J. The psychological burden of skin diseases: a cross-sectional multicenter study among dermatological out-patients in 13 European countries. J Invest Dermatol 2015; 135(4):984-91.
• 34. Tursen U, Gurler A, Boyvat A. Evaluation of clinical findings according to sex in 2313 Turkish patients with Behçet’s disease. Int J Dermatol 2003; 42(5):346-51.
• 35. Alpsoy E, Durusoy C, Yilmaz E, Ozgurel Y, Ermis O, Yazar S, Basaran E. Interferon alfa-2a in the treatment of Behçet disease: a randomized placebo-controlled and double-blind study. Arch Dermatol 2002; 138(4):467-71.
• 36. Alemdaroğlu C, Değim Z, Celebi N, Zor F, Oztürk S, Erdoğan D. Burns. An investigation on burn wound healing in rats with chitosan gel formulation containing epidermal growth factor. Burns 2006; 32(3):319-27.
• 37. Devrimci-Ozguven H, Kundakci TN, Kumbasar H, Boyvat A. The depression, anxiety, life satisfaction and affective expression levels in psoriasis patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2000; 14(4):267-71.
• 38. Balci DD, Balci A, Karazincir S, Ucar E, Iyigun U, Yalcin F, Seyfeli E, Inandi T, Egilmez E. Increased carotid artery intima-media thickness and impaired endothelial function in psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2009; 23(1):1- 6.
• 39. Saini SS, Bindslev-Jensen C, Maurer M, Grob JJ, Bülbül Baskan E, Bradley MS, Canvin J, Rahmaoui A, Georgiou P, Alpan O, Spector S, Rosén K. Efficacy and safety of omalizumab in patients with chronic idiopathic/ spontaneous urticaria who remain symptomatic on H1 antihistamines: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Invest Dermatol 2015; 135(1):67-75.