BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kalp Dışı Cerrahi Planlanan Hastalarda Preoperatif Kardiyak Değerlendirme Yöntemlerimizin Etkinliği

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 92 - 99, 01.01.2020

Öz

Amaç: Toplumdaki yaş ortalamasının yükselmesi ile kardiyak hasta sayısı giderek artmaktadır. Buna bağlı olarak kalp dışı cerrahi geçirecek hastalarda kardiyak komplikasyonlar daha sık görülmektedir. Bu nedenle kardiyak riski olan hastaların preoperatif dönemde öngörülmesinin; hastaların tedavilerinin planlanmasının ve operasyon sırasında gerekli önlemlerin alınabilmesinin önemi daha da artmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: 1 Ağustos - 1 Kasım 2011 tarihleri arasında Anestezi Polikliniğine başvuran ve kalp dışı operasyon geçirecek hastalar çalışmaya alınmıştır. Hastalar “Kalp Dışı Cerrahide Preoperatif Değerlendirme Formu” ile preoperatif olarak değerlendirilmiş ve “Kalp Dışı Cerrahide Kardiyak Hastaların Takip Formu” ile takip edilmişlerdir. “Kardiyak Risk Değerlendirme ve Tanı Algoritması” ve “Klinik Risk Faktörleri”ne göre riskli olan hastalarımız Kardiyoloji Anabilim Dalı tarafından konsülte edilmişlerdir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 1113 hastamızın 119’un da %10,7 kardiyoloji kliniği değerlendirilmesi yapılmıştır. Kardiyoloji değerlendirmesi yapılan hastalarımızda yaş grupları arasında istatistiksel fark görülmüştür p=0,01 . En sık görülen unstabil kardiyak durum %77,1 ile aritmilerdir. ß-bloker kardiyoloji tarafından en çok önerilen ilaç grubu olmuştur. Üç hastada anestezi indüksiyonunda hipotansiyon, 2 hastada intraoperatif aritmi izlenmiştir. Bu hastalar kardiyolojik değerlendirilmesi yapılan ve tedavileri planlanan hastalardır.Sonuç: Yapılan preoperatif değerlendirme yöntemleri ile intraoperatif dönemde kardiyak risk grubu olarak öngörülmüş hastalarda az da olsa kardiyak komplikasyon meydana gelmesi; ve tedavi edilebilmiş olması çalışmamızın protokolünün kalp dışı cerrahi uygulanan hastaların preoperatif değerlendirilmeleri için etkin olduğunu göstermiştir

Kaynakça

  • Fleisher LA, Beattie C. Current practice in the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing major vascular surgery: a survey of cardiovascular anesthesiologists [see comments]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993; 7:650-4.
  • Carroll K, Majeed A, Firth C, Gray J. Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: Population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register. J Public Health Med 2003; 25:29-35.
  • Naughton C, Feneck RO. The impact of age on 6-month survival in patients with cardiovascular risk factors undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61:768-76.
  • Mangano DT. Perioperative medicine: NHLBI working group deliberations and recommendations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18:1-6.
  • Guidelines on pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in noncardiac surgery: The Task Force for PreOperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2010; 27: 92-137.
  • Schwartz PJ, Breithardt G, Howard AJ, Julian DG, Rehnqvist Ahlberg N. Task Force Report: the legal implications of medical guidelines-a Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1999; 20:1152-7.
  • Tuula SO Kurki. Preoperative assessment of patients with cardiac disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. In: David L. Reich ed. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. Anesthesia for Cardiac Patient. New York: I WB Saunders Co, 1997:1-13.
  • Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, Burke DS, O’Malley TA, Goroll AH, Caplan CH, Nolan J, Carabello B, Slater EE. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977; 297:845-50.
  • Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999; 100:1043-9.
  • Detsky AS, Abrams HB, Forbath N, Scott JG, Hilliard JR. Cardiac assessment for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. A multifactorial clinical risk index. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:2131-4.
  • Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TARD) Anestezi Uygulama Kılavuzları; Preoperatif Hazırlık Kasım 2005.
  • Mangano DT. Assessment of risk for cardiac and noncardiac surgical procedures. In: Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. Vo1.9. WB. Saunders Co.,1991: 521.
  • Almanaseer Y, Mukherjee D, Kline-Rogers EM, Kesterson SK, Sonnad SS, Rogers B, Smith D, Furney S, Ernst R, McCort J, Eagle KA. Implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines for preoperative cardiac risk assessment in a general medicine preoperative clinic: Improving efficiency and preserving outcomes. Cardiology 2005; 103:24-9.
  • Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, van de Ven LL, Blankensteijn JD, Baars HF, Yo TI, Trocino G, Vigna C, Roelandt JR, van Urk H. The effect of bisopr- olol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1789-94.

Effectiveness of Preoperative Cardiac Assessment Methods in Patients With Non-Heart Surgery

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 92 - 99, 01.01.2020

Öz

Objective: The number of cardiac patients is increasing with the increased mean age of the population. Cardiac complications are also now being seen more frequently in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Preoperative evaluation of patients with cardiac risk, planning the treatment of patients and taking necessary precautions during the operation have therefore become more important.Material and Methods: Patients who presented at the anesthesia outpatients between 1 August and 1 November 2011 and were scheduled to undergo non-cardiac surgery were included in the study. The patients were assessed preoperatively with the "Non-cardiac Surgery Preoperative Evaluation Form" and followed-up with the "Follow-up Form for Cardiac Patients after Non-cardiac Surgery". The patients found to be at risk with the "Cardiac Risk Assessment and Diagnostic Algorithm "and the "Clinical Risk Factors" were consulted to the Department of Cardiology.Results: A total of 1113 patients were enrolled in the study and 119 10.7% were evaluated by the cardiology department. There was a statistical difference between the age groups in the patients undergoing cardiology evaluation p=0.01 . The most common conditions were unstable cardiac arrhythmias at 77.1%. ß-blockers were the most commonly recommended drug group by the cardiology department. Three patients had hypotension during anesthesia induction and 2 patients had intraoperative arrhythmia. These patients had undergone a cardiology evaluation and the treatment planned accordingly.Conclusion: The fact that only a small number of cardiac complications occurred in the intraoperative period in patients who were judged to have cardiac risk with preoperative evaluation methods showed that the protocol of our study was effective for preoperative evaluation of non-cardiac surgery patients

Kaynakça

  • Fleisher LA, Beattie C. Current practice in the preoperative evaluation of patients undergoing major vascular surgery: a survey of cardiovascular anesthesiologists [see comments]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1993; 7:650-4.
  • Carroll K, Majeed A, Firth C, Gray J. Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: Population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register. J Public Health Med 2003; 25:29-35.
  • Naughton C, Feneck RO. The impact of age on 6-month survival in patients with cardiovascular risk factors undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61:768-76.
  • Mangano DT. Perioperative medicine: NHLBI working group deliberations and recommendations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2004; 18:1-6.
  • Guidelines on pre-operative cardiac risk assessment and perioperative cardiac management in noncardiac surgery: The Task Force for PreOperative Cardiac Risk Assessment and Perioperative Cardiac Management in Non-cardiac Surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2010; 27: 92-137.
  • Schwartz PJ, Breithardt G, Howard AJ, Julian DG, Rehnqvist Ahlberg N. Task Force Report: the legal implications of medical guidelines-a Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 1999; 20:1152-7.
  • Tuula SO Kurki. Preoperative assessment of patients with cardiac disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. In: David L. Reich ed. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. Anesthesia for Cardiac Patient. New York: I WB Saunders Co, 1997:1-13.
  • Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, Burke DS, O’Malley TA, Goroll AH, Caplan CH, Nolan J, Carabello B, Slater EE. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977; 297:845-50.
  • Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Ludwig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation 1999; 100:1043-9.
  • Detsky AS, Abrams HB, Forbath N, Scott JG, Hilliard JR. Cardiac assessment for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. A multifactorial clinical risk index. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:2131-4.
  • Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TARD) Anestezi Uygulama Kılavuzları; Preoperatif Hazırlık Kasım 2005.
  • Mangano DT. Assessment of risk for cardiac and noncardiac surgical procedures. In: Anesthesiology Clinics of North America. Vo1.9. WB. Saunders Co.,1991: 521.
  • Almanaseer Y, Mukherjee D, Kline-Rogers EM, Kesterson SK, Sonnad SS, Rogers B, Smith D, Furney S, Ernst R, McCort J, Eagle KA. Implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines for preoperative cardiac risk assessment in a general medicine preoperative clinic: Improving efficiency and preserving outcomes. Cardiology 2005; 103:24-9.
  • Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, Thomson IR, van de Ven LL, Blankensteijn JD, Baars HF, Yo TI, Trocino G, Vigna C, Roelandt JR, van Urk H. The effect of bisopr- olol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1789-94.
Toplam 14 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Emel Gündüz Bu kişi benim

Nesil Coşkun Fırat Bu kişi benim

Gülbin Arıcı Bu kişi benim

Mert Akbaş Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ocak 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Gündüz E, Coşkun Fırat N, Arıcı G, Akbaş M. Kalp Dışı Cerrahi Planlanan Hastalarda Preoperatif Kardiyak Değerlendirme Yöntemlerimizin Etkinliği. Akd Tıp D. 2020;6(1):92-9.