Rekreasyon Alanlarının Ekonomik Değerinin Saptanmasında Seyahat Maliyeti Yönteminin Kullanımı

Yıl 1999, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 107 - 120, 01.12.1999

Veli Ortaçeşme Burhan Özkan Osman Karagüzel

Öz

Seyahat Maliyeti Yöntemi (SMY), rekreasyonel faaliyetler için kullanılan doğal alanların kullanım değerini saptamak üzere geliştirilmiş bir yöntemdir. Yöntemin temel kabulü, bireyin ikamet ettiği yerden bir rekreasyon alanına ulaşım için yapmış olduğu toplam harcamaların, bu çevresel emtia için ödemeye razı olduğu para miktarını yansıttığı varsayımıdır. SMY, bireysel ve bölgesel olmak üzere iki farklı şekilde uygulanabilmektedir. Bu yöntemle elde edilen sonuçlar, yatırım projelerinin fayda- maliyet analizleri kapsamında uygulama olanağı bulmaktadırlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Seyahat Maliyeti Yöntemi, Rekreasyon, Kullanım Değeri, Ekonomi

The Use of Travel Cost Method in Economic Valuation of Recreation Sites

Öz

Travel Cost Method (TCM) is widely used in the determination of recreational use values of environmental goods such as natural sites. The basic philosophy of the method is that all expenditures made by an individual to move from his permanent residence to a recreational site represents his willingness to pay for this environmental good. TCM is applied in two different ways as Individual Travel Cost Method (ITCM) and Zonal Travel Cost Method (ZTCM). Results from this economic valuation method are used in the cost-benefit analyses of investment projects.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Travel Cost Method, Recreation, Use Value, Economics

Kaynakça

• Adamowicz, W.L., 1988. Behavioral Implication of Nonmarket Valuation Models. Canadian Journal of Agr. Econ., 36, 926-939.
• Adamowicz,, W.L., Graham, T., Fletcher, J.J., 1989a. Inequality Constrained Estimation of Consumer Surplus. Canadian Journal of Agr. Econ., 37(3), 407-420.
• Adamowicz,. W.L., Fletcher, J.J., Graham, T., 1989b. Functional Form and the Statistical Properties of Welfare Measures. American Journal of Agr. Econ., 71(2), 414-421.
• Bateman, I., Garrod, G., Willis, K., 1992. An Introduction to the Estimation of Non-priced Recreation Using the Travel Cost Method. ESRC-Countryside Change Initiative Working Paper no:36, UK.
• Bishop. R.C., Haberlein, T.A., 1979. Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?. American Journal of Agr. Econ., 61(5), 926-930.
• Bockstael, N.E., Strand, I.E. Hanemann, W.M., 1987. Time and Recreation Demand Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(2), 293-302.
• Brown, W., Nawas, F., 1973. Impact of Aggregation on the Estimation of Outdoor Recreation Demand Functions. American Journal of Agr. Econ., 55(2), 246-249.
• Cesario, F.J., 1976. Value of Time in Recreation Benefit Studies. Land Economics, 52, 32-41.
• Fisher, A.C., Krutilla, J.V., 1992. Determination of Optimal Capacity of Resource Based Recreation Facilities. In; Bateman, I., Garrod, G., Willis, K., An Introduction to the Estimation of Non-priced Recreation Using the Travel Cost Method. ESRC- Countryside Change Initiative Working Paper no:36, UK.
• Garrod, G., Pickering, A., Willis, K., 1991. An Economic Estimate of Recreational Benefits of Four Botanic Gardens. ESRC Countryside Change Initiative Working Paper no:25, UK.
• Hanley, N.D., 1989. Valuing Rural Recreation Benefits and Empirical Comparison of Two Approaches. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40(3), 361-374.
• Loureiro, M.P., 1994. Valoracion Economica de los Bienes Ambientales: Aplicacion del Metodo del Coste de Viaje al Parque Natural de la Dehesa de Moncayo. CIHEAM-IAMZ Thesis de Master, Zaragoza.
• Marinelli, A., Casini, L., Romano, D,, 1990. Economic Valuation of the Aggregate Impact and Direct Benefits of Outdoors Recreation: The Case of a Natural Park in Tuscany. Genio Rurale, 53(9), 51-55.
• McConnell, K. E., 1985. The Economics of Outdoor Recreation. In: Knesee, A.V., Sweeney, J. L., Handbook of Natural Resources and Energy Economics, Vol.2 pp 677-722. Elsevier Science B.V., Holland.
• McConnell, K. E., Bockstael, N., 1986. The Travel Cost Demand Model as an Environmental Policy Assessment Tool: A Review of Literature. Western Journal of Agr. Econ., 11(2), 164-178.
• Menz, G.C., Wilton, D. P., 1983. Alternative Ways to Measure Recreation Values by the Travel Cost Method. American Journal of Agr. Econ., 65, 332-336.
• O'Neill, C.E., Davis, J., 1991. Alternative Definitions of Demand for Recreational Angling in Northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 42(2), 174-179.
• Ortaçeşme, V., Özkan, B., Karagüzel, O., 1997. Doğal Çevrenin Ekonomik Değerinin Saptanmasında Kullanılan Yöntemler. Akd. Üniv. Zir. Fak. Derg., 10(1), 249-260.
• Richards, M.T., Brown, T.C., 1992. Economic Value of Campground Visits in Arizona. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Research Paper, no:RG-305.
• Riera, P., Descalzi, C., Ruiz, A., 1994. El Valor Recreativo de los Espacios de Interes Natural en Espana. Revista Espanola de Economia, Numero Monografico sobre Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente.
• Smith, V.K., Desvouges, W.H. McGivney, M.P., 1985. The Opportunity Cost of Travel Time in Recreation Demand Models. Land Economics, 59(3), 259-278.
• Tistell, C.A., 1991. Economics of Environmental Conservation. Elsevier Science Publisher.
• Ward, F.A., Loomis, J.B., 1986. The Travel Cost Demand Model as an Environmental Policy Assessment Tool: A Review of Literature. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 11(2), 164-178.
• Willis, K.G., Garrod, G.D., 1991. An Individual Travel Cost Method of Evaluating Forest Recreation. Journal of Agr. Economics, 42, 33-42.
• Wilman, E.A., Pauls, R.J., 1987. Sensitivity of Consumer Surplus Estimates to Variation in the Parameters of Travel Cost Model. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 35(1), 197-212.
• Ziemer, R.F., Musser, W.N., Carter, H.R., 1980. Recreation Demand Equations: Functional Form and Consumer Surplus. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 136-141.