Öz Liderliğin Öz Yeterlilik ve Üniversite Bağlılığına Etkisi: Müzik Öğretmeni Adayları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, öz liderlik, öz yeterlik ve üniversite bağlılığı değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiyi ve birbirleri üzerindeki etkilerini bulmaktır. Bu doğrultuda, araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan kavramsal modelleri inceleyen ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklem, 1390 müzik öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın örnekleminde 349 müzik öğretmeni adayı bulunmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi için 10 üniversite seçilmiştir. Öğrencilerin katılımı için basit bir rastgele örnekleme yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Hipotezleri test edebilmek için yapısal denklem modeli oluşturulmuştur. Faktör ve madde sayılarını bulmak için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Veriler, aşırı değerler açısından değerlendirildi ve mahalonobis değerlerine göre 16 veri analizden çıkarılmıştır. Alt boyutların çarpıklık ve basıklık katsayıları, verilerin tek değişkenli normal varsayımını karşılayıp karşılamadığını belirlemek için incelenmiştir. Araştırmada müzik öğretmeni adaylarının öz liderlik davranışları, öz yeterliklerini olumlu ve anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Diğer bir sonuca göre, müzik öğretmeni adaylarının öz liderlik davranışları, üniversite bağlılıklarını olumlu ve anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği bulgulanmıştır. Ayrıca, müzik öğretmeni adaylarının öz yeterliği, üniversite bağlılıklarını olumlu ve anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği sonucuna varılmıştır. Öz liderlik, öz yeterlik ve üniversite bağlılığının önemli birer yordayıcısı olduğu sonucu elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca öz yeterlik üniversite bağlılığı için önemli bir yordayıcı olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öz Liderlik
• Öz Yeterlik
• Üniversite Bağlılığı
• Müzik Öğretmen
• Adayları

The Effect of Self-Leadership on Self-Efficacy and University Commitment: A Study on Preservice Music Teachers

Öz

The aim of this study was to find out the relationship among variables self-leadership, self-efficacy and university commitment and their effects on each other. Accordingly, correlational survey model was used as the relationships among variable. It examines conceptual models created by researchers. The population included 1390 preservice music teachers. There were 349 preservice music teacher in the population of the research. The research’s sample consisted of 10 universities. A simple random sample was chosen for the participation of the students. Structural equation model was created with the hypotheses. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to find out the factor and item numbers of the them. The data were evaluated in terms of extreme values and 16 data were excluded according to mahalonobis values. The skewness and kurtosis coefficients of the sub-dimensions were examined to determine whether the univariate normality assumption of the data was met. According to the first result, music teacher candidates' self-leadership behaviors positively and significantly affected their self-efficacy. According to second result, preservice music teachers’ self-leadership behaviors positively and significantly affected their university engagement. According to the third result, it was concluded that the self-efficacy of the preservice music teacher affected their university commitment positively and significantly. Self-leadership was an important predictor of self-efficacy and university commitment, and self-efficacy was an important predictor of university commitment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Self Leadership
• Self Efficacy
• University Commitment
• Preservice Music Teachers

Kaynakça

1. Almutairi, Y. M. N. (2020). Leadership self-efficacy and organizational commitment of faculty members: Higher education. Administrative Sciences, 10(66), 2-11.
2. Alves, J. C., Lovelace, K. J., Manz, C. C., Matsypura, D., Toyasaki, F., & Ke, K. G. (2006). A cross-cultural perspective of self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 338-359.
3. Anderson, J. S., & Prussia, G. E. (1997). The self-leadership questionnaire: Preliminary assessment of construct validity. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(2), 119-143.
4. Andressen, P., Konradt, U., & Neck, C.P. (2012). The relation between self-leadership and transformational leadership: Competing models and the moderating role of virtuality. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 19, 68-82.
5. Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A.L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of University Psychology, 44(5), 427– 445.
6. Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J. S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high university dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651-670.
7. Ayık, A, Savaş, M., & Yücel, E. (2015). İlkokullarda görev yapan okul müdürlerinin genel öz yeterlik ile örgütsel bağlılık algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Examining the relationship between general self-efficacy and organizational commitment perceptions of university principals working in primary universitys]. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 193-218.
8. Aypay, A. (2010). The Adaptation Study of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) Scale to Turkish. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 113-131.

9. Balcı, A. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma [Research in social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
10. Bandura, A. (1991), “Social cognitive theory of self-regulation”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1(50), 248-87.
11. Bandura, A., & Cervone, D. (1986). Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38(1), 92-113
12. Bartlett, J., Kotrlik, W., & Higgins, C., (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43-50
13. Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş, AMOS uygulamaları, [Introduction to structural equation modeling, AMOS application]. Bursa, Ezgi Pub.
14. Bligh, M.C., Pearce, C.L., & Kohles, J.C. (2006), “The importance of self- and shared leadership in team based knowledge work”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (4),296-318
15. Bozkurt, S., Çoban, Ö., Özdemir, M., & Özdemir, N. (2021). Liderlik, okul kültürü, kolektif yeterlik, akademik öz-yeterlik ve sosyoekonomik düzeyin öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 46(207),465-482.
16. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 1(54), 136-136
17. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design SPSS applications and interpretation]. Ankara: Pegem.
18. Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods and Research, 17(3), 303-316.
19. Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2014). Daily self-management and employee work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(1), 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.11.002.
20. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
21. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific Research Methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
22. Campbell, M. R., & Thompson, L. K. (2007). Perceived concerns of preservice music education teachers: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(2), 162-176.
23. Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1998), On the Self-Regulation of Behavior, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
24. Choi, Y. H., & Jung, C. S. (2015). Relationship between self-leadership, self-efficacy and impowerment in nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 16(7), 4604-4613.
25. Choi, M. H., & Kim, D. H. (2020). Effect of Nunchi, self-leadership and academic self-efficacy on college students’ adaptation to college life. Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene, 20(3), 379-386.
26. Christensen, L., Johnson, R., & Turner, L. (2011). Research methods, design, and analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
27. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. The Journal of experimental education, 60(4), 323-337.
28. Conchas, G. (2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino university engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 475-505.
29. Covell, K. (2010). University engagement and rights-respecting universitys. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(1), 39–51.
30. Çengel, M., Totan, T., & Çöğmen, S. (2017). Okula bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması [Adapting the University Engagement Scale into Turkish.]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (4), 1820-1837.
31. Çevik, D. B. (2011). Müzik öğretmeni adaylarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre problem çözme becerileri. [Problem solving skills of music teacher candidates according to various variables]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 19(3),1003-1012
32. Doerksen, P. F. (1999). Aural-diagnostic and prescriptive skills of preservice and expert instrumental music teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(1), 78-88.
33. Erdoğdu, M. Y., & Yüzbaş, D. (2018). Lise öğrencilerinin okula bağlılık ile genel öz-yeterlilik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between high university students' commitment to university and their general self-efficacy]. Journal of Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 32(1), 205-227.
34. Francisco, C. D. (2019). School principals' transformational leadership styles and their effects on teachers' self-efficacy. Online Submission, 7(10), 622-635.
35. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., & Paris, A. (2005). University Engagement. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? New York: Springer.
36. Gifford, E. (1993). The musical training of primary teachers: Old problems, new insights and possible solutions. British Journal of Music Education, 10(1), 33-46.
37. Gist, M. (1989). The influence of training method on self-efficacy and idea generation among managers. Personnel Psychology, 42(4), 787-805.
38. Hackworth, R. S. (2006). Preservice music teachers' perceptions of vocal hygiene: Findings from a national survey. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 16(1), 20-31.
39. Han, A. L., & Kwon, S. (2016). Effects of self-leadership and self-efficacy on nursing performance of nurses working in long-term care hospitals. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, 18(1), 12-21
40. Hebert, D. G. (2007). Five challenges and solutions in online music teacher education. Research and Issues in Music Education, 5(1), 1-10.
41. Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self‐leadership questionnaire. Journal of Managerial psychology, 17 (8), 672-691.
42. Houghton, J.D., Neck, C.P., & Manz, C.C. (2003), “Self-leadership and superleadership: the heart and art of creating shared leadership in teams”, in Pearce, C.L. and Conger, J.A. (Eds), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 123-40
43. Houghton, J. D., Bonham, T. W., Neck, C. P., & Singh, K. (2004). The relationship between self‐leadership and personality., the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Management.
44. Houghton, J. D., & Yoho, S. K. (2005). Toward a contingency model of leadership and psychological empowerment: when should self-leadership be encouraged?. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 65-83.
45. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6 (1), 1-55.
46. Jelen, B. (2013). Türkiye’de müzik öğretmeni yetiştirme sürecinde piyano eğitiminde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Rast Musicology Journal, 1(1), 258-285.
47. Johnson, V. V. (2014). Preservice music teachers’ social skills: Are they really prepared? Applications of Research in Music Education, 32(2), 18-25.
48. Karasar, N. (2020). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. [Scientific research method]. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
49. Kim, H., & Kim, K. (2019). Impact of self‐efficacy on the self‐leadership of nursing preceptors: The mediating effect of job embeddedness. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1756-1763.
50. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press
51. Lee, O. S. (2015). The relationship between emotional intelligence, academic self-efficacy and self-leadership among nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 16 (9), 6036-6043.
52. Lee, Y. S., Park, S. H., & Kim, J. K. (2014). Nursing students' self-leadership, self-efficacy, interpersonal relation, college life satisfaction. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(6), 229-240.
53. Lee, S. Y., & Kim, Y. Y. (2016). The effects of self-efficacy and self-directed learning readiness to self-leadership of nursing student. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 309-318.
54. Legette, R. M. (2013). Perceptions of early-career university music teachers regarding their preservice preparation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 32(1), 12-17.
55. Libbey, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to university: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of University Health, 74(7), 274-283.
56. Long, C. S., Alifiah, M. N., Kowang, T. O., & Ching, C. W. (2015). The relationship between Self-leadership, personality and job satisfaction: A review. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 16.
57. Maddux, J. E. (2002). Self-efficacy: The power of believing you can. In C.R. Snyder & S.J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 277-287). New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management review, 11(3), 585-600.
59. Manz, C. C., & Sims Jr, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management review, 5(3), 361-367.
60. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. Jr (2001), New Superleadership: Leading Others to Lead Themselves, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, CA
61. Manz, C.C. & Neck, C.P. (2004), Mastering Self-Leadership: Empowering Yourself for Personal Excellence, 3rd ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
62. Martin, P., & Nicholls. J. (1987).Hrm practies and employee commitment. Possibilities, pitfalls and paradoxes. British Journal of Management, 1(3), 147-157.
63. Mengi, S. (2011). Ortaöğretim 10. ve 11. sınıf öğrencilerinin sosyal destek ve öz-yeterlik düzeylerinin okula bağlılıkları ile ilişkisi (Yayınlanmamş Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstirüsü, Sakarya.
64. Millican, J. S. (2016). Describing preservice instrumental music educators’ pedagogical content knowledge. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 34 (2), 61-68.
65. Mills, J. (1989). The generalist primary teacher of music: A problem of confidence. British Journal of Music Education, 6(2), 125-138.
66. Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary universitys. Journal of research and development in education, 17(4), 14-24.
67. Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self‐leadership theory and research. Journal of managerial psychology. 21 (4), 270-295.
68. Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2010). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. Pearson.
69. Norris, S. E. (2008). An examination of self-leadership. Emerging leadership journeys, 1(2), 43-61.
70. Oh, H. S., & Wee, H. (2016). Self efficacy, organizational commitment, customer orientation and nursing performance of nurses in local public hospitals. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 22(5), 507-517.
71. Park, I. J., & Jung, H. (2015). Relationships among future time perspective, career and organizational commitment, occupational self-efficacy, and turnover intention. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 43(9), 1547-1561.
72. Park, M. K., & Park, K. N. (2008). A study on nurses' self-leadership, organizational commitment and the nursing performance. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, 14(1), 63-71.
73. Pihl-Thingvad, S. (2014). Is self-leadership the new silver bullet of leadership? An empirical test of the relationship between self-leadership and organizational commitment. Management Revue, 25(2) 103-124.
74. Pillai, R., & Williams, E. A. (2004). Transformational leadership, self‐efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance. Journal of organizational change management. 17(2), 144-159.
75. Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. S., & Manz, C. C. (1998). Self‐leadership and performance outcomes: the mediating influence of self‐efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(5), 523-538.
76. Richards, C., & Killen, R. (1993). Problems of beginning teachers: Perceptions of pre-service music teachers. Research Studies in Music Education, 1(1), 40-51.
77. Russell-Bowie, D. (2009). What me? Teach music to my primary class? Challenges to teaching music in primary universitys in five countries. Music Education Research, 11(1), 23-36.
78. Sumual, M. G. V. (2014). Effect of empowerment, self efficacy, and lecturer to proffession's commitment of tyhe Manado State University. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(5), 18-27.
79. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
80. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2007). Influencing children's self-efficacy and self-regulation of reading and writing through modeling. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 7-25.
81. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
82. Stewart, G.L., Courtright, S.H., & Manz, C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185-222.
83. Suhr, D. (2006). Exploratory or Confirmatory Factor Analysis. SAS Users Group International Conference (pp. 1 - 17). Cary: SAS Institute, Inc.
84. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
85. Tabak, A., Sıgrı, Ü., & Türköz, T. (2013). Öz liderlik ölçeginin Türkçeye uyarlanması çalışması. [ Adaptation of self-leadership scale to Turkish]. Bilig, 67, 213-246.
86. Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1985). A fit index for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38(2), 197-201.
87. Theodorakis, Y. (1996). The influence of goals, commitment, self-efficacy and self-satisfaction on motor performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 8(2), 171-182.
88. Unsworth, K. L., & Mason, C. M. (2012). Help yourself: The mechanisms through which a self-leadership intervention influences strain. Journal of occupational health psychology, 17(2), 235.
89. Wang, H., Jung, S. A., Park, H. E., Yoo, H. S., Bae, Y., & Kim, J. (2016). The metacognition, self-efficacy and self-leadership among nursing students. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 17(9), 619-627.
90. Yılmaz, M., Köseoğlu, P., Gerçek, C., & Soran, H. (2004). Yabancı dilde hazırlanan bir öğretmen öz yeterlik ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 260-267.