Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik Esnekliklerinin Yordanmasında İnternet Bağımlılığı ve Siber Zorbalık Duyarlılığının Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırmada üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik esnekliklerinin, internet bağımlılığının ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılık düzeylerinin rolünün incelenmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Çalışma grubu, İç Anadolu Bölgesi'ndeki devlet üniversitesinin çeşitli bölümlerinde öğrenim gören ve tesadüfi küme örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen üniversite öğrencilerinden oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmada ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya 473'ü kız, 88'i erkek olmak üzere 561 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Araştırmada verilerin toplanmasında Kabul ve Eylem Formu-2, Genç İnternet Bağımlılığı Kısa Formu, Siber Zorbalık Duyarlılık Ölçeği ve Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada bağımsız örnekler t-testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Tekniği ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, algılanan aile geliri düzeyi düşük olan öğrencilerin ortalama psikolojik esneklik puanlarının, algılanan aile geliri orta düzeyde olan öğrencilere göre anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Hafta içi ve hafta sonu internette geçirilen günlük süre ile psikolojik esneklik puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Bu anlamlı fark, günde 0-2 saat internet kullanan grup ile 6 saat ve üzeri internet kullanan grup arasında, 6 saat ve üzeri internet kullanan grup lehinedir. İnterneti kullanma amacı alışveriş yapmak olan grubun psikolojik esneklik puan ortalamalarının, interneti bilgi amaçlı kullanan grubun psikolojik esneklik puan ortalamalarından daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sosyal medyanın günlük kullanım süresi arttıkça ortalama psikolojik esneklik puanı da artıyor. İnternet bağımlılığı ile psikolojik esneklik arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılık ile psikolojik esneklik arasında pozitif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Araştırma bulgularına göre; İnternet bağımlılığı ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılığın psikolojik esneklik puanlarını yordadığı tespit edilmiştir. *Bu çalışma, Prof.Dr.Zeliha TRAŞ danışmanlığında Büşra KABAKCI tarafından tamamlanan “Üniversite öğrencilerinin psikolojik katılıklarının yordanmasında internet bağımlılığı ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılığın rolü” başlıklı yüksek lisans tezinden üretilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Psikolojik Esneklik
• İnternet Bağımlılığı
• Siber Zorbalık Duyarlılığı
• Üniversite öğrencileri

The Roles of Internet Addiction and Cyberbullying Sensitivity for Prediction of University Students' Psychological Inflexibility*

Abstract

In this research, it is aimed to examine the role of university students' psychological inflexibility, internet addiction and sensitivity levels related to cyberbullying. The study group was formed with university students studying in various departments of the state university in the Central Anatolia Region and selected by random cluster sampling method. The relational screening model was used in the research. 561 university students, including 473 girls and 88 boys, participated in the research. Acceptance and Action Form-2, Young Internet Addiction Short Form, Cyber Bullying Sensitivity Scale and Personal Information Form were used to collect the data in the research. Independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson Product Moments Correlation Technique, and multiple linear regression analysis were used in the research. As a result, the average psychological inflexibility scores of students with a low perceived family income level were found to be significantly higher than those of students with a moderate perceived family income. It was concluded that there is a significant and positive relationship between the daily time spent on the Internet on weekdays and on weekends and the psychological inflexibility score averages. This significant difference is between the group that spends 0-2 hours daily on the Internet and the group that spends 6 hours and more, and in favor of the group that spends 6 hours and more. It was found that the psychological inflexibility score averages of the group whose purpose of using the Internet is to shop were higher than the psychological inflexibility score averages of the group using the Internet for information purposes. As the daily usage time of social media increases, the average psychological inflexibility score increases. There is a positive significant relationship between Internet addiction and psychological inflexibility. There is a positive significant relationship between sensitivity and psychological inflexibility related to cyberbullying. According to the research findings; It has been found that the sensitivity related to internet addiction and cyber bullying is a predictor on psychological inflexibility scores.

Keywords

• Psychological Inflexibility*
• Internet Addiction
• Cyberbullying Sensitivity
• university students

Kaynakça

1. Aksoy F. ve Ünübol H. (2021). The Relationship between Internet Addiction and Schema Mechanisms in Adolescents. Addiction Journal. 22(2), 103-113.
2. Anderson, K. J. (2001). Internet use among college students: an exploratory study. Journal of American College Health, 50(1), 21–26. doi:10.1080/07448480109595707
3. Arslan, N. ve Kiper, A. (2018). Self-disclosure and internet addiction. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 56-63.
4. Beard, K. W. ve Wolf, E. M. (2001). Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(3), 377–383. doi:10.1089/109493101300210286
5. Block, J. J. (2008). Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 306–307.doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07101556.
6. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., ... Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy,42, 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth. 2011.03.007.
7. Bond, F.W., Hayes, S.C. ve Barnes-Holmes, D. (2006) Psychological flexibility, ACT, and organizational behavior, Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26:1-2, 25-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J075v26n01_02
8. Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise?. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 15(1). 68-76.doi:10.1375/ajgc.15.1.68

9. Ceyhan, A.A. (2011). University students' problematic internet use and communication skills according to the internet use purposes. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 69-77. URL: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919890.pdf
10. Cheng, C., Sun, P. ve Mak, K.-K. (2015). Internet addiction and psychosocial maladjustment: avoidant coping and coping inflexibility as psychological mechanisms. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 539–546. doi:10.1089/cyber.2015.0121
11. Chou, W.-P., Lee, K.-H., Ko, C.-H., Liu, T.-L., Hsiao, R. C., Lin, H.-F. ve Yen, C.-F. (2017). Relationship between psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance and internet addiction: Mediating effects of mental health problems. Psychiatry Research, 257, 40–44. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.07.021
12. Chou, W.-P., Yen, C.-F. ve Liu, T.-L. (2018). Predicting effects of psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance and stress coping strategies for internet addiction, significant depression, and suicidality in college students: A prospective study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(4), 788. doi:10.3390/ijerph15040788
13. Clearfield, M. W. ve Niman, L. C. (2012). SES affects infant cognitive flexibility. Infant Behavior and Development, 35(1), 29–35. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.09.007
14. Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M. ve Howard, E. (2013). Emerging in a Digital World. Emerging Adulthood, 1(2), 125–137. doi:10.1177/2167696813479782
15. Çolak, T.S. (2014). The Effectiveness of Logotherapy-Oriented Group Counseling in Fostering Forgiveness Flexibility (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sakarya University Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.
16. Dinç, E.S. (2020). Cyberbullying on Social Media Platforms: Examining High School Students' Experiences of Cyberbullying. New Media Electronic Journal, 4(1), 24-39. doi: 10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2020.4/1.24-39
17. Doğru, G. (2019). The Predictive Effect of Post-Traumatic Cognitions, Trauma-Related Guilt, and Locus of Control on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms in Individuals with Trauma Experience (Unpublished master's thesis). Hacettepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Ankara.
18. Dong, G., Lin, X., Zhou, H. ve Lu, Q. (2014). Cognitive flexibility in internet addicts: fMRI evidence from difficult-to-easy and easy-to-difficult switching situations. Addictive Behaviors, 39(3), 677–683. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.028
19. Ercengiz, M. (2017). The Effect of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-Oriented Psycho-Educational Program on Decision-Making Styles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sakarya University Institute of Educational Science, Sakarya.
20. Gilbert, K. E., Tonge, N. A. ve Thompson, R. J. (2018). Associations between depression, anxious arousal and manifestations of psychological inflexibility. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.09.006
21. Grégoire, S., Lachance, L., Bouffard, T. ve Dionne, F. (2018). The use of acceptance and commitment therapy to promote mental health and school engagement in university students: a multisite randomized controlled trial. Behavior Therapy, 49(3), 360–372. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2017.10.003
22. Guan, S.-S. A. ve Subrahmanyam, K. (2009). Youth Internet use: risks and opportunities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry,22(4), 351–356. doi:10.1097/yco.0b013e32832bd7e0
23. Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A. ve Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy,44(1), 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006
24. Kandell, J. J. (1998). Internet Addiction on Campus: The Vulnerability of College Students. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(1), 11–17. doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.11
25. Kashdan, T. B. ve Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
26. Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.001
27. Kaşıkçı, D. N., Çağıltay, K., Karakuş, T., Kurşun, E. ve Ogan, C. (2014). Internet Habits and Safe Internet Usage of Children in Turkiye and Europe. Education and Science. 39 (171). URL: http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/1867/645
28. Kinnari, J. ve Tysk, L. (2020). The moderating role of psychological flexibility on the relatıonshıp between cyber vıctımızatıon and anxıety ın swedısh youth. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi).
29. Levin, M. E., MacLane, C., Daflos, S., Seeley, J. R., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A. ve Pistorello, J. (2014). Examining psychological inflexibility as a transdiagnostic process across psychological disorders. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 3(3), 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2014.06.003
30. Levin, M. E., Pistorello, J., Seeley, J. R. ve Hayes, S. C. (2013). Feasibility of a prototype web-based acceptance and commitment therapy prevention program for college students. Journal of American College Health, 62(1), 20–30. doi:10.1080/07448481.2013.843533
31. Masuda, A., Muto, T., Tully, E. C., Morgan, J. ve Hill, M. L. (2014). Comparing Japanese college students’ and U.S. college students’ disordered eating, distress, and psychological inflexibility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(7), 1162–1174. doi:10.1177/0022022114534982
32. Masuda, A., Tully, E. C., Drake, C. E., Tarantino, N., Ames, A. M. ve Larson, D. G. (2015). Examining Self-Concealment within the Framework of Psychological Inflexibility and Mindfulness: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Investigation. Current Psychology, 36(1), 184–191. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9399-6
33. Mishna, F., Saini, M. ve Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12),1222–1228. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.05.004
34. Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., Kim, S. W., Schreiber, L. R. N. ve Grant, J. E. (2011). A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity. Psychological Medicine, 41(10), 2111–2119. doi:10.1017/s0033291711000316
35. Olweus D. (1994) Bullying at School. Huesmann L.R. (Ed.) Aggressive Behavior. The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_5
36. Pawlikowski, M., Altstötter-Gleich, C. ve Brand, M. (2013). Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test. Computers in Human Behavior; 29(3), 1212-1223.
37. Savcı, M. ve Aysan, F. (2017). Technological Dependencies and Social Connectedness: The Predictive Effect of Internet Addiction, Social Media Addiction, Digital Game Addiction, and Smartphone Addiction on Social Connectedness. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 30(3). 202-216. doi: 10.5350/DAJPN2017300304
38. Shaughnessy, J.J., Zechmeister E.B. ve Zechmeister, J.S. (2012). Research Methods in Psychology. McGraw Hill. URL: https://steladhima.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/john-j-shaughnessy-eugene-b-zechmeister-jeanne-s-zechmeister-research-methods-in-psychology-2012.pdf
39. Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x
40. Stapleton, A., Ruiz, F. J. ve McHugh, L. (2020). Comparative investigation of adolescents’ generalized pliance and psychological ınflexibility across cultural contexts. The Psychological Record. doi:10.1007/s40732-020-00412-3
41. Tanrıkulu, T., Kınay, H. ve Arıcak, O.T. (2013). Sensitivity Scale for Cyberbullying: A Study of Validity and Reliability. Trakya University Faculty of Education Journal., 3(1), 38-47.
42. Tonioni, F., D’Alessandris, L., Lai, C., Martinelli, D., Corvino, S., Vasale, M., … Bria, P. (2012). Internet addiction: hours spent online, behaviors and psychological symptoms. General Hospital Psychiatry, 34(1), 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.09.013
43. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK), [Turkish Statistical Institute] (2019). Household Use of Information Technologies Survey. URL: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=30574
44. Twohig, M. P. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19(4), 499–507. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.04.003
45. Yalnız, A. (2019). The impact of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-oriented psychoeducation program on peer bullying. (Unpublished master's thesis). Sakarya University.
46. Yavuz, F., Ulusoy, S., Iskin, M., Esen, F. B., Burhan, H. S., Karadere, M. E. ve Yavuz, N. (2016). Turkish version of acceptance and action questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): A reliability and validity analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology,26(4), 397–408. doi:10.5455/bcp.20160223124107
47. Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244. doi:10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237